ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06551857CaSPiNUpdated Apr 16, 2025

The Effect of Cancer Treatments on Speech Perception in Noise, Cognition, and Hearing-Related Quality of Life

An observational study in Cancer, Hearing Loss Ototoxic and Cognitive Decline, sponsored by Turku University Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in Finland. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-16.

Sponsored by Turku University Hospital · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Oct 2024; still recruiting 2 years 1 month later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
250
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study will assess the effect of cancer treatments on speech perception in noise, cognition, and hearing-related quality of life by monitoring 200 cancer patients receiving standard care for their underlying malignancy.

Read the detailed description

The study will assess the effects of four different types of cancer treatments on speech perception in noise, hearing thresholds, cognition, and hearing-related quality of life over a follow-up period of 3 years.

The speech perception in noise will be assessed using the Finnish matrix sentence test. Other hearing measures include transient and distortion product otoacoustic emissions, impedance audiometry and pure-tone audiometry extending to high frequencies (0.125kHz - 16kHz).

Hearing-related quality of life will be assessed using Speech, Spatial, and Qualities 12 -questionnaire, Vanderbilt Fatigue Scale 10 -questionnaire and Tinnitus Handicap Index. Cognitive functions will be assed using Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Cognitive Function (FACT-Cog) questionnaire and neuropsychological tests. The neuropsychological tests included in the study are Continuous Performance Test, Continuous Auditory Test of Attention, Trail Making Test A \& B, Stroop Test, Coding and Digit span tasks from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale - Fourth Edition, Word List task from Wechsler Memory Scale III, and Controlled Oral Word Association Test.

Neuropsychological assessments will be conducted at baseline and 1 year and 3 years after the end of the treatments. All other assessments will be conducted at baseline and at 3-4 months, 1 year, and 3 years after the end of the initial treatments.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cancer
  • Hearing Loss Ototoxic
  • Cognitive Decline
  • Quality of Life

Keywords

  • speech perception in noise
  • ototoxicity
  • hearing loss
  • cancer
  • cisplatin
  • oxaliplatin
  • cognition
03

In context

Neoplasms

10,818 studies on the registry are indexed under Neoplasms; 2,324 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 250 is above the median of 200 across 2,638 observational studies indexed under Neoplasms.

Browse Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Turku University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 287 studies on the registry; 67 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

200 patients diagnosed with a malignancy that will be treated with curative intent using one of the treatment modalities under investigation (50 patients / group). The study will also include a control group of 50 healthy volunteers.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • written
  • native Finnish speaker
  • age-normative hearing
  • for participants in the treatment arms: diagnosis of a that will be treated with curative intent with any of the following: 1) Cisplatin as the main chemotherapeutic agent, 2) oxaliplatin as the main chemotherapeutic agent, 3) cisplatin-based chemoradiation therapy in the head and neck region, 4) radiation therapy in the head and neck region

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • inability to provide written
  • Current or prior major otological condition that has affected or has had the potential to affect hearing
  • Conductive or asymmetric sensorineural HL of any severity
  • Severe sensorineural HL
  • Prior treated with chemotherapeutics or radiation therapy
  • Prior use of ototoxic medications
  • Any significant disease or disorder which, in the opinion of the investigator, may either put the subject at risk by participation in the trial, or may influence the result of the trial.
  • Any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would interfere with adherence to the trial requirements.

For participants in the treatment arms:

  • Allergy or to trial medications or their ingredients
  • Pregnancy or breast-feeding, aim of becoming pregnant during the trial.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
250 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Cisplatin

    50 patients receiving cisplatin as the standard care for their underlying malignancy

    Other: Chemotherapy, chemoradiation, radiation therapy

  • Cisplatin-based chemoradion therapy in the head and neck region

    50 patients receiving cisplatin-based chemoradiation therapy in the head and neck region as the standard care for their underlying malignancy

    Other: Chemotherapy, chemoradiation, radiation therapy

  • Head and neck region radiation therapy

    50 patient receiving head and neck region radiation therapy as the standard care for their underlying malignancy

    Other: Chemotherapy, chemoradiation, radiation therapy

  • Oxaliplatin

    50 patients receiving oxaliplatin as the standard care for their underlying malignancy

    Other: Chemotherapy, chemoradiation, radiation therapy

  • Control

    50 healthy volunteers who have never received any ototoxic medications

Interventions

  • OtherChemotherapy, chemoradiation, radiation therapy

    Cancer treatment

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Speech perception in noise

    The treatment-related change in speech perception in noise (in decibel signal-to-noise ratio (db SNR)) from baseline to first follow-up at 3-4 months after the end of the treatment.

    Time frame: 4 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Long-term effects on speech perception in noise

    Treatment-related long-term changes in speech perception in noise (in decibel signal-to-noise ratio (dB SNR)) measured with the Finnish matrix sentence test

    Time frame: 3 years

  2. Short- and long-term effects on high frequency hearing

    Treatment-related changes in high frequency (8-16kHz) hearing thresholds

    Time frame: 3 years

  3. Hearing-related quality of life - Sound quality

    Treatment-related changes in hearing related quality of life measured using the total score from Speech, Spatial, and Qualities 12 question questionnaire (SSQ-12). Responses are given with a VAS scale from 0 to 10, with 10 indicating perfect hearing performance and 0 worst possible performance. Range for total scores is 0-120, and decrease in scores indicates deterioration in hearing-related quality of life.

    Time frame: 3 years

  4. Hearing-related quality of life - Fatigue

    Treatment-related changes in hearing-related fatigue are measured using the total score from Vanderbilt Fatigue Scale for Adults (10 question version, VFS-A-10). Responses are given in a 5-point Likert scale. The range for total scores is 0-40 with higher scores indicating more fatigue / worse score. An increase in the total score indicates increased listening-related fatigue.

    Time frame: 3 years

  5. Hearing-related quality of life - Tinnitus

    Treatment-related changes in tinnitus symptoms are measured using the total score from Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI). The questionnaire provides a total score between 0 and 100, with larger score indicating more tinnitus-related handicap. An increase in the total score indicates increased tinnitus-related handicap.

    Time frame: 3 years

  6. Treatment-related changes in brain glucose metabolism

    Treatment-related brain changes are evaluated from the FDG PET by assessing the voxel-wise mean change in the standardized uptake value ratios (SUVRs) from baseline to follow-up. Decrease in SUVRs indicates treatment-related decrease in brain glucose metabolism.

    Time frame: 3 years

Other outcomes

  1. Treatment-related changes in cognition

    Treatment-related changes in cognition are evaluated using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Cognitive Function (FACT-Cog) questionnaire. Responses are given in a five-point Likert-type scale and are presented as subscale scores for four domains: perceived cognitive impairments, impact of perceived cognitive impairments on quality of life, comments from others, and perceived cognitive abilities. Higher score indicates better perceived performance.

    Time frame: 3 years

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — The data is collected from a clearly specified patient population and includes personal information that can be used to identify individual participants, even after pseudonymization. Study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan, Informed Consent Form, Clinical Study Report, and Analytic Code will be shared through Open Science Framework immediately following publication and be available with no end date.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 16, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06551857
Responsible party
Tytti Willberg (Principal Investigator, Turku University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 13, 2024
Start date
Oct 2, 2024
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 16, 2025

Study contacts

Tytti Willberg, PhD
Contact
tytti.willberg@varha.fi
+358 2 313 5979
Tytti Willberg, PhD
principal investigator · Turku University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion