ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06637943Updated Dec 8, 2025

Comparison of the Diagnosis Time of VET and SCL in Patients With Intraoperative Coagulopathy

An observational study in Arthritis of Knee, Arthritis of Hip and Spine, sponsored by Konkuk University Medical Center. Not yet recruiting at 4 sites in South Korea. Open to participants aged 19 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-08.

Sponsored by Konkuk University Medical Center · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Apr 2026, 6 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
210
Ages
19 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The present study is a prospective, multi-center observational trial comparing the times taken to diagnose coagulopathies using point-of-care (POC) viscoelastic tests or standard central laboratory tests (SCL tests) in patients with intraoperative bleeding.

Read the detailed description

The present study is a prospective multi-center observational trial comparing the time for diagnosing coagulopathies using POC viscoelastic tests, such as rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) and thromboelastography (TEG) and standard central laboratory tests (SCL test, such as PT-INR, aPTT, s-fibrinogen level, platelet count) in intraoperative bleeding patients.

The study will be performed during surgeries that are expected to entail a moderate to severe amount of bleeding and warrant the use of either POC viscoelastic tests, SCL tests, or both to determine the possible association of coagulopathy.

The tests will be conducted when an intraoperative condition requires identifying possible associations of coagulopathies during and after surgical bleeding. The test results will prompt appropriate coagulation management.

The primary objective is to compare the diagnosis time for intraoperative coagulopathy using the POC viscoelastic test or SCL test. The time will be defined as the time elapsed from the time obtaining a blood sample for the POC viscoelastic test or SCL test to the time acknowledging the test results.

Researchers hypothesized that using POC viscoelastic tests would shorten the time for diagnosis compared to SCL tests.

02

Conditions studied

  • Arthritis of Knee
  • Arthritis of Hip
  • Spine
  • Prostate Cancer
  • Hepatic Cancer
  • Valvular Disorder
  • Ischemic Heart Disease
  • Aortic Diseases

Keywords

  • viscoelastic test
  • standard central laboratory test
  • coagulation
03

In context

Prostatic Neoplasms

7,046 studies on the registry are indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms; 1,580 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 210 is close to the median of 200 across 1,310 observational studies indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms.

Browse Prostatic Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Konkuk University Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 95 studies on the registry; 15 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
19 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

conditions/ diseases

  • Arthritis of knee
  • Arthritis of hip
  • Spine
  • Prostate cancer
  • Hepatic cancer
  • Valvular dysfunction
  • Ischemic heart disease
  • Aortic disease

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • patients who will undergo elective surgery with a high risk of moderate to severe amount of intraoperative bleeding or coagulopathy (e.g., cardiac surgery, joint replacement, spine surgery, hepatectomy, radical prostatectomy)
  • patients who provide written
  • patients who may warrant the intraoperative use of POC viscoelastic test or SCL test

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnancy
  • withdrawal of consent
  • termination of surgery without performing either POC viscoelastic test or SCL tests
  • when the study conductor deems it inappropriate to proceed with the protocol with the patient
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
210 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • SCL tests

    standard central laboratory (SCL) tests

    Diagnostic Test: SCL tests

  • POC viscoleastic tests

    point-of-care (POC) viscoelastic tests

    Diagnostic Test: POC viscoelastic tests

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testSCL tests

    applying PT-INR, serum-fibrinogen (Claus Method), serum-platelet count

  • Diagnostic testPOC viscoelastic tests

    applying ROTEM or TEG

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time for establishing a diagnosis using viscoelastic test and SCL test, minute

    Lapsed time (minute) from obtaining a blood sample to identifying association or absence of coagulation dysfunction

    Time frame: From the start and to the end of surgery, an average of 6 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Test results from viscoelastic test and SCL test

    ROTEM (CT-EXTEM, A5-EXTEM, A10-EXTEM, A15-EXTEM, MCF-EXTEM, A5-FIBTEM, A10-FIBTEM, MCF-FIBTEM), TEG (CK R-time, CK alpha angle CRT MA, CFF MA), SCL (hemoglobin, PT-INR, aPTT, platelet count, serum-fibrinogen level) The test results for deciding to give PRBCs: hemoglobin value (g/dl) in both groups The test results for deciding to give FFPs: CT-EXTEM (mm) in the study group vs PT-INR in the control group The test results for deciding to give cryoprecipitates: A5-FIBTEM or MCF-FIBTEM (mm) in the study group vs serum fibrinogen level (mg/dl) in the control group The test results for deciding to give platelets: A5-PLETEM (A5-EXTEM, A5-FIBTEM. mm) or MCF-PLTEM (MCF-EXTEM, MCF-FIBTEM, mm) in the study group vs serum-fibrinogen level (mg/dl) in the control group

    Time frame: From the start and to the end of surgery, an average of 6 hours

  2. The difference in the percentages of patients that lead to the diagnosis of coagulopathies for viscoelastic test and SCL tests

    The difference in the percentages of patients that lead to the diagnosis of coagulopathies for viscoelastic test and SCL tests, respectively, when both tests were performed simultaneously

    Time frame: From the start and to the end of surgery, an average of 6 hours

  3. Time for initiating a treatment, munute

    Defined as lapsed time from acknowledging the result of the test and ordering blood products if indicated (minute)

    Time frame: From the start and to the end of surgery, an average of 6 hours

  4. Time taken to complete the delivery of the blood products to the operation room, minute

    Time taken to complete the delivery of the blood products to the operation room, minute

    Time frame: From the start and to the end of surgery, an average of 6 hours

  5. Amount of blood products transfused if indicated specific to each test, unit

    Amount of blood products transfused if indicated specific to each test packed red blood cells (PRBCs), fresh frozen plasma (FFP), cryoprecipitate, platelet (unit)

    Time frame: From the start and to the end of surgery, an average of 6 hours

  6. comparisons of diagnosis time between POC-viscoelastic test and SCL test

    Lapsed time (minutes) from obtaining a blood sample to identifying the association or absence of coagulation dysfunction in the POC viscoelastic tests and SCL tests

    Time frame: From the start and to the end of surgery, an average of 6 hours

07

Study locations

4 sites
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Feb 2026; primary completion for Apr 2026, 2 months later.

Of 541 non-industry observational studies under Prostatic Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 67 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 29 and three quarters within 162. This study's planned 2 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 650 studies reached it within 60 months; a quarter within 29 and three quarters within 141.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 7, 2024
First posted
Oct 15, 2024
StartEst.
Feb 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Apr 30, 2026
CompletionEst.
May 31, 2026
Last update
Dec 8, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 8, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06637943
Lead sponsor
Konkuk University Medical Center
Collaborators
Korea Health Industry Development Institute, Asan Medical Center, Samsung Medical Center, Soon Chun Hyang University
Responsible party
Tae-Yop Kim, MD PhD (Professor of Anesthesiology, Konkuk University Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 15, 2024
Start date
Feb 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Apr 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
May 31, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 8, 2025

Study contacts

Tae-Yop Kim, MD, PhD
Contact
taeyop@gmail.com
821088116942
Wooseul Lee
Contact
wslee.kku@gmail.com
821088055661
Tae-Yop Kim, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Konkuk University Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Nov 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion