CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06779058Updated Feb 27, 2026

MR Elastography for Assessing Liver Fibrosis in Chronic Hepatitis B

An observational study in Chronic Hepatitis B and Liver Fibrosis, sponsored by Shengjing Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-27.

Sponsored by Shengjing Hospital · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jan 2025; still recruiting 1 year 9 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
600
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

How to construct a non-invasive, accurate, and convenient method to evaluate the severity of liver fibrosis (LF) is an important general problem in the management of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). We plan to investigate the ability of magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) to grade fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B and apply to clinical longitudinal follow-up.

Read the detailed description

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is the most prevalent chronic viral infection worldwide, affecting 254 million people and resulting in 1.2 million new infections annually . Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is strongly associated with liver fibrosis, cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and death. Patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) can achieve an overall cure rate of more than 95% after 12 weeks of treatment with direct-acting antiviral agent (DAA). However, patients with chronic hepatitis B still need long-term management due to the complexity and persistence of their disease. Therefore, rapid, stable and accurate assessment of the disease status of hepatitis B patients and clear classification of liver fibrosis are of great significance for clinical management of chronic hepatitis B patients.

Meanwhile, Antiviral therapy can significantly slow liver disease progression and improve long-term survival in CHB patients. Treatment is only recommended for CHB adults when histological evidences ≥ F2; evidence of F4 based on clinical criteria; HBV DNA > 2000 IU/mL with ALT > ULN (Men: 30 U/L, Women: 19 U/L); or persistent ALT abnormality. For treated patients, imaging and clinical indicators are monitored every six months during the first year, then annually. For untreated patients, monitoring is conducted on an annual basis . However, these current tests often fail to reflect pathological changes in real-time, as they tend to lag behind actual disease progression. Therefore, finding an effective method for regular follow-up is also essential for both treated and untreated patients.

The current diagnostic gold standard, liver biopsy, has limitations due to its invasive nature, sampling error, complications, and high cost, making it impractical for evaluating liver fibrosis and longitudinal monitoring in CHB patients. There is an urgent need for noninvasive evaluation of liver fibrosis and antiviral treatment efficacy. Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) has shown promise in assessing liver fibrosis and necroinflammation in CHB patients. At present, there are few studies on CHB, all of which are single-center studies. The reported cut-off point is not uniform, which is generally lower than the international standard, and whether 2D/3D MRE affects the threshold are inconsistent. Therefore, a multi-center clinical study on the evaluation of CHB fibrosis based on MRE and its application in clinical longitudinal follow-up need to be carried out.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Hepatitis B
  • Liver Fibrosis

Keywords

  • Magnetic resonance elastography
  • Liver stiffness
  • Antiviral therapy
03

In context

Hepatitis B, Chronic

942 studies on the registry are indexed under Hepatitis B, Chronic; 145 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 600 is above the median of 400 across 226 observational studies indexed under Hepatitis B, Chronic.

Browse Hepatitis B, Chronic studies →

Lead sponsor

Shengjing Hospital is the lead sponsor of 125 studies on the registry; 58 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Organize paticipating units to collect standard-of-care data including radiological and clinical data. Patients diagnosed with CHB who received liver biopsy and MRE should be enrolled.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years old
  • Confirmed CHB (laboratory, imaging and clinical tests)
  • MRE within 6 months before and after liver biopsy
  • Treatment-naïve
  • Child-Pugh Grade A (\<7 points)
  • Written informed consent in prospective follow-up cohort

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with liver malignant tumor
  • Chronic hepatitis due to other causes (such as alcoholic hepatitis)
  • CHB combined with hepatitis C, hepatitis D, or HIV
  • Patients with biliary tract diseases
  • Contraindications of MRE examination, MRE failure
  • Poor pathological effect
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
600 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
2 Years
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Retrospective cohort of patients confirmed diagnosed with chronic hepatitis B

    Patients aged ≥ 18 who have been diagnosed with chronic hepatitis B from Jan 2010 to Oct 2024

    Device: MRE · Device: Liver biopsy

  • Prospective follow-up cohort of patients confirmed diagnosed with chronic hepatitis B

    Patients aged ≥ 18 who have been diagnosed with chronic hepatitis B, both treated and untreated from Aug 2022

    Device: MRE · Device: Liver biopsy

Interventions

  • DeviceMRE

    All imaging studies were performed by using a 1.5T/3.0-T MRI system

  • DeviceLiver biopsy

    Liver biopsy are performed by well-trained pathologists in accordance with standard operating procedures.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Accuracy of the features of MRE for grading fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B.

    WIth liver biopsy as reference standand, the diagnostic perforemace (accuracy) for fibrosis of MRE was assessed.

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. The efficacy of grading liver fibrosis in CHB patients evaluated by MRE superior to TE and serological indicators (APRI, FIB-4).

    WIth liver biopsy as reference standand, the efficacy of MRE, TE and serological indicators (APRI, FIB-4) in evaluating the classification of liver fibrosis were compared.

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. The excellent ability of MRE as a non-invasive biomarker for longitudinal monitoring in CHB patients.

    WIth QIBA Profile: Magnetic Resonance Elastography of the Liver as reference standand, changes in MRE and liver histology or clinical indicators during follow-up were investigated.

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 27, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06779058
Lead sponsor
Shengjing Hospital
Responsible party
Yu Shi (Deputy director of department of radology, Shengjing Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 16, 2025
Start date
Jan 1, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 27, 2026

Study contacts

Yiyang Wang
Contact
15291014907@163.com
+86 15291014907
Yu Shi
Contact
18940259980@163.com
+86 189 4025 9980
Yu Shi
principal investigator · Shengjing Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion