ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT06427993Updated Jun 20, 2024

Urine DNA Methylation Detection for Hematuria Evaluation

An observational study in Hematuria, Urothelial Carcinoma and Bladder Cancer, sponsored by Changhai Hospital. Status unknown at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 99 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-06-20.

Sponsored by Changhai Hospital · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified May 2024), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
71
Ages
18 Years to 99 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background: Hematuria, a common symptom of urinary system diseases, can result from various causes including infection, stones, trauma, and tumors. Urothelial carcinoma (UC), the most common malignancy of the urinary system, often presents with hematuria. Current diagnostic methods like urine cytology and cystoscopy have limitations in sensitivity and specificity, and cystoscopy is invasive. DNA methylation biomarkers offer potential for non-invasive UC detection, improving diagnostic accuracy in hematuria patients.

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of DNA methylation biomarkers in detecting UC in patients with hematuria.

Methods: This prospective pilot study will involve collecting preoperative urine samples from hematuria patients for DNA methylation testing using MSRE-qPCR. Sample size calculation was based on an assumed 25% prevalence of UC in hematuria patients, resulting in a total of 71 participants after accounting for a 20% dropout rate. Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic performance will be assessed using ROC curves.

Conclusion: This study seeks to validate the effectiveness of urine DNA methylation testing for UC detection in hematuria patients, providing a basis for its clinical application and informing the design of larger future studies.

Read the detailed description
  1. Background Hematuria is a common symptom of urinary system diseases and can be caused by various factors, including infection, stones, trauma, and tumors. Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is the most common malignant tumor of the urinary system, primarily occurring in the bladder, renal pelvis, and ureter. The early symptoms of UC are often not obvious, with hematuria being the most common symptom. However, current diagnostic methods such as urine cytology and cystoscopy have limitations in sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing UC. Additionally, cystoscopy is invasive and can cause discomfort for patients. DNA methylation biomarkers have shown potential in detecting UC, providing a non-invasive method to improve diagnostic sensitivity and specificity, especially in patients with hematuria.
  2. Objective This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of DNA methylation biomarkers in detecting urothelial carcinoma in patients with hematuria. By collecting preoperative urine samples from a small cohort of hematuria patients and performing DNA methylation testing, we aim to explore the feasibility and advantages of this method in clinical applications.
  3. Methods

    Study Design:

    This is a prospective pilot study aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of DNA methylation biomarkers in detecting urothelial carcinoma in patients with hematuria.

    Sample Size Calculation:

    Based on our previous observations, the incidence of urothelial carcinoma in patients with hematuria is 20%-30%, slightly higher than reported in other literature. Therefore, we hypothesize that 25% of the patients in the hematuria cohort have UC. The group allocation ratio (R): N-/N+ = 75%/25% = 3.

    Assumptions:

    Area under the curve (AUC) under H0: 0.5 AUC under H1: 0.8 Power: 0.95 Significance level (Alpha): 0.05 Type of data: Continuous FPR range: 0.00 to 1.00

    Results: Using PASS 15.0 software for sample size calculation to ensure sufficient statistical power. The calculated sample size is:

    N+ (number of patients with UC): 14 N- (number of patients without UC): 42 Total sample size (N): 56

    Considering a 20% dropout rate, the adjusted sample size is:

    N+': 18 N-': 53 Total sample size (N'): 71

    Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria:

    Inclusion Criteria:

    Aged between 18 and 99 years, with gross or microscopic hematuria (>3/HP). Able to provide 50ml urine for testing before surgery. Consent to participate in the study and sign the informed consent form.

    Exclusion Criteria:

    With history of malignancy or concomitant malignancies other than UC. Severe urinary tract infection leading to sepsis. Patients with indwelling catheters, nephrostomy, or cystostomy. Severe liver or kidney failure or other conditions deemed unsuitable for the study.

    Patients who did not undergo surgical treatment for various reasons. Samples with insufficient DNA content or other quality control failures.

    Sample Collection:

    Clinicians will collect fresh urine samples from enrolled hematuria patients and record their basic information, clinical information, and medical history.

    Samples will be randomly numbered and provided to DNA methylation testing personnel to ensure blinding.

    Testing Method:

    Urine samples were collected in EP Genomic DNA Kit with an automated nucleic acid extraction instrument. Subsequently, 100 ng of genomic DNA was used for methylation-sensitive restriction enzyme qPCR (MSRE-qPCR) detection as described previously. Different from bisulfite PCR relying on bisulfite conversion, MSRE-qPCR is based on the selective digestion of DNA by methylation-sensitive enzyme followed by qPCR with primers that surround the cutting site.

    Unblinding and Data Organization:

    After the last sample is successfully enrolled and tested, non-recruiting personnel and testing personnel will unblind the samples and organize clinical and pathological information.

    Data Analysis:

    Using pathological results as the gold standard. Calculate the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of DNA methylation biomarkers.

    Use statistical methods (such as ROC curves) to evaluate the diagnostic performance of DNA methylation biomarkers and calculate the AUROC.

    Ethics and Informed Consent:

    This study has been approved by the hospital's ethics committee, and all participants must sign an informed consent form.

  4. Conclusion This study aims to validate the effectiveness of urine DNA methylation testing in detecting urothelial carcinoma in patients with hematuria and provide evidence for its clinical application. The results of this preliminary study will offer essential data support and design optimization suggestions for future larger-scale studies.
02

Conditions studied

  • Hematuria
  • Urothelial Carcinoma
  • Bladder Cancer
  • Ureter Cancer
  • Renal Pelvis Cancer

Keywords

  • Hematuria
  • Urothelial Carcinoma
  • Urine DNA Methylation
03

In context

Hematuria

61 studies on the registry are indexed under Hematuria; 18 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 71 is below the median of 716 across 26 observational studies indexed under Hematuria.

Browse Hematuria studies →

Lead sponsor

Changhai Hospital is the lead sponsor of 354 studies on the registry; 136 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 99 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

This is a prospective pilot study aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of DNA methylation biomarkers in detecting urothelial carcinoma in patients with hematuria.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Aged between 18 and 99 years, with gross or microscopic hematuria (>3/HP).
  2. Able to provide 50ml urine for testing before surgery.
  3. Consent to participate in the study and sign the informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. With history of malignancy or concomitant malignancies other than UC.
  2. Severe urinary tract infection leading to sepsis.
  3. Patients with indwelling catheters, nephrostomy, or cystostomy. 4 Severe liver or kidney failure or other conditions deemed unsuitable for the study.

5. Patients who did not undergo surgical treatment for various reasons. 6. Samples with insufficient DNA content or other quality control failures.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
71 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Diagnostic performance of DNA methylation test

    Evaluate the diagnostic performance of DNA methylation biomarkers by calculating the AUROC value.

    Time frame: 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of DNA methylation biomarkers

    Calculate the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of DNA methylation biomarkers.

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Changhai Hospital
    Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Jun 2024; primary completion for Jun 2025, 12 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 20, 2024
First posted
May 24, 2024
StartEst.
Jun 15, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Jun 30, 2025
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2025
Last update
Jun 20, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 20, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06427993
Lead sponsor
Changhai Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 24, 2024
Start date
Jun 15, 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 20, 2024

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in May 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion