ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06516692Updated Dec 5, 2024

Inferior Vena Cava Collapsibility and Distensibility Assessment in Critical Care.

An interventional study of Inferior Vena Cava Collapsibility/distensibility Index (IVC CI/DI) assessment in Sepsis, Acute Renal Failure and Acute Gastroenteritis, sponsored by Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre. Completed at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-12-05.

Sponsored by Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was Nov 2024, 1 year 11 months ago, and no results have been posted to the registry.

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
180
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-14

Among 16 studies in Sepsis with a site in Pakistan — 4 open to participants now, 4 under way, 1 of them phase 3. Sepsis · Pakistan.

Enrollment
7th of 13
180 · median 180
Started
2024
with 2 others
No phase
6 of 16
1 open now
Registered
11th of 16
by date
Lead sponsor
2 of 16
Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre

Among the 16 studies in Sepsis with a site in Pakistan, this one is the 7th largest by enrollment of the 13 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 3 that started in 2024, is one of 6 with no phase, and was the 11th registered.

Sepsis

2,417 studies on the registry are indexed under Sepsis; 542 are open to participants now.

Browse Sepsis studies →

Open to participants now

4 of the 16 studies in Sepsis with a site in Pakistan are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

All 4 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in Pakistan have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in Pakistan →

Who these studies take

Of the 318 Sepsis studies recruiting now, 213 (67%) set no upper age limit and 53 (17%) stop at 75 or younger; 68 take children under 18; 42 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years to 65 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 16 studies in Sepsis with a site in Pakistan, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

This study will help in determining the impact of assessment of Inferior Vena Cava Collapsibility and Distensibility Index (IVC CI and DI) through Point Of Care Ultra Sound (POCUS), for the fluid management of critically ill patients. This would help in better management of such patients in resource limited countries, where costly equipment for cardiac output monitoring and fluid management are frequently not available.

Moreover this study will help in development of future guidelines for fluid resuscitation in critically ill patients.

Read the detailed description

The current study is a randomized clinical trial with the aim to explore comparative outcome between IVC CI and DI versus clinical parameters guided fluid management groups in patients of sepsis, Acute renal failure, Acute gastroenteritis and Diabetic ketoacidosis in terms of,

  1. Within 24 hours 7 day and 28 day mortality
  2. Change in Sequential Organ failure Assessment (ΔSOFA) score from baseline to 24 hours after fluid management.
  3. Cumulative fluid balance at 6 hours of fluid management
  4. Days on mechanical ventilation
  5. Days in Intensive Care Unit (ICU)
  6. Change in lactic acid levels in sepsis sub group
  7. Change in Blood sugar Random (BSR) in Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) sub group
  8. Change in Power of Hydrogen (PH) in septic and diabetic ketoacidosis sub group of participant
03

Conditions studied

  • Sepsis
  • Acute Renal Failure
  • Acute Gastroenteritis
  • Diabetic Ketoacidosis

Keywords

  • Inferior Vena Cava Collapsibility and Distensibility index
  • Fluid management
  • Resuscitation
  • Clinical parameters
  • Sepsis
  • Acute gastroenteritis
  • Acute Renal failure
  • Diabetic ketoacidosis
  • Mortality
  • Cumulative fluid balance
  • Lactic acid
  • Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score
  • Mechanical Ventilation
  • Critical Care
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients admitted in critical care with systolic Blood Pressure \< 90 mmHg with any of the diagnosis as per operational definition:
  • Sepsis
  • Diabetic ketoacidosis
  • Acute kidney injury
  • Acute gastroenteritis

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known case of right heart disease
  • Known case of congestive cardiac failure
  • Presence of marked ascites
  • IVC could not be identified or diameter could not be measured
  • Pregnant females
  • (BMI) >30 Kg/meter2
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
180 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Clinical Parameters guided assessment arm

    Participants recruited to this arm will be assessed for their hydration status and further fluid management as per usual care of assessment through * Capillary refill time * Presence/absence of pulmonary rales. * Jugular venous pressure assessment by clinical methods * Presence / absence of pedal edema

  • Experimental
    Inferior Vena Cava Collapsibility and Distensibility guided assessment arm

    Participants recruited in this arm will be assessed through measurement of inferior vena cava diameter via subcostal window within 3 cm of its opening to right atrium through point of care ultrasound using a curvilinear or phased array probe. For spontaneously breathing patients Inferior Vena Cava Collapsibility Index (IVC CI) will be calculated as: \[(IVC diameter max-IVC diameter min)/IVC diameter max\]×100% * IVC CI \> 50% = overt hypovolemia * IVC CI \< 20% = no overt hypovolemia * IVC CI of 20% to 50% will be goal For mechanically ventilated patients Inferior Vena Cava Distensibility Index (IVC DI) will be calculated as: \[(IVC diameter max-IVC diameter min)/IVC diameter min\]×100% IVC distensibility\>18% = hypovolemia IVC distensibility\<18% = no hypovolemia

    Diagnostic Test: Inferior Vena Cava Collapsibility/distensibility Index (IVC CI/DI) assessment

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testInferior Vena Cava Collapsibility/distensibility Index (IVC CI/DI) assessment

    Assessment of hydration status in critically ill patient recruited to this arm will be intervened through an ultrasound guided calculation of collapsibility and distensibility index of Inferior Vena Cava. This method of intervention will be continued and repeated as needed throughout the stay of the participant in intensive care unit.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Within 24-hours, 7-day and 28 day mortalities

    Death of participant will be considered mortality.

    Time frame: Mortalities will be assessed and recorded within 24hour, then day 7 up to 28th day.

  2. Cumulative fluid balance

    A difference of total amount of fluids given both intravenously and through oral rout to a total amount of urine output or fluid removed during dialysis, calculated in milliliter (ml) will be taken as cumulative fluid balance.

    Time frame: At 6 hours of enrolment of participant

  3. Change in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score(Δ SOFA)

    A difference will be noted in initial Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score ( from 0 up to 24) to score at 24 hours .A positive difference in score will be considered as improvement and a negative difference will be considered as worsening in outcomes. Values for cumulative SOFA scores as well as individual organ SOFA scores for hepatic, neurological, cardiovascular, renal, coagulopathy and respiratory will be analyzed.

    Time frame: At 24 hours of enrolment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Days in Intensive Care Unit (ICU)

    Total ICU stay in days will be noted

    Time frame: ICU days up to 28 day

  2. Days on mechanical ventilation

    This outcome will be measured for the participants who will be mechanically ventilated.

    Time frame: Days in which participant will be on mechanical ventilation up to 28 days

  3. Change in lactic acid levels in septic patient

    This outcome will be measured as difference of values from the time of enrolment to 6 hours in mmol/L in patients with diagnosis of sepsis in the trial

    Time frame: At 6 hours of enrolment of participant

  4. Change in Blood Sugar random (BSR) levels in patients with diabetic ketoacidosis

    This outcome will be measured in mg/dL in patients with diagnosis of diabetic ketoacidosis in the trial

    Time frame: At 6 hours of enrolment of participant

  5. Change in Power of hydrogen (PH) in patients with sepsis and diabetic ketoacidosis

    This outcome will be calculated as difference of values from time of enrolment to 6 hours.

    Time frame: At 6 hours of enrolment of participant

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Jinnah Post graduate Medical Centre
    Karachi, Sindh 71550, Pakistan
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kashani K, Omer T, Shaw AD. The Intensivist's Perspective of Shock, Volume Management, and Hemodynamic Monitoring. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2022 May;17(5):706-716. doi: 10.2215/CJN.14191021. Epub 2022 Apr 4. PubMed 35379765 ↗
  • Basmaji J, Arntfield R, Desai K, Lau VI, Lewis K, Rochwerg B, Fiorini K, Honarmand K, Slessarev M, Leligdowicz A, Park B, Prager R, Wong MYS, Jones PM, Ball IM, Orozco N, Meade M, Thabane L, Guyatt G. The Impact of Point-of-Care Ultrasound-Guided Resuscitation on Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Crit Care Med. 2024 Nov 1;52(11):1661-1673. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006399. Epub 2024 Sep 18. PubMed 39298556 ↗
  • Musikatavorn K, Plitawanon P, Lumlertgul S, Narajeenron K, Rojanasarntikul D, Tarapan T, Saoraya J. Randomized Controlled Trial of Ultrasound-guided Fluid Resuscitation of Sepsis-Induced Hypoperfusion and Septic Shock. West J Emerg Med. 2021 Feb 10;22(2):369-378. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2020.11.48571. PubMed 33856325 ↗
  • Spiliotaki E, Saranteas T, Moschovaki N, Panagouli K, Pistioli E, Kitsinelis V, Briasoulis P, Papadimos T. Inferior vena cava ultrasonography in the assessment of intravascular volume status and fluid responsiveness in the emergency department and intensive care unit: A critical analysis review. J Clin Ultrasound. 2022 Jun;50(5):733-744. doi: 10.1002/jcu.23194. Epub 2022 Mar 18. PubMed 35302241 ↗
  • Kaptein EM, Kaptein MJ. Inferior vena cava ultrasound and other techniques for assessment of intravascular and extravascular volume: an update. Clin Kidney J. 2023 Jun 29;16(11):1861-1877. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfad156. eCollection 2023 Nov. PubMed 37915939 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — No plan to share Individual patient data.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Aug 2024 to primary completion in Nov 2024, 3 months.

Of 301 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Sepsis, half reached primary completion within 23 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 42. This study's 3 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 324 studies reached it within 22 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 40.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 12, 2024
First posted
Jul 24, 2024
StartActual
Aug 1, 2024
Primary completionActual
Nov 30, 2024
CompletionActual
Nov 30, 2024
Last update
Dec 5, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 5, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06516692
Lead sponsor
Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 24, 2024
Start date
Aug 1, 2024
Primary completion
Nov 30, 2024
Completion
Nov 30, 2024
Last update
Dec 5, 2024

Study contacts

Shamim Kausar, EDIC,FCPS
principal investigator · Jinnah Post Graduate and Medical Centre

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion