ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06793020Updated Jan 27, 2025

Diagnosis, Treatment, and Outcome Assessment of Septic Cardiomyopathy Using an Integrated Mathematical Model

An observational study in Septic Cardiomyopathy, sponsored by Vilnius University. Recruiting at 2 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-01-27.

Sponsored by Vilnius University · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Mar 2024; still recruiting 2 years 7 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this observational study is to evaluate whether a new integrated mathematical model can improve the accuracy of diagnosing septic cardiomyopathy and predicting clinical outcomes in adult patients with suspected septic cardiomyopathy. The study aims to determine whether the integrated mathematical model enhances diagnostic accuracy and improves the prediction of clinical outcomes in these patients.

Read the detailed description

This multicenter, prospective observational study will enrol adult patients treated for sepsis or septic shock in the intensive care unit (ICU). Eligible patients will be identified based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria and enrolled in the study after obtaining informed consent. The primary transthoracic echocardiography will be performed within 48 hours of enrollment to gather detailed echocardiographic data, while key hemodynamic measurements will be recorded simultaneously.

A second transthoracic echocardiography will be conducted within 10 days of the initial evaluation. This follow-up assessment will occur during continued ICU care after discontinuation of vasopressor therapy or during hospitalization in the general ward, depending on the patient's clinical progression. The echocardiographic and hemodynamic parameters from both the initial and follow-up evaluations will be input into a mathematical formula designed to integrate these data into a single cardiovascular estimate. This integrated model will then be used to assess its ability to predict patient outcomes.

Following hospital discharge, patients will be followed for up to one year. During this period, a long-term follow-up assessment will be conducted, during which patients will complete the SF-36 quality of life questionnaire. This follow-up will assess patients\' overall health, functional status, frequency of healthcare visits, and need for nursing care. These data will provide insights into the long-term impact of sepsis and septic cardiomyopathy on survivors beyond the acute phase of their illness.

This study will evaluate whether the use of an integrated model that combines clinical parameters with echocardiographic measurements can improve the accuracy of diagnosing septic cardiomyopathy and provide valuable predictions of clinical outcomes. Additionally, the study will assess the course of septic cardiomyopathy and its impact on one-year follow-up outcomes, including patient quality of life. A broadly applicable diagnostic approach could allow for timely treatment adjustments, reduce the burden of sepsis-related complications, and improve overall patient outcomes.

02

Conditions studied

  • Septic Cardiomyopathy

Keywords

  • Septic cardiomyopathy
  • Sepsis
  • Septic shock
03

In context

Sepsis

2,416 studies on the registry are indexed under Sepsis; 541 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is below the median of 150 across 1,162 observational studies indexed under Sepsis.

Browse Sepsis studies →

Lead sponsor

Vilnius University is the lead sponsor of 61 studies on the registry; 11 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients treated for sepsis or septic shock in the Intensive Care Units of two university hospitals.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 years or older;
  • Sepsis according to SEPSIS-3 criteria:
  • Suspected/confirmed infection and
  • SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) score ≥ 2 or qSOFA score ≥ 2;
  • Septic shock according to SEPSIS-3 criteria:
  • Sepsis is diagnosed and
  • Vasopressor infusion is used to maintain a mean arterial pressure (MAP) ≥ 65 mmHg and
  • Lactate > 2 mmol/l;
  • Cardiovascular support requirement for norepinephrine > 0.1 mcg/kg/min infusion;
  • Signed form (ICF);

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals under 18 years of age;
  • Has uncompensated cardiovascular disease:
  • Cardiogenic shock;
  • Congenital heart disease;
  • Heart failure functional class IV;
  • Refusal to participate in the study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of septic cardiomyopathy when comparing a new clinical-echocardiographic model with the standard diagnostic method (left ventricular ejection fraction).

    Incidence of septic cardiomyopathy, evaluated by comparing the diagnostic accuracy of a new clinical-echocardiographic model with the standard method, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) measurement. The study will determine whether the new model improves the diagnosis of septic cardiomyopathy in patients with sepsis or septic shock.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of one-year follow-up.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Assessing the severity of septic cardiomyopathy and determining the severity grade.

    This will be done by applying clinical and echocardiographic data to the integrated mathematical model, which will then categorize the severity of the condition into predefined severity grades. The assessment aims to provide a more nuanced understanding of the diseases impact on cardiac function and to validate the models ability to stratify patients based on the severity of their condition.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of one-year follow-up.

  2. Length of intensive care unit and hospital stay

    Total cumulative number of days spent in intensive care unit and hospital

    Time frame: Intensive care unit days spent per patient: within 60 days following intensive care unit admission. Hospital days spent per patient: from admission up to 30 days.

  3. Mortality

    Mortality during intensive care unit stay, in hospital and at 1 year

    Time frame: Within 1 year of inclusion

  4. Recovery of cardiac function

    Changes in the integrated mathematical model during hospitalization

    Time frame: Within 30 days of inclusion

  5. Long-term health and functional outcomes

    Heath-related quality of life assessed by Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). Assessment of changes in functional capacity, number of visits to healthcare facilities, and the need for nursing care.

    Time frame: Within 1 year of inclusion

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
  • Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos
    Vilnius, Lithuania
    Recruiting
    • Tomas Jovaisa, Prof · Contacttomas.jovaisa@santa.lt · +37062697567
    • Tomas Jovaisa, Prof · Contact
    • Lina Puodziukaite · Contact
  • University Clinical Centre of the Medical University of Warsaw
    Warsaw, Poland
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 27, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06793020
Lead sponsor
Vilnius University
Collaborators
Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos
Responsible party
Tomas Jovaisa (Prof, Vilnius University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 27, 2025
Start date
Mar 17, 2024
Primary completion
Mar 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 27, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion