ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07397689SORTUpdated Aug 7, 2026

Early Sepsis Recognition Tool

An observational study in Infection and Sepsis, sponsored by KK Women's and Children's Hospital. Recruiting at 19 sites in 9 countries. Open to participants aged Up to 18 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-07.

Primary conditionSepsisRegistry: InfectionsReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Infections — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Sepsis
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Sepsis, a narrower term within Infections.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by KK Women's and Children's Hospital · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Feb 2026; still recruiting 9 months later.

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
40,000
Ages
Up to 18 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study seeks to develop early recognition tools specially designed for children meeting the Phoenix definition and explore implementation science aspects by investigating facilitators and barriers to adopting Phoenix sepsis criteria in clinical practice. This addresses the critical need for systemic, evidence-based approaches to paediatric sepsis identification across diverse healthcare settings in Asia.

Read the detailed description

SPECIFIC AIMS AND HYPOTHESES Specific Aim 1: Among children \< 18 years old with suspected infection hospitalised in participating Pediatric Acute \& Critical Care Medicine Asian Network sites, the investigators seek to compare mortality risk among those with a Phoenix sepsis score of ≥ 2 against those with a score \< 2.

Hypothesis 1: The investigators hypothesize that that in-hospital mortality (%) will increase at least 5-times in both higher-resource and lower-resource sites when children with suspected infection have a Phoenix sepsis score of ≥ 2 (compared to those with a score of \<2). This is based on published Phoenix data.

Specific Aim 2: The investigators aim to derive and validate the Sepsis Optimal Recognition Toolkit in children (SORT) among children (\< 18 years old) with suspected infection in both higher-resource and lower-resource sites in the Pediatric Acute and Critical Care Medicine in Asia Network (PACCMAN).

Hypothesis 2: The investigators hypothesize that SORT will perform with a sensitivity of 90% and a c-statistic of at least 0.80 in predicting for sepsis as defined by a Phoenix Sepsis Score ≥ 2.

Specific Aim 3: The investigators seek to understand the feasibility and acceptability of implementing the Phoenix criteria across PACCMAN sites.

Hypothesis 3: The investigators hypothesize that the parameters required by the Phoenix sepsis score will be feasible and that clinicians and patients will find it acceptable to apply in routine practice.

Exploratory Aim: The investigators aim to study the mimickers of sepsis among children \< 18 years old with a Phoenix sepsis score of ≥ 2.

Hypothesis (Exploratory): The investigators hypothesize that children with tissue hypoperfusion from cardiac, hypovolemia and toxicology causes will fulfil Phoenix criteria and mimic sepsis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Infection
  • Sepsis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Phoenix sepsis score
  • early recognition
  • infection
  • child
03

In context

Sepsis Reclassified

2,417 studies on the registry are indexed under Sepsis; 542 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 40,000 is above the median of 150 across 1,162 observational studies indexed under Sepsis.

Browse Sepsis studies →

Lead sponsor

KK Women's and Children's Hospital is the lead sponsor of 137 studies on the registry; 33 are open to participants now.

Compared within Sepsis, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Infections. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Children \< 18 years old with suspected infection. Suspected infection is defined as children who undergo blood cultures and receive broad-spectrum anti-microbial agents in the first 24 hours of admission. Anti-microbial agents include antibiotics, antiviral, antifungal and antimalarial medications.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Children \< 18 years old
  • Suspected infection defined by (1) blood culture performed (irrespective of result), AND (2) use of broad-spectrum anti-microbial agents, in the first 24 hours of admission

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years and older
  • Patients who discharge At Own Risk (AOR) without outcome data
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
40,000 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
30 Days
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Retrospective Cohort

    ARM 1: Retrospective cohort study of children hospitalised with suspected infection from 1st January 2020 to 31st December 2025, among participating sites of the Pediatric Acute \& Critical Care Medicine Asian Network (PACCMAN).

    Other: Application of the Phoenix Sepsis Score

  • Prospective Cohort

    ARM 2: Prospective cohort study of children hospitalised with suspected infection from 1st February 2026 to 30th June 2028, among participating sites of the Pediatric Acute \& Critical Care Medicine Asian Network (PACCMAN)

    Other: Application of the Phoenix Sepsis Score

Interventions

  • OtherApplication of the Phoenix Sepsis Score

    Data Variables in the first 24 hours of hospital admission as per Phoenix Sepsis Score: Including that of respiratory function (PaO2:FiO2 and SpO2:FiO2 ratios, need for oxygen, high-flow, non-invasive or mechanical ventilation support), cardiovascular function (including need for vasoactive medications, lactate value and mean arterial pressure), coagulopathy (measured using platelets, International Normalized Ratio, D-dimer and Fibrinogen), neurologic dysfunction (measured with Glasgow Coma Scale and presence of fixed pupils), endocrine (blood glucose), immunologic (absolute neutrophil and absolute lymphocyte count), renal (creatinine levels) and hepatic (total bilirubin and alanine transaminase). Data from the Emergency Departments will need to be linked to inpatient records to obtain the worst values in each domain that occurred in the first 24 hours.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Performance of Phoenix Sepsis Score in Pediatric Acute and Critical Care Medicine in Asia Network (PACCMAN) sites in Asia

    Following Specific Aim 1: The primary outcome measure is to validate the Phoenix Sepsis Score in PACCMAN sites in Asia, with the clinical outcome of Mortality. The performance will be measured using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).

    Time frame: 2 years

  2. Performance of Phoenix Sepsis Score in Pediatric Acute and Critical Care Medicine in Asia Network (PACCMAN) sites in Asia

    Following Specific Aim 1: The primary outcome measure is to validate the Phoenix Sepsis Score in PACCMAN sites in Asia, with the clinical outcome of Mortality. The performance will be measured using area under precision recall curve (AUPRC). The investigators will also measure the performance using sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values.

    Time frame: 2 years

  3. Derivation of an early recognition tool called Sepsis Optimal Recognition Toolkit in children (SORT)

    Following the second specific Aim, the outcome is for the model SORT to be derived with a sensitivity of 90% and a c-statistic of at least 0.80 in predicting for sepsis as defined by a Phoenix Sepsis Score ≥ 2.

    Time frame: 2 years

07

Study locations

5 of 19 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Arabi YM, Alsaawi A, Alzahrani M, Al Khathaami AM, AlHazme RH, Al Mutrafy A, Al Qarni A, Vishwakarma RK, Al Anazi R, Al Qasim E, Abdukahil SA, Al-Rabeah FK, Al Ghamdi H, Alatassi A, Al-Dorzi HM, Al-Hameed F, Babakr R, Alghamdi AA, Bin Salih S, Alharbi A, AlKatheri ME, Mustafa H, Al-Qahtani S, Al Qahtani S, Alselaim N, Tashkandi N, Alyami AH, Alyousef Z, AlDibasi O, Al-Qahtani AH, Aldawood A, Caswell A, Al Ayadhi N, Al Rehaili H, Al Arfaj A, Al Mubarak H, Alwasaidi T, Zahrani S, Alalawi Y, Alhadab A, Nasser T, Omer T, Al Johani SM, Alajlan A, Sadat M, Alzunitan M, Al Mohrij S; SCREEN Trial Group and the Saudi Critical Care Trials Group. Electronic Sepsis Screening Among Patients Admitted to Hospital Wards: A Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial. JAMA. 2025 Mar 4;333(9):763-773. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.25982. PubMed 39658862 ↗
  • Sanchez-Pinto LN, Bennett TD, DeWitt PE, Russell S, Rebull MN, Martin B, Akech S, Albers DJ, Alpern ER, Balamuth F, Bembea M, Chisti MJ, Evans I, Horvat CM, Jaramillo-Bustamante JC, Kissoon N, Menon K, Scott HF, Weiss SL, Wiens MO, Zimmerman JJ, Argent AC, Sorce LR, Schlapbach LJ, Watson RS; Society of Critical Care Medicine Pediatric Sepsis Definition Task Force; Biban P, Carrol E, Chiotos K, Flauzino De Oliveira C, Hall MW, Inwald D, Ishimine P, Levin M, Lodha R, Nadel S, Nakagawa S, Peters MJ, Randolph AG, Ranjit S, Souza DC, Tissieres P, Wynn JL. Development and Validation of the Phoenix Criteria for Pediatric Sepsis and Septic Shock. JAMA. 2024 Feb 27;331(8):675-686. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.0196. PubMed 38245897 ↗
  • Schlapbach LJ, Weiss SL, Bembea MM, Carcillo JA, Leclerc F, Leteurtre S, Tissieres P, Wynn JL, Zimmerman J, Lacroix J; Pediatric Organ Dysfunction Information Update Mandate (PODIUM) Collaborative. Scoring Systems for Organ Dysfunction and Multiple Organ Dysfunction: The PODIUM Consensus Conference. Pediatrics. 2022 Jan 1;149(1 Suppl 1):S23-S31. doi: 10.1542/peds.2021-052888D. PubMed 34970683 ↗
  • Rudd KE, Johnson SC, Agesa KM, Shackelford KA, Tsoi D, Kievlan DR, Colombara DV, Ikuta KS, Kissoon N, Finfer S, Fleischmann-Struzek C, Machado FR, Reinhart KK, Rowan K, Seymour CW, Watson RS, West TE, Marinho F, Hay SI, Lozano R, Lopez AD, Angus DC, Murray CJL, Naghavi M. Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990-2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet. 2020 Jan 18;395(10219):200-211. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32989-7. PubMed 31954465 ↗
  • Watson RS, Carrol ED, Carter MJ, Kissoon N, Ranjit S, Schlapbach LJ. The burden and contemporary epidemiology of sepsis in children. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2024 Sep;8(9):670-681. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(24)00140-8. PubMed 39142741 ↗
  • Schlapbach LJ, Watson RS, Sorce LR, Argent AC, Menon K, Hall MW, Akech S, Albers DJ, Alpern ER, Balamuth F, Bembea M, Biban P, Carrol ED, Chiotos K, Chisti MJ, DeWitt PE, Evans I, Flauzino de Oliveira C, Horvat CM, Inwald D, Ishimine P, Jaramillo-Bustamante JC, Levin M, Lodha R, Martin B, Nadel S, Nakagawa S, Peters MJ, Randolph AG, Ranjit S, Rebull MN, Russell S, Scott HF, de Souza DC, Tissieres P, Weiss SL, Wiens MO, Wynn JL, Kissoon N, Zimmerman JJ, Sanchez-Pinto LN, Bennett TD; Society of Critical Care Medicine Pediatric Sepsis Definition Task Force. International Consensus Criteria for Pediatric Sepsis and Septic Shock. JAMA. 2024 Feb 27;331(8):665-674. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.0179. PubMed 38245889 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Data dictionaries, aggregate data and analytical plan can be shared with investigators who submit their requests to the Responsible Party with a reasonable request.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan

Time frame: Start Date: December 2028 End Date: December 2029

Access criteria: Researchers should submit the request to the Responsible Party listed in this study. Data dictionaries, aggregate data and analytical plan can be shared.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Feb 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2028, 28 months after the start.

Of 492 non-industry observational studies under Sepsis, half reached primary completion within 29 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 58. This study's planned 28 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 544 studies reached it within 27 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 56.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 2, 2026
First posted
Feb 9, 2026
StartActual
Feb 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jun 2028
CompletionEst.
Dec 2028
Last update
Aug 7, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 7, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07397689
Collaborators
National Medical Research Council (NMRC), Singapore
Responsible party
Chong Shu-Ling (Dr, KK Women's and Children's Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 9, 2026
Start date
Feb 1, 2026
Primary completion
Jun 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 7, 2026

Study contacts

Chong Shu-Ling Dr, MBBS, MRCPCH, MCI, MPH
Contact
Chong.Shu-Ling@kkh.com.sg
65 -81211519

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion