ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06538246Blueprint 2Updated Jul 23, 2026

Adaptive Coping Skills Training to Improve Psychological Distress Among Cardiorespiratory Failure Survivors

An interventional study of Blueprint and Education program in Depression, Anxiety and Post-traumatic Stress Disorder, sponsored by Duke University. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-23.

Sponsored by Duke University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Oct 2024; still recruiting 2 years later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
400
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Conditions treated in intensive care units (ICUs) such as the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), congestive heart failure, COVID pneumonia, and sepsis are common. These can lead to high rates of depression, anxiety, and PTSD that worsen quality of life. Yet there are few effective strategies able to overcome barriers of limited access to mental health care. Even less is known about the experiences of patients from racially and ethnically minoritized populations because of they haven't been included well in past research.

To address this problem, the investigators developed Blueprint, a mobile app that coaches people to use adaptive coping skills to self-manage their symptoms. The investigators found that it reduced depression symptoms and improved quality of life compared to placebo.

To confirm these promising findings, the investigators are doing a formal test of Blueprint. The investigators will enroll 400 people who received ICU care from 4 hospitals (Duke, UCLA, Colorado, and Oregon). These patients will be randomized to receive either the Blueprint mobile app or a special Education Program mobile app the investigators developed. -both delivered through similar mobile app platforms. Our specific aims are to see which program improves symptoms better across 6 months of follow up.

This project addresses national research priorities and could advance the field with a personalizable yet population-focused therapy that could be scaled broadly and efficiently to enhance mental health equity.

Read the detailed description

Cardiorespiratory conditions such as the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), congestive heart failure, COVID pneumonia, and sepsis are among the most common causes of mortality and morbidity. They are also notable for high rates of persistent psychological distress symptoms including depression, anxiety, and PTSD that worsen quality of life and outcomes of the underlying conditions. Yet there are few effective strategies able to overcome barriers of limited access to mental health care. Even less is known about distress management among people from structurally disadvantaged backgrounds such as racially and ethnically minoritized populations because of their suboptimal representation in relevant clinical trials.

To fill this gap, the investigators developed Blueprint, an adaptive coping skills training intervention, and have optimized it over years of research. The investigators conducted a multicenter RCT (PCORI PFA 195) of a telephone- and web-based version among those recently hospitalized with serious cardiorespiratory conditions, finding that it reduced depression symptoms and improved quality of life among those with elevated baseline distress. Informed by lessons learned about intervention delivery and eligibility criteria, the investigators next conducted a single-center pilot RCT (R34 HL145387) that targeted a broader population and tested a completely automated, self-guided, symptom-responsive mobile app version of Blueprint. The investigators found excellent adherence and a strong effect on depression, anxiety, PTSD, and quality of life compared to control.

Given these promising findings, a formal test of the Blueprint adaptive coping skills training intervention's efficacy is needed. Therefore, the investigators propose a 5-year multicenter RCT with 6-month follow up in which 400 cardiorespiratory failure survivors with elevated symptoms of psychological distress post-discharge are randomized to either Blueprint or an Education Program control-both delivered through similar mobile app platforms. Our specific aims will: (1) Test Blueprint vs. control on symptoms of depression, anxiety, PTSD, and quality of life; (2) Determine patient-level characteristics associated with a great treatment response among sociodemographic subgroups of interest, also applying a heterogeneity of treatment effects analysis to identify other groups of clinical relevance; and (3) Ensure off-the-shelf intervention readiness for implementation by using an exploratory mixed-methods hybrid type 1 implementation framework analysis that integrates semi-structured interviews with trial participants and quantitative trial data from Aims 1 and 2.

Innovative elements include a fully automated mobile health delivery system that personalizes content in response to changes in symptom trajectories, a focus on racially and ethnically minoritized persons, the integration of a Spanish language intervention version, and strong community engagement. This project addresses national research priorities and could advance the field with a personalizable yet population-focused therapy that could be scaled broadly and efficiently to enhance mental health equity.

02

Conditions studied

  • Depression
  • Anxiety
  • Post-traumatic Stress Disorder
  • Stress
  • Worries; Pain or Disability
  • Breath Shortness
03

In context

Depression

8,577 studies on the registry are indexed under Depression; 1,720 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 400 is above the median of 81 across 7,063 interventional studies indexed under Depression.

Browse Depression studies →

Lead sponsor

Duke University is the lead sponsor of 2,063 studies on the registry; 273 are open to participants now.

Of its 204 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 167 (82%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria Inclusion criteria present in the hospital

  1. Adult (age ≥18)
  2. Managed in an ICU or stepdown unit for ≥24 hours during the time inclusion criterion #3 is met
  3. Serious acute cardiorespiratory condition, defined as ≥1 of the following:

    • mechanical ventilation via endotracheal tube for ≥4 hours
    • non-invasive ventilation (CPAP, BiPAP) for ≥4 hours in a 24-hour period provided for acute respiratory failure
    • new use of supplemental oxygen ≥6 liters per minute (or increase in baseline continuous oxygen)
    • use of vasopressors for shock of any etiology
    • use of inotropes for shock of any etiology
    • use of pulmonary vasodilators
    • use of aortic balloon pump or cardiac assist device for cardiogenic shock
    • use of diuretic intravenous drip
    • evidence of acute coronary ischemia (i.e., elevated troponin level, supporting changes, unstable angina symptoms documented)
    • urgent cardiac catheterization
  4. Cognitive status intact

    • No history of pre-existing significant cognitive impairment (e.g., dementia) as per medical chart
  5. Absence of severe mental illness

    • Treatment for severe mental illness (e.g., psychosis, bipolar affective disorder, schizoaffective disorder, schizoid personality disorder, schizophrenia [as per medical record], hospitalization for any psychiatric disorder) within the 6 months preceding the current hospital admission
    • Evidence of poorly managed severe mental illness
    • No endorsement of suicidality at time of admission or
  6. Functional fluency in English or Spanish (i.e., sufficient knowledge of English or Spanish to complete study tasks like watch videos, complete surveys)

Inclusion criteria present after hospital discharge (i.e., at the time of arrival home after discharge from the hospital)

1. Elevated baseline psychological distress symptoms, defined as a Hospital Anxiety and Distress Scale (HADS) total score ≥8

Exclusion Criteria Exclusion criteria present in the hospital

  1. Active alcohol or drug abuse (e.g., admission for alcohol withdrawal, drug-related complication, positive toxicology screening at admission, endorsement of active addiction)
  2. Anticipated complex medical needs after discharge that would be disruptive to intervention and follow up; for example:

    • Anticipated surgical procedures
    • Anticipated complex medical regiment (e.g., new chemotherapy, new dialysis, need for repeat surgery, pregnant and near term)
    • Plan for comfort care
  3. Other complex needs anticipated that could interfere with the ability to complete study procedures. Examples include:

    • Anticipated disruptive travel
    • Inability to use mobile app
    • Anticipated unstable living situation
  4. Anticipated or actual discharge to a location other than independent in a home setting (e.g., nursing home, long-term acute care facility, inpatient rehabilitation facility, home hospice)
  5. Persistently impaired cognition as a result of illness (Impairment defined as ≥3 errors on the Callahan cognitive status screen and/or the lack of decisional capacity (i.e., patient could be consented by medical team for a procedure if necessary)
  6. Currently imprisoned or incarcerated or in home detention
  7. Lack a reliable smartphone with cellular data plan or access to the internet
  8. Currently enrolled in another study involving an intervention whose objectives conflict with the objectives of this study
  9. Previously enrolled in the trial

Exclusion criteria present after hospital discharge (i.e., at T1 Data Collection conducted at the time of arrival home from the hospital)

  1. Failure to randomize within 14 days from planned start date (planned start date is within 3 days post-discharge from the hospital to home to accommodate weekends)
  2. Readmission to hospital before randomization completed
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ECG (electrocardiogram)

A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
400 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Blueprint adaptive coping skills intervention

    This is a unique adaptive coping skills intervention developed over years of research that targets patients hospitalized for cardiorespiratory conditions. Participants will receive 4 weeks of different Blueprint content through a mobile app. Each week's session includes a within-app HADS survey for safety monitoring. A printed or PDF workbook with complementary content and QR links to app videos is provided.

    Behavioral: Blueprint

  • Active comparator
    Education program control

    This is cardiorespiratory condition-specific content through an iterative process, informed by research on informational needs and past successful education programs. Participants will receive 4 weeks of different 10-minute informational videos unrelated to Blueprint content through a mobile app. Each week's session includes a within-app HADS survey for safety monitoring. A printed or PDF workbook with complementary content and QR links to app videos is provided.

    Behavioral: Education program

Interventions

  • BehavioralBlueprint

    This is a mobile app-based adaptive coping skills intervention that lasts 1 month

  • BehavioralEducation program

    This is a mobile app-based education program that lasts 1 month

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)

    The HADS evaluates anxiety (7 items) and depression (7 items) with a 14-item instrument assessing symptoms on a 4-point scale rated from 0 "not at all" to 3 "very often indeed". It has a score range of 0 to 42 with higher scores indicating more symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post-randomization

Secondary outcomes

  1. Post-Traumatic Stress Syndrome inventory (PTSS)

    The PTSS rates 10 post-traumatic stress symptoms and has a score range of 10 (no symptoms) to 70 (high burden of symptoms).

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post-randomization

  2. EuroQOL-5D visual analog scale (EQ VAS) quality of life measure

    The EQ VAS records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale where the endpoints are labelled 'Best imaginable health state' (100) and 'Worst imaginable health state' (0). The VAS can be used as a quantitative measure of health outcome that reflects the patient's own judgement.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post-randomization

  3. Perceived Stress Scale 4-Item survey (PSS-4)

    This is a 4-item short version of the PSS. Scores can range from 0 (lowest stress) to 16 (highest level of stress)

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post-randomization

Other outcomes

  1. Patient Health Questionnaire 10-Item symptoms scale (PHQ-10)

    The PHQ-10 is an adapted version of the PHQ-15, a measure of physical symptoms. Scores can range from 0 (best) to 30 (worst).

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post-randomization

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Cox CE, Gallis JA, Olsen MK, Porter LS, Gremore T, Greeson JM, Morris C, Moss M, Hough CL. Mobile Mindfulness Intervention for Psychological Distress Among Intensive Care Unit Survivors: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2024 Jul 1;184(7):749-759. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.0823. PubMed 38805199 ↗
  • Cox CE, Hough CL, Jones DM, Ungar A, Reagan W, Key MD, Gremore T, Olsen MK, Sanders L, Greeson JM, Porter LS. Effects of mindfulness training programmes delivered by a self-directed mobile app and by telephone compared with an education programme for survivors of critical illness: a pilot randomised clinical trial. Thorax. 2019 Jan;74(1):33-42. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2017-211264. Epub 2018 May 23. PubMed 29793970 ↗
  • Baudier RL, Mosack KE, Lapidus JA, Porter LS, Anderson A, Hope AA, Johnson A, Johnson K, Lesowski K, Avallone Mantelli R, Marentes Ruiz CJ, McDougal M, Mejia-Flores L, Mitchell J, Moss M, Neville TH, Estela Vasquez Guzman C, Vu A, Wolwowicz EL, Hough CL, Morris CD, Cox CE. Blueprint 2: A self-directed mobile adaptive coping skills intervention to improve psychological distress symptoms among cardiorespiratory failure survivors study protocol. Contemp Clin Trials. 2026 Jul;166:108359. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2026.108359. Epub 2026 May 30. PubMed 42217309 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Plan to share deidentified data via an approved and secure data sharing source on completion of the study and publication of results, as per NIH guidelines.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report, Analytic code

Time frame: Per NIH guidelines

Access criteria: To be determined

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Oct 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Nov 2027, 37 months after the start.

Of 3,468 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Depression, half reached primary completion within 21 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 41. This study's planned 37 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 3,566 studies reached it within 21 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 41.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 26, 2024
First posted
Aug 5, 2024
StartActual
Oct 15, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Nov 15, 2027
CompletionEst.
Apr 15, 2028
Last update
Jul 23, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 23, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06538246
Lead sponsor
Duke University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 5, 2024
Start date
Oct 15, 2024
Primary completion
Nov 15, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 15, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 23, 2026

Study contacts

Christopher Cox
Contact
christopher.cox@duke.edu
919-681-7232
Kristy Johnson
Contact
kristy.johnson@duke.edu
Christopher Cox
principal investigator · Professor of Medicine

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion