ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06611462STRONG-HerniaUpdated Sep 25, 2024

STRONG for Surgery & Strong for Life - Intensive Prehabilitation for Risk Reduction in Ventral Hernia Repair

An interventional study of Prehabilitation (the STRONG programme) in Ventral Hernia, Surgery and Risk Reduction, sponsored by Bispebjerg Hospital. Recruiting at 3 sites in Denmark. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-09-25.

Sponsored by Bispebjerg Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Mar 2026, 8 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Mar 2024; still recruiting 2 years 8 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
400
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The five risky lifestyles Smoking, Nutrition (obesity and malnutrition), risky Alcohol intake, and Physical inactivity (SNAP) are common in surgical patients and associated with worse postoperative outcomes. Mono-factor interventions targeting and improving these risky lifestyles have been shown to reduce the risk at surgery, but there is a lack of systematic assessment of all five lifestyles of the patient before surgery and related optimization.

This study aims to evaluate the effect of intensive combined lifestyle interventions (the STRONG programme) compared with treatment as usual in patients undergoing ventral hernia repair on postoperative complications, health, and costs on short and longer term.

The hypothesis is that the STRONG programme will halve the complication rates within 30 days.

Read the detailed description

This study is a multicentre randomised controlled trial. A total of 400 participants with one or more of the five risky SNAP lifestyles will be randomised to either the STRONG programme (a prehabilitation intervention) or treatment as usual preoperatively (control). The STRONG programme is individually tailored to the needs of the participants. The program contains education, motivational, and pharmaceutical support. All participants will be followed up at the end of the intervention/at surgery, one, three, and six months after surgery. Long-term outcomes are followed up from national registers two years after surgery.

Interim analysis will be employed.

02

Conditions studied

  • Ventral Hernia
  • Surgery
  • Risk Reduction
  • Lifestyle
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Prehabilitation

Keywords

  • Ventral Hernia
  • Surgery
  • Risk Reduction
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Prehabilitation
  • Smoking
  • Alcohol drinking
  • Obesity
  • Malnutrition
  • Physical Inactivity
03

In context

Hernia, Ventral

230 studies on the registry are indexed under Hernia, Ventral; 45 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 400 is above the median of 90 across 153 interventional studies indexed under Hernia, Ventral.

Browse Hernia, Ventral studies →

Lead sponsor

Bispebjerg Hospital is the lead sponsor of 289 studies on the registry; 29 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Participants ≥18 years scheduled for ventral hernia repair (defect smaller than 8cm)
  • Enough time for at least 4 weeks of prehabilitation
  • Screened positive for at least 1 risky SNAP factor
  • Signed

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Ventral hernia repairs with defect larger than 8 cm
  • Pregnancy/breastfeeding
  • Allergy/other contradiction to pharmaceutical and/or nutritional support
  • Contradiction to exercise
  • Previous complicated alcohol withdrawal symptoms (delirium or seizures)
  • Not able to participate in intervention due to psychiatric ilness
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
400 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Prehabilitation

    Intervention (the STRONG programme): At least six counselling sessions (around one per week) prior to surgery as an integrated prehabilitation programme tailored to the individual patient's need for risk reduction at surgery based on a baseline screening for risky SNAP factors. It is delivered via the surgical "Engage in the process of change". The smoking cessation intervention follows the Gold Standard Programme and a similar structure has been used for alcohol cessation, physical exercise, and nutrition interventions. All participants in the intervention group will receive immunonutrition in the days before surgery.

    Behavioral: Prehabilitation (the STRONG programme)

  • No intervention
    Treatment as usual

    Treatment as usual in the preoperative period in the included hospital departments, e.g. brief counselling/advice regarding smoking cessation and weight loss, and handing out the national folders on smoking and surgery. Participants are free to access support to lifestyle changes in the community.

Interventions

  • BehavioralPrehabilitation (the STRONG programme)

    Participants screened positive for one or more SNAP factors and randomised to the intervention group will receive an individualised plan for prehabilitation of their specific SNAP factors.

    Also known as: Smoking cessation, Alcohol cessation, Physical activity, Nutritional support for malnutrition and/or obesity

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Postoperative complications within 30 days

    Number and proportion of participants with at least one postoperative complication defined by requiring treatment

    Time frame: 30 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Postoperative complications within 3 and 6 months

    Number and proportion of participants with at least one postoperative complication defined by requiring treatment

    Time frame: 3 months, 6 months

  2. Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI)

    Calculated from the Clavien-Dindo classification of the postoperative complications

    Time frame: 30 days, 3 months, 6 months

  3. Successful quitting of risky lifestyles

    Number and proportion of participants without all of their preoperative risky lifestyles (identified at baseline). Successful quitting of risky lifestyles are defined as: * Smoking: no use of any tobacco products * Malnutrition: not at risk of malnutrition defined as NRS \<3 * Obesity: 5-10 % loss of body fat mass compared to baseline * Alcohol: Zero alcohol intake at end of intervention/surgery and below risky limits (\<14 units per week) at postoperative follow-ups * Physical inactivity: being physically active at least 3.5 hours per week

    Time frame: End of intervention/at surgery, 30 days, 3 months, 6 months

  4. Any improvement of risky lifestyles

    Number and proportion of participants with any improvement of any of their risky lifestyles compared with baseline. Any improvements include: * Smoking: a reduced number of cigarettes * Malnutrition: improvement in level of malnutrition (NRS scale) * Obesity: any loss of body fat mass * Alcohol: a reduced alcohol intake weekly (reduced number of units weekly) * Physical inactivity: Any improvement in minutes of daily physical activity

    Time frame: End of intervention/at surgery, 30 days, 3 months, 6 months

  5. Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)

    Number and proportion of patients with improvement of HRQoL compared with baseline. HRQoL is measured by the EQ-5D instrument

    Time frame: End of intervention/at surgery, 30 days, 3 months, 6 months

  6. Costs

    Measured as individual direct and indirect healthcare costs per patient based on data from national registries

    Time frame: 30 days, 6 months, 2 years

  7. Cost-effectiveness

    Calculated as a probability in percent (%)

    Time frame: 2 years

  8. Patient expectations

    Measured as a number on a VAS scale from 0-10

    Time frame: Baseline

  9. Patient reflections 1

    Qualitative analysis of patients reflections on advantages and disadvantages of changing or continuing current lifestyle

    Time frame: Baseline

  10. Patient reflections 2

    Qualitative analysis of patient reflections obtained from semi-structured interviews

    Time frame: Baseline

Other outcomes

  1. Postoperative length of stay

    Descriptively reported as total time in hospital within 30 postoperative days with 95% CI

    Time frame: From surgery until 30 days postoperative

  2. Readmission

    Descriptively reported as number and proportion (in %) of participants with readmission with 95% CI

    Time frame: 90 days

  3. Time back to work/usual activities

    Descriptively reported, patient reported

    Time frame: 30 days, 3 months, 6 months

  4. Hernia recurrence

    Descriptively reported as number and proportion of participants with hernia recurrence

    Time frame: 90 days

  5. Reoperation for hernia recurrence

    Descriptively reported as number and proportion (in %) of participants reoperated for hernia recurrence with 95% CI

    Time frame: 90 days

  6. Visits to primary care

    Descriptively reported as number and proportion (in %) of participants with any visits to primary care with 95% CI

    Time frame: 30 days

  7. Successful quitting of risky lifestyles individually

    Descriptively reported as number and proportion (in%) of participants without their preoperative risky lifestyle (identified at baseline) with 95% CI. Each lifestyle is reported separately. Successful quitting of risky lifestyles are defined as: * Smoking: no use of any tobacco products * Malnutrition: not at risk of malnutrition defined as NRS \<3 * Obesity: 5-10 % loss of body fat mass compared to baseline * Alcohol: Zero alcohol intake at end of intervention/surgery and below risky limits (\<14 units per week) at postoperative follow-ups * Physical inactivity: being physically active at least 3.5 hours per week

    Time frame: End of intervention/at surgery, 30 days, 3 months, 6 months

  8. Change in ASA score

    Descriptively reported as number and proportion (in %) of participants with change in ASA score level compared with baseline related to a change in risky SNAP factors with 95% CI

    Time frame: End of intervention/at surgery, 30 days, 3 months, 6 months

  9. Change of frailty

    Descriptively reported as number and proportion (in %) of participants with change in frailty score compared with baseline with 95% CI. Measured by Fried's Modified Frailty Score.

    Time frame: End of intervention/at surgery, 30 days, 3 months, 6 months

  10. Morbidity

    Descriptively reported as grouped diagnoses via the Danish version of ICD-10 based on data from the Danish National Patient Registry.

    Time frame: 2 years

07

Study locations

1 of 3 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Mar 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Mar 2026, 23 months after the start.

Of 75 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Hernia, Ventral, half reached primary completion within 33 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 19 and three quarters within 48. This study's planned 23 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 88 studies reached it within 37 months; a quarter within 19 and three quarters within 56.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 13, 2024
First posted
Sep 25, 2024
StartActual
Mar 4, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Mar 1, 2026
CompletionEst.
Mar 1, 2028
Last update
Sep 25, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 25, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06611462
Collaborators
Copenhagen University Hospital at Herlev, Zealand University Hospital, Holbaek Sygehus
Responsible party
Hanne Tonnesen (Clinical Professor, MD, Bispebjerg Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 25, 2024
Start date
Mar 4, 2024
Primary completion
Mar 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 25, 2024

Study contacts

Hanne Tønnesen, Professor MD
Contact
hanne.tonnesen@regionh.dk
+4538163840
Hanne Tønnesen, Professor MD
principal investigator · WHOCC, The Parker Institute, Bispebjerg-Frederiksberg Hospital, RegH, Copenhagen

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion