CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06656208Updated Apr 18, 2025

Effects of Pubic Symphysis Manipulation in Patients With Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction

An interventional study of Pubic symphysis manipulation and Traditional sacroiliac treatment in Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction, sponsored by Riphah International University. Completed at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to female participants aged 25 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-18.

Sponsored by Riphah International University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
44
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
25 Years to 60 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The aim of this research is to determine the effect of Pubic Symphysis manipulation on pain, disability and fear avoidance behavior in patients with sacroiliac joint dysfunction. Randomized controlled trials was done at Pakistan Railway Hospital. The sample size was 44. The subjects will be divided into Control group and Experimental group. Each group will be having 22 participants. Study duration was of 12 months. Sampling technique applied was non probability connivance sampling technique. Subject included in the study will be female with presence of back pain for ≥6 months, Unilateral back pain, Age 25-60 years, Postpartum women, Patient with pubic tenderness. Tools used in the study are NPRS, Oswestry Disability Index and FABQ. Data will be analyzed using SPSS version 26.

Read the detailed description

Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) dysfunction is a degenerative condition that is considered a major cause of low back pain. It has been resulting from abnormal motion of the joint known as SIJ dysfunction (SIJD). During pregnancy, heightened levels of estrogen and relaxin, coupled with the pressure exerted by a growing fetus, may induce excessive mobility in the SIJs. Conversely, pelvic fractures and a sedentary lifestyle can contribute to decreased mobility and fixation of the joints. Life time prevalence of low back pain is 85%. Among these patients 10% to 25% of, sacroiliac joint is the cause of pain. In Pakistan, female undergraduate students have a higher prevalence of low back pain compared to males. Individuals with SIJD often present with unilateral pain below L5. The pain is often localized distal and medial to the PSIS. It is described as sharp, dull, or shooting and is often misdiagnosed as radicular pain, as it can extend down the posterior thigh to the S1 dermatome. Factors contributing to SIJD include high velocity trauma, degenerative arthritis, inflammatory arthropathy etc. The ability to rise from a chair is a basic functional task that is frequently compromised in individuals diagnosed with SIJD. This condition has been associated with up to 14-20% of patients affected by limiting the overall quality of life.

The pubic symphysis plays a vital role in stabilizing the anterior pelvis while allowing for a limited range of movement. Pubic symphysis dysfunction is characterized by discomfort in the pubic bone region that intensifies during activities such as walking, lifting, or stair climbing, hip abduction, rolling over in bed. Patients often report tenderness over the pubic symphysis. Symptoms include burning, stabbing, or shooting pain that radiates towards the abdomen, back, leg, and perineum. Symphysis pubis dysfunction (SPD) occurs where the joint becomes sufficiently relaxed to allow instability in the pelvic girdle. In severe cases of SPD the symphysis pubis may partially or completely rupture.

Literature review: A study by Aghalar Javadov et al. in 2021 aims to assess the effects of manual therapy for sacroiliac joints in comparison with lumbar exercises. Result of this study shows long term effects of manual therapy in sacroiliac joint dysfunction.

Another study conducted by Shokri E et al. in which effectiveness of sacroiliac joint (SIJ) manipulation alone was compared with a combination of SIJ and lumbar manipulation for treating SIJ dysfunction. The study results indicated that a single session of SIJ and lumbar manipulation is more effective in reducing functional disability compared to SIJ manipulation alone.

A study conducted by S. Becker et al. investigates whether sacroiliac joint pain is linked to alterations in the pubic symphysis. The findings of this study indicate that changes in the pubic symphysis, along with low back pain and positive provocative tests, could potentially indicate dysfunction in the sacroiliac joint.

Purpose of the study was to investigate effects of pubic symphysis manipulation in patients with sacroiliac joint dysfunction.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Sacroiliac joint dysfunction
  • Symphysis pubis dysfunction (SPD)
  • Pubic symphysis manipulation (PSM)
  • Low back pain
  • Disability
  • Pubic malalignment
03

In context

Joint Diseases

712 studies on the registry are indexed under Joint Diseases; 127 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 44 is below the median of 60 across 470 interventional studies indexed under Joint Diseases.

Browse Joint Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

Riphah International University is the lead sponsor of 2,133 studies on the registry; 633 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
25 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Female gender
  • Age 25-60 years
  • Presence of back pain for ≥6 months
  • Postpartum women
  • Patient with pubic tenderness
  • Patient with pubic symphysis asymmetry
  • Unilateral back pain
  • Participants had 2 positive test out of four test, Sacroiliac distraction test, Sacroiliac compression test, thigh thrust test, sacral thrust test.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants underwent surgical approaches
  • History of fracture
  • Patients suffering from pubic neuralgia and osteitis pubis
  • SIJ or Hip joint pathology
  • Arthritides
  • Adductor strain
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
44 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental Group

    Pubic symphysis manipulation with 5 repetitions hold for 10 sec and ask the patient to apply max. Contraction and then relax. Whereas, the therapist applies a rapid stretch to a new barrier and is held for 10 seconds. SIJ mobilizations will be given with 30 Oscillations per set for 15 seconds, 3 sets on effected side along with

    Other: Pubic symphysis manipulation

  • Active comparator
    Control Group

    SIJ mobilizations will be given with 30 Oscillations per set for 15 seconds, 3 sets on effected side.

    Other: Traditional sacroiliac treatment

Interventions

  • OtherPubic symphysis manipulation

    Manipulation was applied in the crook lying position with 5 repetitions hold for 10 sec and ask the patient to apply max. Contraction in Abduction and then relax. Whereas, the therapist applies a rapid stretch to a new barrier and is held for 10 seconds.

  • OtherTraditional sacroiliac treatment

    Mobilization was applied in prone lying position on sacroiliac joint, 30 Oscillations per set for 15 seconds, 3 sets on effected side.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Numeric pain rating scale

    The NPRS is a self-reported, or clinician administered, measurement tool to measure pain intensity consisting of a numerical point scale with extreme anchors of 'no pain' to 'extreme pain'. The scale is typically set up on a horizontal or vertical line, ranges most commonly from 0-10 or 0-100, and can be administered in written or verbal form.

    Time frame: baseline to 6th day

  2. Fear Avoidance Belief Questionnaire (FABQ)

    his scale is used to measure fear avoidance behavior in patients due to pain. It consists of 16 items and patients rate their agreement with each statement on a 7- point Likert scale (0 = completely disagree, 6 = completely agree). The original factor analysis revealed two sub-scales: the work sub-scale (FABQ w) with 7 questions (maximum score = 42) and the physical activity sub-scale (FABQ pa) with 4 questions (maximum score = 24). A higher score indicates more strongly held fear avoidance beliefs.

    Time frame: baseline to 6th day

Secondary outcomes

  1. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)

    The Oswestry Disability Index is used to measure a patient's permanent functional disability. There are 10 questions, for each question there is a possible 5 points; 0 for the first answer, 1 for the second answer, etc. Add up the total for the 10 questions and rate them on the scale at right. Indicating Mild, Moderate, Severe, Complete or No disability.

    Time frame: baseline to 6th day

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Pakistan Railway Hospital
    Rawalpindi, Punjab 26054, Pakistan
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 18, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06656208
Lead sponsor
Riphah International University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 24, 2024
Start date
Oct 10, 2024
Primary completion
Jan 25, 2025
Completion
Apr 16, 2025
Last update
Apr 18, 2025

Study contacts

Maliha Fatima, MS-OMPT
principal investigator · Riphah International University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion