An observational study in Hematuria, Urothelial Carcinoma and Bladder Cancer, sponsored by Changhai Hospital. Status unknown at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 99 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-06-20.
Sponsored by Changhai Hospital · Observational
Background: Hematuria, a common symptom of urinary system diseases, can result from various causes including infection, stones, trauma, and tumors. Urothelial carcinoma (UC), the most common malignancy of the urinary system, often presents with hematuria. Current diagnostic methods like urine cytology and cystoscopy have limitations in sensitivity and specificity, and cystoscopy is invasive. DNA methylation biomarkers offer potential for non-invasive UC detection, improving diagnostic accuracy in hematuria patients.
Objective: This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of DNA methylation biomarkers in detecting UC in patients with hematuria.
Methods: This prospective pilot study will involve collecting preoperative urine samples from hematuria patients for DNA methylation testing using MSRE-qPCR. Sample size calculation was based on an assumed 25% prevalence of UC in hematuria patients, resulting in a total of 71 participants after accounting for a 20% dropout rate. Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic performance will be assessed using ROC curves.
Conclusion: This study seeks to validate the effectiveness of urine DNA methylation testing for UC detection in hematuria patients, providing a basis for its clinical application and informing the design of larger future studies.
Methods
Study Design:
This is a prospective pilot study aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of DNA methylation biomarkers in detecting urothelial carcinoma in patients with hematuria.
Sample Size Calculation:
Based on our previous observations, the incidence of urothelial carcinoma in patients with hematuria is 20%-30%, slightly higher than reported in other literature. Therefore, we hypothesize that 25% of the patients in the hematuria cohort have UC. The group allocation ratio (R): N-/N+ = 75%/25% = 3.
Assumptions:
Area under the curve (AUC) under H0: 0.5 AUC under H1: 0.8 Power: 0.95 Significance level (Alpha): 0.05 Type of data: Continuous FPR range: 0.00 to 1.00
Results: Using PASS 15.0 software for sample size calculation to ensure sufficient statistical power. The calculated sample size is:
N+ (number of patients with UC): 14 N- (number of patients without UC): 42 Total sample size (N): 56
Considering a 20% dropout rate, the adjusted sample size is:
N+': 18 N-': 53 Total sample size (N'): 71
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria:
Inclusion Criteria:
Aged between 18 and 99 years, with gross or microscopic hematuria (>3/HP). Able to provide 50ml urine for testing before surgery. Consent to participate in the study and sign the informed consent form.
Exclusion Criteria:
With history of malignancy or concomitant malignancies other than UC. Severe urinary tract infection leading to sepsis. Patients with indwelling catheters, nephrostomy, or cystostomy. Severe liver or kidney failure or other conditions deemed unsuitable for the study.
Patients who did not undergo surgical treatment for various reasons. Samples with insufficient DNA content or other quality control failures.
Sample Collection:
Clinicians will collect fresh urine samples from enrolled hematuria patients and record their basic information, clinical information, and medical history.
Samples will be randomly numbered and provided to DNA methylation testing personnel to ensure blinding.
Testing Method:
Urine samples were collected in EP Genomic DNA Kit with an automated nucleic acid extraction instrument. Subsequently, 100 ng of genomic DNA was used for methylation-sensitive restriction enzyme qPCR (MSRE-qPCR) detection as described previously. Different from bisulfite PCR relying on bisulfite conversion, MSRE-qPCR is based on the selective digestion of DNA by methylation-sensitive enzyme followed by qPCR with primers that surround the cutting site.
Unblinding and Data Organization:
After the last sample is successfully enrolled and tested, non-recruiting personnel and testing personnel will unblind the samples and organize clinical and pathological information.
Data Analysis:
Using pathological results as the gold standard. Calculate the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of DNA methylation biomarkers.
Use statistical methods (such as ROC curves) to evaluate the diagnostic performance of DNA methylation biomarkers and calculate the AUROC.
Ethics and Informed Consent:
This study has been approved by the hospital's ethics committee, and all participants must sign an informed consent form.
61 studies on the registry are indexed under Hematuria; 18 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 71 is below the median of 716 across 26 observational studies indexed under Hematuria.
Browse Hematuria studies →Changhai Hospital is the lead sponsor of 354 studies on the registry; 136 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
This is a prospective pilot study aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of DNA methylation biomarkers in detecting urothelial carcinoma in patients with hematuria.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
5. Patients who did not undergo surgical treatment for various reasons. 6. Samples with insufficient DNA content or other quality control failures.
Diagnostic performance of DNA methylation test
Evaluate the diagnostic performance of DNA methylation biomarkers by calculating the AUROC value.
Time frame: 1 year
Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of DNA methylation biomarkers
Calculate the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of DNA methylation biomarkers.
Time frame: 1 year
Start is estimated for Jun 2024; primary completion for Jun 2025, 12 months later.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is status unknown, as verified in May 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.