An interventional study of NOA lens type 1 and NOA lens type 2 in Keratoconus, Presbyopia and Scleral Contact Lenses, sponsored by Azalea Vision. Recruiting at 2 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-13.
Sponsored by Azalea Vision · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The purpose of this clinical study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the NOA lens, a custom-made scleral contact lens developed by Azalea Vision BV, in improving visual quality for individuals with keratoconus and presbyopia.
This clinical study investigates a new lens design featuring a specific central aperture (opening) intended to enhance image quality by increasing depth of focus and reducing optical aberrations. The NOA lens serves as a functional prototype for future "smart lens" technology, specifically the ALMA Smart Lens. The study aims to determine if this specialized lens provides a solution for patients whose visual needs are not fully met by conventional glasses or contact lenses.
The investigation will compare a standard refractive scleral lens (Type 1) against the aperture-integrated lens (Type 2) to validate the "pinhole effect" in improving vision and reducing higher-order aberrations.
This is a pre-market, interventional, exploratory, open-label, proof-of-concept study designed to validate the mode of action of the NOA lens, which is a freeform, rigid gas permeable (RGP) scleral contact lens customized to the unique topography of each patient's eye. The investigation serves as a functional prototype to validate the technology intended for the future ALMA Smart Lens by utilizing a specialized integrated optical aperture (pinhole) to enhance depth of focus and reduce the impact of optical aberrations.
The study primarily aims to validate this mode of action by evaluating the lens's effectiveness: for patients with keratoconus, the focus is on reducing higher-order aberrations, whereas for patients with presbyopia, the focus is on improving near visual acuity. While the primary focus is on these visual improvements, the study also evaluates the safety profile of the device by monitoring the cumulative incidence and severity of device-related safety events throughout the participation period.
The clinical process begins with a screening visit where eligibility is confirmed through medical history, visual acuity measurements, and comprehensive eye scans, including corneal topography and wavefront aberrometry. During the baseline visit, patients are fitted with the NOA lens Type 1, a scleral lens that provides standard refractive correction. After the lens has settled, investigators perform assessments of visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, visual field, and aberrometry to establish a reference standard. At the final testing visit, the process is repeated using the NOA lens Type 2, which incorporates the internally sealed optical aperture, allowing for a direct comparison of visual performance and higher-order aberrations against the baseline.
313 studies on the registry are indexed under Keratoconus; 56 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 16 is below the median of 40 across 205 interventional studies indexed under Keratoconus.
Browse Keratoconus studies →Azalea Vision is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.
An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.
A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.
Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Clinically significant
Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Hypersensitivity
An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Autoimmune disease
A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.
Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Keratoconus, without having presbyopia
Device: NOA lens type 1 · Device: NOA lens type 2
Emmetropic (+-0.5 D) presbyopia, without having corneal irregularities
Device: NOA lens type 1 · Device: NOA lens type 2
Provides standard refractive correction. It is a clear (un-printed) lens used only to design the type 2 lens by assessing on-eye centration and stability. It also acts as the reference standard for baseline assessments in the NOA study
Incorporates an integrated optical aperture (pinhole) created by an opaque dye, in addition to standard refractive correction. This opaque layer is printed on an internal surface and sealed within the lens cavity. The inclusion of this optical aperture is intended to enhance depth of focus (the "pinhole effect") and reduce the impact of optical aberrations
Mode of action NOA lens in keratoconus group
Change from baseline in higher-order aberrations (HOAs), as measured by a wavefront aberrometer and expressed as the total root mean square (RMS) wavefront error, following a single evaluation session with the NOA lens type 2.
Time frame: As assessed at the final study visit 3 (=approximately 6 weeks after baseline) compared to the baseline visit 2 (=day 0 + approximately 6 weeks)
Mode of action NOA lens in presbyopia group
Change from baseline in near visual acuity, as measured by a logMAR chart, following a single evaluation session with the NOA lens type 2.
Time frame: As assessed at the final study visit 3 (=approximately 6 weeks after baseline) compared to the baseline visit 2 (=day 0 + approximately 6 weeks)
Safety of NOA lens
Cumulative incidence and severity of device-related safety events throughout the study, in both groups
Time frame: as from screening visit 1 (day 0) until study completion, which takes place on average 12 weeks after the screening visit.
Plan to share: No — This study will be registered in a public trial register (clinicaltrials.gov) prior to inclusion of the first subject. The content - including the participating Principal Investigators and Clinical Study Sites - will be updated throughout the conduct of the study. Results information from this study will be submitted to the public trial register.
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Azalea Vision