ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06477965Updated Oct 28, 2024

Embo Registry; National Registry for Artery Embolization

An observational study in Chronic Pain, Osteoarthritis, Knee and Osteoarthritis Thumb, sponsored by Vascular Solutions of North Carolina. Recruiting at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-10-28.

Sponsored by Vascular Solutions of North Carolina · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2024; still recruiting 2 years 3 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
1,000
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Embo Registry is a retrospective and prospective observational study to evaluate real world effectiveness and the use of Artery Embolization as a treatment for chronic pain with patients that have osteoarthritis and localized pain to provide symptomatic relief. This study is to determine the efficacy and validity of procedure and that following procedure patients had decreased pain and improved quality of life.

Read the detailed description

Embolic Solution are intended for use in occluding blood vessels for therapeutic or operative purposes. The embolic solution is used during an outpatient procedure, the physician will insert a small catheter onto the artery supplying the lining of the target joint or target localized pain. Tiny particles are then injected through the catheter into these arteries, reducing blood flow to the target area. This reduces the amount of inflammation associated with osteoarthritis, tendonitis, tenosynovitis or an injury, a process that can help decrease symptoms or eliminate the associated localized pain to this area. With understanding that it does not treat the underlying cartilage destruction or underlying condition causing pain but would like to determine the efficacy and validity of this treatment. For the study to determine efficacy and overall improvement of patients post procedure by comparing patient's pain preoperative and post operatively, if there is a decreased use of medication preoperatively compared to post procedure and increased quality of life preoperative and post procedure. Clinical outcomes of improvement will be determined by improvement of Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Index (WOMAC), EQ-5D-5L Quality of Life Questionnaire, and to determine if patients had decrease used of medication prescribed preoperatively.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Pain
  • Osteoarthritis, Knee
  • Osteoarthritis Thumb
  • Osteoarthritis Shoulder
  • Pain, Chronic
  • Tendonitis Elbow
  • Tendonitis Shoulder
  • Tendonitis;Achilles
  • Tenosynovitis

Keywords

  • Pain
  • Osteoarthritis
  • Arthritis
  • Tendonitis
  • Tenosynovitis
03

In context

Chronic Pain

3,227 studies on the registry are indexed under Chronic Pain; 729 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1,000 is above the median of 120 across 753 observational studies indexed under Chronic Pain.

Browse Chronic Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Vascular Solutions of North Carolina as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients with symptomatic and localized pain from diagnoses such as osteoarthritis, tendonitis, tenosynovitis, or injury who underwent Artery Embolization for the treatment of their symptoms/pain.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • > 18 years of age undergone artery embolization interventions for the treatment of chronic pain due to osteoarthritis or other diagnoses that cause localized pain.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None
05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
1,000 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
12 Months
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Group

    For the study to determine efficacy and overall improvement of patients post artery embolization by comparing patient's pain preoperative and post operatively, if there is a decreased use of medication preoperatively compared to post procedure and increased quality of life preoperative and post procedure. Clinical outcomes of improvement will be determined by improvement of Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Index (WOMAC), EQ-5D-5L Quality of Life Questionnaire, and to determine if patients had decrease used of medication prescribed preoperatively.

    Procedure: Artery Embolization

Interventions

  • ProcedureArtery Embolization

    Embolic Solution are intended for use in occluding blood vessels for therapeutic or operative purposes. The embolic solution is used during an outpatient procedure, the physician will insert a small catheter onto the artery supplying the lining of the target joint or target localized pain. Tiny particles are then injected through the catheter into these arteries, reducing blood flow to the target area. This reduces the amount of inflammation associated with osteoarthritis, tendonitis, tenosynovitis or an injury, a process that can help decrease symptoms or eliminate the associated localized pain to this area. With understanding that it does not treat the underlying cartilage destruction or underlying condition causing pain but would like to determine the efficacy and validity of this treatment.

    Also known as: Genicular Artery Embolization, GAE

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Primary Outcome

    Clinical success at 3 months, defined as improvement in Western Ontario and McMaster University (WOMAC) Pain Subscale from pre-operative/baseline WOMAC scores.

    Time frame: 3 months

  2. Primary Outcome

    Clinical success at 3 months, defined as improvement of Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Scores from pre-operative/baseline scores.

    Time frame: 3 months

  3. Primary Outcome

    Comparative assessment at 3 months of decreased use of medication prescribed at baseline to 3 months post operatively.

    Time frame: 3 months

  4. Primary Outcome

    Clinical success at 3 months, as defined by improvement in the quality of life using the EQ-5D-5L Quality of Life Questionnaire compared to baseline.

    Time frame: 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Secondary Outcome

    Number of patients achieving clinical success at 1,3, 6, and 12-months post procedure.

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Secondary Outcome

    Decrease in Western Ontario and McMaster University (WOMAC) index compared to baseline, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months.

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. Secondary Outcome

    Pain score assessed using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score from baseline, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months.

    Time frame: 12 months

  4. Secondary Outcome

    Number of subjects who had pain reduction \>50% in the mean VAS pain scale at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months in comparison with baseline/preprocedural assessments.

    Time frame: 12 months

  5. Secondary Outcome

    Change in the use of narcotics or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID's) compared to baseline through 1, 3, 6, and 12 months.

    Time frame: 12 months

  6. Secondary Outcome

    Change in quality of life using the EQ-5D-5L Quality of Life Questionnaire compared to baseline through 1, 3, 6, and 12 months.

    Time frame: 12 months

  7. Secondary Outcome

    Number of patients with confirmed cases of osteoarthritis with a Kellgren and Lawerence Grade Level 2-3 (confirmed by X-Ray) improved symptoms compared to baseline through to 1, 3, 6 and 12-months post procedure.

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Related links

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Dissemination of data will be through publications in peer-reviewed scientific journals, national and international meeting, on-line presentations, and providing de-identified data to participating site investigators and by providing analysis results upon request from site investigators.

Supporting information: Clinical study report

Time frame: 12 months

Access criteria: Must contact sponsor for approval or participate in study research.

Data sharing details ↗ · emboregistry.ai

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jul 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jul 2027, 36 months after the start.

Of 336 non-industry observational studies under Chronic Pain, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 56. This study's planned 36 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 362 studies reached it within 24 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 56.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 21, 2024
First posted
Jun 27, 2024
StartActual
Jul 15, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Jul 15, 2027
CompletionEst.
Jul 15, 2029
Last update
Oct 28, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 28, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06477965
Lead sponsor
Vascular Solutions of North Carolina
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 27, 2024
Start date
Jul 15, 2024
Primary completion
Jul 15, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 15, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 28, 2024

Study contacts

Amer Iqbal
Contact
amer@vascularsolutions.org
919-897-5999
Meaghan Thomas, CCRP
Contact
meaghan@vascularsolutions.org
9198975999
Siddhartha Rao, MD
principal investigator · Vascular Solutions of North Carolina
Amer Iqbal
study director · Vascular Solutions of North Carolina
Meaghan Thomas, CCRP
study chair · Vascular Solutions of North Carolina

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion