An interventional study of bipolar diathermy "Standard technique". and coblation technique. in Epistaxis Nosebleed, sponsored by Assiut University. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 6 Years to 17 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-19.
Sponsored by Assiut University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of coblation technique versus bipolar technique in management of RAE in children regarding the following:
Epistaxis commonly referred to as "nosebleed" remains to be one of the most common ENT emergencies presenting to the accident and emergency departments (AED) worldwide. Idiopathic epistaxis is a common complaint seen in children in rhinology outpatient clinics. In most pediatric cases, idiopathic epistaxis originates from Kiesselbach's plexus, which is located in the anteroinferior portion of the nasal septum; thus, this condition is also known as recurrent anterior epistaxis (RAE). The ideal treatment for idiopathic RAE has yet to be elucidated. In most cases only leaning forwards, pinching of the nose and washing of the face and nose with cold water is all that is needed to stop the epistaxis; in other cases, more aggressive interventions as using nasal packing or chemical cauterization are needed. Although silver nitrate cautery is the most common method of chemical cautery for the treatment of RAE, it has mainly been used to control bleeding associated with small vessels and ulceration of the nasal mucosa . Electrosurgery appears to be more effective than silver nitrate in controlling bleeding telangiectasias. Johnson et al. suggested that bipolar electrocautery may be a superior treatment in children with RAE at risk of severe bleeding, in whom chemical cautery will likely fail. Coblation is a minimally invasive therapeutic technique that can cover a large tissue volume, thus allowing for rapid ablation and a large area of coagulation with minimal side effects. Review of the available literatures doesn't compare between these two methods "Bipolar versus coblation regarding their efficacy to control RAE in children". In this research we will study the outcomes of both techniques.
96 studies on the registry are indexed under Epistaxis; 22 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 64 is close to the median of 64 across 81 interventional studies indexed under Epistaxis.
Browse Epistaxis studies →Assiut University is the lead sponsor of 5,078 studies on the registry; 2,178 are open to participants now.
Of its 14 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
The bipolar technique for group A: A bipolar with straight blade will be used with a footplate-operated switch to control the coagulation time, and the length, width and depth of penetration of the thermal power. The lesion will be coagulated in a distal-to-proximal direction to achieve a uniform gray-white coagulation zone in the lesion and surrounding tissue. Multiple ablations at the same area should be avoided to avoid septal perforation. After finishing coagulation small gauze impregnated with antibiotic ointment will be applied for 2 hours postoperatively.
Procedure: bipolar diathermy "Standard technique".
The coblation technique for group B: An coblator with tonsillar blade will be used with a footplate-operated switch to control the coagulation time, and the length, width and depth of penetration of the thermal power. The lesion will be coagulated in a distal-to-proximal direction to achieve a uniform gray-white coagulation zone in the lesion and surrounding tissue. Multiple ablations at the same area should be avoided to avoid septal perforation. After finishing coagulation small gauze impregnated with antibiotic ointment will be applied for 2 hours postoperatively.
Procedure: coblation technique.
The bipolar technique for group A: A bipolar with straight blade will be used with a footplate-operated switch to control the coagulation time, and the length, width and depth of penetration of the thermal power. The lesion will be coagulated in a distal-to-proximal direction to achieve a uniform gray-white coagulation zone in the lesion and surrounding tissue. Multiple ablations at the same area should be avoided to avoid septal perforation. After finishing coagulation small gauze impregnated with antibiotic ointment will be applied for 2 hours postoperatively.
The coblation technique for group B: An coblator with tonsillar blade will be used with a footplate-operated switch to control the coagulation time, and the length, width and depth of penetration of the thermal power. The lesion will be coagulated in a distal-to-proximal direction to achieve a uniform gray-white coagulation zone in the lesion and surrounding tissue. Multiple ablations at the same area should be avoided to avoid septal perforation. After finishing coagulation small gauze impregnated with antibiotic ointment will be applied for 2 hours postoperatively.
Number of participants with successful hemostasis on the day of the procedure.
No epistaxis within the first 24 hours of the procedure.
Time frame: The first 24 hours postoperative
Postoperative complications
1. Rate of rebleeding rates at 1 and 4 weeks, and 6 months. 2. Rate of mucosal healing. 3. Rate of postoperative crust formation. 4. Rate of postoperative synechiae formation. 5. Rate of postoperative septal perforation.
Time frame: 6 months
No study locations are listed for this record.
Start is estimated for Mar 2025; primary completion for Dec 2025, 9 months later.
Of 24 interventional studies with no phase under Epistaxis, half reached primary completion within 14 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 3 and three quarters within 25. This study's planned 9 months is below that.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.