ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06542497VEGA-3Updated Oct 26, 2026Results posted

Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of POS to Improve Distance-corrected Near Visual in Participants With Presbyopia

A Phase 3 interventional study of 0.75% phentolamine ophthalmic solution and Placebo in Presbyopia, sponsored by Opus Genetics, Inc. Completed at 39 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 45 Years to 64 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-26.

Sponsored by Opus Genetics, Inc · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 26, 2026Sponsor changedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
569
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
45 Years to 64 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Safety and efficacy of POS in participants with presbyopia

Read the detailed description

Randomized, Double-Masked, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution (POS) 0.75% in Participants with Presbyopia

02

Conditions studied

  • Presbyopia

Browse trials for

03

In context

Presbyopia

336 studies on the registry are indexed under Presbyopia; 35 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 569 is above the median of 61 across 276 interventional studies indexed under Presbyopia.

Browse Presbyopia studies →

Lead sponsor

Opus Genetics, Inc is the lead sponsor of 17 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Of its 13 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 13 (100%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
45 Years to 64 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Participants must meet all of the following criteria:

  1. Males or females ≥ 45 and ≤ 64 years of age
  2. Able to comply with all protocol-mandated procedures independently and to attend all scheduled office visits
  3. Able and willing to give signed
  4. Able to self-administer study medication throughout the study period

    Inclusion criteria #5, #6, and #7 must all be met at both Screening and Baseline Visits:

  5. BCDVA of 55 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters (20/20 Snellen equivalent) or better in photopic conditions in each eye
  6. DCNVA of 50 ETDRS letters (20/50 Snellen equivalent) or worse but not \<35 ETDRS letters (20/100 Snellen equivalent) in photopic conditions in each eye and binocularly
  7. For participants who depend on reading glasses or bifocals, binocular best-corrected near VA of 65 ETDRS letters (20/25 Snellen equivalent) or better
  8. Photopic PD of ≥ 4 mm in the study eye at Screening

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Excluded from the study will be individuals with any of the following characteristics:

Ophthalmic (in either eye):

  1. Use of any topical prescription (including Vuity® or Qlosi™) or over-the-counter (OTC) ophthalmic medications of any kind within 7 days of Screening until study completion, with the exception of lid scrubs with OTC products (eg, OCuSOFT® lid scrub, SteriLid®, baby shampoo, etc.) and artificial tears as specified in Exclusion Criterion #2 below
  2. Use of any OTC artificial tears (preserved or unpreserved) during visit days or 15 min before or after instillation of study medication
  3. Use of Ryzumvi™ (POS) within 7 days prior to Screening
  4. Use of any dry eye product, such as topical ophthalmic therapy for dry eye (eg, generic cyclosporine, Restasis®, Xiidra®, Cequa®, Eysuvis®, and Meibo®) or intranasal dry eye product (eg, Tyrvaya®) or other devices within 12 months prior to Screening
  5. Tear break-up time of \< 5 seconds or corneal fluorescein staining (CFS) Grade ≥ 2 in the inferior zone or Grade ≥ 1 in the central zone using the National Eye Institute scale
  6. ocular disease (eg, cataract, glaucoma, corneal edema, uveitis, retinal degeneration, loss of visual field, or any macular pathology) that, in the judgment of the Investigator, might interfere with study procedures
  7. Recent or current evidence of ocular infection or inflammation in either eye (such as current evidence of clinically significant blepharitis, conjunctivitis, keratitis, etc.). Participants must be symptom free for at least 7 days prior to Screening
  8. Any history of herpes simplex or herpes zoster keratitis
  9. Known allergy, , or to any component of the phentolamine or vehicle formulations
  10. Prior participation in a study involving the use of POS for the treatment of presbyopia or night vision disturbance
  11. History of cauterization of the punctum or punctal plug (silicone or collagen) insertion or removal
  12. Ocular trauma within 6 months prior to Screening
  13. Ocular surgery or any ocular laser treatment within 6 months prior to Screening. Any history of radial keratotomy is prohibited
  14. Participants with surgical monovision, multifocal, or extended depth-of-focus intraocular lenses (IOLs). Monofocal IOLs are acceptable if in place > 6 months prior to Screening
  15. Monofocal IOL in place > 6 months prior to Screening with any posterior capsule opacification
  16. History of any traumatic (surgical or nonsurgical) or nontraumatic condition affecting the pupil or iris (eg, irregularly shaped pupil, neurogenic pupil disorder, iris atrophy, iridotomy, iridectomy, iritis, etc.)
  17. Unwilling or unable to discontinue use of contact lenses at least 1 hour prior to Screening for soft contact lenses or at least 8 hours prior to Screening for hard gas permeable contact lenses, and at least 8 hours (for both types of lenses) prior to all other office visits

    Systemic:

  18. Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to alpha- and/or beta-adrenoceptor antagonists (eg, or bronchial asthma; abnormally low blood pressure (BP) or heart rate (HR); second- or third-degree heart blockage or congestive heart failure)
  19. Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to any systemic cholinergic parasympathomimetic agent
  20. Clinically significant systemic disease (eg, uncontrolled diabetes, myasthenia gravis, cancer, hepatic, renal, endocrine, or cardiovascular disorders) that might interfere with the study as deemed by the judgment of the Investigator
  21. Initiation of treatment with, or any changes to, the current dosage, drug, or regimen of any systemic adrenergic or cholinergic drugs within 7 days prior to Screening or during the study; however, Flomax® (tamsulosin) is specifically excluded
  22. Participation in any study within 30 days prior to Screening
  23. Females of who are pregnant, nursing, planning a pregnancy, or not using a medically acceptable form of . Acceptable methods include the use of at least one of the following: intrauterine device, hormonal contraception (oral, injection, patch, implant, ring), barrier with spermicide (condom, diaphragm), or abstinence. A female is considered to be of childbearing potential unless she is 1 year or 3 months post-surgical sterilization. All females of childbearing potential, including those with post-tubal ligation, must have a negative urine pregnancy test result at Visit 1 (Screening)
  24. Resting HR outside the range of 50 to 110 beats per min (bpm) following at least a 5 min rest period in the sitting position at Visit 1 (Screening). HR may be repeated only once if outside the specified range, following another 5 min rest period in the sitting position
  25. Hypertension with resting diastolic BP > 105 mmHg or systolic BP > 160 mmHg following at least a 5-min rest period in the sitting position at Visit 1 (Screening). BP may be repeated only once if outside the specified range, following another 5-min rest period in the sitting position
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(9)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Postmenopausal

Periods have stopped for good: usually no period for 12 months in a row without another medical reason, sometimes confirmed by a blood test (FSH).

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
569 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    0.75% phentolamine ophthalmic solution

    Drug: phentolamine ophthalmic solution 0.75%, a non-selective alpha-1 and alpha-2 adrenergic antagonist

    Drug: 0.75% phentolamine ophthalmic solution

  • Placebo comparator
    phentolamine ophthalmic solution vehicle

    Drug: Placebo

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Subjects With ≥ 15 Letters of Improvement in Binocular DCNVA and With < 5 Letters of Loss in Binocular BCDVA From Baseline Comparing POS-treated Participants to Placebo-treated Participants at 12 Hours Post-dose at Visit 4 (Day 8)

    The primary efficacy endpoint is the percentage of participants with ≥ 15 letters of improvement in binocular DCNVA and with \< 5 letters of loss in binocular BCDVA from baseline comparing POS-treated participants to placebo-treated participants at 12 hours post-dose at Visit 4 (Day 8).

    Time frame: 8 Days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Subjects With ≥ 15 Letters of Improvement in Binocular DCNVA and With < 5 Letters of Loss in Binocular BCDVA From Baseline at Day 1 (1-hour Post-dose), Day 3, and Week 6

    This secondary efficacy endpoint is the percentage of participants with ≥ 15 letters of improvement in binocular DCNVA and with \< 5 letters of loss in binocular BCDVA from baseline comparing POS-treated participants to placebo-treated participants at 12 hours post-dose at Day 1 (1-hour post-dose), Day 3, and Week 6.

    Time frame: 6 Weeks

  2. Percentage of Subjects With ≥ 5, ≥ 10, and ≥ 15 Letters of Improvement in DCNVA From Baseline (Binocular) at Day 1 (0.5 Hours and 1 Hour Post-dose), Day 3, Day 8, and Week 6

    The percentage of Subjects With ≥ 5, ≥ 10, and ≥ 15 Letters of Improvement in DCNVA From Baseline (Monocular and Binocular) at Day 1 (0.5 hours and 1 hour post-dose), Day 3, Day 8, and Week 6.

    Time frame: 6 Weeks

  3. Percentage of Subjects With ≥ 5, ≥ 10, and ≥ 15 Letters of Improvement in DCNVA From Baseline (Monocular - Study Eye) at Day 1 (0.5 Hours and 1-hour Post-dose), Day 3, Day 8, and Week 6

    This outcome measure will investigate the percentage of subjects with ≥ 5, ≥ 10, and ≥ 15 letters of improvement in DCNVA from baseline (monocular - study eye) at Day 1 (0.5 hours and 1-hour post-dose), Day 3, Day 8, and Week 6.

    Time frame: 6 Weeks

  4. Change in DCNVA From Baseline (Binocular) at Day 1 (0.5 Hours and 1-hour Post-dose), Day 3, Day 8, and Week 6

    This outcome measure will investigate the change in DCNVA from baseline (binocular) at Day 1 (0.5 hours and 1-hour post-dose), Day 3, Day 8, and Week 6.

    Time frame: 6 Weeks

  5. Change in DCNVA From Baseline (Monocular - Study Eye) at Day 1 (0.5 Hours and 1-hour Post-dose), Day 3, Day 8, and Week 6

    This outcome measure will investigate the Change in DCNVA From Baseline (Monocular - Study Eye) at Day 1 (0.5 hours and 1-hour post-dose), Day 3, Day 8, and Week 6

    Time frame: 6 Weeks

  6. Change in Mean Binocular DCNVA From Baseline at Week 6 Compared to the Best Prior Observed Change From Baseline in Mean Binocular DCNVA in Subjects Treated With POS

    This outcome measure investigates the change in mean binocular DCNVA from baseline at Week 6 compared to the best prior observed change from baseline in mean binocular DCNVA in subjects treated with POS.

    Time frame: 6 Weeks

  7. Percentage of Subjects With DCNVA ≤ 20/15, ≤ 20/20, ≤ 20/25, ≤ 20/32, ≤ 20/40, ≤ 20/50, ≤ 20/63, ≤ 20/80, ≤ 20/100, ≤ 20/125, and ≤ 20/160 at Day 1 (0.5 Hours and 1-hour Post-dose), Day 3, Day 8, and Week 6

    This outcome measure will investigate the percentage of subjects with DCNVA ≤ 20/15, ≤ 20/20, ≤ 20/25, ≤ 20/32, ≤ 20/40, ≤ 20/50, ≤ 20/63, ≤ 20/80, ≤ 20/100, ≤ 20/125, and ≤ 20/160 at Day 1 (0.5 hours and 1-hour post-dose), Day 3, Day 8, and Week 6.

    Time frame: 6 Weeks

  8. Percentage of Subjects With Baseline DCNVA ≤ 20/63, ≤ 20/80, ≤ 20/100, ≤ 20/125, and ≤ 20/160 With a ≥ 10-Letter and ≥ 15-Letter Improvement in DCNVA at Day 1 (0.5 Hours and 1-hour Post-dose), Day 3, Day 8, and Week 6

    This outcome measure will investigate the percentage of subjects with baseline DCNVA ≤ 20/63, ≤ 20/80, ≤ 20/100, ≤ 20/125, and ≤ 20/160 with a ≥ 10-Letter and ≥ 15-Letter Improvement in DCNVA at Day 1 (0.5 hours and 1-hour post-dose), Day 3, Day 8, and Week 6.

    Time frame: 6 Weeks

  9. Percentage of Subjects With ≥ 5, ≥ 10, and ≥ 15 Letters of Improvement in Binocular DCIVA From Baseline at Day 1 (1-hour Post-dose), Day 3, Day 8, and Week 6

    This outcome measure will investigate the percentage of subjects with ≥ 5, ≥ 10, and ≥ 15 letters of improvement in binocular DCIVA from baseline at Day 1 (1-hour post-dose), Day 3, Day 8, and Week 6.

    Time frame: 6 Weeks

  10. Change in Binocular DCIVA From Baseline at Day 1 (1-hour Post-dose), Day 3, Day 8, and Week 6

    This outcome measure will investigate the change in binocular DCIVA from baseline at Day 1 (1-hour post-dose), Day 3, Day 8, and Week 6.

    Time frame: 6 Weeks

  11. Percentage of Subjects With Loss or Improvement in BCDVA From Baseline (Binocular) at Day 1 (1-hour Post-dose), Day 3, Day 8, and Week 6

    This outcome measure will investigate the percentage of subjects with loss or improvement in BCDVA from baseline (Binocular) at Day 1 (1-hour post-dose), Day 3, Day 8, and Week 6.

    Time frame: 6 Weeks

  12. Change in BCDVA From Baseline (Binocular) at Day 1 (1-hour Post-dose), Day 3, Day 8, and Week 6

    This outcome measure will investigate the change in BCDVA from baseline (Binocular) at Day 1 (1-hour post-dose), Day 3, Day 8, and Week 6.

    Time frame: 6 Weeks

  13. Change in BCDVA From Baseline (Monocular - Study Eye) at Day 1 (1-hour Post-dose), Day 3, Day 8, and Week 6

    This outcome measure will investigate the Change in BCDVA From Baseline (Monocular - Study Eye) at Day 1 (1-hour post-dose), Day 3, Day 8, and Week 6.

    Time frame: 6 Weeks

  14. Change in Pupil Diameter From Baseline at Day 3 and Day 8

    This outcome measure will investigate the change in pupil diameter from baseline at Day 3 and Day 8.

    Time frame: 8 Days

  15. Percent Change in Pupil Diameter From Baseline at Day 3 & Day 8

    This outcome measure will investigate the Percent Change in Pupil Diameter from Baseline at Day 3 \& Day 8.

    Time frame: 8 Days

  16. Percentage of Subjects With Pupil Diameter of < 3.5, < 3.0, < 2.5, < 2.0, and < 1.5 mm at Day 3 and Day 8

    This outcome measure will investigate the percentage of subjects with pupil diameter of \< 3.5, \< 3.0, \< 2.5, \< 2.0, and \< 1.5 mm at Day 3 and Day 8.

    Time frame: 8 Days

  17. Percentage of Subjects With Pupil Diameter of 1.5 to < 2.0 mm, 2.0 to < 2.5 mm, 2.5 to < 3.0 mm, and 3.0 to < 3.5 mm at Day 3 and Day 8

    This outcome measure will investigate the percentage of subjects with pupil diameter of 1.5 to \< 2.0 mm, 2.0 to \< 2.5 mm, 2.5 to \< 3.0 mm, and 3.0 to \< 3.5 mm at Day 3 and Day 8.

    Time frame: 8 Days

  18. Change From Baseline in Overall and Component Subject-Reported Outcomes at Day 3, Day 8, and Week 6

    This outcome measure investigates the change from baseline in overall and component subject-reported outcomes at Day 3, Day 8, and Week 6. : Responses to each question used a 1-5 scale with 1=Worst outcome and 5=Best outcome.

    Time frame: 6 Weeks

07

Results

Posted Aug 17, 2026

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
Milestone0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic SolutionPhentolamine Ophthalmic Solution Vehicle
Started341228
Completed233195
Not completed10833

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Subjects With ≥ 15 Letters of Improvement in Binocular DCNVA and With < 5 Letters of Loss in Binocular BCDVA From Baseline Comparing POS-treated Participants to Placebo-treated Participants at 12 Hours Post-dose at Visit 4 (Day 8)

The primary efficacy endpoint is the percentage of participants with ≥ 15 letters of improvement in binocular DCNVA and with \< 5 letters of loss in binocular BCDVA from baseline comparing POS-treated participants to placebo-treated participants at 12 hours post-dose at Visit 4 (Day 8).

Time frame:
8 Days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Percentage of Subjects With ≥ 15 Letters of Improvement in Binocular DCNVA and With < 5 Letters of Loss in Binocular BCDVA From Baseline Comparing POS-treated Participants to Placebo-treated Participants at 12 Hours Post-dose at Visit 4 (Day 8)
Participants0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic SolutionPhentolamine Ophthalmic Solution Vehicle
Percentage of Subjects With ≥ 15 Letters of Improvement in Binocular DCNVA and With < 5 Letters of Loss in Binocular BCDVA From Baseline Comparing POS-treated Participants to Placebo-treated Participants at 12 Hours Post-dose at Visit 4 (Day 8)9226
Statistical analysis
  • 0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution vs Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution Vehicle · Regression, Logistic · p = <0.0001
SecondaryPercentage of Subjects With ≥ 15 Letters of Improvement in Binocular DCNVA and With < 5 Letters of Loss in Binocular BCDVA From Baseline at Day 1 (1-hour Post-dose), Day 3, and Week 6

This secondary efficacy endpoint is the percentage of participants with ≥ 15 letters of improvement in binocular DCNVA and with \< 5 letters of loss in binocular BCDVA from baseline comparing POS-treated participants to placebo-treated participants at 12 hours post-dose at Day 1 (1-hour post-dose), Day 3, and Week 6.

Time frame:
6 Weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Percentage of Subjects With ≥ 15 Letters of Improvement in Binocular DCNVA and With < 5 Letters of Loss in Binocular BCDVA From Baseline at Day 1 (1-hour Post-dose), Day 3, and Week 6
Participants0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic SolutionPhentolamine Ophthalmic Solution Vehicle
Day 1, 1 hour post-dose7014
Day 37824
Week 68231
Day 89226
Statistical analysis
  • 0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution vs Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution Vehicle · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.0002
  • 0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution vs Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution Vehicle · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.0005
  • 0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution vs Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution Vehicle · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.0002
SecondaryPercentage of Subjects With ≥ 5, ≥ 10, and ≥ 15 Letters of Improvement in DCNVA From Baseline (Binocular) at Day 1 (0.5 Hours and 1 Hour Post-dose), Day 3, Day 8, and Week 6

The percentage of Subjects With ≥ 5, ≥ 10, and ≥ 15 Letters of Improvement in DCNVA From Baseline (Monocular and Binocular) at Day 1 (0.5 hours and 1 hour post-dose), Day 3, Day 8, and Week 6.

Time frame:
6 Weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Percentage of Subjects With ≥ 5, ≥ 10, and ≥ 15 Letters of Improvement in DCNVA From Baseline (Binocular) at Day 1 (0.5 Hours and 1 Hour Post-dose), Day 3, Day 8, and Week 6
Participants0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic SolutionPhentolamine Ophthalmic Solution Vehicle
Day 1, 0.5 hours post-dose: ≥ 15 letters4013
Day 1, 1 hour post-dose: ≥ 15 letters7115
Day 3: ≥ 15 letters7925
Day 8: ≥ 15 letters9227
Week 6: ≥ 15 letters8332
Day 1, 0.5 hours post-dose: ≥ 10 letters9951
Day 1, 1-hour post-dose: ≥ 10 letters16466
Day 3: ≥ 10 letters16663
Day 8: ≥ 10 letters18766
Week 6: ≥ 10 letters16377
Day 1, 0.5 hours post-dose: ≥ 5 letters214111
Day 1, 1-hour post-dose: ≥ 5 letters257136
Day 3: ≥ 5 letters272134
Day 8: ≥ 5 letters280142
Week 6: ≥ 5 letters236142
Statistical analysis
  • 0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution vs Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution Vehicle · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.0328
  • 0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution vs Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution Vehicle · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.0002
  • 0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution vs Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution Vehicle · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.0006
  • 0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution vs Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution Vehicle · Regression, Logistic · p = <0.0001
  • 0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution vs Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution Vehicle · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.0002
  • 0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution vs Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution Vehicle · Regression, Logistic · p = <0.0001
  • 0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution vs Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution Vehicle · Regression, Logistic · p = <0.0006
SecondaryPercentage of Subjects With ≥ 5, ≥ 10, and ≥ 15 Letters of Improvement in DCNVA From Baseline (Monocular - Study Eye) at Day 1 (0.5 Hours and 1-hour Post-dose), Day 3, Day 8, and Week 6

This outcome measure will investigate the percentage of subjects with ≥ 5, ≥ 10, and ≥ 15 letters of improvement in DCNVA from baseline (monocular - study eye) at Day 1 (0.5 hours and 1-hour post-dose), Day 3, Day 8, and Week 6.

Time frame:
6 Weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Percentage of Subjects With ≥ 5, ≥ 10, and ≥ 15 Letters of Improvement in DCNVA From Baseline (Monocular - Study Eye) at Day 1 (0.5 Hours and 1-hour Post-dose), Day 3, Day 8, and Week 6
Participants0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic SolutionPhentolamine Ophthalmic Solution Vehicle
Day 1, 0.5 hours post-dose: ≥ 15 letters4010
Day 1, 1-hour post-dose: ≥ 15 letters6221
Day 3: ≥ 15 letters6112
Day 8: ≥ 15 letters7823
Week 6: ≥ 15 letters6623
Day 1, 0.5 hours post-dose: ≥ 10 letters9638
Day 1, 1-hour post-dose: ≥ 10 letters15057
Day 3: ≥ 10 letters15254
Day 8: ≥ 10 letters14653
Week 6: ≥ 10 letters13358
Day 1, 0.5 hours post-dose: ≥ 5 letters207105
Day 1, 1-hour post-dose: ≥ 5 letters260130
Day 3: ≥ 5 letters247119
Day 8: ≥ 5 letters252123
Week 6: ≥ 5 letters219120
SecondaryChange in DCNVA From Baseline (Binocular) at Day 1 (0.5 Hours and 1-hour Post-dose), Day 3, Day 8, and Week 6

This outcome measure will investigate the change in DCNVA from baseline (binocular) at Day 1 (0.5 hours and 1-hour post-dose), Day 3, Day 8, and Week 6.

Time frame:
6 Weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Letters Read
Change in DCNVA From Baseline (Binocular) at Day 1 (0.5 Hours and 1-hour Post-dose), Day 3, Day 8, and Week 6
Letters Read0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic SolutionPhentolamine Ophthalmic Solution Vehicle
Day 1, 0.5 hours post-dose6.58 ± 0.324.50 ± 0.40
Day 1, 1 hour post-dose8.96 ± 0.345.66 ± 0.41
Day 39.38 ± 0.345.68 ± 0.42
Day 810.10 ± 0.356.10 ± 0.42
Week 610.48 ± 0.376.67 ± 0.43
Statistical analysis
  • 0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution vs Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution Vehicle · ANCOVA · p = <0.0001
  • 0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution vs Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution Vehicle · ANCOVA · p = <0.0001
  • 0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution vs Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution Vehicle · ANCOVA · p = <0.0001
  • 0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution vs Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution Vehicle · ANCOVA · p = <0.0001
  • 0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution vs Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution Vehicle · ANCOVA · p = <0.0001
SecondaryChange in DCNVA From Baseline (Monocular - Study Eye) at Day 1 (0.5 Hours and 1-hour Post-dose), Day 3, Day 8, and Week 6

This outcome measure will investigate the Change in DCNVA From Baseline (Monocular - Study Eye) at Day 1 (0.5 hours and 1-hour post-dose), Day 3, Day 8, and Week 6

Time frame:
6 Weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Letters Read
Change in DCNVA From Baseline (Monocular - Study Eye) at Day 1 (0.5 Hours and 1-hour Post-dose), Day 3, Day 8, and Week 6
Letters Read0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic SolutionPhentolamine Ophthalmic Solution Vehicle
Day 1, 0.5 Hours Post-dose6.53 ± 0.334.59 ± 0.41
Day 1, 1-Hour Post-dose8.68 ± 0.345.63 ± 0.42
Day 38.62 ± 0.364.80 ± 0.44
Day 89.01 ± 0.365.22 ± 0.44
Week 69.29 ± 0.395.54 ± 0.46
SecondaryChange in Mean Binocular DCNVA From Baseline at Week 6 Compared to the Best Prior Observed Change From Baseline in Mean Binocular DCNVA in Subjects Treated With POS

This outcome measure investigates the change in mean binocular DCNVA from baseline at Week 6 compared to the best prior observed change from baseline in mean binocular DCNVA in subjects treated with POS.

Time frame:
6 Weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Letters Read
Change in Mean Binocular DCNVA From Baseline at Week 6 Compared to the Best Prior Observed Change From Baseline in Mean Binocular DCNVA in Subjects Treated With POS
Letters Read0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution
Day 1, 0.5 hours post-dose6.6 ± 0.34
Day 1, 1 hour post-dose9.0 ± 0.36
Day 39.3 ± 0.35
Day 810.0 ± 0.36
Week 610.4 ± 0.36
Statistical analysis
  • 0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution · ANCOVA · p = 1.0000 (This analysis will test if at any of the previous time points did the 90% CI of the difference from Week 6 include a loss of 5 letters, the predefined criterion for evidence of tachyphylaxis.)
SecondaryPercentage of Subjects With DCNVA ≤ 20/15, ≤ 20/20, ≤ 20/25, ≤ 20/32, ≤ 20/40, ≤ 20/50, ≤ 20/63, ≤ 20/80, ≤ 20/100, ≤ 20/125, and ≤ 20/160 at Day 1 (0.5 Hours and 1-hour Post-dose), Day 3, Day 8, and Week 6

This outcome measure will investigate the percentage of subjects with DCNVA ≤ 20/15, ≤ 20/20, ≤ 20/25, ≤ 20/32, ≤ 20/40, ≤ 20/50, ≤ 20/63, ≤ 20/80, ≤ 20/100, ≤ 20/125, and ≤ 20/160 at Day 1 (0.5 hours and 1-hour post-dose), Day 3, Day 8, and Week 6.

Time frame:
6 Weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Percentage of Subjects With DCNVA ≤ 20/15, ≤ 20/20, ≤ 20/25, ≤ 20/32, ≤ 20/40, ≤ 20/50, ≤ 20/63, ≤ 20/80, ≤ 20/100, ≤ 20/125, and ≤ 20/160 at Day 1 (0.5 Hours and 1-hour Post-dose), Day 3, Day 8, and Week 6
Participants0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic SolutionPhentolamine Ophthalmic Solution Vehicle
Day 1, 0.5 hours post-dose: ≤ 20/1530
Day 1, 1 hour post-dose: ≤ 20/1530
Day 320
Day 830
Week 620
Day 1, 0.5 hours post-dose: ≤ 20/2092
Day 1, 1-hour post-dose: ≤ 20/20111
Day 3: ≤ 20/20102
Day 8: ≤ 20/20150
Week 6: ≤ 20/20115
Day 1, 0.5 hours post-dose: ≤ 20/25278
Day 1, 1-hour post-dose: ≤ 20/254810
Day 3: ≤ 20/254819
Day 8: ≤ 20/255920
Week 6: ≤ 20/255023
Day 1, 0.5 hours post-dose: ≤ 20/327334
Day 1, 1-hour post-dose: ≤ 20/3212339
Day 3: ≤ 20/3213243
Day 8: ≤ 20/3214749
Week 6: ≤ 20/3212557
Day 1, 0.5 hours post-dose: ≤ 20/4016668
Day 1, 1-hour post-dose: ≤ 20/4021191
Day 3: ≤ 20/4020695
Day 8: ≤ 20/4022899
Week 6: ≤ 20/40203105
Day 1, 0.5 hours post-dose: ≤ 20/50261155
Day 1, 1-hour post-dose: ≤ 20/50284164
Day 3: ≤ 20/50292165
Day 8: ≤ 20/50299166
Week 6: ≤ 20/50261165
Day 1, 0.5 hours post-dose: ≤ 20/63316203
Day 1, 1-hour post-dose: ≤ 20/63324209
Day 3: ≤ 20/63327207
Day 8: ≤ 20/63326207
Week 6: ≤ 20/63280197
Day 1, 0.5 hours post-dose: ≤ 20/80338224
Day 1, 1-hour post-dose: ≤ 20/80338225
Day 3: ≤ 20/80336222
Day 8: ≤ 20/80337222
Week 6: ≤ 20/80283211
Day 1, 0.5 hours post-dose: ≤ 20/100339228
Day 1, 1-hour post-dose: ≤ 20/100340228
Day 3: ≤ 20/100337225
Day 8: ≤ 20/100338225
Week 6: ≤ 20/100283213
Day 1, 0.5 hours post-dose: ≤ 20/125340228
Day 1, 1-hour post-dose: ≤ 20/125340228
Day 3: ≤ 20/125337225
Day 8: ≤ 20/125338226
Week 6: ≤ 20/125283215
Day 1, 0.5 hours post-dose: ≤ 20/160340228
Day 1, 1-hour post-dose: ≤ 20/160340228
Day 3: ≤ 20/160337225
Day 8: ≤ 20/160338226
Week 6: ≤ 20/160283215
Statistical analysis
  • 0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution vs Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution Vehicle · Regression, Logistic · p = <0.0001
  • 0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution vs Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution Vehicle · Regression, Logistic · p = <0.0001
  • 0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution vs Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution Vehicle · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.0046
  • 0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution vs Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution Vehicle · Regression, Logistic · p = <0.0414
SecondaryPercentage of Subjects With Baseline DCNVA ≤ 20/63, ≤ 20/80, ≤ 20/100, ≤ 20/125, and ≤ 20/160 With a ≥ 10-Letter and ≥ 15-Letter Improvement in DCNVA at Day 1 (0.5 Hours and 1-hour Post-dose), Day 3, Day 8, and Week 6

This outcome measure will investigate the percentage of subjects with baseline DCNVA ≤ 20/63, ≤ 20/80, ≤ 20/100, ≤ 20/125, and ≤ 20/160 with a ≥ 10-Letter and ≥ 15-Letter Improvement in DCNVA at Day 1 (0.5 hours and 1-hour post-dose), Day 3, Day 8, and Week 6.

Time frame:
6 Weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Percentage of Subjects With Baseline DCNVA ≤ 20/63, ≤ 20/80, ≤ 20/100, ≤ 20/125, and ≤ 20/160 With a ≥ 10-Letter and ≥ 15-Letter Improvement in DCNVA at Day 1 (0.5 Hours and 1-hour Post-dose), Day 3, Day 8, and Week 6
Participants0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic SolutionPhentolamine Ophthalmic Solution Vehicle
Day 8, ≤ 20/63 & ≥ 15 letters — ≥ 15 letters6721
Day 8, ≤ 20/80 & ≥ 15 letters — ≥ 15 letters8626
Day 8, ≤ 20/100 & ≥ 15 letters — ≥ 15 letters9227
Day 8, ≤ 20/125 & ≥ 15 letters — ≥ 15 letters9227
Day 8, ≤ 20/160 & ≥ 15 letters — ≥ 15 letters9227
Day 8, ≤ 20/63 & ≥ 10 letters — ≥ 15 letters15053
Day 8, ≤ 20/80 & ≥ 10 letters — ≥ 15 letters18165
Day 8, ≤ 20/100 & ≥ 10 letters — ≥ 15 letters18766
Day 8, ≤ 20/125 & ≥ 10 letters — ≥ 15 letters18766
Day 8, ≤ 20/160 & ≥ 10 letters — ≥ 15 letters18766
Day 8, ≤ 20/63 & ≥ 5 letters — ≥ 15 letters230107
Day 8, ≤ 20/80 & ≥ 5 letters — ≥ 15 letters271136
Day 8, ≤ 20/100 & ≥ 5 letters — ≥ 15 letters280142
Day 8, ≤ 20/125 & ≥ 5 letters — ≥ 15 letters280142
Day 8, ≤ 20/160 & ≥ 5 letters — ≥ 15 letters280142
Statistical analysis
  • 0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution vs Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution Vehicle · Regression, Logistic · p = <0.0243
  • 0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution vs Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution Vehicle · Regression, Logistic · p = <0.0015
SecondaryPercentage of Subjects With ≥ 5, ≥ 10, and ≥ 15 Letters of Improvement in Binocular DCIVA From Baseline at Day 1 (1-hour Post-dose), Day 3, Day 8, and Week 6

This outcome measure will investigate the percentage of subjects with ≥ 5, ≥ 10, and ≥ 15 letters of improvement in binocular DCIVA from baseline at Day 1 (1-hour post-dose), Day 3, Day 8, and Week 6.

Time frame:
6 Weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Percentage of Subjects With ≥ 5, ≥ 10, and ≥ 15 Letters of Improvement in Binocular DCIVA From Baseline at Day 1 (1-hour Post-dose), Day 3, Day 8, and Week 6
Participants0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic SolutionPhentolamine Ophthalmic Solution Vehicle
Day 1, 1-hour post-dose, ≥ 15 letters — ≥ 15 letters164
Day 3: ≥ 15 letters — ≥ 15 letters223
Day 8: ≥ 15 letters — ≥ 15 letters2712
Week 6: ≥ 15 letters — ≥ 15 letters2719
Day 1, 1-hour post-dose, ≥ 10 letters — ≥ 15 letters6623
Day 3: ≥ 10 letters — ≥ 15 letters9036
Day 8: ≥ 10 letters — ≥ 15 letters10542
Week 6: ≥ 10 letters — ≥ 15 letters8440
Day 1, 1-hour post-dose: ≥ 5 letters — ≥ 15 letters19392
Day 3: ≥ 5 letters — ≥ 15 letters20697
Day 8: ≥ 5 letters — ≥ 15 letters217108
Week 6: ≥ 5 letters — ≥ 15 letters18999
Statistical analysis
  • 0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution vs Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution Vehicle · Regression, Logistic · p = <0.0001
  • 0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution vs Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution Vehicle · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.0018
  • 0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution vs Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution Vehicle · Regression, Logistic · p = <0.0051
  • 0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution vs Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution Vehicle · Regression, Logistic · p = >0.0510
SecondaryChange in Binocular DCIVA From Baseline at Day 1 (1-hour Post-dose), Day 3, Day 8, and Week 6

This outcome measure will investigate the change in binocular DCIVA from baseline at Day 1 (1-hour post-dose), Day 3, Day 8, and Week 6.

Time frame:
6 Weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Letters Read
Change in Binocular DCIVA From Baseline at Day 1 (1-hour Post-dose), Day 3, Day 8, and Week 6
Letters Read0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic SolutionPhentolamine Ophthalmic Solution Vehicle
Day 1, 1 hour post-dose4.89 ± 0.263.18 ± 0.31
Day 35.84 ± 0.273.40 ± 0.33
Day 86.40 ± 0.273.98 ± 0.33
Week 66.43 ± 0.284.01 ± 0.34
Statistical analysis
  • 0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution vs Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution Vehicle · ANCOVA · p = <0.0001
SecondaryPercentage of Subjects With Loss or Improvement in BCDVA From Baseline (Binocular) at Day 1 (1-hour Post-dose), Day 3, Day 8, and Week 6

This outcome measure will investigate the percentage of subjects with loss or improvement in BCDVA from baseline (Binocular) at Day 1 (1-hour post-dose), Day 3, Day 8, and Week 6.

Time frame:
6 Weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Percentage of Subjects With Loss or Improvement in BCDVA From Baseline (Binocular) at Day 1 (1-hour Post-dose), Day 3, Day 8, and Week 6
Participants0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic SolutionPhentolamine Ophthalmic Solution Vehicle
Day 1, 1-hour post-dose: >= 15 Letters00
Day 3: >= 15 Letters00
Day 8: >= 15 Letters00
Week 6: >= 15 Letters00
Day 1, 1-hour post-dose: >= 10 Letters11
Day 3: >= 10 Letters22
Day 8: >= 10 Letters33
Week 6: >= 10 Letters64
Day 1, 1-hour post-dose: >= 5 Letters2814
Day 3: >= 5 Letters5528
Day 8: >= 5 Letters7941
Week 6: >= 5 Letters6437
Day 1, 1-hour post-dose: >= -4 to <= 4 Letters296200
Day 3: >= -4 to <= 4 Letters271185
Day 8: >= -4 to <= 4 Letters252180
Week 6: >= -4 to <= 4 Letters251170
Day 1, 1-hour post-dose: <= -5 Letters1614
Day 3: <= -5 Letters1112
Day 8: <= -5 Letters75
Week 6: <= -5 Letters1011
Day 1, 1-hour post-dose: <= -10 Letters21
Day 3: <= -10 Letters10
Day 8: <= -10 Letters00
Week 6: <= -10 Letters10
Day 1, 1-hour post-dose: <= -15 Letters00
Day 3: <= -15 Letters10
Day 8: <= -15 Letters00
Week 6: <= -15 Letters10
Statistical analysis
  • 0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution vs Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution Vehicle · Regression, Logistic · p = >0.1683
SecondaryChange in BCDVA From Baseline (Binocular) at Day 1 (1-hour Post-dose), Day 3, Day 8, and Week 6

This outcome measure will investigate the change in BCDVA from baseline (Binocular) at Day 1 (1-hour post-dose), Day 3, Day 8, and Week 6.

Time frame:
6 Weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Letters Read
Change in BCDVA From Baseline (Binocular) at Day 1 (1-hour Post-dose), Day 3, Day 8, and Week 6
Letters Read0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic SolutionPhentolamine Ophthalmic Solution Vehicle
Day 1, 1 hour post-dose0.49 ± 0.170.13 ± 0.20
Day 30.86 ± 0.190.64 ± 0.23
Day 81.44 ± 0.181.30 ± 0.2
Week 61.02 ± 0.200.83 ± 0.25
Statistical analysis
  • 0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution vs Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution Vehicle · ANCOVA · p = >0.1759
SecondaryChange in BCDVA From Baseline (Monocular - Study Eye) at Day 1 (1-hour Post-dose), Day 3, Day 8, and Week 6

This outcome measure will investigate the Change in BCDVA From Baseline (Monocular - Study Eye) at Day 1 (1-hour post-dose), Day 3, Day 8, and Week 6.

Time frame:
6 Weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Letters Read
Change in BCDVA From Baseline (Monocular - Study Eye) at Day 1 (1-hour Post-dose), Day 3, Day 8, and Week 6
Letters Read0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic SolutionPhentolamine Ophthalmic Solution Vehicle
Day 1, 1 Hour Post-dose0.49 ± 0.170.13 ± 0.20
Day 30.86 ± 0.190.64 ± 0.23
Day 81.44 ± 0.181.30 ± 0.22
Week 61.02 ± 0.200.83 ± 0.25
Statistical analysis
  • 0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution vs Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution Vehicle · ANCOVA · p = <0.1759
SecondaryChange in Pupil Diameter From Baseline at Day 3 and Day 8

This outcome measure will investigate the change in pupil diameter from baseline at Day 3 and Day 8.

Time frame:
8 Days
Reported as:
Least squares mean · millimeters
Change in Pupil Diameter From Baseline at Day 3 and Day 8
millimeters0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic SolutionPhentolamine Ophthalmic Solution Vehicle
Day 3-1.17 ± 0.03-0.16 ± 0.04
Day 8-1.17 ± 0.03-0.21 ± 0.04
Statistical analysis
  • 0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution vs Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution Vehicle · ANCOVA · p = <0.0001
SecondaryPercent Change in Pupil Diameter From Baseline at Day 3 & Day 8

This outcome measure will investigate the Percent Change in Pupil Diameter from Baseline at Day 3 \& Day 8.

Time frame:
8 Days
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Percent Change
Percent Change in Pupil Diameter From Baseline at Day 3 & Day 8
Percent Change0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic SolutionPhentolamine Ophthalmic Solution Vehicle
Day 3-24.51 ± 0.67-2.93 ± 0.82
Day 8-24.48 ± 0.66-4.14 ± 0.81
Statistical analysis
  • 0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution vs Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution Vehicle · ANCOVA · p = <0.0001
SecondaryPercentage of Subjects With Pupil Diameter of < 3.5, < 3.0, < 2.5, < 2.0, and < 1.5 mm at Day 3 and Day 8

This outcome measure will investigate the percentage of subjects with pupil diameter of \< 3.5, \< 3.0, \< 2.5, \< 2.0, and \< 1.5 mm at Day 3 and Day 8.

Time frame:
8 Days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Percentage of Subjects With Pupil Diameter of < 3.5, < 3.0, < 2.5, < 2.0, and < 1.5 mm at Day 3 and Day 8
Participants0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic SolutionPhentolamine Ophthalmic Solution Vehicle
Day 3: < 3.5 mm17710
Day 8: < 3.5 mm18120
Day 3: < 3.0 mm862
Day 8: < 3.0 mm785
Day 3: < 2.5 mm160
Day 8: < 2.5 mm101
Day 3: < 2.0 mm00
Day 8: < 2.0 mm00
Day 3: < 1.5 mm00
Day 8: < 1.5 mm00
Statistical analysis
  • 0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution vs Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution Vehicle · Regression, Logistic · p = <0.0001
  • 0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution vs Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution Vehicle · Regression, Logistic · p = <0.0004
SecondaryPercentage of Subjects With Pupil Diameter of 1.5 to < 2.0 mm, 2.0 to < 2.5 mm, 2.5 to < 3.0 mm, and 3.0 to < 3.5 mm at Day 3 and Day 8

This outcome measure will investigate the percentage of subjects with pupil diameter of 1.5 to \< 2.0 mm, 2.0 to \< 2.5 mm, 2.5 to \< 3.0 mm, and 3.0 to \< 3.5 mm at Day 3 and Day 8.

Time frame:
8 Days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Percentage of Subjects With Pupil Diameter of 1.5 to < 2.0 mm, 2.0 to < 2.5 mm, 2.5 to < 3.0 mm, and 3.0 to < 3.5 mm at Day 3 and Day 8
Participants0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic SolutionPhentolamine Ophthalmic Solution Vehicle
Day 3: 1.5 to < 2.0 mm00
Day 8, 1.5 to < 2.0 mm00
Day 3: 2.0 to < 2.5 mm160
Day 8: 2.0 to < 2.5 mm101
Day 3: 2.5 to < 3.0 mm702
Day 8: 2.5 to < 3.0 mm684
Day 3: 3.0 to < 3.5 mm918
Day 8: 3.0 to < 3.5 mm10315
Day 3: 2.4 to ≤ 3.5 mm17010
Day 8: 2.4 to ≤ 3.5 mm17519
Statistical analysis
  • 0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution vs Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution Vehicle · Regression, Logistic · p = <0.0006
  • 0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution vs Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution Vehicle · Regression, Logistic · p = <0.0001
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Overall and Component Subject-Reported Outcomes at Day 3, Day 8, and Week 6

This outcome measure investigates the change from baseline in overall and component subject-reported outcomes at Day 3, Day 8, and Week 6. : Responses to each question used a 1-5 scale with 1=Worst outcome and 5=Best outcome.

Time frame:
6 Weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Scores on a Scale
Change From Baseline in Overall and Component Subject-Reported Outcomes at Day 3, Day 8, and Week 6
Scores on a Scale0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic SolutionPhentolamine Ophthalmic Solution Vehicle
My study medication made my near vision3.63 ± 0.033.27 ± 0.04
How convenient was it to use your study medication for your near vision4.13 ± 0.054.16 ± 0.06
How frequently would you use the study medication if it were available to you4.29 ± 0.073.89 ± 0.09
Day 8, How frequently would you use the study medication if it were available to you4.04 ± 0.083.62 ± 0.10
How satisfied are you with how long the effects of the study medication lasted throughout the day3.39 ± 0.052.87 ± 0.06
How satisfied are you with your study medication to help you see clearly up close when you3.26 ± 0.062.69 ± 0.07
My study medication made my near vision in dim/low light3.45 ± 0.033.17 ± 0.04
How frequently did you use some form of near vision correction?0.27 ± 0.050.09 ± 0.06
How often did you need to use or do something to help you read small-sized text at a near distance?0.49 ± 0.050.30 ± 0.06
How often did you need to use or do something to help you read information on a cell phone at a...0.37 ± 0.050.18 ± 0.06
How often did you need to use or do something to help you read information on a computer screen...0.49 ± 0.060.43 ± 0.07
How likely would you be to use the study medication for near vision correction?3.87 ± 0.073.49 ± 0.08
Statistical analysis
  • 0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution vs Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution Vehicle · ANCOVA · p = <0.0307
  • 0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution vs Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution Vehicle · ANCOVA · p = <0.0176
  • 0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution vs Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution Vehicle · ANCOVA · p = <0.0121

Adverse events

Collected over For enrollment until the end of study, up to 48 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 2% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution0/341 (0%)4/341 (1.2%)158/341 (46.3%)
Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution Vehicle0/228 (0%)3/228 (1.3%)21/228 (9.2%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
Event0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic SolutionPhentolamine Ophthalmic Solution Vehicle
Encephalitis bacterialInfections and infestations0/3411/228
Rib fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/3411/228
Acute respiratory failureRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/3411/228
Intracranial aneurysmVascular disorders0/3411/228
Retinal vein occlusionEye disorders1/3410/228
CholecystitisHepatobiliary disorders1/3410/228
Septic shockInfections and infestations1/3410/228
Lung neoplasm malignantNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/3410/228
Metabolic encephalopathyNervous system disorders1/3410/228
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 21
Most frequent other events
Event0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic SolutionPhentolamine Ophthalmic Solution Vehicle
Conjunctival hyperaemiaEye disorders95/3414/228
Instillation site irritationGeneral disorders55/3413/228
Eye irritationEye disorders21/3410/228
DysgeusiaNervous system disorders20/3411/228
Eczema eyelidsEye disorders18/3410/228
Visual acuity reducedEye disorders12/34111/228
Instillation site erythemaGeneral disorders15/3410/228
Dry eyeEye disorders14/3417/228
Eye pruritusEye disorders12/3412/228
Conjunctivitis allergicEye disorders12/3411/228

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic SolutionPhentolamine Ophthalmic Solution VehicleTotal
Mean54.3 ± 5.0854.5 ± 4.9154.4 ± 5.01
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic SolutionPhentolamine Ophthalmic Solution VehicleTotal
Female229148377
Male11280192
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic SolutionPhentolamine Ophthalmic Solution VehicleTotal
Hispanic or Latino483482
Not Hispanic or Latino293194487
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic SolutionPhentolamine Ophthalmic Solution VehicleTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native213
Asian14822
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander101
Black or African American422769
White276191467
More than one race617
Unknown or Not Reported000
BCDVA in the Study Eye
BCDVA in the Study Eye(Letters)0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic SolutionPhentolamine Ophthalmic Solution VehicleTotal
Mean57.9 ± 3.0158.1 ± 3.3658 ± 3.15
BCDVA Binocular
BCDVA Binocular(Letters)0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic SolutionPhentolamine Ophthalmic Solution VehicleTotal
Mean59.4 ± 3.2959.7 ± 3.7459.5 ± 3.48
DCNVA Binocular
DCNVA Binocular(Letters)0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic SolutionPhentolamine Ophthalmic Solution VehicleTotal
Mean47.2 ± 3.5146.9 ± 3.9647.1 ± 3.70
DCNVA in the Study Eye
DCNVA in the Study Eye(Letters)0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic SolutionPhentolamine Ophthalmic Solution VehicleTotal
Mean43.1 ± 4.3143.7 ± 4.4143.4 ± 4.36

11 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

39 sites
  • Arizona Eye Center
    Chandler, Arizona 85224, United States
  • Carrot Eye Center
    Mesa, Arizona 85202, United States
  • Eye Doctors of Arizona
    Phoenix, Arizona 85028, United States
  • MRB Eye Care Consultants, LLC
    Scottsdale, Arizona 85260, United States
  • Empire Eye & Laser Center
    Bakersfield, California 93309, United States
  • Global Research Management, Inc.
    Glendale, California 91204, United States
  • Gordon Schanzlin New Vision Institute
    La Jolla, California 92307, United States
  • LoBue Laser and Eye Medical Center, Inc.
    Murrieta, California 92562, United States
  • Eye Research Foundation
    Newport Beach, California 92663, United States
  • Wolstan and Goldberg Eye Associates
    Torrance, California 90505, United States
  • Segal Drug Trials, Inc.
    Delray Beach, Florida 33484, United States
  • South Florida Glaucoma
    Delray Beach, Florida 33484, United States
  • Levenson Eye
    Jacksonville, Florida 32204, United States
  • Bowden Eye & Associates
    Jacksonville, Florida 32256, United States
  • Shettle Eye Research
    Largo, Florida 33773, United States
  • Sabal Eye Care/dba Omega Vision Center
    Longwood, Florida 32779, United States
  • Mid Florida Eye Center
    Mt. Dora, Florida 32757, United States
  • Virdi Eye Clinic
    Rock Island, Illinois 61201, United States
  • Price Vision Group
    Indianapolis, Indiana 46260, United States
  • Durrie Vision
    Overland Park, Kansas 66210, United States
  • Kannarr Eye Care
    Pittsburg, Kansas 66762, United States
  • Heart of America Eye Care, P.A.
    Shawnee Mission, Kansas 66204, United States
  • The Eye Care Institute
    Louisville, Kentucky 40206, United States
  • Fraser Eye Care Center
    Fraser, Michigan 48026, United States
  • Moyes Eye Center
    Kansas City, Missouri 64154, United States
  • Rochester Ophthalmological Group
    Rochester, New York 14618, United States
  • Oculus Research , Inc.
    Garner, North Carolina 27529, United States
  • Bergstrom Eye
    Fargo, North Dakota 58103, United States
  • Red River Research Partners
    Fargo, North Dakota 58103, United States
  • Athens Eye Care
    Athens, Ohio 45701, United States
  • West Bay Eye Associates
    Warwick, Rhode Island 02888, United States
  • Advancing Vision Research
    Goodlettsville, Tennessee 37072, United States
  • Optometry Group
    Memphis, Tennessee 38111, United States
  • Total Eye Care
    Memphis, Tennessee 38119, United States
  • Whitsett Vision Group
    Houston, Texas 77055, United States
  • Lake Travis Eye and Laser Center/ Revolution Research
    Lakeway, Texas 78738, United States
  • Red River Research Partners
    Richardson, Texas 75080, United States
  • Parkhurst NuVision
    San Antonio, Texas 78229, United States
  • Eye Institute of Utah
    Salt Lake City, Utah 84107, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Sponsor
Ocuphire Pharma, Inc.→Opus Genetics, Inc
Oct 26, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 26, 2026
    Sponsor Ocuphire Pharma, Inc.→Opus Genetics, Inc
    + 3 other changes: identifiers, verification date and contact details

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06542497
Lead sponsor
Opus Genetics, Inc
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 7, 2024
Start date
Aug 15, 2024
Primary completion
Apr 3, 2025
Completion
Jan 22, 2026
Results posted
Aug 17, 2026
Last update
Oct 26, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Phentolamine

Start the discussion