ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06704698Updated Oct 15, 2026

Postoperative Analgesia Between Paravertebral Block and Epidural Block in Esophageal Surgery

An interventional study of Liposomal bupivacaine and Bupivacaine Hydrochloride in Pain Syndrome, Dizziness and Vomiting, sponsored by Zhejiang Cancer Hospital. Completed at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-15.

Sponsored by Zhejiang Cancer Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 15, 2026Now CompletedPrimary completion moved+3 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
132
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Prevention of postoperative pain is essential for the recovery of esophageal surgery. Epidural analgesia is a traditional and standard perioperative pain management for these patients. Beneficials of epidural analgesia have been widely established. However, there are still several potential disadvantages such as perioperative hypotension, failure of administration, rare but serious neurological complications. Ultrasound-guided regional nerve block has become a widely used technique due to its low degree of trauma and precise target of action. In combined with liposome bupivacaine (LB), a new long-acting local anesthetic, was proven to have a maximum duration of 72 hours, thus improving postoperative analgesia, reducing opioid consumption, and enhancing patient satisfaction. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of TPVB liposomal bupivacaine (LB) or plane bupivacaine (SB) for Overall Benefit of Analgesic Score (OBAS) after esophageal surgery.

Read the detailed description

After approved by the Ethics Committee of the Cancer Hospital of Zhejiang Province (Approval Number: IRB-2024-1037 (IIT)). This study was registered prior to patient admission. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. The study is scheduled to run from November 25, 2024, to December 31, 2027. A total of 132 patients with ASA physical status I and III, undergoing thoracoscopic esophagectomy will be included. For patients in the liposomal bupivacaine group, in the left lateral decubitus position, a transversus paravertebral block (TPVB) is performed under ultrasound guidance at the right T4-T5, T7-T8, and bilateral T10-T11 paravertebral spaces, injecting 66.5mg (10 ml) liposomal bupivacaine into each space. Postoperative pain control involves patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) with 250 μg sufentanil diluted to a total of 250 ml volume with saline. Background dose of 2-3 mL/h, PCA bolus of 2-4 mL depending on height and weight, lockout interval of 15 minutes, and a maximum dose of 10-15 mL.For the standard control group, a T6-T8 epidural block is administered, with 4-6 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine was applied depend on the height and weight. Postoperative analgesia is managed with patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA), with 141 μg sufentanil and 300 mg bupivacaine hydrochloride diluted to 250 mL. Background dose of 3-6 mL/h, PCA bolus of 3-4 mL, lockout interval of 15 minutes, and a maximum dose of 20 mL.

When a participant's resting VAS score is ≥4 and they request additional pain relief, the first rescue analgesic is a single intravenous dose of acetaminophen or an NSAID (flurbiprofen axetil, 50 mg). For a second rescue, a single intravenous dose of 100 mg tramadol is administered. Additionally, the APS team adjusts the background and bolus doses based on pain relief assessments from the previous 24 hours.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pain Syndrome
  • Dizziness
  • Vomiting
  • Itching
  • Sweet Syndrome
  • Cold
  • Satisfaction, Patient
03

In context

Dizziness

226 studies on the registry are indexed under Dizziness; 56 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 132 is above the median of 43 across 170 interventional studies indexed under Dizziness.

Browse Dizziness studies →

Lead sponsor

Zhejiang Cancer Hospital is the lead sponsor of 282 studies on the registry; 117 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

The criteria were revised on the registry on Oct 15, 2026. See what changed

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • physical status I-III;
  • Scheduled for elective minimally invasive esophagectomy
  • Approved participation before study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with for local nerve block such as spinal anatomic structure abnormality or local infection of puncture area;
  • Anergic to medications used in this study;
  • Patient have chronic pain disorders, chronic opioid use, or a history of anesthetic drug of alcohol abuse;
  • hepatic impairement ( class B and higher) or renal impairement (serum creatinine > 133mg/L);
  • Inability to complete postoperative pain assessments or questionnaires due to communication barriers or mental disorders;
  • participation in another clinical trial.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Child-Pugh class

A score of how well the liver works in people with liver disease such as cirrhosis: class A is mild, B moderate and C severe.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
132 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Thoracic paravertebral block

    Ultrasound guided paravertebral block (TPVB) with liposomal bupivacaine is performed in this group. 40ml of liposomal bupivacaine and saline mixture was injected to the right T4-T5, T7-T8, and bilateral T10-T11 paravertebral spaces, with 10 ml for each space. Patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) is used for postoperative pain management.

    Drug: Liposomal bupivacaine

  • Other
    Epidural block

    For the standard control group, a T6-T8 epidural block is administered. Postoperative analgesia is managed with patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA).

    Drug: Bupivacaine Hydrochloride

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall Benefit of Analgesic Score (OBAS)

    Record pain, dizziness,vomiting, itching, sweating, feeling cold, and analgesic satisfaction in the first 72 hours. The higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    Time frame: 3 days after surgery.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Area under the curve of mean artery pressure (MAP < 65 mmHg)

    Measure the area under the curve of mean artery pressure.

    Time frame: From start of anesthesia to the end of surgery, an average of 5 hours.

  2. Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    Record Visual Analog Scale scores after surgery, the scale of scores is from 0 to 10 and higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    Time frame: 3 days after surgery.

  3. Total opioid consumption

    Record total opioid consumption after surgery.

    Time frame: 3 days after surgery.

  4. In-hospital stay

    Record in-hospital stay after surgery.

    Time frame: From the end of surgery to discharge of hospital. An average of 10 days.

Other outcomes

  1. Long time Visual Analog Scale (VAS) after surgery

    Record 3 months and 12 months Visual Analog Scale Scores after surgery, the scale of scores is from 0 to 10 and higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    Time frame: 1 year.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Jiangling Wang
    Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310022, China
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Study plan is available when required to the principal investigator.

Supporting information: Study protocol

Time frame: From the study ended to the published

Access criteria: Doctors or healthy providers only.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedDate before it movedWhere the date was before it movedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Dec 2024 to primary completion in Mar 2025, 3 months.

Of 82 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Dizziness, half reached primary completion within 22 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 42. This study's 3 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 90 studies reached it within 20 months; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 42.

Since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026, the dates moved once, on Oct 15, 2026: primary completion Dec 2025 → Mar 2025 and completion Dec 2025 → Mar 2026.

Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 18, 2024
First posted
Nov 26, 2024
StartActual
Dec 3, 2024
Primary completionActual
Mar 13, 2025was Dec 2025
CompletionActual
Mar 13, 2026was Dec 2025
Last update
Oct 15, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Status
Recruiting→Completed
changed Oct 15, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 25, 2025→Mar 13, 2025 (actual)
Oct 15, 2026
Study completion
Dec 30, 2025→Mar 13, 2026 (actual)
Oct 15, 2026
Eligibility
1 inclusion criterion edited; 1 exclusion criterion edited, 2 added, 1 removed
What changed in the criteria
Inclusion criteria
  • ChangedBefore Scheduled elective thoracoscopic esophagectomy(three-incision approach);Now Scheduled for elective minimally invasive esophagectomy
Exclusion criteria
  • RemovedPatient have chronic pain;
  • EditedPatient receiving anticoagulantshave chronic pain disorders, opioidschronic opioid use, or have a history of narcotic abuse oranesthetic drug of alcohol abuse;
  • Addedhepatic impairement (Child-Pugh class B and higher) or renal impairement (serum creatinine > 133mg/L);
  • Addedparticipation in another clinical trial.
Oct 15, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 15, 2026
    Recruiting→Completed
    Primary completion Dec 25, 2025→Mar 13, 2025 (now actual)
    Study completion Dec 30, 2025→Mar 13, 2026 (now actual)
    Eligibility 1 inclusion criterion edited; 1 exclusion criterion edited, 2 added, 1 removed
    What changed in the criteria
    Inclusion criteria
    • ChangedBefore Scheduled elective thoracoscopic esophagectomy(three-incision approach);Now Scheduled for elective minimally invasive esophagectomy
    Exclusion criteria
    • RemovedPatient have chronic pain;
    • EditedPatient receiving anticoagulantshave chronic pain disorders, opioidschronic opioid use, or have a history of narcotic abuse oranesthetic drug of alcohol abuse;
    • Addedhepatic impairement (Child-Pugh class B and higher) or renal impairement (serum creatinine > 133mg/L);
    • Addedparticipation in another clinical trial.
    + 4 other changes: index terms, verification date, contact details and site details

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06704698
Responsible party
xupingbo (Principal Investigator, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 26, 2024
Start date
Dec 3, 2024
Primary completion
Mar 13, 2025
Completion
Mar 13, 2026
Last update
Oct 15, 2026

Study contacts

Jiangling Wang, Ph.D
principal investigator · Zhejiang Cancer Hospital

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Liposomal Bupivacaine

Start the discussion