ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06512753HEMLETUpdated Jul 22, 2024

The Effectiveness of Hydroxychloroquine Versus Methotrexate in the Treatment of Lichen Planopilaris in Routine Clinical Care: a Patient Preference Trial

An observational study in Lichen Planopilaris and Cicatricial Alopecia, sponsored by Erasmus Medical Center. Recruiting at 1 site in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-07-22.

Sponsored by Erasmus Medical Center · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jul 2026, 4 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Jul 2024; still recruiting 2 years 4 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
56
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Rationale Lichen planopilaris (LPP) is a prevalent form of cicatricial alopecia, predominantly affecting women and causing irreversible hair loss. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and methotrexate (MTX) are the most frequently used systemics for treatment of LPP in daily practice. Due to the absence of well-established treatment guidelines, this study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of HCQ and MTX in routine clinical care.

Objective(s) To investigate the effectiveness of HCQ and MTX in the treatment of adults with lichen planopilaris in routine clinical care.

Study type Prospective, patient preference clinical trial with a duration up to 48 weeks in accordance with the routine clinical care guidelines.

Study population This study will include adults (≥18 years) diagnosed with LPP.

Methods Patients will choose between HCQ and MTX treatment as in routine clinical care, receiving follow-up in accordance with standard clinical practices. They will not be randomized. The primary endpoint is the measurement of the Lichen Planopilaris Activity Index (LPPAI) at the 6-months, providing a quantitative assessment of the disease's activity and response to the selected treatment. The Skindex-29 questionnaire will be conducted at each visit, allowing evaluation of the impact on patients' quality of life.

Read the detailed description

Treatment of LPP remains a challenge due to limited evidence-based guidelines and a lack of randomized controlled trials, leading to the absence of standardized therapeutic protocols and outcome measures. Currently, the treatment goal for LPP primarily focuses on halting disease progression to minimize further hair loss and alleviate associated symptoms. Treatment options for LPP include topical/intralesional corticosteroids, and systemic therapies such as hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), methotrexate (MTX), and other immunosuppressive agents. However, the absence of daily practice studies makes it challenging to establish therapeutic recommendations.

This patient preferred trial aims to fill a crucial knowledge gap in LPP management. Existing evidence lacks comprehensive guidelines for treating LPP effectively, leaving current approaches largely empirical. Aligning with the urgent need for answers highlighted by the 'Nederlandse Vereniging voor Dermatologie en Venereologie Kennisagenda Dermatologie 2019': 'Q9 - Wat is de effectiviteit van systemische behandeling bij patiënten met cicatriciële alopeciëen?' (What is the most effective systemic treatment for cicatricial alopecias) (13) underscores the pressing concern regarding the effectiveness of systemic therapy in cicatricial alopecia. This study seeks to contribute novel insights to the field by comparing the effectiveness of the two most commonly used systemic treatments, HCQ and MTX in treating LPP. By comparing the effectiveness and safety profiles of these systemics, this study endeavours to provide valuable information that can guide evidence-based treatment decisions and enhance the overall understanding of LPP management.

Objective(s)

The main objective is to assess the effectiveness in routine clinical care of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and methotrexate (MTX) in the treatment of adults diagnosed with lichen planopilaris (LPP) by evaluating the impact on the Lichen Planopilaris Activity Index (LPPAI) after a 6-month treatment period.

Primary objective:

To investigate the difference in LPPAI between baseline and 24 weeks of treatment between the HCQ and MTX group

Secondary objectives:

  1. To compare LPPAI between HCQ and MTX at 0, 12, 24, 36, and 48 weeks.
  1. To compare the quality of life between HCQ and MTX at 0, 12, 24, 36, and 48 weeks.
  1. To compare the side effects of HCQ and MTX.
  1. To compare the proportion of patients who discontinued therapy due to sides effects in both groups.

Skindex-29

The Skindex-29 is a dermatology-specific questionnaire. It evaluates the effect of skin conditions on physical, psychological, and social aspects. It assesses the extent to which a skin condition has influenced quality of life over the past week. The 29 questions are divided into 3 domains: symptoms, emotions, and functioning. A higher score corresponds to a greater impact on quality of life.

Other disease- and treatment-related characteristics will be retrieved from the electronic patient records.

02

Conditions studied

  • Lichen Planopilaris
  • Cicatricial Alopecia

Keywords

  • Lichen planopilaris
  • Cicatricial alopecia
  • Hydroxychloroquine
  • Methotrexate
03

In context

Lichen Planus

74 studies on the registry are indexed under Lichen Planus; 15 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 56 is below the median of 80 across 17 observational studies indexed under Lichen Planus.

Browse Lichen Planus studies →

Lead sponsor

Erasmus Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 478 studies on the registry; 183 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

All adult (≥18 years) patients diagnosed with LPP. All patients will be recruited at the dermatology outpatient clinics in the Erasmus University Medical Center.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age of 18 years and older.
  • Diagnosed with LPP.
  • Willingness to provide for participation in the study.
  • No or known allergies to HCQ or MTX.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Histopathological different diagnosis than LPP.
  • Inability to adhere to the study protocol, including medication intake, clinic visits, and questionnaire completion.
  • Patients who are ineligible for the HCQ arm (due to ), are automatically included in the MTX arm.
  • Contraindications HCQ:

retinopathy and/or maculopathy

myasthenia gravis

body weight less than 35 kg

Patients who are ineligible for the MTX arm (due to contraindications), are automatically included in the HCQ arm.

  • Contraindications MTX:

Conception (both male and female) and lactation

Severe kidney or liver dysfunction (fibrosis, cirrhosis) or alcohol abuse

Bone marrow hypoplasia, immunodeficiency

Anemia, leukopenia, or thrombocytopenia

Poor nutritional status (low albumin)

or allergy to MTX

Lung toxicity due to MTX or significant reduction in lung function.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
56 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ)

    HCQ is administered orally at a dosage of 400 mg daily.

    Drug: Hydroxychloroquine

  • Methotrexate (MTX)

    MTX is given at a dose of 15 mg per week, orally or subcutaneously. Additionally, folate supplementation is administered concurrently as part of standard care, with folate 10 mg/week administered 24 hours after MTX intake.

    Drug: Methotrexate

Interventions

  • HCQ (15) is administered orally at a dosage of 400 mg daily.

  • MTX (16) is given at a dose of 15 mg per week, orally or subcutaneously. Additionally, folate supplementation is administered concurrently as part of standard care, with folate 10 mg/week administered 24 hours after MTX intake.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. LPPAI

    The main study parameter is the change in Lichen PlanoPilaris Activity Index (LPPAI) measured at 6 months (0-10).

    Time frame: at 24 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. LPPAI

    The main study parameter is the change in Lichen PlanoPilaris Activity Index (LPPAI) measured (0-10).

    Time frame: at 0, 12, 36, 48 weeks

  2. Skindex-29

    Quality of Life

    Time frame: at 0, 12, 24, 36, 48 weeks

  3. Side effects

    Number of side effects

    Time frame: at 0, 12, 24, 36, 48 weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 22, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06512753
Responsible party
DirkJan Hijnen (MD, PhD, Erasmus Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 22, 2024
Start date
Jul 1, 2024
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 22, 2024

Study contacts

Mathias Willaert, MD
Contact
HEMLET@erasmusmc.nl
(010) 704 01 10
DirkJan Hijnen, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Erasmus Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion