ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06651970Updated Sep 24, 2026

Acalabrutinib Monotherapy vs Investigator's Choice of Treatment in Patients With CL Leukaemia and Heart Failure

A Phase 4 interventional study of Acalabrutinib and Investigator's choice of treatment in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia and Moderate to Severe Cardiac Impairment, sponsored by AstraZeneca. Recruiting at 23 sites in 6 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 130 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-24.

Sponsored by AstraZeneca · Phase 4, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Feb 2025; still recruiting 1 year 9 months later.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 130 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This will be a global Phase IV, open-label, randomised study to evaluate the safety and tolerability of acalabrutinib (monotherapy, 100 mg orally [po], twice daily [bd]) compared to investigator's choice of treatment, in patients with CLL (TN or R/R) and moderate to severe cardiac impairment. Patients with moderate to severe cardiac impairment will include those with moderate to severe cardiac conditions, who may have been excluded from previous acalabrutinib clinical trials and in whom the safety of acalabrutinib was not systematically assessed.

The study is planned to take place in approximately 25 centres globally. The study will be conducted in centres that have established close collaboration between the Haematology and Cardiology divisions, preferably with a cardio-oncologist on the team.

An IDMC will be responsible for making recommendations for study continuation.

Read the detailed description

Randomised controlled study:

Treatment phase:

Patients will receive treatment with either acalabrutinib 100 mg po tablets bd (until unacceptable toxicity or progression) or investigator's choice of treatment (chlorambucil, venetoclax, ibrutinib, zanabrutinib, rituximab or Obinutuzumab etc). For the control arm the treatment type and duration will be defined by the PI prior to randomisation.

Each treatment cycle is 28 days/4 weeks. Haematology visits (labs, physical exam), will be performed at the first day of each cycle for the first 8 cycles and every 4 cycles there after.

Response assessment will be performed by the PI in accordance with modified iwCLL 2018 criteria every 4 cycles (16 weeks). Imaging and BM testing only as deemed appropriate by PI.

Safety assessments will be performed at every visit.

Cardiology assessments will be performed at the end of cycle 1 (C2D1) and 3 (C4D1) and thereafter every 4 cycles (16 weeks). These assessments will include:

  • A cardiology consult.
  • ECHO, 12-lead ECG and 24-hour Holter.
  • Cardiac biomarkers.
  • Any additional testing will be performed as clinically indicated.

Cardiac MRI post-screening will be performed every year.

Decisions for permanent withdrawal or modifications to treatment due to cardiac AEs will be made by PI after close consultation with the cardiologist.

Post-Treatment Phase:

Safety assessments

Once treatment is discontinued due to any of the reasons mentioned above, a safety follow-up (SFU) will occur within 45 days of the last dose of treatment. This will occur regardless of the patient developing progressive disease or initiation a new anti-CLL therapy during that timespan. The evaluation will include:

  • Cardiology consult
  • Cardiac biomarkers
  • 12-lead ECG, ECHO and 24 hour Holter
  • Cardiac MRI (if not performed in the last 6 months).

The subsequent safety assessments will continue until disease progression, WoC, death or termination of study whichever occurs first.

These will mirror the in-treatment schedule, with cardiology consults including ECHO, ECG, cardiac biomarkers and 24 hour Holter performed every 16 weeks and yearly cardiac MRI. Once patient has progressive disease they will be contacted to assess survival status every 16 weeks.

Response assessments Patients that discontinue treatment prior to progression will continue to be evaluated for disease progression every 16 weeks. The response assessment will be per iwCLL 2018 guidelines and will be performed by the PI. Bone marrow testing and imaging will continue to remain optional and per PI discretion.

Once patient has progressive disease they will be contacted every 16 weeks for survival status and information on any new anti-cancer therapy until WoC, death, termination of study by Sponsor whichever occurs first.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia
  • Moderate to Severe Cardiac Impairment

Keywords

  • Hemic Diseases
  • Lymphatic Diseases
03

In context

Leukemia, B-Cell

190 studies on the registry are indexed under Leukemia, B-Cell; 52 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is above the median of 39 across 162 interventional studies indexed under Leukemia, B-Cell.

Browse Leukemia, B-Cell studies →

Lead sponsor

AstraZeneca is the lead sponsor of 3,499 studies on the registry; 270 are open to participants now.

Of its 368 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 178 (48%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 130 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Men and women ≥ 18 years of age, at the time of signing the .
  2. performance status of 0 to 3
  3. Meet at least one of the following cardiovascular inclusion criteria: - (LVEF) \< 50% as assessed by local ECHO at screening. - History of heart failure or meeting Universal Definition of Heart Failure at screening, regardless of current LVEF. - History of ischaemic heart disease (IHD) including acute coronary syndrome, myocardial infarction, or coronary revascularization (percutaneous coronary intervention/stent or coronary artery bypass surgery). - Diagnosis of cardiomyopathy - Ongoing (symptomatic or requiring intervention) cardiac arrhythmia, including atrial fibrillation or other arrhythmias. - History of moderate or severe cardiac valvular diseases as documented per cardiac imaging
  4. Diagnosis of CLL
  5. Treatment naïve or patients who have received no more than 2 prior lines of systemic anti-CLL treatment.
  6. Active disease per iwCLL 2018 criteria that requires treatment.
  7. Meet the following laboratory parameters:

    1. (ANC) ≥ 500 cells/μL (0.50 × 109/L).
    2. count ≥ 30,000 cells/μL (30 × 109/L).
    3. Serum and ALT ≤ 3.0 × .
    4. Total ≤ 1.5 × ULN unless directly attributable to Gilbert's syndrome.
    5. Estimated (ie, estimated [eGFR] using Cockcroft-Gault) ≥ 40 mL/min, or serum creatinine ≤ 2 × ULN.
  8. Women and men who are sexually active and can bear children must agree to use highly effective forms of while on the study and for 2 days after the last dose of acalabrutinib.
  9. Patients must be willing and able to adhere to the study visit schedule, understand, and comply with other protocol requirements, and provide written informed consent and authorisation to use protected health information (in accordance with national and local patient privacy regulations). Note: vulnerable patients, as defined in the ICH GCP, are not allowed on this protocol (eg, prisoners or institutionalised patients).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Known active CNS leukaemia, or spinal cord compression. In case of R/R patients with prior history of CNS localisation of leukaemia who received treatment are eligible provided that there is no evidence of CNS involvement at study entry as documented by cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytology and/or brain MRI.
  2. Ongoing Richter's transformation.
  3. Prior exposure to a BTKi.
  4. Major surgery within 30 days before first dose of study treatment.
  5. Uncontrolled haemolytic anaemia.
  6. Received any drug within 30 days or 5 half-lives (whichever is shorter) before first dose of study treatment.
  7. Received a within 28 days of first dose of study treatment.
  8. History of or ongoing confirmed PML.
  9. History of prior except for the following:

    1. Prior history of malignancy with no evidence of active disease present for more than

3 years before screening or felt to be at low risk for recurrence by treating physician.

(b) Adequately treated lentigo maligna melanoma without current evidence of disease or adequately resected non-melanomatous skin cancer (ie, basal cell carcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin). (c) Curatively treated in situ carcinoma of the cervix or carcinoma in situ of the prostate at any time prior to study without current evidence of disease. 10 Unable to swallow tablets or malabsorption syndrome, or disease significantly affecting gastrointestinal function, or resection of the stomach or small bowel or gastric bypass, symptomatic inflammatory bowel disease, or partial or complete bowel obstruction.

11 Active uncontrolled systemic infection (bacterial, fungal, viral or other) or localised infection. 12 Known history of infection with (HIV). 13 Serologic status reflecting active HepB or HepC infection.

(a) Patients with HepB core antibody positive who are surface antigen negative or who are HepC antibody positive will need to have a negative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) result before randomisation and must be willing to undergo deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) PCR testing during the study. (b) Patients who are HepB surface antigen positive or HepB PCR positive and those who are HepC PCR positive will be excluded. 14 History of stroke or intracranial haemorrhage within 6 months prior to randomisation.

15 History of bleeding diathesis (eg, haemophilia, von Willebrand disease). 16 Requires or receiving anticoagulation with warfarin or equivalent vitamin K antagonists (eg, phenprocoumon) within 7 days of first dose of study treatment. Direct anti-X (DOACs) or low molecular weight heparins (LMWH, eg, enoxaparin) on stable dosing schedule is allowed. 17 Requires treatment with a strong cytochrome P450 3A () inhibitor/inducer. The use of strong CYP3A inhibitors within 1 week or strong CYP3A inducers within 3 weeks of the first dose of study treatment is prohibited. 18 Breastfeeding or pregnant. 19 Concurrent participation in another therapeutic clinical trial. 20 Uncontrolled cardiac/cardiovascular disease including the following:

  1. Baseline cardiac troponin (cTnI or cTnT or hs-cTn) levels greater than the (per the local laboratories reference range) that is due to an acute coronary event and cannot be fully explained by non-ischaemic conditions.
  2. Uncontrolled cardiac tachyarrhythmias (sinus, atrial or ventricular) that require new/additional therapy within the last month.
  3. Clinically significant defined as QT interval corrected by Fridericia's formula (QTcF) values; QTcF > 500 ms.
  4. Any of the following within the last 3 months:

i. Unstable IHD: percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass surgery, or an episode of acute coronary syndrome including acute myocardial infarction and unstable angina pectoris. ii. Major cardiac surgery/procedures or valvular surgery. iii. Hospitalization due to heart failure. 21 Uncontrolled hypertension despite optimal management 22 Current life-threatening illness, medical conditions, organ system dysfunction or lifestyle habits which, in the investigator's opinion, could compromise the patient's safety or ability to adhere to the study protocol.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(20)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Relapsed and refractory

Relapsed: the illness came back after treatment had worked. Refractory: it did not respond to treatment, or stopped responding while still on it.

Absolute neutrophil count (ANC)

The number of neutrophils, white blood cells that help fight infection, in a given amount of blood. Too few raises the risk of infection.

It is a count, not a percentage of the white cells. Limits are written in units that mean the same: ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L is ≥ 1,500 per mm³ (µL). Each lab has its own reference range.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

Creatinine clearance (CrCl)

How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Leptomeningeal disease

Cancer that has spread to the leptomeninges, the thin layers covering the brain and spinal cord, and the fluid between them. It is not the same as brain metastases.

Criteria often treat it separately, and many studies leave it out even where treated brain metastases are allowed.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Live vaccines

Vaccines made with a weakened form of the germ, such as measles–mumps–rubella (MMR), chickenpox and yellow fever. They can be risky when the immune system is weakened. Flu injections are not live; the nasal flu spray is.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

CYP3A (CYP3A4) inhibitors and inducers

CYP3A is a group of enzymes, mainly CYP3A4, in the liver and gut that break down many medicines. Some medicines, supplements and foods (grapefruit, St John’s wort) slow them down or speed them up, which changes how much of a study drug stays in the body.

Studies list them so they can be avoided or switched; bring a list of everything you take, including supplements.

QT and QTc

On an ECG, the QT interval is the time the heart’s lower chambers take to activate electrically and recover in each beat. QTc is that time adjusted for heart rate (QTcF by Fridericia’s formula, QTcB by Bazett’s). Some medicines lengthen it, and a long QTc can raise the risk of a dangerous heart rhythm.

The study may name a correction formula and a limit in milliseconds, often around 450–480.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Treatment Arm A (Acalabrutinib Monotherapy)

    All participants randomised to Arm A will receive treatment with the investigational product acalabrutinib.

    Drug: Acalabrutinib

  • Other
    Treatment Arm B

    Patients in Arm B will receive investigator's choice of treatment its duration will be based on standard duration of therapy for that regimen or until disease progression/patient withdrawal/study termination, whichever occurs first.

    Other: Investigator's choice of treatment

Interventions

  • Acalabrutinib Monotherapy

    Also known as: Calquence

  • OtherInvestigator's choice of treatment

    control arm treatment type will be defined by the PI prior to randomisation

    Also known as: Investigator's choice of treatment : i.e venetoclax, Rituximab, Obinutuzumab, Zanubrutinib etc.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Safety endpoints 1: To evaluate the incidence of CV (CardioVascular) adverse events leading to drug discontinuation after acalabrutinib treatment compared to investigators choice of treatment.

    Frequency and time to discontinuation of any study treatment due to worsening in cardiovascular function or cardiovascular AEs.

    Time frame: Visits are screening+ 8 visits( every 4 weeks) and then every 16 weeks until termination of the study which would be 4 years from the last subject randomized.

  2. Safety endpoints 2: To evaluate the duration on treatment prior to drug discontinuation due to CV adverse events after acalabrutinib treatment compared to investigators choice of treatment.

    Incidence of Grade 4 and 5 cardiovascular events of interest.

    Time frame: Visits are screening+ 8 visits( every 4 weeks) and then every 16 weeks until termination of the study which would be 4 years from the last subject randomized.

  3. Safety endpoints 3: To evaluate the incidence of life threatening and fatal cardiac events of interest after acalabrutinib treatment compared to investigators choice of treatment.

    Incidence and relationship to study treatment of Grade ≥ 3 AEs.

    Time frame: Visits are screening+ 8 visits( every 4 weeks) and then every 16 weeks until termination of the study which would be 4 years from the last subject randomized.

  4. Safety endpoints 4: To evaluate the frequency of grade≥3 Adverse events after acalabrutinib treatment compared to investigators choice of treatment.

    Incidence and relationship to study treatment

    Time frame: Visits are screening+ 8 visits( every 4 weeks) and then every 16 weeks until termination of the study which would be 4 years from the last subject randomized.

  5. Safety endpoints 5: To evaluate the frequency of AESI per Acalabrutinib IB after acalabrutinib treatment compared to investigators choice of treatment.

    Incidence and relationship to study treatment of Non-cardiovascular AE that led to discontinuation of any study treatment.

    Time frame: Visits are screening+ 8 visits( every 4 weeks) and then every 16 weeks until termination of the study which would be 4 years from the last subject randomized.

  6. Safety endpoints 6: To evaluate the rate of discontinuation due to non-CV adverse events after acalabrutinib treatment compared to investigators choice of treatment.

    Incidence and relationship to study treatment of Events of clinical interest (ECI) per acalabrutinib IB

    Time frame: Visits are screening+ 8 visits( every 4 weeks) and then every 16 weeks until termination of the study which would be 4 years from the last subject randomized.

  7. Safety endpoints 7: To evaluate the rate of any serious adverse event after acalabrutinib treatment compared to investigators choice of treatment.

    Incidence and relationship to study treatment of Serious adverse events (SAEs).

    Time frame: Visits are screening+ 8 visits( every 4 weeks) and then every 16 weeks until termination of the study which would be 4 years from the last subject randomized.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Efficacy Endpoints 1:To evaluate the overall survival after acalabrutinib treatment compared to investigators choice of treatment.

    Overall survival (OS), defined as the time from randomisation to death from any cause. Per iwCLL 2018 criteria: • Event-free survival (EFS), defined as the time from randomisation to disease progression, initiation of subsequent anti-CLL therapy, or death from any cause, whichever occurs first.

    Time frame: Visits are screening+ 8 visits( every 4 weeks) and then every 16 weeks until termination of the study which would be 4 years from the last subject randomized.

  2. Efficacy Endpoints 2:To evaluate the overall response rate after acalabrutinib treatment compared to investigators choice of treatment.

    Overall response rate (ORR), defined as the proportion of patients with a complete response (CR), complete response with incomplete bone marrow recovery (CRi), nodular partial response (nPR) or partial response (PR).

    Time frame: Visits are screening+ 8 visits( every 4 weeks) and then every 16 weeks until termination of the study which would be 4 years from the last subject randomized.

  3. Efficacy Endpoints 3: To evaluate the duration of response after acalabrutinib treatment compared to investigators choice of treatment.

    Duration of response (DOR), defined as the time from the first documented response (PR or better) to disease progression or death (by any cause in the absence of disease progression).

    Time frame: Visits are screening+ 8 visits( every 4 weeks) and then every 16 weeks until termination of the study which would be 4 years from the last subject randomized.

  4. Efficacy Endpoints 4: To evaluate the progression free survival after acalabrutinib treatment compared to investigators choice of treatment.

    Progression-free survival (PFS), defined as the time from randomisation to disease progression or death (by any cause in the absence of disease progression).

    Time frame: Visits are screening+ 8 visits( every 4 weeks) and then every 16 weeks until termination of the study which would be 4 years from the last subject randomized.

  5. Efficacy Endpoints 5:To evaluate the event free survival after acalabrutinib treatment compared to investigators choice of treatment.

    Overall response rate (ORR), defined as the proportion of patients with a complete response (CR), complete response with incomplete bone marrow recovery (CRi), nodular partial response (nPR) or partial response (PR).

    Time frame: Visits are screening+ 8 visits( every 4 weeks) and then every 16 weeks until termination of the study which would be 4 years from the last subject randomized.

07

Study locations

18 of 23 sites recruiting
  • Research Site
    Charlotte, North Carolina 28204, United States
    Withdrawn

    Not enrolling at this site — choose another above.

  • Research Site
    Columbus, Ohio 43210, United States
    Recruiting
  • Research Site
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
    Recruiting
  • Research Site
    Brno, 625 00, Czechia
    Recruiting
  • Research Site
    Hradec Králové, 500 05, Czechia
    Withdrawn

    Not enrolling at this site — choose another above.

  • Research Site
    Prague, 10034, Czechia
    Recruiting
  • Research Site
    Cagliari, 09121, Italy
    Recruiting
  • Research Site
    Florence, 50134, Italy
    Recruiting
  • Research Site
    Milan, 20122, Italy
    Recruiting
  • Research Site
    Milan, 20132, Italy
    Recruiting
  • Research Site
    Pavia, 27100, Italy
    Recruiting
  • Research Site
    Perugia, 06156, Italy
    Recruiting
  • Research Site
    Krakow, 30-727, Poland
    Recruiting
  • Research Site
    Poznan, 60-693, Poland
    Recruiting
  • Research Site
    Barcelona, 08003, Spain
    Recruiting
  • Research Site
    Madrid, 28040, Spain
    Recruiting
  • Research Site
    Seville, 41009, Spain
    Recruiting
  • Research Site
    Bournemouth, BH7 7DW, United Kingdom
    Withdrawn

    Not enrolling at this site — choose another above.

  • Research Site
    Oxford, OX3 7LE, United Kingdom
    Recruiting
  • Research Site
    Plymouth, PL6 8DH, United Kingdom
    Recruiting
  • Research Site
    Romford, RM7 0AG, United Kingdom
    Withdrawn

    Not enrolling at this site — choose another above.

  • Research Site
    Stockton, TS19 8PE, United Kingdom
    Withdrawn

    Not enrolling at this site — choose another above.

  • Research Site
    Sutton Coldfield, B74 3UP, United Kingdom
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Qualified researchers can request access to anonymized individual patient-level data from AstraZeneca group of companies sponsored clinical trials via the request portal Vivli.org. All requests will be evaluated as per the AZ disclosure commitment: https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure. Yes, indicates that AZ are accepting requests for IPD, but this does not mean all requests will be shared.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan

Time frame: AstraZeneca will meet or exceed data availability as per the commitments made to the EFPIA PhRMA Data Sharing Principles. For details of our timelines, please rerefer to our disclosure commitment at https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure.

Access criteria: When a request has been approved AstraZeneca will provide access to the anonymized individual patient-level data via secure research environment Vivli.org. Signed Data Usage Agreement (non-negotiable contract for data accessors) must be in place before accessing requested information.

Data sharing details ↗ · vivli.org

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Feb 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Sep 2032, 91 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 20, 2024
First posted
Oct 22, 2024
StartActual
Feb 4, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Sep 30, 2032
CompletionEst.
Sep 30, 2032
Last update
Sep 24, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 24, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06651970
Lead sponsor
AstraZeneca
Collaborators
Fortrea, CALYX Inc., eResearch Technology, Inc., CISCRP
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 22, 2024
Start date
Feb 4, 2025
Primary completion
Sep 30, 2032 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 30, 2032 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 24, 2026

Study contacts

AstraZeneca Clinical Study Information Center
Contact
information.center@astrazeneca.com
1-877-240-9479

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Acalabrutinib

Start the discussion