ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06688084PETTENK-OSUpdated Sep 25, 2026

Pathogenicity Factors of Staphylococcus Pettenkoferi in Foot Wounds and Osteitis in Diabetic Patients

An observational study in Diabetic Foot Ulcer, sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes. Completed at 1 site in France. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-25.

Sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes · Observational

Updated Sep 25, 2026Now CompletedResults publication added+1 moreGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
230
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Gram-positive cocci, particularly Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci (SCoN), are the bacteria most frequently isolated from diabetic foot ulcers. Although studies have been carried out on the role of S. aureus in the unfavorable evolution of these wounds, no studies have focused on the role of SCoN. Of the fifty or so SCoN species, not all have the same virulence potential. The role of Staphylococcus pettenkoferi is unknown, yet this bacterium is the 7th most frequently identified in diabetic foot ulcers, suggesting that it may also be involved in the pathophysiology of these infections. At Nîmes University Hospital, this bacterium is mainly identified in samples from diabetic foot ulcers or osteitis in our laboratory and 80% of the bacteria present are in biofilms.It is essential to understand the mechanisms governing these bacterial interactions and establish the true pathogenic potential of these bacteria. Recently, the Nîmes team showed that a strain of S. pettenkoferi (SP165) isolated from foot osteitis in a diabetic patient had real virulence potential. SP165 could not only produce biofilm, but could also survive in human blood, human keratinocytes and murine and human macrophages. It also caused significant embryonic mortality in a zebrafish model. A second study of 29 isolates from Nîmes University Hospital subsequently demonstrated that there were two predominant clones with different virulences. Three biofilm production profiles (rapidly and highly biofilm-producing, slowly biofilm-producing and non-biofilm-producing) and two zebrafish profiles (highly and moderately lethal) were reported by phenotypic and genomic analyses on this panel of strains. Genes for resistance, virulence and biofilm production were also found on their genomes.

Read the detailed description

Gram-positive cocci, in particular Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci (SCoN), are the bacteria most frequently isolated from diabetic foot ulcers. While studies have been carried out on the role of S. aureus in the unfavorable evolution of these wounds, no study has focused on the role of SCoN. Of the fifty or so SCoN species, not all have the same virulence potential. The role of Staphylococcus pettenkoferi is not known. Yet this bacterium is the 7th most frequently identified in diabetic foot ulcers, suggesting that it may also be involved in the pathophysiology of these infections. In the work of Loetsche et al. a study of the microbiome of 349 diabetic foot ulcer samples by targeted 16S rDNA sequencing showed that the genus Staphylococcus was the most abundant, with a relative abundance of 22.8%, including 13.3% S. aureus and 5.3% S. pettenkoferi.

At Nîmes University Hospital, this bacterium is mainly identified in samples from diabetic foot ulcers or osteitis in our laboratory (89 isolations of S. pettenkoferi from diabetic foot ulcer samples out of 167 isolations made of this bacterium between 2018 and 2022).The difficulty of managing chronic wounds also lies in the fact that almost 80% of the bacteria present are in biofilms. It has also been established that the environment in which bacteria are found, and in particular the interactions they establish between themselves, play a significant role in delayed wound healing. It is therefore essential to understand the mechanisms governing these bacterial interactions and to establish the true pathogenic potential of these bacteria.

Recently, our team demonstrated that a strain of S. pettenkoferi (SP165) isolated from foot osteitis in a diabetic patient had real virulence potential. As well as being able to produce biofilm, SP165 was able to survive in human blood, human keratinocytes and murine and human macrophages. It also demonstrated its virulence by causing significant embryonic mortality in the zebrafish model.

A second study of 29 isolates from Nîmes University Hospital subsequently demonstrated the existence of two predominant clones with different virulences.

Three biofilm production profiles (rapidly and highly biofilm-producing, slowly biofilm-producing and non-biofilm-producing) and two zebrafish virulence profiles (highly and moderately lethal) were reported by phenotypic and genomic analyses on this panel of strains. Genes for resistance, virulence and biofilm production were also found on their genomes.

02

Conditions studied

  • Diabetic Foot Ulcer

Keywords

  • Diabetes
  • Foot
  • Infection
  • Staphylococcus pettenkoferi
  • Osteitis
03

In context

Diabetic Foot

1,077 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetic Foot; 222 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 230 is above the median of 100 across 191 observational studies indexed under Diabetic Foot.

Browse Diabetic Foot studies →

Lead sponsor

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes is the lead sponsor of 595 studies on the registry; 90 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The collection of strains at the Nîmes University Hospital site from 9 European laboratories collected between 2015 and 2023 for a total of 108 months was carried out between November 2021 and August 2023.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Not applicable for this research on a ready-constituted collection of strains of Staphylococcus pettenkoferi

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not applicable for this research on a ready-constituted collection of strains of Staphylococcus pettenkoferi
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
230 participants (actual)
Target follow-up
2 Years
Patient registry
Yes
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Interventions

  • OtherMolecular epidemiology of the collection

    Next-generation genomic sequencing (MICRO\&BIO platform, MiSeq, Illumina) and bioinformatics analyses. After validating data quality, genomes will be re-assembled using Spades software (version 3.15.4) and CLC® (Qiagen), then compared with the National Center for Biotechnology Information GenBank database. They will also be analysed on the online Type-Strain Genomes Server platform to accurately identify the bacteria. Genome annotation will be done using the DDBJ Fast Annotation and Submission Tool. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) analysis based on the alignment of whole genomes and core-genomes will be carried out using version 7 of MAFFT (multiple alignment using fast Fourier transform) software, then quantified using snp-dists (version 0.6.3). This approach will enable the molecular epidemiology of the collection of strains in France and other European countries to be clarified, and the main circulating clades to be assessed, particularly depending on the origin of samples.

  • OtherStudy of the resistome of the S. pettenkoferi population

    The resistome will be assessed by identifying known and described resistance genes in staphylococci using bioinformatics analyses of sequenced complete bacterial genomes. A search for plasmids will also be made using various specific software packages (ResFinder, CARD, PointFinder, Plasmidfinder, in-house pipeline).

  • OtherStudy of the virulome of the S. pettenkoferi population

    The virulome of the strains will be studied based on the genomic sequencing data obtained and with reference to the literature on Staphylococci. Various specific software packages (Pathogenfinder, Virulencefinder, in-house pipeline) will be used for this purpose.

  • OtherStudy of the resistance profiles of all S. pettenkoferi isolates

    Antibiotic resistance will be assessed using a Sensititer® plate (Thermo ScientificTM, Illkirch) to evaluate the minimum inhibitory concentration of isolates against a series of antibiotics commonly used for S. pettenkoferi infections, including new molecules currently on the market or in development, such as Ceftaroline, Ceftobiprole, Dalbavancin, Delafloxacin, Tedizolid and Oritavancin. Minimum inhibitory concentration values will be interpreted in accordance with the recommendations of the Antibiogram Committee of the Société Française de Microbiologie (https://www.sfm-microbiologie.org/2021/04/23/casfm-avril-2021-v1-0/).

  • OtherSelection of strains for in-depth phenotypic study

    Different strains of S. pettenkoferi isolated from foot osteitis in diabetic patients and non-diabetic osteitis will be selected according to the clades identified and phenotypically characterised by further analysis: * Observation of culture characteristics (culture requirements, growth time, colony size and haemolytic capacity), (n=20) * Determination of growth curves by measuring absorbance at 600 nm using the Infinite M Mano automatic absorbance reader (TECAN, Lyon), (n=20) * Study of the ability to form biofilm in the presence (antibiofilmogram) (n=85) or absence (BioFilm Ring® test, Biofilm Control, St Beauzire) (n=85) of various antibiotics commonly used for the treatment of S. pettenkoferi infection during osteitis.

  • OtherSelection of strains (n=3) for the virulence study

    Three strains of S. pettenkoferi isolated from foot osteitis in diabetic patients will be selected on the basis of the clades identified and the study of the virulome in order to be analysed on : * In vitro cell culture models of macrophages (RAW 264.7) and osteoblasts (MC3T3-E1) to assess the invasion potential of these isolates by measuring internalisation rates (TECAN, Lyon) and LDH release (CyQUANT LDH Cytotoxicity kit), a sign of cellular toxicity of the isolate. * An in vivo wound model on diabetic zebrafish (Dario rerio) with evaluation of their survival at 48h in the presence of the isolates by immersion. These models were developed at the MICRO\&BIO Platform and the INSERM 1047 VBIC unit.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Genetic diversity of Staphyloccocus pettenkoferi strains isolated from osteitis and non-diabetic wounds, blood cultures and nasal carriage.

    Number of clades estimated via typing by complete sequencing of the bacterial genomes of all S. pettenkoferi strains and analysis of phylogenetic distances (whole genome and core genome single nucleotide polymorphisms).

    Time frame: Day 0 to 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Genetic diversity of Staphyloccocus pettenkoferi strains isolated from osteitis and non-diabetic wounds, blood cultures and nasal carriage.

    Number of clades estimated via typing by complete sequencing of the bacterial genomes of all Staphylococcus pettenkoferi strains and analysis of phylogenetic distances.

    Time frame: 3 - 6 months

  2. Resistome in the strain population according to sample origin:osteitis

    The presence of antibiotic resistance genes (resistome) will be identified by bioinformatics analysis of sequenced bacterial genomes.

    Time frame: 3 - 6 months

  3. Resistome in the strain population according to sample origin: non-diabetic wounds

    The presence of antibiotic resistance genes (resistome) will be identified by bioinformatics analysis of sequenced bacterial genomes.

    Time frame: 3 - 6 months

  4. Resistome in the strain population according to sample origin: diabetic wounds

    The presence of antibiotic resistance genes (resistome) will be identified by bioinformatics analysis of sequenced bacterial genomes.

    Time frame: 3 - 6 months

  5. Resistome in the strain population according to sample origin: blood cultures

    The presence of antibiotic resistance genes (resistome) will be identified by bioinformatics analysis of sequenced bacterial genomes.

    Time frame: 3 - 6 months

  6. Resistome in the strain population according to sample origin: nasal carriage

    The presence of antibiotic resistance genes (resistome) will be identified by bioinformatics analysis of sequenced bacterial genomes.

    Time frame: 3 - 6 months

  7. Virulome in the strain population according to sample origin: osteitis

    The presence of virulence genes (virulome) will be identified by bioinformatics analysis of sequenced bacterial genomes.

    Time frame: 3 - 6 months

  8. Virulome in the strain population according to sample origin: non-diabetic wounds

    The presence of virulence genes (virulome) will be identified by bioinformatics analysis of sequenced bacterial genomes.

    Time frame: 3 - 6 months

  9. Virulome in the strain population according to sample origin: diabetic wounds

    The presence of virulence genes (virulome) will be identified by bioinformatics analysis of sequenced bacterial genomes.

    Time frame: 3 - 6 months

  10. Virulome in the strain population according to sample origin: blood cultures

    The presence of virulence genes (virulome) will be identified by bioinformatics analysis of sequenced bacterial genomes.

    Time frame: 3 - 6 months

  11. Virulome in the strain population according to sample origin: nasal carriage

    The presence of virulence genes (virulome) will be identified by bioinformatics analysis of sequenced bacterial genomes.

    Time frame: 3 - 6 months

  12. Plasmids inthe strain population and according to sample origin: osteitis

    The presence of plasmids will be identified by bioinformatics analysis of sequenced bacterial genomes.

    Time frame: 3 - 6 months

  13. Plasmids inthe strain population and according to sample origin: non-diabetic wounds

    The presence of plasmids will be identified by bioinformatics analysis of sequenced bacterial genomes.

    Time frame: 3 - 6 months

  14. Plasmids inthe strain population and according to sample origin: diabetic wounds

    The presence of plasmids will be identified by bioinformatics analysis of sequenced bacterial genomes.

    Time frame: 3 - 6 months

  15. Plasmids inthe strain population and according to sample origin: blood cultures

    The presence of plasmids will be identified by bioinformatics analysis of sequenced bacterial genomes.

    Time frame: 3 - 6 months

  16. Plasmids inthe strain population and according to sample origin: nasal carriage

    The presence of plasmids will be identified by bioinformatics analysis of sequenced bacterial genomes.

    Time frame: 3 - 6 months

  17. Phenotypic resistance profiles in the population in a subsample of 85 strains

    The minimum inhibitory concentration for a series of antibiotics will be recorded (antibiograms of isolates).These antibiograms will be established on newly-marketed or current molecules such as Ceftarolin, Ceftobiprol, Dalbavancin, Delafloxacin, Tedizolid and Oritavancin.

    Time frame: 6 - 14 months

  18. Phenotypic resistance profiles in the population and according to sample origin: osteitis

    Minimum inhibitory concentration for a series of antibiotics (antibiograms of isolates). These antibiograms will be established on newly-marketed or current molecules such as Ceftarolin, Ceftobiprol, Dalbavancin, Delafloxacin, Tedizolid and Oritavancin.

    Time frame: 6 - 14 months

  19. Phenotypic resistance profiles in the population and according to sample origin: non-diabetic wounds

    Minimum inhibitory concentration for a series of antibiotics (antibiograms of isolates). These antibiograms will be established on newly-marketed or current molecules such as Ceftarolin, Ceftobiprol, Dalbavancin, Delafloxacin, Tedizolid and Oritavancin.

    Time frame: 6 - 14 months

  20. Phenotypic resistance profiles in the population and according to sample origin: diabetic wounds

    Minimum inhibitory concentration for a series of antibiotics (antibiograms of isolates). These antibiograms will be established on newly-marketed or current molecules such as Ceftarolin, Ceftobiprol, Dalbavancin, Delafloxacin, Tedizolid and Oritavancin.

    Time frame: 6 - 14 months

  21. Phenotypic resistance profiles in the population and according to sample origin: blood cultures

    Minimum inhibitory concentration for a series of antibiotics (antibiograms of isolates). These antibiograms will be established on newly-marketed or current molecules such as Ceftarolin, Ceftobiprol, Dalbavancin, Delafloxacin, Tedizolid and Oritavancin.

    Time frame: 6 - 14 months

  22. Phenotypic resistance profiles in the population and according to sample origin: nasal carriage

    Minimum inhibitory concentration for a series of antibiotics (antibiograms of isolates). These antibiograms will be established on newly-marketed or current molecules such as Ceftarolin, Ceftobiprol, Dalbavancin, Delafloxacin, Tedizolid and Oritavancin.

    Time frame: 6 - 14 months

  23. Amount of biofilm formation in the absence and presence of antibiotics in a selection (85 sub-samples) of S. pettenkoferi strains according to sample origine: osteitis

    Biofilm formation index in the presence/absence of a series of antibiotics (antibiograms of isolates). These antibiotics will be newly-marketed or current molecules such as Ceftarolin, Ceftobiprol, Dalbavancin, Delafloxacin, Tedizolid and Oritavancin. Results recorded on a scale ranging from 0 = biofilm and 12 = no biofilm

    Time frame: 6 - 14 months

  24. Amount of biofilm formation in the absence and presence of antibiotics in a selection (85 sub-samples) of S. pettenkoferi strains according to sample origine: non-diabetic wounds

    Biofilm formation index in the presence/absence of a series of antibiotics (antibiograms of isolates). These antibiotics will be newly-marketed or current molecules such as Ceftarolin, Ceftobiprol, Dalbavancin, Delafloxacin, Tedizolid and Oritavancin. Results recorded on a scale ranging from 0 = biofilm and 12 = no biofilm

    Time frame: 6 - 14 months

  25. Amount of biofilm formation in the absence and presence of antibiotics in a selection (85 sub-samples) of S. pettenkoferi strains according to sample origine: diabetic wounds

    Biofilm formation index in the presence/absence of a series of antibiotics (antibiograms of isolates). These antibiotics will be newly-marketed or current molecules such as Ceftarolin, Ceftobiprol, Dalbavancin, Delafloxacin, Tedizolid and Oritavancin. Results recorded on a scale ranging from 0 = biofilm and 12 = no biofilm

    Time frame: 6 - 14 months

  26. Amount of biofilm formation in the absence and presence of antibiotics in a selection (85 sub-samples) of S. pettenkoferi strains according to sample origine: blood cultures

    Biofilm formation index in the presence/absence of a series of antibiotics (antibiograms of isolates). These antibiotics will be newly-marketed or current molecules such as Ceftarolin, Ceftobiprol, Dalbavancin, Delafloxacin, Tedizolid and Oritavancin. Results recorded on a scale ranging from 0 = biofilm and 12 = no biofilm

    Time frame: 6 - 14 months

  27. Amount of biofilm formation in the absence and presence of antibiotics in a selection (85 sub-samples) of S. pettenkoferi strains according to sample origine: nasal carriage

    Biofilm formation index in the presence/absence of a series of antibiotics (antibiograms of isolates). These antibiotics will be newly-marketed or current molecules such as Ceftarolin, Ceftobiprol, Dalbavancin, Delafloxacin, Tedizolid and Oritavancin. Results recorded on a scale ranging from 0 = biofilm and 12 = no biofilm

    Time frame: 6 - 14 months

  28. Bacterial growth rate according to sample origin in a sub-sample of 20 strains: osteitis

    Bacterial growth curve by measuring absorbance on bacterial culture over time.

    Time frame: 6 - 14 months

  29. Bacterial growth rate according to sample origin in a sub-sample of 20 strains: non-diabetic wounds

    Bacterial growth curve by measuring absorbance on bacterial culture over time.

    Time frame: 6 - 14 months

  30. Bacterial growth rate according to sample origin in a sub-sample of 20 strains: diabetic wounds

    Bacterial growth curve by measuring absorbance on bacterial culture over time.

    Time frame: 6 - 14 months

  31. Bacterial growth rate according to sample origin in a sub-sample of 20 strains: blood cultures

    Bacterial growth curve by measuring absorbance on bacterial culture over time.

    Time frame: 6 - 14 months

  32. Bacterial growth rate according to sample origin in a sub-sample of 20 strains: nasal carriage

    Bacterial growth curve by measuring absorbance on bacterial culture over time.

    Time frame: 6 - 14 months

  33. Virulence profiles according to sample origin in a sub-sample of 3 strains: osteitis

    The rate of internalisation and release of LDH (a sign of cellular toxicity of the bacterial isolate) in an in vitro osteoblast cell culture model (MC3T3-E1)

    Time frame: 6 - 14 months

  34. Virulence profiles according to sample origin in a sub-sample of 3 strains: intracellular bacterial multiplication of S. pettenkoferi strains from osteitis

    The amount of intracellular bacterial multiplication will be assessed in an in vitro macrophage cell culture model (RAW 264.7).

    Time frame: 6 - 14 months

  35. Virulence profiles according to sample origin in a sub-sample of 3 strains: diabetic wounds

    The rate of internalisation and release of LDH (a sign of cellular toxicity of the bacterial isolate) in an in vitro osteoblast cell culture model (MC3T3-E1)

    Time frame: 6 - 14 months

  36. Virulence profiles according to sample origin in a sub-sample of 3 strains: intracellular bacterial multiplication of S. pettenkoferi strains from diabetic wounds

    The amount of intracellular bacterial multiplication will be assessed in an in vitro macrophage cell culture model (RAW 264.7).

    Time frame: 6 - 14 months

  37. Virulence profiles according to sample origin in a sub-sample of 3 strains: blood cultures

    The rate of internalisation and release of LDH (a sign of cellular toxicity of the bacterial isolate) in an in vitro osteoblast cell culture model (MC3T3-E1)

    Time frame: 6 - 14 months

  38. Virulence profiles according to sample origin in a sub-sample of 3 strains:intracellular bacterial multiplication of S. pettenkoferi strains from blood cultures

    The amount of intracellular bacterial multiplication will be assessed in an in vitro macrophage cell culture model (RAW 264.7).

    Time frame: 6 - 14 months

  39. Virulence profiles according to sample origin in a sub-sample of 3 strains: nasal carriage

    The rate of internalisation and release of LDH (a sign of cellular toxicity of the bacterial isolate) in an in vitro osteoblast cell culture model (MC3T3-E1)

    Time frame: 6 - 14 months

  40. Virulence profiles according to sample origin in a sub-sample of 3 strains:intracellular bacterial multiplication of S. pettenkoferi strains from nasal carriage

    The amount of intracellular bacterial multiplication will be assessed in an in vitro macrophage cell culture model (RAW 264.7).

    Time frame: 6 - 14 months

  41. Virulence profiles according to sample origin in a sub-sample of 3 strains: survival time of diabetic zebrafish immersed in S. pettenkoferi strains from osteitis

    Survival curve at 48 hours

    Time frame: Up to 48 hours

  42. Virulence profiles according to sample origin in a sub-sample of 3 strains: survival time of diabetic zebrafish immersed in S. pettenkoferi strains from non-diabetic wounds

    Survival curve at 48 hours

    Time frame: Up to 48 hours

  43. Virulence profiles according to sample origin in a sub-sample of 3 strains: survival time of diabetic zebrafish immersed in S. pettenkoferi strains from diabetic wounds

    Survival curve at 48 hours

    Time frame: Up to 48 hours

  44. Virulence profiles according to sample origin in a sub-sample of 3 strains: survival time of diabetic zebrafish immersed in S. pettenkoferi strains from blood cultures

    Survival curve at 48 hours

    Time frame: Up to 48 hours

  45. Virulence profiles according to sample origin in a sub-sample of 3 strains: survival time of diabetic zebrafish immersed in S. pettenkoferi strains from nasal carriage

    Survival curve at 48 hours

    Time frame: Up to 48 hours

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Nîmes University Hospital
    Nîmes, Gard 30029, France
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Magnan C, Curtil-Dit-Galin M, Morsli M, Cattoir V, Piau-Couapel C, Soderquist B, Kahl BC, Denis O, Rwayane K, Corvec S, Francois P, Salipante F, Pantel A, Dunyach-Remy C, Laurent F, Lavigne JP; European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) Study Group for Staphylococci and Staphylococcal Diseases (ESGS). Staphylococcus pettenkoferi: an underrecognized species with clinically relevant antimicrobial resistance. A comprehensive genomic European study. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2026 Dec;15(1):2724635. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2026.2724635. Epub 2026 Sep 16. PubMed 42748359 ↗
  • Magnan C, Plumet L, Morsli M, Dunyach-Remy C, Pouget C, Sotto A, Molle V, Lavigne J-P. A narrative review of coagulase-negative staphylococci in diabetic foot infections. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2025 Dec 11;38(4):e0012125. doi: 10.1128/cmr.00121-25. Epub 2025 Nov 4. PubMed 41186420 ↗
09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedDate before it movedWhere the date was before it movedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jan 2024 to primary completion in Dec 2025, 23 months.

Of 65 non-industry observational studies under Diabetic Foot, half reached primary completion within 29 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 94. This study's 23 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 90 studies reached it within 28 months; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 59.

Completion moved once since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026: May 2026 → Dec 2025, on Sep 25, 2026.

Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 9, 2024
First posted
Nov 14, 2024
StartActual
Jan 1, 2024
Primary completionActual
Dec 31, 2025
CompletionActual
Dec 31, 2025was May 2026
Last update
Sep 25, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Status
Active, not recruiting→Completed
changed Sep 25, 2026
Study completion
May 1, 2026→Dec 31, 2025 (actual)
Sep 25, 2026
Publications
Results publication added: Magnan C, Plumet L, Morsli M, Dunyach-Remy C, Pouget C, Sotto A, Molle V, Lavigne J-P. A narrative review of coagulase-negative staphylococci in diabetic foot… PubMed 41186420 ↗
Sep 25, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Sep 25, 2026
    Active, not recruiting→Completed
    Publications Results publication added: Magnan C, Plumet L, Morsli M, Dunyach-Remy C, Pouget C, Sotto A, Molle V, Lavigne J-P. A narrative review of coagulase-negative staphylococci in diabetic foot… PubMed 41186420 ↗
    Study completion May 1, 2026→Dec 31, 2025 (now actual)
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06688084
Collaborators
Staphylococcal National Reference Center, Lyon, France, Rennes University Hospital, Nantes University Hospital, Universität Tübingen, Örebro University, Sweden, Charles University, Czech Republic, University Hospital Muenster
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 14, 2024
Start date
Jan 1, 2024
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2025
Completion
Dec 31, 2025
Last update
Sep 25, 2026

Study contacts

Chloé MAGNAN, Dr.
principal investigator · Nîmes University Hospital, FRANCE

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion