ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06422442Updated May 21, 2024

Information Processing Biases in Adults Who Stutter

An interventional study of Threat-related stimulus exposure in Stuttering, Adult, sponsored by University of Memphis. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-05-21.

Sponsored by University of Memphis · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Oct 2025, 1 year ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Registered 8 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Sep 2023, registered May 2024).
  • Started Sep 2023; still recruiting 3 years 2 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
80
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to examine whether stuttering is associated with a tendency to attend more quickly or for longer durations to threat-related information in the environment (threat-related attention bias). The main questions it aims to answer are:

Do adults who stutter, relative to adults who do not stutter, attend to threat-related stimuli more than neutral information? Are attentional biases observed across different types of threat or are they specific to threats related to stuttering experiences? Do measures of attention bias explain individual differences in psychological reactions among adults who stutter?

Read the detailed description

The goal of the project is to examine threat-related attentional processes associated with stuttering. In Aim 1, investigators will establish differences in attention bias (AB) in adults who do and do not stutter and the processing stage at which differences emerge. In Aim 2, investigators will compare AB effects across different categories of threat stimuli to determine whether threat-related AB in adults who stutter is general or disorder-specific. In Aim 3, the investigators examine the role of AB as a causal factor mediating effects of individual risk-factors (related to temperament and attention control) on stuttering impact and anticipation. Participants will include 35 adults who stutter and 35 adults who stutter between the ages of 18-30 years, all meeting specified eligibility criteria. All participants will complete three experimental tasks for measuring AB: (1) a free-viewing task, (2) dot-probe task, and (3) emotional Stroop task. Study procedures will be administered over two sessions (2-2.5 hours each) scheduled within three weeks of each other. Key outcomes will include reaction time and eye-tracking measures, which will be used to extract multiple AB indices. Data will be analyzed via mixed-effects regression analysis with a random intercept for subject and maximal converging random-slopes structure. Age, gender, socioeconomic status and various measures used for inclusion purposes will be included as covariates. Mediation analyses will assess four relationships (Temperament -> Stuttering impact, Temperament -> Anticipation, Attention control -> Stuttering impact, and Attention control -> Anticipation), with AB as the mediator variable in each analysis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stuttering, Adult

Browse trials for

03

In context

Stuttering

74 studies on the registry are indexed under Stuttering; 23 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 80 is above the median of 44 across 57 interventional studies indexed under Stuttering.

Browse Stuttering studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Memphis is the lead sponsor of 44 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Speaks English as their primary language
  • Normal hearing (based on pure tone screening)
  • Normal or corrected vision (based on report)
  • Normal color vision (based on Ishihara Test, Concise Edition)
  • Nonverbal intelligence within at least average range based on Test of Nonverbal Intelligence, 4th Edition
  • Expressive language within at least average range score based on Expressive One-Word Picture Vocabulary Test

Additional inclusion criteria for adults who stutter:

  • Self-identification as a person who stutters
  • Score of at least 11 (mild stuttering) on Stuttering Severity Index, 4th Edition

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Reported significant medical history
  • Psychological or emotional disorder
  • History of frank neurological injury
  • Known speech, language, or learning disorder(s) other than stuttering
  • Reading difficulties
  • Score within range for ADHD on Adults ADHD Self-Rating Scale
  • Score within clinically significant range for depression on Beck Depression Inventory
  • Score within clinically significant range for anxiety on State-Trait Anxiety Inventory
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
80 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Eye tracking tasks

    All participants complete three tasks in which they view threat-related and neutral stimuli (words or faces)

    Behavioral: Threat-related stimulus exposure

Interventions

  • BehavioralThreat-related stimulus exposure

    Participants will view threat-related stimuli (words or faces) paired with nonthreat matches in three related experimental paradigms.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Reaction time (RT) measures

    A) A key outcome measure from the dot-probe task will consist of RTs for congruent trials (in which probe appears in the location of threat stimulus) vs. incongruent trials (probe replaces neutral stimulus). (B) Key outcome measure from the emotional Stroop will include RT for threat vs. neutral words.

    Time frame: Trial duration (maximum of 10 seconds)

  2. Total dwell time on threat

    This primary (and most reliable) index of AB will be extracted from eye movement data and represents the total duration of all fixations to areas of interest with threat stimuli for each trial of the free-viewing task.

    Time frame: Trial duration (8 seconds)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Eye tracking indices of AB

    Additional indices of AB will be extracted from eye movement data and examined in exploratory manner: (1) probability of first fixation to an area of of interest (AOI), (2) first fixation latency, (3) first fixation duration, 4) first-run dwell time (representing summed duration of all fixations to an AOI from the first fixation until the AOI is exited), and (5) second-run dwell time (summed duration of all fixations within an AOI from the second time the AOI is entered until it is exited).

    Time frame: Trial duration (8 seconds)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • University of Memphis
    Memphis, Tennessee 38152, United States
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Data will be made freely and publicly available on OSF (https://osf.io) together with our publications, with prior Institutional Review Board approval. Archived data will also be made available to other researchers upon request (by emailing the PI) and without cost. A signed data-sharing agreement will be required for researchers to access data; the agreement will stipulate that shared data must be used solely for the purpose of research, must not be transferred to or shared with others, must not be manipulated for the purpose of identifying subjects, and that the planned research must be reviewed and approved by an Institutional Review Board.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Sep 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Oct 2025, 25 months after the start.

Of 37 interventional studies with no phase under Stuttering, half reached primary completion within 28 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 38. This study's planned 25 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 13, 2024
First posted
May 21, 2024
StartActual
Sep 11, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Oct 30, 2025
CompletionEst.
Jun 30, 2026
Last update
May 21, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 21, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06422442
Lead sponsor
University of Memphis
Collaborators
University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 21, 2024
Start date
Sep 11, 2023
Primary completion
Oct 30, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
May 21, 2024

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion