ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07927894PharmaBagUpdated Nov 10, 2026

PharmaBag: A Sustainable Packaging System to Reduce Pharmaceutical Waste and Support a Net-Zero NHS

An observational study in Cancer, sponsored by The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-10.

Sponsored by The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust · Observational

Updated Nov 10, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,000
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Every year, a lot of NHS medicine goes to waste. This can happen for many reasons. Sometimes treatment plans might change. Sometimes patients get side-effects. Sadly, some patients die before they finish their medicine. Even if medicines are still in date and unopened, UK rules say they must be thrown away. This is because we can't tell if they've been stored safely and are still okay to use.

Wasting medicines is harmful in many ways. Making and moving medicines creates more pollution than all the cars on the road. When unused medicines are thrown away, they can leak into soil and water, damaging the environment. It's also expensive. This waste costs the NHS over £300 million every year. Also, when we throw away medicines that could have been reused, it can cause medicine shortages, making it harder for others to get the treatments they need.

This project will test a new medicine bag called the PharmaBag which can tell if a medicine has been opened or kept too hot or too cold. If an unopened medicine is returned in a PharmaBag, and it has been stored safely, it might be possible to safely reuse it. This could be especially important for expensive cancer medicines, which are often left unused due to side effects or treatment changes.

We will give patients who are prescribed oral anti-cancer medicines their normal prescription inside the PharmaBags. This will help us see how well the bags work in real NHS settings. We'll measure how many medicines are returned, what condition they're in, and whether they could have been safely reused. We'll use this information to calculate how this system could reduce waste, save NHS money, and help the environment.

In future, this new system could help stop medicine waste across the NHS. If it works well and is safe, it could even help change national rules, so that safe, unused medicines don't have to be thrown away. This could save money, help the environment, and help patients get the care they need.

Read the detailed description

Introduction This project aims to support the NHS net zero carbon targets1 by piloting a sustainable prescription over-packaging system (the 'PharmaBag') that enables the safe reuse of returned medications. Medicines are estimated to account for 25% of NHS carbon emissions2 and 4.5% of global greenhouse gases, surpassing even the automotive industry.3 Pharmaceutical manufacturing is resource-intensive, requiring material extraction, water consumption, and land use, alongside emissions and pollutants generated during supply and disposal.4-6 Pharmaceutical waste therefore represents a source of preventable environmental harm across the entire product lifecycle.

Medicine wastage is also economically damaging. In 2009, the annual cost of unused primary care medicines in the UK was estimated at £300 million.7 When accounting for waste from secondary and tertiary care, alongside rising prescription volumes and post-Brexit import costs, the current figure is likely to be substantially higher. This inefficiency also contributes to medication shortages, which can seriously affect patient care.

Many causes of pharmaceutical waste are preventable, such as over-prescribing, incorrect use of medicines (e.g., inhalers), and stockpiling.8 The NHS has implemented several effective strategies to reduce these, including patient and staff education, medication reviews, and 28-day prescribing cycles.1, 8 Despite these measures, a substantial portion of pharmaceutical waste stems from causes that cannot be lessened at the source, including unwanted side effects, lack of efficacy, dosage changes, or patient death. This can only be addressed by enabling the redistribution of unused medications. However, current UK regulations prohibit medicines from re-entering the supply chain even if they are unopened and within date.9 This policy constraint limits how non-preventable waste can be managed and underscores the need to develop and validate reuse-enabled packaging.

Pharmaceutical waste is particularly prominent in the use of oral anti-cancer medicines (OACMs). These agents now account for approximately 25% of all anti-cancer prescriptions, a figure that continues to increase alongside growing cancer rates.10 While they offer more convenient and often better-tolerated alternatives to infusion-based treatments,11 their production is both environmentally and economically demanding. Manufacturing can involve energy-intensive synthesis, specialised packaging, and, in many cases, complex cold-chain logistics.12 These treatments can also cost more than £100,000 per patient each year.13 Nevertheless, around one-third of patients discontinue treatment early, often due to toxicity, poor response, or death. Targeting this drug class with the PharmaBag therefore offers a key opportunity to achieve meaningful reductions in waste and emissions. Demonstrating safety, patient acceptability, and both carbon footprint and cost savings in this context could also pave the way for broader adoption across other treatment areas.

International experience demonstrates that medicine reuse is feasible within regulated healthcare systems, 15,16, 17, 18 with programmes operating in several countries and limited reuse permitted in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic. 19 However, most existing approaches rely primarily on the integrity of original packaging and offer limited verification of storage conditions.

The ROAD study 12, 20 in the Netherlands evaluated the reuse of returned oral anti-cancer medicines using additional outer-packaging with temperature monitoring and demonstrated that a proportion of unused medicines can be safely identified as suitable for redispensing. While effective, this approach relied on resource-intensive electronic monitoring, limiting scalability and environmental benefit. These findings highlight the need to develop and evaluate lower-cost, lower-resource packaging solutions that maintain safety while improving environmental and economic sustainability.

Aims and Objectives This project aims to support the NHS in achieving its net zero carbon targets by addressing pharmaceutical waste. Specifically, it will evaluate the 'PharmaBag', an environmentally friendly, low-cost prescription over-packing system. Returned medications in the PharmaBag will be assessed for suitability for redispensing based on predefined quality criteria. While no medications will be reused during this project, findings will provide evidence to inform future regulatory discussions and support wider adoption of sustainable medicines reuse across the NHS.

Primary objective:

  • To determine the potential environmental benefit of the PharmaBag as a safe return and redispensing system for unused OACMs in UK clinical practice.

Secondary objectives:

  • To assess the quality and quantity of OACMs returned using the PharmaBag.
  • To determine the potential NHS cost savings from the PharmaBag as a safe return and redispensing system for unused OACMs.
  • To explore the usability and acceptability of the PharmaBag Methodology Overall Design: This research study will be a prospective, single-group intervention evaluating the quantity and quality of returned unused OACMs dispensed in the PharmaBag system. Data will be used to determine the potential environmental and economic benefit of the Pharmabag based on the proportion of returned medicines that could have been safely redispensed following quality checks.

Returned medicines will not be redispensed to patients during this study. Instead, they will be assessed for theoretical suitability for reuse based on predefined safety and quality criteria (e.g., packaging integrity and expiry date).

Population, Sample Size, and Setting: We aim to recruit 1,000 adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with a current cancer diagnosis who are prescribed OACMs for home use by a CCC clinician. Although formal power calculations are not typically required for economic and sustainability evaluations,22 this sample size aligns with comparable intervention studies in the field12, 20 and will provide adequate power for stratified economic and sustainability analyses, with an anticipated one-third (\~333) of patients discontinuing treatment,12, 14, 20 and half of these (\~167) with unused medications.12, 20, 23

Participants will be recruited from all five CCC sites to ensure coverage of a diverse and representative population across Cheshire and Merseyside. The eligibility criteria are broad to support inclusivity:

  • Inclusion criteria: Adults aged ≥18 years, with a cancer diagnosis, prescribed OACMs by CCC clinicians, and able to provide informed consent.
  • Exclusion criteria: Severe co-morbidities considered by the study team to interfere with the individual's ability to complete requirements of the study, or to provide informed consent.

Recruitment and Consent: Participants will be identified through CCC pharmacy records or the oncology outpatient clinic and recruited using a combination of postal invitations, email, telephone, and in-person contact. Initial contact may be made by the pharmacy technician, consultant, or member of the research delivery team who will provide a brief study brochure outlining the purpose and requirements of participation.

Interested patients will be given a Participant Information Sheet (PIS) containing full details about the study, including the aims, procedures, potential benefits and risks, data handling, and participant rights. Patients who wish to take part will provide informed consent either via a secure digital platform or, for those without digital access, using a paper consent form. Patients who do not wish to take part will have the option to provide a reason, enabling us to better understand barriers to participation and potential reluctance to use the system.

To avoid repeated contact, all recruitment attempts will be recorded in both the pharmacy dispensing system and the hospital's electronic medical record system (Meditech). For patients who provide consent, registration will also be recorded in these systems to support coordination across the research and pharmacy teams.

Recruitment will take place over 12 months with an additional six months for follow-up (total study duration 18 months). Each participant may remain on the study for up to one year. Participation in the study is entirely voluntary, and patients are free to withdraw at any point without giving a reason and without affecting their clinical care.

Intervention: Consenting participants will receive their prescribed OACM in its standard manufacturer packaging, but contained within the PharmaBag over-packing system. They will receive written instructions outlining how to store and handle the medication, how to preserve the integrity of the PharmaBag, and how to return any unused medication. This information will also be discussed during the recruitment and consent process, either in person or via telephone.

Participants will be advised to return any unused OACMs by bringing the PharmaBag to their next scheduled clinical visit, or via the CCC's pre-existing, risk-assessed home medication collection and delivery service. No additional hospital visits will be required so as not to inconvenience the participant.

After receiving their medication, participants will complete a digital questionnaire via email, a paper questionnaire supplied with their medications if requested, or a telephonic questionnaire administered by the pharmacy technician or research delivery team. The questionnaire has been developed with input from patients and clinicians and will include structured items addressing ease of use, confidence in returning medications, satisfaction with packaging, and any perceived barriers, as well as questions designed to assess whether the intervention has improved knowledge or awareness about safe medication storage at home.

The PharmaBag intervention does not alter clinical care or prescribing; all medications will continue to be dispensed according to the participant's usual treatment plan. The additional packaging will enable quality assurance checks to support information on the reusability of returned medications. Following these checks and data recording, the medicines will be disposed of using normal pharmacy disposal procedures. The recruitment and intervention pathway is shown in Figure 2.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cancer

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • environment
  • waste
  • pharmacy
03

In context

Neoplasms

10,818 studies on the registry are indexed under Neoplasms; 2,324 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1,000 is above the median of 200 across 2,638 observational studies indexed under Neoplasms.

Browse Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust is the lead sponsor of 19 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adults aged ≥18 years with a current cancer diagnosis who are prescribed oral anti-cancer medicines (OACMs) for home use by a CCC clinician. The study aims to recruit 1,000 participants across all five CCC site

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Be aged 18 years or over Have a current cancer diagnosis Be prescribed oral anti-cancer medicines (OACMs) by a CCC clinician Be able to provide

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Severe co-morbidities which the study team considers would interfere with the participant's ability to complete the study requirements or provide

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,000 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Cohort 1

    Cohort: Adults aged ≥18 with a cancer diagnosis who are prescribed oral anti-cancer medicines (OACMs) by CCC clinicians. Sites: Recruitment will take place across all five CCC sites

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Potential environmental benefit of the PharmaBag

    Greenhouse gas emissions will be estimated as carbon dioxide equivalents (CO₂e) using a screening life-cycle assessment conducted in accordance with ISO 14040/14044. Returned oral anti-cancer medicines will first be assessed for theoretical suitability for redispensing using predefined quality criteria, including packaging/seal integrity, physical condition, temperature adherence and remaining shelf life. The estimated environmental impact of the PharmaBag-enabled return pathway will then be compared with current single-use medication disposal practice. Medicines will not be redispensed during the study.

    Time frame: From enrolment through completion of participant follow-up, up to 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Potential NHS cost savings

    Potential NHS cost savings, assessed through a health economic evaluation of the costs and potential savings associated with the PharmaBag system

    Time frame: From enrolment through completion of participant follow-up, up to 12 months

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Nov 2026; primary completion for Nov 2028, 23 months later.

Of 1,098 non-industry observational studies under Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 61 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 24 and three quarters within 227. This study's planned 23 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 1,246 studies reached it within 58 months; a quarter within 24 and three quarters within 210.

Neoplasms covers many different conditions, not one, so the studies compared here vary widely. Read these figures as a rough guide.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 29, 2026
First posted
Nov 10, 2026
StartEst.
Nov 30, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Nov 1, 2028
CompletionEst.
Nov 1, 2028
Last update
Nov 10, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 10, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 10, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07927894
Lead sponsor
The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 10, 2026
Start date
Nov 30, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Nov 1, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 10, 2026

Study contacts

Seamus Coyle Dr
Contact
seamus.coyle@nhs.net
0151 556 5000

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Nov 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion