ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07677527VPTG-RCTUpdated Jul 7, 2026

Efficacy of Vicarious Post-Traumatic Growth Intervention for Nurses in Emergency Units

An interventional study of Psychoeducational Vicarious Post-Traumatic Growth Intervention in Vicarious Trauma, Psychological Distress and Post-Traumatic Growth, Psychological, sponsored by Fatima Jinnah Women University. Recruiting at 1 site in Pakistan. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-07.

Sponsored by Fatima Jinnah Women University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Mar 2026, registered Jun 2026).
  • Started Mar 2026; still recruiting 8 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the efficacy of a Vicarious Post-Traumatic Growth (VPTG) Intervention among nurses working in emergency units. Emergency nurses are frequently exposed to traumatic events through patient care, which may contribute to vicarious trauma and psychological distress. The intervention is designed to facilitate positive psychological growth, resilience, adaptive coping, and psychological well-being while reducing the adverse impact of indirect trauma exposure. Participants will be randomly assigned to intervention and control groups. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline, post-intervention, and follow-up periods to determine the effectiveness of the intervention in promoting vicarious post-traumatic growth and reducing vicarious trauma among emergency nurses.

Read the detailed description

Emergency nurses regularly encounter critically ill, injured, and dying patients, exposing them to repeated indirect traumatic experiences. Such exposure can lead to vicarious trauma, emotional exhaustion, and psychological distress. However, exposure to trauma may also contribute to positive psychological changes referred to as vicarious post-traumatic growth.

This study evaluates the efficacy of a structured Vicarious Post-Traumatic Growth Intervention developed specifically for nurses working in emergency units. The intervention integrates psychoeducation, cognitive behavioral techniques, mindfulness practices, resilience enhancement strategies, emotional regulation skills, stress management techniques, and peer support activities.

A randomized controlled trial design will be employed. Eligible nurses will be randomly assigned to either an intervention group or a control group. Participants will complete baseline assessments before intervention implementation. Outcome measures will be reassessed immediately after completion of the intervention and during follow-up assessments.

Primary outcomes include reduction in vicarious trauma and enhancement of vicarious post-traumatic growth. Secondary outcomes include resilience, coping strategies, psychological well-being, and occupational functioning. Findings may contribute to the development of evidence-based psychological support programs for nurses working in high-stress healthcare settings.

02

Conditions studied

  • Vicarious Trauma
  • Psychological Distress
  • Post-Traumatic Growth, Psychological
  • Psychological Well-being

Keywords

  • Vicarious Post-Traumatic Growth
  • Emergency Nurses
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Resilience
  • Vicarious Trauma
  • Mental Health
  • Psychological Intervention
  • Coping Strategies
03

In context

Compassion Fatigue

60 studies on the registry are indexed under Compassion Fatigue; 21 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is close to the median of 64 across 45 interventional studies indexed under Compassion Fatigue.

Browse Compassion Fatigue studies →

Lead sponsor

Fatima Jinnah Women University is the lead sponsor of 23 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Registered nurses currently employed in emergency departments.
  2. Minimum six months of emergency department work experience.
  3. Able to read and understand English or Urdu.
  4. Willing to provide .
  5. Available to participate throughout intervention and follow-up assessments.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Current diagnosis of severe psychiatric disorder requiring intensive treatment.
  2. Current participation in trauma-focused psychotherapy.
  3. Cognitive impairment affecting study participation.
  4. Planned transfer from emergency unit during study period.
  5. Refusal to provide .
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Vicarious Post-Traumatic Growth Intervention

    Participants receive a structured psychoeducational intervention consisting of trauma education, cognitive behavioral techniques, mindfulness exercises, resilience-building activities, stress management training, emotional regulation skills, and peer support sessions.

    Behavioral: Psychoeducational Vicarious Post-Traumatic Growth Intervention

  • No intervention
    Routine Professional Support

    Participants continue receiving routine institutional support and standard professional resources available within the hospital setting.

Interventions

  • BehavioralPsychoeducational Vicarious Post-Traumatic Growth Intervention

    A structured psychoeducational and behavioral intervention designed to promote vicarious post-traumatic growth and reduce vicarious trauma among emergency nurses. The intervention incorporates cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) techniques, mindfulness practices, resilience-building exercises, psychoeducation regarding vicarious trauma, stress management strategies, reflective activities, and peer-support components. The program is delivered in scheduled sessions over the intervention period and aims to enhance coping skills, psychological well-being, professional functioning, and post-traumatic growth.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Vicarious Posttraumatic Growth Score

    This outcome measures change in vicarious posttraumatic growth among emergency unit nurses exposed to the intervention. Vicarious posttraumatic growth will be assessed using the Vicarious Posttraumatic Growth Inventory (VPTGI; Deaton, 2020), a self-report questionnaire. The total score will be calculated by summing item responses. Higher scores indicate greater vicarious posttraumatic growth (better psychological outcome).

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Post-intervention (Week 8), 3-month follow-up (Week 20), 6-month follow-up (Week 32)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Vicarious Trauma Score

    This outcome measures vicarious trauma symptoms among emergency nurses. The Vicarious Trauma Scale (VTS; Vrklevski \& Franklin, 2008) will be used. The total score is obtained by summing item responses. Higher scores indicate greater vicarious trauma (worse psychological outcome).

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Post-intervention (Week 8), 3-month follow-up (Week 20), 6-month follow-up (Week 32)

  2. Change in Resilience Score

    Resilience will be assessed using the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS), which measures the ability to recover from stress. Scores are calculated as the mean of all items. Higher scores indicate greater resilience (better outcome).

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Post-intervention (Week 8), 3-month follow-up (Week 20), 6-month follow-up (Week 32)

  3. Change in Coping Strategies

    Coping strategies will be assessed using the CSI-SF, measuring both adaptive and maladaptive coping styles. Scores will be reported as subscale and total scores. Higher adaptive coping scores indicate better coping outcomes.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Post-intervention (Week 8), 3-month follow-up (Week 20), 6-month follow-up (Week 32)

  4. Change in Psychological Well-being

    Psychological well-being will be assessed using the 18-item Psychological Well-being Scale. Total scores will be computed by summing item responses. Higher scores indicate better psychological well-being.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Post-intervention (Week 8), 3-month follow-up (Week 20), 6-month follow-up (Week 32)

Other outcomes

  1. Personality Traits

    Personality traits (Big Five dimensions) will be assessed using the Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI). Scores will be calculated for each trait dimension. This measure will be used as a baseline covariate and moderator, not as an intervention outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline only (Week 0)

  2. Intervention Adherence

    Measured as the percentage of attended intervention sessions (CBT, mindfulness, psychoeducation, peer support). Reported as percentage (%) of completed sessions per participant.

    Time frame: Throughout intervention period (Weeks 1-8)

  3. Intervention Fidelity

    Assessed using a structured fidelity checklist completed by supervisors to ensure protocol adherence. Reported as percentage of protocol components delivered correctly.

    Time frame: During intervention delivery (Weeks 1-8)

  4. Attrition Rate

    Number and percentage of participants who drop out of the study at each assessment point.

    Time frame: Post-intervention (Week 8), 3-month follow-up (Week 20), 6-month follow-up (Week 32)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Nishtar Hospital, Burn Unit (NMH), Multan Institute of Cardiology (MIC), Bakhtawar Amin Hospital, Multan, Khawaja Fareed Social Security Hospital
    Multan, 59070, Pakistan
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 7, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07677527
Lead sponsor
Fatima Jinnah Women University
Responsible party
Seerat Fatima (PhD Candidate and Principal Investigator, Fatima Jinnah Women University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 30, 2026
Start date
Mar 1, 2026
Primary completion
Jun 1, 2026
Completion
Sep 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 7, 2026

Study contacts

SEERAT FATIMA
Contact
seeratfatima554@gmail.com
+923066605577

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion