An interventional study of Lingual brackets and Buccal brackets in Crowding of Anterior Maxillary Teeth and Crowding of Anterior Mandibular Teeth, sponsored by Damascus University. Completed at 1 site in Syrian Arab Republic. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 25 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-05-06.
Sponsored by Damascus University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Patients who have moderate crowding that could be treated on a non-extraction will be treated in this study. The apical root resorption and alveolar bone height of the lingual and labial fixed appliances will be assessed. All patients will receive a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan at two different times (T0: Before treatment, T1: After treatment).
There are two groups: The first group (Experimental): The patients in this group will be treated using Lingual Fixed Orthodontic Appliances. The second group (Control): The patients in this group will be treated using Labial Fixed Orthodontic Appliances.
Recently, the therapeutic results of lingual orthodontics have become similar to those produced by labial orthodontics. However, lingual appliances act differently. The application of force near the center of resistance and the distance between the lingual brackets leads to an increase in friction and, thus, an increase in the force applied during treatment. In addition, the contact of the lower incisors with the brackets of the upper incisors in the lingual technique can lead to the intrusion of these incisors. Therefore, these factors can be potential risks for apical root resorption and alveolar bone height in lingual orthodontics.
2D radiographs may not accurately depict the true amount of root resorption due to magnification errors and difficulties in obtaining repeatable images. Besides, conventional two-dimensional radiographs cannot accurately assess alveolar bone height in the anterior region. CBCT has proven to be valuable in diagnosing root resorption due to its capability to produce distortion-free images, as well as its ability to maintain a high level of reproducibility despite changes in tooth positions after treatment, with high sensitivity and specificity. On the other hand, the use of CBCT allows for an evaluation of alveolar bone height in the anterior region with high accuracy and precision.
88 studies on the registry are indexed under Crowding; 22 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 40 is above the median of 36 across 74 interventional studies indexed under Crowding.
Browse Crowding studies →Damascus University is the lead sponsor of 212 studies on the registry; 11 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
This group received treatment with lingual brackets with 0.018-inch slots (DTC Orthodontics, Hangzhou, China) applied with the aid of a special, indirect bonding technique, the "Modified HIRO® Technique." Individual lingual archwires (Forestadent®, Germany) were also used.
Procedure: Lingual brackets
Patients in this group received treatment with labial appliances with 0.018-inch slots (American Orthodontics brackets, Mini Master series, MBT prescription) directly bonded on both arches. Prefabricated archwires (American Orthodontics, Sheboygan, WI, USA) were also used.
Procedure: Buccal brackets
These brackets will be used on the lingual surfaces of the upper and lower teeth.
These brackets will be used on the vestibular surfaces of the upper and lower teeth.
Change in tooth lengths
Axial, coronal, and sagittal planes of the CBCT images will be reoriented to be perpendicular to the long axis of each tooth under assessment. The distances were measured as follows. Central and lateral incisors: from incisal edge to apex (sagittal section). Canines: from cusp tip to apex (sagittal section). Single-rooted premolar: from vestibular cusp tip to apex (sagittal section). Two-rooted premolar: from vestibular cusp tip to apex (sagittal section) and lingual cusp tip to apex (coronal section). Upper molars: from the mesiolingual cusp tip to the apex of the lingual root of the molar (coronal section), from the mesobuccal cusp tip to the apex of the mesobuccal root of the molar (sagittal section), from distobuccal cusp tip to the apex of distobuccal root of molar (sagittal section).
Time frame: T0: one day before the commencement of treatment. T1: one day following the end of treatment
Change in the alveolar bone height
The CBCT images were redirected according to the long axis of each tooth as given previously. The distance between the cementoenamel junction and the crest of the alveolar bone was measured in the sagittal plane for central and lateral incisors, while in the coronal plane for canines. For the premolars and first molars, the distance between the cementoenamel junction and the crest of the alveolar bone was measured in the coronal plane.
Time frame: T0: one day before the commencement of treatment. T1: one day following the end of treatment
Plan to share: No
This study is completed, as verified in May 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.