ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06595433Updated Sep 19, 2024

Effect of Post-Activation Potentiation

An interventional study of Experimental and Experimental in Post-Activation Potentiation and Performance, sponsored by University of Gaziantep. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to male participants aged 18 Years to 21 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-09-19.

Sponsored by University of Gaziantep · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 9 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Nov 2023, registered Sep 2024).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
12
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 21 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

This study investigated the acute effect of post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) on snatch performance to exhaustion in elite weightlifters.

Read the detailed description

Background This study investigated the acute effect of post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) on snatch performance to exhaustion in elite weightlifters.

Methods The study was designed according to a randomized crossover experimental design. Twelve male elite athletes (age; 18.45 ± 0.52 years; height; 1.73 ± 0.03m, body mass; 71.36 ± 11.36kg) voluntarily participated in the study. The participants performed a general warm-up for five minutes, followed by a weightlifting-specific warm-up for five minutes, and rested for two minutes. Then, the athletes performed three different PAPE protocols on different days and performed the snatch performance to exhaustion. Shapiro-Wilk test was applied for the normality test, and the Levene test was applied for the homogeneity test. Repeated measures of two-way analysis of variance (2x3) were applied to analyze the differences between treatments. Greenhouse-Geiser correction test was used for measurements where the sphericity assumption was not met.

02

Conditions studied

  • Post-Activation Potentiation
  • Performance

Keywords

  • Weightlifting, snatch, training
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of Gaziantep is the lead sponsor of 104 studies on the registry; 27 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 21 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • no recent injury
  • no medication or supplements
  • being a volunteer

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • doping or chronic drug use
  • neuromuscular disease, metabolic, hormonal, or cardiovascular disorders,
  • and orthopedic limitation
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Sequential assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
12 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    PAPE 90% warm up protocol

    performed three repetitions of dip squats with 90% of their one-repetition maximal dip squats and rested for 4 minutes.

    Other: Experimental

  • Experimental
    PAPE 50% warm up protocol

    performed three repetitions of dip squats with 50% of their one-repetition maximal dip squats and rested for 4 minutes.

    Other: Experimental

  • Other
    Unloaded warm-up protocol

    They performed the snatch movement with 75% of their maximum snatch weight without pre-warm-up, i.e. without weights, until exhaustion.

    Other: unloaded protocol

Interventions

  • OtherExperimental

    In the PAPE 90% protocol, participants performed a general warm-up (e.g., jogging on a treadmill) for 5 minutes and a weightlifting-specific warm-up for 5 minutes, followed by 2 minutes of rest. After resting, they were asked to perform ten repetitions of dip squats with body weight and rested for 1 minute.Then, unlike the unloaded protocol, they performed three repetitions of dip squats with 90% of their one-repetition maximal dip squats and rested for 4 minutes. After resting, they performed a snatch to exhaustion with 75% of their maximum snatch weight. Then they rested for 2 minutes and performed one more repetition of the snatch to exhaustion. The maximum number of repetitions between sets was recorded.

  • OtherExperimental

    In the PAPE 50% protocol, 5 minutes of general warm-up (jogging on a treadmill) and 5 minutes of weightlifting-specific warm-up were followed by 2 minutes of rest as in the other protocols. After resting, they were asked to perform ten repetitions of body-weighted dip squats and rested for 1 minute. Then, unlike the unloaded and PAPE 90% protocols, they performed eight repetitions of bottom squats with 50% of their maximal bottom squats for one repetition and rested for 4 minutes. After resting, they performed snatches with 75% of their maximum snatch weight until exhaustion. Then they rested for 2 minutes and performed one more repetition of the snatch to exhaustion. The maximum number of repetitions was recorded for statistical analysis.

  • Otherunloaded protocol

    In the unloaded protocol, subjects performed a 5-minute general warm-up (e.g., jogging on a treadmill) and 5 minutes of weightlifting-specific warm-up followed by 2 minutes of rest. After resting, they performed ten repetitions of bottom squats with their body weight and then rested for 1 minute. After rest, they performed the snatch movement with 75% of their maximum snatch weight until exhaustion. Then, they rested for 2 minutes and again performed the snatch with 75% of their maximum snatch weight until exhaustion. The maximum number of snatch repetitions performed by the weightlifters was recorded for statistical analysis.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. number of snatch repetitions performed to exhaustion

    This outcome is measured to determine how different warm-up protocols (90% 1RM squats, 50% 1RM squats, and no-load condition) affect the athletes\' performance in snatch repetitions. The statistical analysis focuses on comparing the average number of repetitions between these protocols.

    Time frame: Two weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Gaziantep University, Faculty of Sport Sciences
    Gaziantep, Sehitkamil 27150, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 19, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06595433
Responsible party
Zarife Pancar (Associate Professor, University of Gaziantep) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 19, 2024
Start date
Nov 20, 2023
Primary completion
Nov 27, 2023
Completion
Dec 13, 2023
Last update
Sep 19, 2024

Study contacts

Zarife Pancar, PhD
study director · Sports Sciences Research Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion