ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06966752NC3Updated May 13, 2025

Comparison of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) and Non-Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV) in Preterm Newborns With Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

An interventional study of NIPPV and CPAP in Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS), sponsored by Vilnius University. Recruiting at 1 site in Lithuania. Open to participants aged 0 Minutes to 44 Weeks. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-13.

Sponsored by Vilnius University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Mar 2025; still recruiting 1 year 7 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
150
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
0 Minutes to 44 Weeks
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Primary objective: to evaluate safety and efficacy of two different non-invasive respiratory support modalities in preterm neonatal patients with respiratory distress syndrome.

Secondary objective is to compare different respiratory support mode performance in different gestational age groups.

Primary endpoint is treatment failure.

With this study, the following hypotheses will be tested:

Hypothesis 1: NIPPV has a lower failure rate compared to CPAP mode. Hypothesis 2: NIPPV complication rate is non-superior compared to CPAP.

Read the detailed description

Treatment failure is defined as any of the following:

  • FiO2>0.6 to maintain SpO2>88%
  • Respiratory acidosis (pH\<7.2, pCO2>65 mmHg)
  • recurrent apnea (>4 episodes/h) or apnea requiring bag and mask ventilation
  • Silverman Andersen respiratory severity score (SAS score) ≥6 and does not improve by > 20% within 4-8 hours

Secondary endpoints:

  • Mortality rate
  • Intubation rate
  • Late onset sepsis (LOS) rate
  • Treatment duration
  • Complication rates:

Pneumothorax rate Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) Persisting ductus arteriosus (PDA) Intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP)

Nasal trauma:

  • I° - nasal/septal redness
  • II° - nasal/septal redness + indent
  • III° - nasal/septal redness + indent + skin breakdown

Abdominal distension:

  • Visible abdominal distension (defined by attending clinician) AND one of the following:
  • Feeding intolerance (defined by clinician) OR
  • >3 desaturation episodes or >20% FiO2 increase in 1 hour after feed.

With this study, the following hypotheses will be tested:

Hypothesis 1: NIPPV has a lower failure rate compared to CPAP mode. Hypothesis 2: NIPPV complication rate is non-superior compared to CPAP.

02

Conditions studied

  • Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS)
03

In context

Respiratory Distress Syndrome

1,387 studies on the registry are indexed under Respiratory Distress Syndrome; 283 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 150 is above the median of 60 across 822 interventional studies indexed under Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Browse Respiratory Distress Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Vilnius University is the lead sponsor of 61 studies on the registry; 11 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
0 Minutes to 44 Weeks
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. gestational age (GA) between 22+0 and 34+6 weeks (estimated on the postmenstrual date and early gestation ultrasonographic findings).
  2. Need of respiratory support (deemed by a clinician).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Major congenital anomalies
  2. Cardiovascular instability
  3. Consent refused or not provided
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
150 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    CPAP

    Patients under CPAP respiratory support.

    Other: NIPPV

  • Experimental
    NIPPV

    Patients under Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV).

    Other: CPAP

Interventions

  • OtherNIPPV

    NIPPV * PEEP 6-8 cmH2O * PIP: 14-16 cmH2O * Tinsp: 0.3-0.5sec * \<28 weeks GA: 0.3 - 0.4 sec * \>28weeks GA: 0.4 - 0.5 sec * Rate: 20-35 breaths per minute.

    Also known as: Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation

  • OtherCPAP

    CPAP pressure of 6-8 mmH2O

    Also known as: Nasal Continuous Airway Pressure, nCPAP

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Treatment failure

    Need of intubation

    Time frame: 7 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Secondary outcomes

    Mortality rate

    Time frame: 44 weeks corrected gestational age

  2. Secondary outcomes

    Intubation rate

    Time frame: 7 days

  3. Secondary outcomes

    Late onset sepsis (LOS) rate

    Time frame: 44 weeks corrected gestational age

  4. Secondary outcomes

    Treatment duration

    Time frame: 44 weeks corrected gestational age

  5. Secondary outcomes

    Complication rates

    Time frame: 44 weeks corrected gestational age

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 13, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06966752
Lead sponsor
Vilnius University
Responsible party
Arunas Liubsys (Associate professor, Vilnius University) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 13, 2025
Start date
Mar 25, 2025
Primary completion
May 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
May 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
May 13, 2025

Study contacts

Arunas Liubsys, Associate Professor
Contact
arunas.liubsys@santa.lt
+370 6 872 2520
Ernestas Virsilas
Contact
ernestas.virsilas@santa.lt
+37060787438

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion