CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06766682Updated Jul 22, 2026

Emotion Regulation Skill Program: Impact on Emotion Regulation, Experiential Avoidance & Compassion Fatigue

An interventional study of The Skill Development Program for Emotion Regulation in Compassion Fatigue, Experiential Avoidance and Emotion Regulation Abilities, sponsored by Hacettepe University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-22.

Sponsored by Hacettepe University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
66
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In this study, the effects of the skills development program for regulating emotions applied to oncology nurses on oncology nurses' emotion regulation, experiential avoidance, and comorbidity fatigue will be examined. The research will be conducted as a randomized controlled experimental study with pretest-posttest and follow-up design.

Read the detailed description

Cancer has profound emotional, psychological, and behavioral impacts on patients and caregivers. Oncology nurses, while providing care, often experience feelings of helplessness, sadness, anxiety, and anger. Shift work-induced insomnia and irregular living patterns can impair emotional regulation, negatively affecting nurses' ability to provide holistic care, make effective decisions, and maintain professional interactions. Emotional recognition and management skills are critical for nurses engaged in long-term care processes. Emotional regulation involves identifying, understanding, and managing emotional responses, encompassing awareness, appropriate management, and expression. Ineffective emotional regulation may lead to difficulties in coping with emotional challenges and increase the risk of developing disorders such as depression and anxiety.

The literature highlights that emotional regulation strategies, which involve specific skills to modify emotional experiences, play a significant role in the development of various psychopathological disorders and affect mental health. Maladaptive strategies such as experiential avoidance-defined as avoiding situations or thoughts to escape distressing emotions-have been linked to increased risks of anxiety, depression, and burnout. Effective emotional regulation strategies are crucial for maintaining mental health and influencing behaviors. Increased experiential avoidance among healthcare workers has been associated with higher levels of burnout.

Empathy is a cornerstone of psychosocial care for patients and their families in oncology clinics. However, failure to regulate emotions during empathetic interactions can result in compassion fatigue, characterized by physical and emotional exhaustion, anger, disengagement, reduced job performance, and patient dissatisfaction. Effective emotional regulation supports the delivery of empathetic care and protects the psychosocial well-being of nurses. Emotional regulation enhances individuals' emotional awareness and enables more conscious and controlled management of emotions. This study aims to investigate the impact of an emotional regulation skills development program on oncology nurses' emotional regulation difficulties, experiential avoidance, and compassion fatigue in challenging work environments.

02

Conditions studied

  • Compassion Fatigue
  • Experiential Avoidance
  • Emotion Regulation Abilities
  • Emotion Regulation

Keywords

  • oncology nursing
  • difficulty in emotion regulation
  • emotion regulation skill
  • experiential avoidance
  • compassion fatigue
03

In context

Compassion Fatigue

53 studies on the registry are indexed under Compassion Fatigue; 17 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 66 is close to the median of 60 across 39 interventional studies indexed under Compassion Fatigue.

Browse Compassion Fatigue studies →

Lead sponsor

Hacettepe University is the lead sponsor of 983 studies on the registry; 212 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Volunteering to participate in the research
  • Working in the specified units for at least six months
  • Not having a disease or disability would make it difficult for them to understand the program and data collection tools and to apply the skills.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having received or currently receiving individual or group psychotherapy/counseling program within the last six months
  • Requesting to withdraw from the study at any stage of the research
  • Regularly missing two consecutive group sessions
  • Failure to attend three or more sessions in total
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
66 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    The Skill Development Program for Emotion Regulation

    The Skill Development Program for Emotion Regulation to be carried out with the intervention group consists of 6 sessions. The sessions are planned to be held in 3 groups of 11 people. The duration of a session is planned to be 90 minutes. Sessions will be completed in three weeks, twice a week. Sessions will be face-to-face. The session of the same group will be held on the same day and time every week.

    Behavioral: The Skill Development Program for Emotion Regulation

  • No intervention
    Control Group

    After the follow-up tests were completed for the nurses in the control group, the 6-session skill program applied to the intervention group was planned to be applied in the same way within their wishes.

Interventions

  • BehavioralThe Skill Development Program for Emotion Regulation

    The Skill Development Program for Emotion Regulation to be carried out with the intervention group was planned as 6 sessions. The aim of this study was to investigate The Skill Development Program for Emotion Regulation Program on oncology nurses' emotion regulation difficulties, emotion regulation skills, experiential avoidance, and compassion fatigue.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Difficulty in Emotion Regulation Scale-Short Form

    Difficulty in Emotion Regulation Scale-Short Form consists of 16 items and 5 sub-dimensions in 5-point Likert type (1=almost never, 5=almost always). It has five sub-dimensions: Clarity, Goals, Impulse, Strategies, and Non-Acceptance. A minimum score of 16 points and a maximum score of 80 points can be obtained from the scale and high scores obtained from the sub-dimensions and total score of the scale indicate that emotion regulation difficulties are high.

    Time frame: [Time Frame: Baseline, 3th week, 3st month follow-up) (Pretest-posttest follow-up experimental design)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in the Emotion Regulation Skills Scale

    The Emotion Regulation Skills Scale is a five-point Likert-type (1=almost never, 5=almost always) self-report instrument consisting of 27 items and nine subscales. The sub-dimensions are Awareness/attention, Body sensations, Clarity, Understanding, Acceptance, Tolerance, Preparation for confrontation, Self-support, and Modification. The minimum score that can be obtained from the scale is 27 and the maximum score is 135. The scale can be evaluated on the total score and the average of the sub-dimension scores

    Time frame: [Time Frame: Baseline, 3th week, 3st month follow-up) (Pretest-posttest follow-up experimental design)

Other outcomes

  1. Change in the Multidimensional Experiential Avoidance Scale-30

    This scale is a 7-point Likert-type (1: Strongly Disagree; 7: Strongly Agree) self-report instrument consisting of 30 items. The minimum score is 30 points and the maximum score is 210 points. This scale has 6 subscales. These subscales consist of behavioral avoidance, aversion to distress, procrastination, distraction/suppression, suppression/denial and endurance of distress. The increase in the scores obtained from the scale means an increase in the level of the related dimension. Only item 15 of the scale items is reverse scored. However, it is possible to get a total score; however, for this purpose, it is necessary to reverse score the distress tolerance dimension.

    Time frame: [Time Frame: Baseline, 3th week, 3st month follow-up) (Pretest-posttest follow-up experimental design)

  2. Change in the Compassion Fatigue Short Scale

    This scale is a 10-point Likert-type scale ranging from rarely/never (1) to very often (10) and consists of 13 items. The lowest score is 13 and the highest score is 130. As the scores obtained from the scale increase, the level of co-sensory fatigue experienced by individuals also increases. The scale consists of two sub-dimensions: 'secondary trauma' and 'occupational burnout'

    Time frame: [Time Frame: Baseline, 3th week, 3st month follow-up) (Pretest-posttest follow-up experimental design)

  3. Participant Information Form

    The participant information form included questions about the descriptive characteristics of the nurses. In this context, it includes eight questions such as age, gender, education level, marital status, working time as a nurse, working time as an oncology nurse, number of patients cared for daily, working time per week, place of work, psychiatric diagnosis or treatment, individual or group psychotherapy or psychological counseling program in the past

    Time frame: Time Frame: baseline

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hacettepe University
    Ankara, Ankara 06100, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Barnett MD, Hays KN, Cantu C. Compassion fatigue, emotional labor, and emotional display among hospice nurses. Death Stud. 2022;46(2):290-296. doi: 10.1080/07481187.2019.1699201. Epub 2019 Dec 9. PubMed 31814533 ↗
  • Figley, C. R. (2013). Compassion fatigue: Coping with secondary traumatic stress disorder in those who treat the traumatized. Routledge.
  • Guner P, Hicdurmaz D, Kocaman Yildirim N, Inci F. Psychosocial care from the perspective of nurses working in oncology: A qualitative study. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2018 Jun;34:68-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2018.03.005. Epub 2018 Mar 16. PubMed 29784141 ↗
  • Lincoln, T. M., Schulze, L., & Renneberg, B. (2022). The role of emotion regulation in the characterization, development and treatment of psychopathology. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1(5), 272-286
  • Yiğit, İ. ve Guzey-Yiğit, M. (2019). Psychometric properties of Turkish version of difficulties in emotion regulation scale-brief form (DERS-16). Current Psychology, 38, 1503-1511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9712-7
  • Zheng RS, Guo QH, Dong FQ, Owens RG. Chinese oncology nurses' experience on caring for dying patients who are on their final days: a qualitative study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2015 Jan;52(1):288-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.09.009. Epub 2014 Oct 5. PubMed 25445033 ↗
  • Lyu XC, Jiang HJ, Lee LH, Yang CI, Sun XY. Oncology nurses' experiences of providing emotional support for cancer patients: a qualitative study. BMC Nurs. 2024 Jan 20;23(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-01718-1. PubMed 38245735 ↗
  • Kostka AM, Borodzicz A, Krzeminska SA. Feelings and Emotions of Nurses Related to Dying and Death of Patients - A Pilot Study. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2021 Jun 4;14:705-717. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S311996. eCollection 2021. PubMed 34113186 ↗
  • Cotter P, Holden A, Johnson C, Noakes S, Urch C, King A. Coping With the Emotional Impact of Working in Cancer Care: The Importance of Team Working and Collective Processing. Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 15;13:877938. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.877938. eCollection 2022. PubMed 35911049 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 22, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06766682
Lead sponsor
Hacettepe University
Responsible party
Aycan Kayalar (Principal Investigator, Hacettepe University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 9, 2025
Start date
Mar 3, 2025
Primary completion
Jun 27, 2025
Completion
Sep 26, 2025
Last update
Jul 22, 2026

Study contacts

DUYGU HİÇDURMAZ, Professor
study director · Hacettepe University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion