ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06478797ANDES-CHILDUpdated Jun 27, 2024

Early Resuscitation in Paediatric Sepsis Using Inotropes

A Phase 2 interventional study of Fluid and Adrenalin in Sepsis, sponsored by NATALIA LOPERA MUNERA. Not yet recruiting at 4 sites in 3 countries. Open to participants aged 28 Days to 18 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-06-27.

Sponsored by NATALIA LOPERA MUNERA · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jul 2025, 1 year 4 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
28 Days to 18 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Septic shock in children still carries substantial mortality and morbidity. While resuscitation with 40-60 mL/kg intravenous fluid boluses remains a cornerstone of initial resuscitation, an increasing body of evidence indicates potential for harm related to high volume fluid administration. The investigators hypothesize that a protocol on early use of inotropes in children with septic shock is feasible and will lead to less fluid bolus use compared to standard fluid resuscitation. Here, the investigators describe the protocol of the Adrenaline in Early Sepsis Resuscitation in Children- A Randomised Controlled Pilot Study in the Emergency Department (ANDES CHILD)

02

Conditions studied

  • Sepsis

Keywords

  • pediatric sepsis
  • septic shock
  • inotropes
  • adrenaline
  • emergency department
  • fluid
  • child
03

In context

Sepsis

2,416 studies on the registry are indexed under Sepsis; 541 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 40 is below the median of 102 across 1,165 interventional studies indexed under Sepsis.

Browse Sepsis studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with NATALIA LOPERA MUNERA as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
28 Days to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • 28 days and \<18 years
  • Treated for sepsis
  • Received at least 20 ml/kg fluid bolus in the last 4 hours and clinician decides to continue treating signs of shock
  • Parental/caregiver consent prior to or after enrolment

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Preterm babies born \<34 weeks gestation that have a corrected age of \<28 days
  • Received ≥ 40 mL/kg of fluid boluses during the 4 h pre-enrolment
  • Inotrope infusion commenced pre-enrolment
  • Lack of access (intraosseous, central venous or peripheral) to administer fluids and/or inotropes after 60min of enrolment
  • Cardiomyopathy or chronic cardiac failure
  • Chronic hypertension due to cardiovascular or renal disease, requiring regular antihypertensive treatment
  • Known chronic renal failure (defined as requiring renal replacement therapy)
  • Known chronic hepatic failure
  • Palliative care patient/patient with limitation of treatment (not for inotropes, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, intubation or ventilation)
  • Cardiopulmonary arrest in the past 2 h requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation of >2min duration, or death is deemed to be imminent or inevitable during this admission.
  • Major bleeding with haemorrhagic shock
  • Sepsis is not likely to be the cause of shock
  • Previous enrollment in ANDES-CHILD
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Control group

    Sepsis will be treated with a standardized therapy protocol, where participants will receive fluids for resuscitation. Specifically, they will receive 40-60 ml/kg of fluids before the initiation of inotropes

    Other: Fluid

  • Experimental
    Intervention group

    Sepsis will be treated with early inotropes, where participants will receive adrenaline after the first bolus of 20 ml/kg

    Drug: Adrenalin

Interventions

  • OtherFluid

    Sepsis will be treated with standardized therapy protocol, where participants receive fluids (balanced or non-balanced crystalloids, or colloids) to be resuscitated. Specifically, they will receive 40-60 ml/kg of fluids before the initiation of inotropes.

  • Sepsis will be treated with early inotropes, where participants will receive adrenaline at a dose of 0.05 - 0.1 mcg/kg/min via peripheral intravenous, intraosseous, or central venous routes after the first fluid bolus of 20 ml/kg

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Survival free of organ support at 28 days

    Organ support will be defined as invasive ventilation support, cardiovascular organ support (inotropic or ECMO support), and renal replacement therapy

    Time frame: From time of randomization until 28 days, if death occurs, time is set to 0 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Recuitment rates

    Secondary feasibility outcome 1

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Proportion of eligible randomised

    Other feasibility 2

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. Proportion of eligible consented using perspective consent and consent to continue

    Other feasibility 3

    Time frame: 12 months

  4. Time to initiation of inotropes between the control and the early inotrope arm

    Other feasibility 4

    Time frame: 24 hours

  5. Amount of fluid delivered (in mLs per kg) during the first 24 h between the control and the early inotrope arm

    Other feasibility 5

    Time frame: 24 hours

  6. Protocol violations

    Other feasibility 6. Percentage of patients not treated according to the assigned group.

    Time frame: 12 months

  7. Survival free of inotrope support at 7 days

    Secondary exploratory clinical outcome 1

    Time frame: 7 days

  8. Survival free of invasive ventilation support at 7 days

    Secondary exploratory clinical outcome 2

    Time frame: 7 days

  9. 28-day mortality

    Secondary exploratory clinical outcome 3

    Time frame: From time of randomization until 28 days

  10. Survival free of PICU censored at 28 days

    Secondary exploratory clinical outcome 4

    Time frame: 28 days

  11. PICU length of stay

    Secondary exploratory clinical outcome 5

    Time frame: 28 days

  12. Hospital length of stay

    Secondary exploratory clinical outcome 6

    Time frame: 28 days

  13. Functional Status Score at 28 days

    Secondary exploratory clinical outcome 7

    Time frame: 28 days

  14. Modified Pediatric Overall Performance Category at 28 days

    Secondary exploratory clinical outcome 7

    Time frame: 28 days

  15. Amount of fluid (mLs per kg) received during the first hour, and by 4, 12, and 24 hour post enrolment

    Secondary exploratory clinical outcome 8

    Time frame: 24 hours

  16. Proportion of patients with lactate <2 mmol/l at 6, 12, and 24 hours post enrolment

    Secondary exploratory clinical outcome 9

    Time frame: 24 hours

  17. Time to reversal of tachycardia during the first 24 h

    Secondary exploratory clinical outcome 10

    Time frame: 24 hours

  18. Time to shock reversal, defined as cessation of inotropes for at least 4 h censored at 28 days

    Secondary exploratory clinical outcome 11

    Time frame: 28 days

07

Study locations

4 sites
  • Hospital de Niños "Dr. Orlando Alassia"
    Santa Fe, Argentina
  • Hospital Regional San Juan De Dios Tarija
    Tarija, Bolivia
    • Nils Casson, MD · Contactnilsjefe1@hotmail.com · +591 7 6187393
    • Nils Casson, MD · Principal investigator
  • Hospital De Clínicas
    Asunción, Paraguay
    • Ricardo Iramain, MD · Contactiramainricardo@gmail.com · +595 981300491
    • Ricardo Iramain, MD · Principal investigator
  • Hospital Niños de Acosta Ñu
    San Lorenzo, Paraguay
    • Viviana Pavlicich, MD · Contactp_viviana@hotmail.com · +595 971206043
    • Viviana Pavlicich, MD · Principal investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, Bellomo R, Bernard GR, Chiche JD, Coopersmith CM, Hotchkiss RS, Levy MM, Marshall JC, Martin GS, Opal SM, Rubenfeld GD, van der Poll T, Vincent JL, Angus DC. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287. PubMed 26903338 ↗
  • Schlapbach LJ, Kissoon N. Defining Pediatric Sepsis. JAMA Pediatr. 2018 Apr 1;172(4):312-314. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.5208. No abstract available. PubMed 29459982 ↗
  • Scott HF, Brou L, Deakyne SJ, Kempe A, Fairclough DL, Bajaj L. Association Between Early Lactate Levels and 30-Day Mortality in Clinically Suspected Sepsis in Children. JAMA Pediatr. 2017 Mar 1;171(3):249-255. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.3681. PubMed 28068437 ↗
  • Rudd KE, Johnson SC, Agesa KM, Shackelford KA, Tsoi D, Kievlan DR, Colombara DV, Ikuta KS, Kissoon N, Finfer S, Fleischmann-Struzek C, Machado FR, Reinhart KK, Rowan K, Seymour CW, Watson RS, West TE, Marinho F, Hay SI, Lozano R, Lopez AD, Angus DC, Murray CJL, Naghavi M. Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990-2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet. 2020 Jan 18;395(10219):200-211. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32989-7. PubMed 31954465 ↗
  • Schlapbach LJ, Straney L, Alexander J, MacLaren G, Festa M, Schibler A, Slater A; ANZICS Paediatric Study Group. Mortality related to invasive infections, sepsis, and septic shock in critically ill children in Australia and New Zealand, 2002-13: a multicentre retrospective cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015 Jan;15(1):46-54. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(14)71003-5. Epub 2014 Dec 1. PubMed 25471555 ↗
  • Schlapbach LJ, Aebischer M, Adams M, Natalucci G, Bonhoeffer J, Latzin P, Nelle M, Bucher HU, Latal B; Swiss Neonatal Network and Follow-Up Group. Impact of sepsis on neurodevelopmental outcome in a Swiss National Cohort of extremely premature infants. Pediatrics. 2011 Aug;128(2):e348-57. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-3338. Epub 2011 Jul 18. PubMed 21768312 ↗
  • Kirsten R, Heintz B, Nelson K, Oremek G, Speck U. Influence of two guar preparations on glycosylated hemoglobin, total cholesterol and triglycerides in patients with diabetes mellitus. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol. 1992 Dec;30(12):582-6. PubMed 1335441 ↗
  • Reinhart K, Daniels R, Kissoon N, Machado FR, Schachter RD, Finfer S. Recognizing Sepsis as a Global Health Priority - A WHO Resolution. N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 3;377(5):414-417. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1707170. Epub 2017 Jun 28. No abstract available. PubMed 28658587 ↗
  • Schlapbach LJ, Kissoon N, Alhawsawi A, Aljuaid MH, Daniels R, Gorordo-Delsol LA, Machado F, Malik I, Nsutebu EF, Finfer S, Reinhart K. World Sepsis Day: a global agenda to target a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2020 Sep 1;319(3):L518-L522. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00369.2020. Epub 2020 Aug 19. No abstract available. PubMed 32812788 ↗
  • Schlapbach LJ, Thompson K, Finfer SR. The WHO resolution on sepsis: what action is needed in Australia? Med J Aust. 2019 Nov;211(9):395-397.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50279. Epub 2019 Jul 22. No abstract available. PubMed 31329300 ↗
  • Weiss SL, Peters MJ, Alhazzani W, Agus MSD, Flori HR, Inwald DP, Nadel S, Schlapbach LJ, Tasker RC, Argent AC, Brierley J, Carcillo J, Carrol ED, Carroll CL, Cheifetz IM, Choong K, Cies JJ, Cruz AT, De Luca D, Deep A, Faust SN, De Oliveira CF, Hall MW, Ishimine P, Javouhey E, Joosten KFM, Joshi P, Karam O, Kneyber MCJ, Lemson J, MacLaren G, Mehta NM, Moller MH, Newth CJL, Nguyen TC, Nishisaki A, Nunnally ME, Parker MM, Paul RM, Randolph AG, Ranjit S, Romer LH, Scott HF, Tume LN, Verger JT, Williams EA, Wolf J, Wong HR, Zimmerman JJ, Kissoon N, Tissieres P. Surviving sepsis campaign international guidelines for the management of septic shock and sepsis-associated organ dysfunction in children. Intensive Care Med. 2020 Feb;46(Suppl 1):10-67. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05878-6. PubMed 32030529 ↗
  • Evans IVR, Phillips GS, Alpern ER, Angus DC, Friedrich ME, Kissoon N, Lemeshow S, Levy MM, Parker MM, Terry KM, Watson RS, Weiss SL, Zimmerman J, Seymour CW. Association Between the New York Sepsis Care Mandate and In-Hospital Mortality for Pediatric Sepsis. JAMA. 2018 Jul 24;320(4):358-367. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.9071. PubMed 30043064 ↗
  • Davis AL, Carcillo JA, Aneja RK, Deymann AJ, Lin JC, Nguyen TC, Okhuysen-Cawley RS, Relvas MS, Rozenfeld RA, Skippen PW, Stojadinovic BJ, Williams EA, Yeh TS, Balamuth F, Brierley J, de Caen AR, Cheifetz IM, Choong K, Conway E Jr, Cornell T, Doctor A, Dugas MA, Feldman JD, Fitzgerald JC, Flori HR, Fortenberry JD, Graciano AL, Greenwald BM, Hall MW, Han YY, Hernan LJ, Irazuzta JE, Iselin E, van der Jagt EW, Jeffries HE, Kache S, Katyal C, Kissoon N, Kon AA, Kutko MC, MacLaren G, Maul T, Mehta R, Odetola F, Parbuoni K, Paul R, Peters MJ, Ranjit S, Reuter-Rice KE, Schnitzler EJ, Scott HF, Torres A Jr, Weingarten-Arams J, Weiss SL, Zimmerman JJ, Zuckerberg AL. American College of Critical Care Medicine Clinical Practice Parameters for Hemodynamic Support of Pediatric and Neonatal Septic Shock. Crit Care Med. 2017 Jun;45(6):1061-1093. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002425. Erratum In: Crit Care Med. 2017 Sep;45(9):e993. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002573.. Kissoon, Niranjan Tex [corrected to Kissoon, Niranjan]; Weingarten-Abrams, Jacki [corrected to Weingarten-Arams, Jacki]. PubMed 28509730 ↗
  • Maitland K, Kiguli S, Opoka RO, Engoru C, Olupot-Olupot P, Akech SO, Nyeko R, Mtove G, Reyburn H, Lang T, Brent B, Evans JA, Tibenderana JK, Crawley J, Russell EC, Levin M, Babiker AG, Gibb DM; FEAST Trial Group. Mortality after fluid bolus in African children with severe infection. N Engl J Med. 2011 Jun 30;364(26):2483-95. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1101549. Epub 2011 May 26. PubMed 21615299 ↗
  • Sinitsky L, Walls D, Nadel S, Inwald DP. Fluid overload at 48 hours is associated with respiratory morbidity but not mortality in a general PICU: retrospective cohort study. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2015 Mar;16(3):205-9. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000318. PubMed 25581632 ↗
  • Long E, Babl F, Dalziel S, Dalton S, Etheridge C, Duke T; Paediatric Research in Emergency Departments International Collaborative (PREDICT). Fluid resuscitation for paediatric sepsis: A survey of senior emergency physicians in Australia and New Zealand. Emerg Med Australas. 2015 Jun;27(3):245-50. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12400. Epub 2015 Apr 28. PubMed 25919571 ↗
  • Gelbart B, Schlapbach L, Ganeshalingham A, Ganu S, Erickson S, Oberender F, Hoq M, Williams G, George S, Festa M; Paediatric Study Group of the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society. Fluid bolus therapy in critically ill children: a survey of practice among paediatric intensive care doctors in Australia and New Zealand. Crit Care Resusc. 2018 Jun;20(2):131-138. PubMed 29852852 ↗
  • Brierley J, Peters MJ. Distinct hemodynamic patterns of septic shock at presentation to pediatric intensive care. Pediatrics. 2008 Oct;122(4):752-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-1979. PubMed 18829798 ↗
  • Finfer S, Myburgh J, Bellomo R. Intravenous fluid therapy in critically ill adults. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2018 Sep;14(9):541-557. doi: 10.1038/s41581-018-0044-0. Erratum In: Nat Rev Nephrol. 2018 Nov;14(11):717. doi: 10.1038/s41581-018-0060-0. PubMed 30072710 ↗
  • Gamble C, Krishan A, Stocken D, Lewis S, Juszczak E, Dore C, Williamson PR, Altman DG, Montgomery A, Lim P, Berlin J, Senn S, Day S, Barbachano Y, Loder E. Guidelines for the Content of Statistical Analysis Plans in Clinical Trials. JAMA. 2017 Dec 19;318(23):2337-2343. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.18556. PubMed 29260229 ↗
  • Harron K, Woolfall K, Dwan K, Gamble C, Mok Q, Ramnarayan P, Gilbert R. Deferred Consent for Randomized Controlled Trials in Emergency Care Settings. Pediatrics. 2015 Nov;136(5):e1316-22. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-0512. Epub 2015 Oct 5. PubMed 26438711 ↗
  • Goldstein B, Giroir B, Randolph A; International Consensus Conference on Pediatric Sepsis. International pediatric sepsis consensus conference: definitions for sepsis and organ dysfunction in pediatrics. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2005 Jan;6(1):2-8. doi: 10.1097/01.PCC.0000149131.72248.E6. PubMed 15636651 ↗
  • Matics TJ, Sanchez-Pinto LN. Adaptation and Validation of a Pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score and Evaluation of the Sepsis-3 Definitions in Critically Ill Children. JAMA Pediatr. 2017 Oct 2;171(10):e172352. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.2352. Epub 2017 Oct 2. PubMed 28783810 ↗
  • Pollack MM, Holubkov R, Funai T, Clark A, Moler F, Shanley T, Meert K, Newth CJ, Carcillo J, Berger JT, Doctor A, Berg RA, Dalton H, Wessel DL, Harrison RE, Dean JM, Jenkins TL. Relationship between the functional status scale and the pediatric overall performance category and pediatric cerebral performance category scales. JAMA Pediatr. 2014 Jul;168(7):671-6. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.5316. PubMed 24862461 ↗
  • Cook D, Lauzier F, Rocha MG, Sayles MJ, Finfer S. Serious adverse events in academic critical care research. CMAJ. 2008 Apr 22;178(9):1181-4. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.071366. No abstract available. PubMed 18427095 ↗
  • Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. Epub 2008 Sep 30. PubMed 18929686 ↗
  • Schlapbach LJ, Gibbons K, Ridolfi R, Harley A, Cree M, Long D, Buckley D, Erickson S, Festa M, George S, King M, Singh P, Raman S, Bellomo R; RESPOND PICU study investigators and the Australian New Zealand Intensive Care Society Paediatric Study Group (ANZICS PSG). Resuscitation in Paediatric Sepsis Using Metabolic Resuscitation-A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study in the Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (RESPOND PICU): Study Protocol and Analysis Plan. Front Pediatr. 2021 Apr 30;9:663435. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.663435. eCollection 2021. PubMed 34041208 ↗
  • Brierley J, Carcillo JA, Choong K, Cornell T, Decaen A, Deymann A, Doctor A, Davis A, Duff J, Dugas MA, Duncan A, Evans B, Feldman J, Felmet K, Fisher G, Frankel L, Jeffries H, Greenwald B, Gutierrez J, Hall M, Han YY, Hanson J, Hazelzet J, Hernan L, Kiff J, Kissoon N, Kon A, Irazuzta J, Lin J, Lorts A, Mariscalco M, Mehta R, Nadel S, Nguyen T, Nicholson C, Peters M, Okhuysen-Cawley R, Poulton T, Relves M, Rodriguez A, Rozenfeld R, Schnitzler E, Shanley T, Kache S, Skippen P, Torres A, von Dessauer B, Weingarten J, Yeh T, Zaritsky A, Stojadinovic B, Zimmerman J, Zuckerberg A. Clinical practice parameters for hemodynamic support of pediatric and neonatal septic shock: 2007 update from the American College of Critical Care Medicine. Crit Care Med. 2009 Feb;37(2):666-88. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31819323c6. Erratum In: Crit Care Med. 2009 Apr;37(4):1536. Skache, Sara [corrected to Kache, Saraswati]; Irazusta, Jose [corrected to Irazuzta, Jose]. PubMed 19325359 ↗
  • Levin M, Cunnington AJ, Wilson C, Nadel S, Lang HJ, Ninis N, McCulloch M, Argent A, Buys H, Moxon CA, Best A, Nijman RG, Hoggart CJ. Effects of saline or albumin fluid bolus in resuscitation: evidence from re-analysis of the FEAST trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2019 Jul;7(7):581-593. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30114-6. Epub 2019 Jun 10. PubMed 31196803 ↗
  • Inwald DP, Canter R, Woolfall K, Mouncey P, Zenasni Z, O'Hara C, Carter A, Jones N, Lyttle MD, Nadel S, Peters MJ, Harrison DA, Rowan KM; PERUKI (Paediatric Emergency Research in the UK and Ireland) and PICS SG (Paediatric Intensive Care Society Study Group). Restricted fluid bolus volume in early septic shock: results of the Fluids in Shock pilot trial. Arch Dis Child. 2019 May;104(5):426-431. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-314924. Epub 2018 Aug 7. PubMed 30087153 ↗
  • Parker MJ, Thabane L, Fox-Robichaud A, Liaw P, Choong K; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group and the Canadian Critical Care Translational Biology Group. A trial to determine whether septic shock-reversal is quicker in pediatric patients randomized to an early goal-directed fluid-sparing strategy versus usual care (SQUEEZE): study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2016 Nov 22;17(1):556. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1689-2. PubMed 27876084 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Jul 2024; primary completion for Jul 2025, 12 months later.

Of 43 non-industry phase 2 interventional studies under Sepsis, half reached primary completion within 30 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 35. This study's planned 12 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 60 studies reached it within 29 months; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 37.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 19, 2024
First posted
Jun 27, 2024
StartEst.
Jul 2024
Primary completionEst.
Jul 2025
CompletionEst.
Dec 2025
Last update
Jun 27, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 27, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06478797
Lead sponsor
NATALIA LOPERA MUNERA
Collaborators
University Children's Hospital, Zurich, Universidad Nacional del Nordeste, Argentina, Instituto Latino Americano de Sepse, Hospital Pablo Tobón Uribe
Responsible party
NATALIA LOPERA MUNERA (Pediatrician, principal investigator, Hospital General Pediátrico Niños de Acosta Ñu) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jun 27, 2024
Start date
Jul 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jul 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 27, 2024

Study contacts

Natalia Lopera, MD
Contact
natalialoperam@gmail.com
+57 3122978381

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jun 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Epinephrine

Start the discussion