ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06446934AVLA1Updated Jun 6, 2024

AKTIIA OBPM to Assess CPAP Effect on Blood Pressure in Obstructive Sleep Apnea

An interventional study of CPAP in Hypertension, Cardiac Function and Hemodynamics and Usability, sponsored by Hospital Universitario Araba. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 25 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-06-06.

Sponsored by Hospital Universitario Araba · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2025, 11 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
90
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
25 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy works for blood pressure (BP) control in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) adult patients plus undiagnosed hypertension (HBP), using a cuffless bracelet for continual optical BP monitoring (AKTIIA OBPM).

It will also learn if CPAP improves cardiac function in these patients using speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) and to learn about ease of use and patient experience with AKTIIA device and AKTIIA OBPM.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does CPAP reduce systolic BP (and other BP metrics) in this population?
  • Does CPAP improve cardiac function in the same population? Researchers will compare BP metrics derived from AKTIIA OBPM and STE metrics in a before and after CPAP therapy to evaluate its therapeutic effect.

Participants will:

  • Take a CPAP titration and telemonitoring program for 12 weeks (from the titration date)
  • Take an AKTIIA OBPM one week before CPAP and 12 weeks since CPAP titration date
  • Take a STE test twice, before starting CPAP and 12 weeks after CPAP titration date
  • Take an online survey about easy of use and patient experience with AKTIIA OBPM device
Read the detailed description

Patients with moderate-severe OSA, indication for CPAP therapy and undiagnosed hypertension will be included. If the patient meets all the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria, he/she will be considered a candidate for the study. Once the informed consent has been signed, a visit will be made to initiate continuous blood pressure monitoring with the AKTIIA system (AKTIIA OBPM). The first week (week 0, preCPAP) serves to confirm the presence of HBP (average BP 130/80+ mmHg and/or average nocturnal BP 120/70+ mmHg).

If the participant has HBP criteria, an speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) will be performed (preCPAP) and then CPAP treatment will be initiated following the sleep unit´s telemonitoring care program with initial ambulatory pressure titration. If the participant do not have HBP criteria, only CPAP treatment will be started.

The CPAP titration date will be day 1 for AKTIIA OBPM and CPAP monitoring. At 12 weeks of monitoring, a second STE will be scheduled (post-CPAP) and the end-of-study on-site visit is performed to assess: efficacy and adherence to CPAP, clinical and BP control in the AKTIIA OBPM (week 12, post-CPAP).

Finally, an anonymous electronic survey on AKTIIA device usability and patient experience with AKTIIA OBPM and CPAP therapy will be conducted.

Withdrawal criteria are: ineffective CPAP titration, CPAP dropout, invalid AKTIIA OBPM or dropout, prescription of antihypertensive drug, patient decision or PI decision and loss of contact.

Researchers will compare pre-post CPAP blood pressure metrics (systolic BP as the main parameter), circadian profile, dynamic metrics, STE metrics, efficacy and CPAP adherence, symptoms (ESS, QOL own scales) and subgroup analysis by gender, age, OSA severity or CPAP adherence.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hypertension
  • Cardiac Function and Hemodynamics
  • Usability
  • Patient Experience

Keywords

  • Hypertension
  • Obstructive Sleep Apnea
  • Blood Pressure Monitors
  • Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
  • Echocardiography
  • Pulse Wave Analysis
  • Photoplethysmography
  • Telemedicine
03

In context

Hypertension

6,114 studies on the registry are indexed under Hypertension; 912 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 90 is close to the median of 100 across 4,575 interventional studies indexed under Hypertension.

Browse Hypertension studies →

Lead sponsor

Hospital Universitario Araba is the lead sponsor of 9 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
25 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults 25-70 years old
  • Moderate-severe OSA (AHI 15+)
  • First prescription of CPAP therapy
  • Undiagnosed HBP
  • Smartphone use and technological skills

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Antihypertensive drug
  • Cardiovascular comorbidity: atrial fibrilation, heart failure, ischemic heart disease, stroke
  • Reduced perfusion (e.g. Raynaud)
  • Severe/Advanced chronic disease
  • Central apnea
  • Pregnancy
  • Shift work
  • Other social issues: misunderstanding/miscommunication
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
90 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Other
    CPAP

    Interventional pre-post CPAP therapy

    Device: CPAP

Interventions

  • DeviceCPAP

    Initial CPAP titration and subsequent CPAP therapy for 12 weeks

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in the AKTIIA OBPM systolic blood pressure (SBP) at 12 weeks

    Change in 24h/7d average SBP from week 0 (pre-CPAP) to week 12 (post-CPAP). SBP expressed in mmHg (millimeters of mercury)

    Time frame: 1 week pre-CPAP and 1 week post-CPAP at the end of 12 weeks AKTIIA OBPM

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in the left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV-GLS) at 12 weeks

    Change in LV-GLS from pre-CPAP speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) to post-CPAP STE at week 12 (post-CPAP). LV-GLS values are reported as absolute numbers. By convention, GLS is expressed as a negative number (normal range, -19% to -20%), and more negative LV GLS values represent better systolic performance.

    Time frame: Baseline prep-CPAP and at the end of 12 weeks AKTIIA OBPM

Other outcomes

  1. Change from OSA diagnosis in Epworth Sleepiness Scale scoring at 12 weeks

    Change in ESS scoring from OSA diagnosis (pre-CPAP) to ESS scoring at the end of 12 weeks (post-CPAP). The ESS score is based on 8 questions and a scale of 0 to 24. The scale estimates whether the participants are experiencing excessive sleepiness due to OSA and its improvement with CPAP therapy. A normal score (no diurnal sleepiness) is less than 11 points.

    Time frame: Baseline at OSA diagnosis (pre-CPAP) and at the end of 12 weeks AKTIIA OBPM (post-CPAP)

  2. Usability of AKTIIA system and Patient Experience with AKTIIA OBPM at 12 weeks

    Participants answer an anonymous survey of several questions about the usability of the AKTIIA system and their experience and opinion about continuous blood pressure monitoring for 12 weeks. The questions are asked on a Likert scale from 1 to 5, with 5 being the best satisfaction/opinion.

    Time frame: At the end of 12 weeks AKTIIA OBPM

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Sola J, Cortes M, Perruchoud D, De Marco B, Lobo MD, Pellaton C, Wuerzner G, Fisher NDL, Shah J. Guidance for the Interpretation of Continual Cuffless Blood Pressure Data for the Diagnosis and Management of Hypertension. Front Med Technol. 2022 May 17;4:899143. doi: 10.3389/fmedt.2022.899143. eCollection 2022. PubMed 35655524 ↗
  • Tadic M, Gherbesi E, Faggiano A, Sala C, Carugo S, Cuspidi C. The impact of continuous positive airway pressure on cardiac mechanics: Findings from a meta-analysis of echocardiographic studies. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2022 Jul;24(7):795-803. doi: 10.1111/jch.14488. Epub 2022 Jun 13. PubMed 35695237 ↗
  • Bazzano LA, Khan Z, Reynolds K, He J. Effect of nocturnal nasal continuous positive airway pressure on blood pressure in obstructive sleep apnea. Hypertension. 2007 Aug;50(2):417-23. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.106.085175. Epub 2007 Jun 4. PubMed 17548722 ↗
  • Bradley TD, Floras JS. Obstructive sleep apnoea and its cardiovascular consequences. Lancet. 2009 Jan 3;373(9657):82-93. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61622-0. Epub 2008 Dec 26. PubMed 19101028 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — All Individual Participant Data (IPD) that underlie results in a publication

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form

Time frame: Data requests can be submitted starting 1 month after article publication and the data will be made accessible for up to 24 months. Extensions will be considered on a case-by-case basis.

Access criteria: Data obtained through this study may be provided to qualified researchers with academic interest in sleep apnea, HBP or AKTIIA OBPM. Data or samples shared will be coded, with no protected health information included. Approval of the request and execution of all applicable agreements (i.e. a material transfer agreement) are prerequisites to the sharing of data with the requesting party. Access to trial IPD can be requested by qualified researchers engaging in independent scientific research, and will be provided following review and approval of a research proposal and Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) and execution of a Data Sharing Agreement (DSA). For more information or to submit a request, please contact to migueljavier.azpiazublocona@osakidetza.eus

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Jun 2024; primary completion for Dec 2025, 18 months later.

Of 1,403 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Hypertension, half reached primary completion within 23 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 41. This study's planned 18 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 1,498 studies reached it within 23 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 41.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 27, 2024
First posted
Jun 6, 2024
StartEst.
Jun 1, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2025
CompletionEst.
Apr 2026
Last update
Jun 6, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 6, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06446934
Lead sponsor
Hospital Universitario Araba
Collaborators
Bioaraba Health Research Institute
Responsible party
Mikel Azpiazu (Medical Doctor, Hospital Universitario Araba) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 6, 2024
Start date
Jun 1, 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 6, 2024

Study contacts

Mikel Azpiazu, MD
Contact
migueljavier.azpiazublocona@osakidetza.eus
945 00 59 16 ext. +34
Mikel Azpiazu, MD
principal investigator · Hospital Universitario Araba

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in May 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion