CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06567626DECIDE-CADUpdated Apr 3, 2025

Decision Support Tool for Revascularisation Options in Coronary Artery Disease

An observational study in Coronary Artery Disease, sponsored by University of Leicester. Recruiting at 2 sites in United Kingdom. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-03.

Sponsored by University of Leicester · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Oct 2024; still recruiting 1 year 11 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
126
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Together with patients and healthcare professionals, we want to design a Decision Support Tool (DST) that will help people with coronary artery disease to understand and choose treatments that best reflect their preferences and values.

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a leading cause of death. Blood vessels supplying oxygen to the heart muscle become narrowed by a gradual build-up of fatty material. This can result in heart attacks, heart failure, and sudden death. One way to treat the blockage is by inserting an inner sleeve called a "stent" into the blood vessel and clearing the blockage by forcing it into the artery wall. Another method involves diverting the blood supply around the blockage using a vessel harvested from another body site; this is called "bypass surgery". The best treatment, either stents or surgery, is different for everyone.

A Decision Support Tool (DST) will provide key information on the pros and cons of stents or surgery and how these match an individual's preferences and values. People are then empowered to make shared decisions about treatment with their doctors. Personalising treatment decisions in this way can reduce inequalities in care and improve shared decision making. Our proposed research will develop a DST in the form of a webpage with alternative print material for those at risk of digital poverty. The DST will be developed in multiple languages to improve accessibility.

There are two parts to the study: the first part will use the experience of patients, who have already had stent or surgery, and healthcare professionals to design and refine a DST prototype; this will be done through workshops, focus groups, and cognitive interviews. The second part will test whether it is possible to use the DST by people with CAD waiting for a procedure; this will be done through questionnaires and interviews. The result of this study can then subsequently inform an assessment of the refined DST on a national level, with the hopes of enabling more effective shared decision making.

02

Conditions studied

  • Coronary Artery Disease

Keywords

  • Shared Decision Making
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI)
  • Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG)
03

In context

Coronary Artery Disease

5,598 studies on the registry are indexed under Coronary Artery Disease; 957 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 126 is below the median of 336 across 1,947 observational studies indexed under Coronary Artery Disease.

Browse Coronary Artery Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Leicester is the lead sponsor of 166 studies on the registry; 51 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Work Package 1:

  • 40 people with lived experience of coronary revascularisation
  • 38 healthcare professionals

Work Package 2:

  • 40 people awaiting coronary revascularisation
  • 8 healthcare professionals

Eligibility criteria

WP1. DST CO-DESIGN PATIENT PARTICIPANTS

Inclusion Criteria

Participants may enter the study if ALL of the following applies:

  1. Any adult (≥ 18 years) with lived experience of coronary revascularisation
  2. Willing and able to consent to study participation.
  3. Able to understand written and spoken English for decisional needs workshop or focus groups (NB this criterion is not required for cognitive interviews or acceptability questionnaire)

Exclusion Criteria

Participants may not enter the study if they are unable to provide informed consent. Individuals who participate in focus groups are ineligible for subsequent participation in cognitive interviews and acceptability questionnaires.

WP1. DST CO-DESIGN HCP PARTICIPANTS

Inclusion Criteria

Participants may enter the study if ALL of the following applies:

  1. Healthcare professional with a patient-facing clinical role which involves decision making regarding coronary revascularisation
  2. Willing and able to consent to study participation.
  3. Able to understand written and spoken English

Exclusion Criteria

Participants may not enter the study if they are unable to provide informed consent.

WP2. DST FEASIBILITY PATIENT PARTICIPANTS

Inclusion Criteria

Participants may enter the study if ALL of the following applies:

  1. Adult (≥ 18 years) awaiting coronary revascularisation
  2. Has received coronary angiography for definitive diagnosis.
  3. Willing and able to consent to study participation.
  4. Able to understand written and spoken English, Polish, Romanian, Urdu, Panjabi, or Gujarati

Exclusion Criteria

Participants may not enter the trial if ANY of the following apply:

  1. Where clinical consensus strongly recommends one option of revascularisation over another
  2. Unable to provide informed consent
  3. Unable to speak one of the aforementioned 6 languages

WP2. DST FEASIBILITY HCP PARTICIPANTS

Inclusion Criteria

Participants may enter the study if ALL of the following applies:

  1. Healthcare professional with a patient-facing clinical role which involves decision making regarding coronary revascularisation
  2. Willing and able to consent to study participation.
  3. Able to understand written and spoken English

Exclusion Criteria

Participants may not enter the study if they are unable to provide informed consent.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
126 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • DST Co-Design (Work Package 1)

    * 40 people with lived experience of coronary revascularisation * 38 healthcare professionals

  • DST Feasibility (Work Package 2)

    * 40 people awaiting coronary revascularisation * 8 healthcare professionals

    Other: Decision Support Tool (DECIDE-CAD)

Interventions

  • OtherDecision Support Tool (DECIDE-CAD)

    DECIDE-CAD is a decision support tool - designed using mixed methods through this study - which aims to enable shared decision making with people who are considering revascularisation options for coronary artery disease.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Rate of eligibility

    Eligibility will be calculated as all patients eligible for study participation as a proportion of all patients who receive ACS treatment during the study period.

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Rate of enrolment

    Enrolment will be calculated as patients who provide informed consent and receive the DST as a proportion of all eligible patients.

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Rate of attrition

    Attrition will be calculated as patients who do not complete the study as a proportion of all patients enrolled.

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Decisional Conflict

    Level of decisional conflict, measured using Decisional Conflict Scale before and after revascularisation procedure.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  2. Acceptability

    User acceptability of decision support tool, measured using researcher-generated questionnaire after revascularisation procedure.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  3. Knowledge

    User knowledge about revascularisation options, measured using researcher-regenerated questionnaire before and after revascularisation procedure.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  4. Preference

    User preference about revascularisation options, measured using Control Preference Scale and Patients Preferences Questionnaire for Angina treatment before and after revascularisation procedure.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  5. Satisfaction with decision

    User satisfaction with decision, measured using Satisfaction with Decision Scale after revascularisation procedure.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  6. Decision Regret

    Degree of decision regret about revascularisation treatment received, measured using Decision Regret Scale after revascularisation procedure

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  7. Treatment concordance

    Concordance between user's preferred procedure and the treatment received, assessed after revascularisation procedure.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  8. Level of shared decision making

    Level of shared decision making experienced by the user, measured using Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) after revascularisation procedure.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  9. Health status

    Health status measured using 20-item Short Form Survey before and after revascularisation procedure.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 2 sites recruiting
  • University of Leicester
    Leicester, LE1 7RH, United Kingdom
    • Dr Ann Cheng · Contact · 01162522101
    Not yet recruiting
  • University Hospitals of Leicester
    Leicester, LE39QP, United Kingdom
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Fully anonymised individual participant data can be made available on request for future studies with ethics approval.

Supporting information: Study protocol

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 3, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06567626
Lead sponsor
University of Leicester
Collaborators
University Hospitals, Leicester
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 23, 2024
Start date
Oct 11, 2024
Primary completion
Mar 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 3, 2025

Study contacts

Dr Ann Cheng
Contact
decidecad@leicester.ac.uk
0116 252 2101

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion