ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06422533Updated Jun 4, 2024

Ceftolozane/Tazobactam vs. Piperacillin/Tazobactam for the Treatment of Bacteremia in Hemato-oncological Patients

An interventional study of Ceftolozane/tazobactam and Piperacillin/tazobactam in Hematologic Neoplasms and Neutropenia, sponsored by Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia de Mexico. Recruiting at 1 site in Mexico. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-06-04.

Sponsored by Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia de Mexico · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jul 2025, 1 year 3 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Registered 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Nov 2023, registered Apr 2024).
  • Started Nov 2023; still recruiting 3 years later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
226
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Patients with hematological malignancies receive highly myelotoxic chemotherapy regimens that cause periods of severe myelosuppression, which places them at high risk of developing bacteremia.

At a global level, a very significant increase in multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative microorganisms, particularly Enterobacteriaceae producing extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL) and MDR P.aeruginosa, have been described during the last decade. Among the strategies to reduce bacterial resistance, ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) as a "carbapenem-sparing" antibiotic has been proposed.

C/T has broad-spectrum activity since it has action against ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae and MDR P. aeruginosa. Studies carried out in the real world using this antibiotic in patients with hematological malignancies have demonstrated clinical success in reports and case series, considered a therapeutic option in patients with Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa infections, particularly in MDR pathogens.

At the National Cancer Institute (in Spanish, Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia), Gram-negative bacilli have been identified for more than 20 years as the pathogens most frequently associated with bacteremia. Escherichia coli occupies the first place in 25% (41% ESBL), followed by Klebsiella spp. in 5.6% (11.2% ESBL) and P. aeruginosa in 5.6% (11.2% MDR). The protocol for approaching and treating hematological malignancy patients with severe neutropenia and fever is to initiate an antimicrobial regimen with piperacillin/tazobactam (P/T). In patients who persist with fever after 48 to 72 hours of starting antibiotics, who present with clinical deterioration, or in whom P/T-resistant bacteria are identified, this is escalated to carbapenem.

Therefore, it is proposed to compare the clinical and microbiological response in patients with hematological malignancies who present with severe neutropenia and fever and who present clinical data of bacteremia, with empirical treatment with C/T vs. P/T, trying to reduce the use of carbapenems in this group of patients.

Read the detailed description

At a global level, a very significant increase in multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative microorganisms has been described during the last decade, particularly Enterobacteriaceae producing extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL) and MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa. This is directly related to the use of broad-spectrum antimicrobials, particularly carbapenems. Among the strategies to reduce bacterial resistance, using ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) as a "carbapenem-sparing" antibiotic is proposed. C/T has been administered in hemato-oncological patients with severe neutropenia, colonized by resistant strains in centers with a high prevalence of Enterobacteriaceae-ESBL and P. aeruginosa MDR.

The study's purpose is to demonstrate non-inferiority between ceftolozane/tazobactam vs. piperacillin/tazobactam for patients with hematological malignancies who present severe neutropenia and fever, including those patients who have bacteremia due to Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. C/T is a combination antibiotic with a new cephalosporin, structurally similar to ceftazidime, plus tazobactam. The FDA approved This known beta-lactamase inhibitor in 2018 to treat intra-abdominal and complicated urinary infections. In 2019, its indication was expanded to nosocomial pneumonia and those associated with mechanical ventilation. In Mexico, it was approved for marketing in June 2019. C/T has broad-spectrum activity since it has action against ESBL-producing Enterobacteria and MDR P. aeruginosa. Studies carried out in the real world using this antibiotic in patients with hematological malignancies have demonstrated clinical success in reports and case series, considered a therapeutic option in patients with Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa infections, particularly in MDR pathogens.

At the National Cancer Institute, Gram-negative bacilli have been identified for more than 20 years as the pathogens most frequently associated with bacteremia, with Escherichia coli occupying first place at 25% (41% ESBL), followed by Klebsiella sp. in 5.6% (11.2% ESBL), and P. aeruginosa in 5.6% (11.2% MDR). The protocol for approaching and treating hemato-oncological patients with severe neutropenia and fever is to initiate an antimicrobial regimen with piperacillin/tazobactam (P/T) if they are hemodynamically stable. In patients who persist with fever after 48 to 72 hours of starting antibiotics, who present with clinical deterioration, or in whom P/T-resistant bacteria are identified, this is escalated to a carbapenem (usually meropenem).

A randomized, open, non-inferiority clinical trial comparing 1:1 two antibiotics, P/T vs. C/T, for the treatment of severe neutropenia and fever and/or developing Enterobacteriaceae or P. aeruginosa bacteremia in patients with hematologic malignancies

Methodological strategies All patients who come to the National Cancer Institute with signs of severe neutropenia (polymorphonuclear cells \<500 cells/mm3) and fever (≥38.3 degrees Celsius in one measure or ≥38 degrees Celsius in at least two measures) will be considered for inclusion. Blood cultures will be taken upon admission (catheter and peripheral in those with the same), or two peripherals with a difference of 15 minutes between each one. Blood cultures will be requested before signing the informed consent since they are part of the initial approach to these patients, regardless of whether they enter the study. They will be taken before the administration of antimicrobials.

Medical staff from the infectious disease department will evaluate the inclusion and exclusion criteria and invite the candidate to the study.

If the patient accepts, they will be provided informed consent to review it in detail, explaining any doubts. If they agree to participate, the corresponding signatures will be made.

Randomization will be done based on a stratified method in two groups: Group 1, patients with leukemia, and Group 2, patients with other hemato-oncological pathologies. They will be randomized into ten blocks and divided into the two groups above.

The administration of the P/T or C/T antimicrobial regimen will begin depending on the group to which they have been assigned, following the manufacturer's instructions and according to the administration standards at INCan.

The clinical and microbiological response will be evaluated in the first 72-96 hours (taking randomization as day +1), defined as patient survival plus resolution of fever plus sterilization of blood cultures (taken within the first 72-96 hours).

If patients have been fever-free for at least 48 hours and have no growth in blood cultures, they will receive at least five days of antibiotic treatment.

The administration time will be at least seven days in patients with P. aeruginosa or Enterobacteriaceae growth in blood cultures.

Patients whose blood cultures report growth of bacteria different from the previous ones, yeast, or polymicrobial growth will be excluded from the study.

Treatment failure will be considered, and the following will be included in the intention-to-treat analysis:

  • If the growth in the blood culture is Enterobacteriaceae or P. aeruginosa, resistant to the antibiotic assigned.
  • There is growth of the same bacteria in control blood cultures taken 72-96 hours after starting antibiotics.
  • If, during treatment, the patient presents signs of hemodynamic instability, respiratory failure, clinical deterioration, or septic shock, changing the antimicrobial regimen will be considered.

The following will be considered a relapse and will be included in the intention-to-treat analysis:

  • When the same microorganism is isolated at the beginning, it grows in blood cultures after having negative blood cultures.
  • Or in the first 30 days after completing the antibiotic regimen, considering the resolution of the primary infectious focus.

During treatment, they will not be able to receive any other Gram-negative antibiotic except prophylaxis against P. jirovecii (400/80 mg/day TMP/SMX or 800/160 mg every 48 h).

The number of days of antibiotics will be counted. It will be documented when an antibiotic is modified and the reason for the change (microbiological failure, clinical deterioration, drug-related adverse events, and others). The appearance of diarrhea will be monitored, and Glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) and toxin for Clostridiodes difficile will be requested.

Patients will be evaluated daily until fever resolution and until hospital discharge (if this occurs in the first 14 days), recording fever and adverse events, including diarrhea, leukocytes, and neutrophils. Follow-up will be carried out until day +30 from the patient's inclusion in the study. If the patient is discharged before this date, a telephone call will be made on day +30 to verify the clinical status.

The evolution will be classified as alive without infection, alive with clinical or microbiological data of infection, also considering C. difficile infection, dead from infection without neutropenia, dead from infection with neutropenia, dead from terminal illness, or dead from another cause.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hematologic Neoplasms
  • Neutropenia

Keywords

  • ceftolozane/tazobactam
  • piperacillin/tazobactam
  • neutropenia
  • hematologic neoplasms
03

In context

Hematologic Neoplasms

1,444 studies on the registry are indexed under Hematologic Neoplasms; 420 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 226 is above the median of 46 across 1,044 interventional studies indexed under Hematologic Neoplasms.

Browse Hematologic Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia de Mexico is the lead sponsor of 41 studies on the registry; 13 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • All patients >18 years old
  • Diagnosis of any hematological
  • Severe neutropenia (polymorphonuclear \<500 cells/mm3)
  • Fever (≥38.3 degrees Celsius in one measure, or ≥38 degrees Celsius in at least two measures)
  • Median arterial pressure ≥65 mmHg on admission
  • A ≥ 5 days
  • Agree to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known to cephalosporins or anaphylaxis with beta-lactams
  • Clinical signs related to hemodynamic instability
  • Concomitant use of another antibiotic with activity against Gram-negatives (except Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) as prophylaxis for P. jirovecii
  • Patients with end-stage chronic renal failure (\<10 ml/min by -ACCr) or on renal replacement therapy.
  • Patients with grade IV mucositis
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Creatinine clearance (CrCl)

How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
226 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Ceftolozane/tazobactam

    Ceftozolane/tazobactam (C/T) is a combination antibiotic with a new cephalosporin, structurally similar to ceftazidime, plus tazobactam. The FDA approved This known beta-lactamase inhibitor in 2018 to treat intra-abdominal and complicated urinary infections. In 2019, its indication was expanded to nosocomial pneumonia and those associated with mechanical ventilation. In Mexico, it was approved for marketing in June 2019. C/T has broad-spectrum activity since it has action against ESBL-producing Enterobacteria and MDR P. aeruginosa. Studies carried out in the real world using this antibiotic in patients with hematological malignancies have demonstrated clinical success in reports and case series, considered a therapeutic option in patients with Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa infections, particularly in MDR pathogens.

    Drug: Ceftolozane/tazobactam

  • Active comparator
    Piperacillin/tazobactam

    At our hospital, Piperacillin/tazobactam is the primary drug used as an empirical treatment in patients with severe neutropenia and fever, according to Clinical Practice Guidelines for the use of antimicrobial agents in neutropenic patients with cancer.

    Drug: Piperacillin/tazobactam

Interventions

  • DrugCeftolozane/tazobactam

    Drug page: Ceftolozane

    Ceftolozane/tazobactam 1.5 g tid IV infusion for 1 hour during 5 to 7 days

    Also known as: Zerbaxa

  • DrugPiperacillin/tazobactam

    Piperacillin/tazobactam 4.5 g qid IV infusion for 30 minutes during 5 to 7 days

    Also known as: Tazocin, Pipertazo, Tazonam, Tazovak

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mortality of all patients at day 30

    To assess the number of patients who will be alive or dead in the first 30 days. On day 30, a physical visit will be made to the patient's bedside if the patient is hospitalized. If the patient is not hospitalized, the clinical record will be evaluated, and one of the investigators will make a phone call to ensure the patient's status for that date.

    Time frame: Day 30

Secondary outcomes

  1. Microbiological response through the sterilization of repeated blood cultures take

    Number of patients that will have repeated blood cultures sterilized (no growth of the same bacteria isolated in the first set of blood cultures taken in day 1).

    Time frame: Day 3 to day 4

  2. Clinical response measured through fever resolution

    The presence of fever (\>38 Celsius degree) will be evaluated according to nursing records that are carried out three times a day (morning, afternoon, and night shifts). Clinical failure will be considered when the patient persists with fever (\>38 Celsius degrees) on day four after starting the antimicrobial regimen. Clinical success will be considered when the fever resolves between day 1 and day 3 of starting antibiotics.

    Time frame: Day 4

Other outcomes

  1. Clostridioides difficile infection documented through toxin/GDH C. difficile test in those patients who develop diarrhea, abdominal pain and/or distended abdomen.

    Number of patients who develop diarrhea or abdominal pain or distended abdomen, with a test positive for C. difficile (toxin/GDH C. difficile test).

    Time frame: Day 1 to day 30

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia
    Mexico City, Tlalpan 14080, Mexico
    Recruiting
    • Diana Vilar Compte, M.D., M.Sc. · Contactdiana_vilar@yahoo.com.mx · +52 56280400
    • Patricia Volkow, M.D. · Contactpvolkowf@gmail.com · +52 56280400
    • Beda D Islas-Muñoz, M.D., M.Sc · Sub investigator
    • Pamela Alatorre-Fernández, M.D. · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Karaiskos I, Giamarellou H. Carbapenem-Sparing Strategies for ESBL Producers: When and How. Antibiotics (Basel). 2020 Feb 5;9(2):61. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9020061. PubMed 32033322 ↗
  • Xie O, Cisera K, Taylor L, Hughes C, Rogers B. Clinical syndromes and treatment location predict utility of carbapenem sparing therapies in ceftriaxone-non-susceptible Escherichia coli bloodstream infection. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2020 Nov 30;19(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12941-020-00400-z. PubMed 33256752 ↗
  • Giacobbe DR, Bassetti M, De Rosa FG, Del Bono V, Grossi PA, Menichetti F, Pea F, Rossolini GM, Tumbarello M, Viale P, Viscoli C; ISGRI-SITA (Italian Study Group on Resistant Infections of the Societa Italiana Terapia Antinfettiva). Ceftolozane/tazobactam: place in therapy. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2018 Apr;16(4):307-320. doi: 10.1080/14787210.2018.1447381. Epub 2018 Mar 9. PubMed 29493397 ↗
  • Shortridge D, Pfaller MA, Castanheira M, Flamm RK. Antimicrobial Activity of Ceftolozane-Tazobactam Tested Against Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with Various Resistance Patterns Isolated in U.S. Hospitals (2013-2016) as Part of the Surveillance Program: Program to Assess Ceftolozane-Tazobactam Susceptibility. Microb Drug Resist. 2018 Jun;24(5):563-577. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2017.0266. Epub 2017 Oct 17. PubMed 29039729 ↗
  • Pfaller MA, Bassetti M, Duncan LR, Castanheira M. Ceftolozane/tazobactam activity against drug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa causing urinary tract and intraabdominal infections in Europe: report from an antimicrobial surveillance programme (2012-15). J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017 May 1;72(5):1386-1395. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx009. PubMed 28165526 ↗
  • Livermore DM, Mushtaq S, Meunier D, Hopkins KL, Hill R, Adkin R, Chaudhry A, Pike R, Staves P, Woodford N; BSAC Resistance Surveillance Standing Committee. Activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam against surveillance and 'problem' Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and non-fermenters from the British Isles. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017 Aug 1;72(8):2278-2289. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx136. PubMed 28520867 ↗
  • Pfaller MA, Shortridge D, Sader HS, Flamm RK, Castanheira M. Ceftolozane-tazobactam activity against drug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa causing healthcare-associated infections in Australia and New Zealand: Report from an Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (2013-2015). J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2017 Sep;10:186-194. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.05.025. Epub 2017 Jul 19. PubMed 28735046 ↗
  • Pfaller MA, Shortridge D, Sader HS, Gales A, Castanheira M, Flamm RK. Ceftolozane-tazobactam activity against drug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa causing healthcare-associated infections in Latin America: report from an antimicrobial surveillance program (2013-2015). Braz J Infect Dis. 2017 Nov-Dec;21(6):627-637. doi: 10.1016/j.bjid.2017.06.008. Epub 2017 Sep 21. PubMed 28941394 ↗
  • Seifert H, Korber-Irrgang B, Kresken M; German Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Study Group. In-vitro activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacteriaceae isolates recovered from hospitalized patients in Germany. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2018 Feb;51(2):227-234. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2017.06.024. Epub 2017 Jul 10. PubMed 28705666 ↗
  • Fernandez-Cruz A, Alba N, Semiglia-Chong MA, Padilla B, Rodriguez-Macias G, Kwon M, Cercenado E, Chamorro-de-Vega E, Machado M, Perez-Lago L, Garcia de Viedma D, Diez Martin JL, Munoz P. A Case-Control Study of Real-Life Experience with Ceftolozane-Tazobactam in Patients with Hematologic Malignancy and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019 Jan 29;63(2):e02340-18. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02340-18. Print 2019 Feb. PubMed 30530598 ↗
  • Bergas A, Albasanz-Puig A, Fernandez-Cruz A, Machado M, Novo A, van Duin D, Garcia-Vidal C, Hakki M, Ruiz-Camps I, Del Pozo JL, Oltolini C, DeVoe C, Drgona L, Gasch O, Mikulska M, Martin-Davila P, Peghin M, Vazquez L, Laporte-Amargos J, Dura-Miralles X, Pallares N, Gonzalez-Barca E, Alvarez-Uria A, Puerta-Alcalde P, Aguilar-Company J, Carmona-Torre F, Clerici TD, Doernberg SB, Petrikova L, Capilla S, Magnasco L, Fortun J, Castaldo N, Carratala J, Gudiol C. Real-Life Use of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam for the Treatment of Bloodstream Infection Due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Neutropenic Hematologic Patients: a Matched Control Study (ZENITH Study). Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Jun 29;10(3):e0229221. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02292-21. Epub 2022 Apr 27. PubMed 35475683 ↗
  • Criscuolo M, Trecarichi EM. Ceftazidime/Avibactam and Ceftolozane/Tazobactam for Multidrug-Resistant Gram Negatives in Patients with Hematological Malignancies: Current Experiences. Antibiotics (Basel). 2020 Feb 3;9(2):58. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9020058. PubMed 32028615 ↗
  • Marchesi F, Toma L, Di Domenico EG, Cavallo I, Spadea A, Prignano G, Pimpinelli F, Papa E, Terrenato I, Ensoli F, Mengarelli A. Ceftolozane-Tazobactam for Febrile Neutropenia Treatment in Hematologic Malignancy Patients Colonized by Multi-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae: Preliminary Results from a Prospective Cohort Study. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2020 Sep 1;12(1):e2020065. doi: 10.4084/MJHID.2020.065. eCollection 2020. No abstract available. PubMed 32952976 ↗
  • Clerici D, Oltolini C, Greco R, Ripa M, Giglio F, Mastaglio S, Lorentino F, Pavesi F, Farina F, Liberatore C, Castiglion B, Tassan Din C, Bernardi M, Corti C, Peccatori J, Scarpellini P, Ciceri F, Castagna A. The place of ceftazidime/avibactam and ceftolozane/tazobactam for therapy of haematological patients with febrile neutropenia. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2021 Jun;57(6):106335. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2021.106335. Epub 2021 Apr 7. PubMed 33838223 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Individual participant data (IPD) could be shared with other researchers.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Informed consent form

Time frame: The data will become available at the end of the study. The plan is to finish the analysis and write the manuscript at the end of 2025.

Access criteria: The data requisition must be carried out with a solid foundation for which the information will be used. The investigators and sub-investigators will review the criteria.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Nov 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jul 2025, 20 months after the start.

Of 185 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Hematologic Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 40 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 21 and three quarters within 125. This study's planned 20 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 191 studies reached it within 40 months; a quarter within 21 and three quarters within 125.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 25, 2024
First posted
May 21, 2024
StartActual
Nov 7, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Jul 31, 2025
CompletionEst.
Aug 30, 2025
Last update
Jun 4, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 4, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06422533
Lead sponsor
Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia de Mexico
Responsible party
Patricia Cornejo Juarez (Principal Investigator, Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia de Mexico) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 21, 2024
Start date
Nov 7, 2023
Primary completion
Jul 31, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 30, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 4, 2024

Study contacts

Diana Vilar Compte, M.D.,M.Sc.
Contact
diana_vilar@yahoo.com.mx
+52 5628 0400 ext. 12110
Patricia Volkow, M.D.
Contact
pvolkowf@gmail.com
+52 5628 0400 ext. 12120
Patricia Cornejo-Juarez, M.D.,M.Sc.
principal investigator · Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Ceftolozane

Start the discussion