ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT06731465Updated Aug 11, 2026

Efficiency, Efficacy, Periodontal & Occlusal Outcomes for Aligners Versus Fixed Orthodontic Appliances in Crowded Incisor Treatment

An interventional study of Clear aligner therapy and Fixed pre-adjusted edgewise orthodontic appliance in Crowding of Anterior Mandibular Teeth, sponsored by University of Sharjah. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in United Arab Emirates. Open to participants aged 16 Years to 45 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-11.

Sponsored by University of Sharjah · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year after the study started (first participant enrolled Oct 2023, registered Oct 2024).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
16 Years to 45 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare between fixed labial braces and clear aligners for the straightening of moderately overlapped lower front teeth. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Effect of treatment on gum health
  • Which treatment achieves lower front teeth alignment faster in terms of alignment time and t number of visits required to the orthodontist
  • How well it straightens teeth.

Participants will:

  • Receive either labial braces or clear aligners as part of their orthodontic treatment.
  • Come for regular follow-up visits every 4 to 6 weeks with the orthodontist till full straightening of the lower front teeth.
  • Have a 3D scan of their teeth taken after their teeth are aligned along with a specialized x-ray of their head and jaw.
Read the detailed description

The study is a randomized controlled trial aimed at comparing the efficiency, efficacy, periodontal and occlusal outcomes between two orthodontic treatment options: clear aligners and traditional fixed braces for patients with moderate crowding in the lower incisors.

Pre-treatment diagnostic records including clinical examination, intraoral scans, intraoral and extraoral photographs will be obtained for each participant.

To ensure that participants in both groups have similar levels of crowding severity and comparable dental health characteristics at the start of the study, randomization will be conducted in blocks. A total of forty participants (20 in each group) will be selected according to specific criteria designed to maintain this uniformity across both treatment groups.This study follows a parallel-group design and the participants will be randomly allocated into one of the two groups included in the study:

Intervention Groups:

  • Group A - Fixed Labial Braces (Master Series®, American Orthodontics): In the traditional braces group, fixed metal brackets will be bonded to the lower teeth, and archwires will be used in a specific sequence designed to bring the teeth into alignment over time.
  • Group B - Clear Aligners (EON Aligner): The clear aligner group will receive custom-fitted aligners created using a digital model of each participant's teeth. These aligners are removable, requiring patient adherence to wearing them for at least 22 hours daily.

Primary Outcomes:

  1. Total alignment time
  2. Clinical measures of periodontal status
  3. Occlusal contact distribution
  4. Efficacy of clear aligners Vs fixed appliances in alignment of lower anterior teeth

Secondary Outcomes:

  1. Total number of scheduled routine appointments and additional emergency visits
  2. Missed appointment rate
  3. Number of refinements
  4. Bracket/ attachment failure rate
  5. Chair-side Time
  6. Treatment Efficiency Index
  7. BANA (Microbial-enzymatic N-benzoyl-DL-arginine-2-napthylamide) Score
  8. Immunological Assay using ELISA
  9. Patient's occlusal comfort level
  10. Changes in mandibular incisor inclination
  11. Changes in the mandibular arch form

Data will be analyzed using SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) software, with statistical tests appropriate to the variable types (e.g., Mann-Whitney for group comparisons and Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test for time-related variables).

02

Conditions studied

  • Crowding of Anterior Mandibular Teeth

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Clinical trial
  • Clear Aligners
  • Fixed Pre-adjusted Edgewise Orthodontic Appliance
  • Orthodontic Treatment
  • Efficiency
  • Efficacy
  • Periodontal Outcomes
  • Randomized Clinical Trial
  • Orthodontic alignment time
  • Occlusal outcomes
03

In context

Crowding

88 studies on the registry are indexed under Crowding; 22 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 40 is above the median of 36 across 74 interventional studies indexed under Crowding.

Browse Crowding studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Sharjah is the lead sponsor of 42 studies on the registry; 17 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with moderate-severe lower crowding (Little's irregularity index 4 to 9 mm), non-extraction treatment
  • Age range: 16-45 years old
  • Class I malocclusion
  • Full permanent dentition
  • No caries or periodontal disease

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Extraction cases
  • Patients with craniofacial syndromes, or cleft palate
  • Patients with uncontrolled medical conditions or taking medication that can interfere with orthodontic tooth movement.
  • Presence of extensive dental restorations in proximity to the gingival margin
  • Presence of fixed bridges/crowns or partial dentures
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Fixed labial braces group

    Participants in this group will be treated with pre-adjusted fixed orthodontic appliances.

    Device: Fixed pre-adjusted edgewise orthodontic appliance

  • Active comparator
    Clear aligner group

    Participants in this group will receive clear aligners customized based on a digital model of each patient's dentition.

    Device: Clear aligner therapy

Interventions

  • DeviceClear aligner therapy

    Participants in this group will receive clear aligners (EON Aligner, Minneapolis), designed and customized based on a digital model of each patient's dental structure. Aligners will be worn for at least 22 hours daily, and patients will change to a new aligner depending on treatment progress.

    Also known as: Clear aligners, Clear aligner therapy (CAT), Eon aligner

  • DeviceFixed pre-adjusted edgewise orthodontic appliance

    Participants in this group will be treated with pre-adjusted fixed orthodontic appliances (Master Series®, American Orthodontics™, WI, USA). This system includes fixed brackets bonded on the labial surface of teeth and a sequence of progressively larger arch wires aimed at achieving alignment over time.

    Also known as: Fixed orthodontic appliance, Fixed labial braces, Conventional braces, Edgewise appliance, Fixed Appliance, Pre-adjusted Appliance, Straight-wire Appliance, Fixed Braces, Fixed Orthodontic Braces, Pre-adjusted Edgewise Bracket System, Straight-wire Bracket System, Fixed Multibracket Appliance, Fixed Straight-wire Technique

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Total alignment time

    The duration of treatment time (rounded to the nearest day) required to achieve full alignment of the mandibular incisors determined clinically as \<1mm little's irregularity index, evaluated for both treatment groups. This information is to be extracted from participant notes into a data collection sheet designed specifically for this study.

    Time frame: Through alignment, an average of 6 months

  2. Bleeding on probing

    Bleeding on probing as an indicator of tissue inflammatory response to bacterial pathogensis, using the Michigan Williams probe assigned a score of 0 - 3 for each site.

    Time frame: Baseline, after 3 months, and after 6 months

  3. Occlusal contact surface area

    Occlusal contact surface area as measured by the T-scan device in terms of no. of pixels

    Time frame: Baseline, and after an average of 6 months, and after treatment an average of 1 year

  4. Efficacy of clear aligners Vs fixed appliances in alignment of lower anterior teeth

    Efficacy of clear aligners Vs fixed appliances in alignment of lower anterior teeth using Little's irregularity index

    Time frame: Baseline, and after an average of 6 months

  5. Symmetry of contact distribution

    Symmetry of contact distribution as measured by the T-scan device.

    Time frame: Baseline, and after an average of 6 months

  6. Probing depth

    The distance measured from the base of the pocket to the most apical point on the gingival margin using the Michigan Williams probe.

    Time frame: Baseline, after 3 months, and after 6 months

  7. Plaque index

    Plaque index to evaluate the level and rate of plaque formation on tooth surfaces

    Time frame: Baseline, after 3 months, and after 6 months

  8. Gingival index

    Gingival index to determine the severity of gingival inflammation with a score from 0 - 3

    Time frame: Baseline, after 3 months, and after 6 months

  9. Total treatment time

    The duration of treatment time (rounded to the nearest day) required to complete treatment, evaluated for both treatment groups. This information is to be extracted from participant notes into a data collection sheet designed specifically for this study.

    Time frame: Through treatment, an average of 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Total number of scheduled routine appointments and additional emergency visits

    The number of scheduled routine appointments required to achieve full mandibular incisor alignment and additional visits for emergencies as recorded in participants' notes and the data collection sheet.

    Time frame: Through alignment, an average of 6 months

  2. Missed appointment rate

    The number of scheduled routine appointments that the patient failed to attend during the alignment phase of treatment as recorded in both participants' notes and the data collection sheet.

    Time frame: Through alignment, an average of 6 months

  3. Number of refinements

    If any of the participants required a refinement scan prior to completion of leveling and alignment of the mandibular incisors, this would be recorded in both participants' notes and the data collection sheet

    Time frame: Through alignment, an average of 6 months

  4. Bracket/ attachment failure rate

    Adverse events i.e., bracket failure rate in Group A and attachment failure rate in Group B were recorded in both participants' notes and the data collection sheet. The patient's provider noted in the clinical chart every bracket that had bond failure during the course of the study trial period. The brackets on the molar teeth were omitted. Brackets that debonded twice or more on the same tooth were counted only once. At the end of 180 days post-bonding, the percentage of broken brackets was calculated as: number of debonded brackets divided by the total number of teeth bonded (excluding molar teeth).

    Time frame: Through alignment, an average of 6 months

  5. Chair side time

    The average time taken at the initial banding and bonding visit for the group A and the initial attachment bonding and aligner delivery visit for group B along with multiple routine mid-treatment appointments for both the groups during the alignment phase of treatment, as well as one emergency appointment for both measured using a digital stopwatch. The appointment times were rounded to the nearest minute with the total chair side time beginning when the patient sits on the chair and ending when they stood up to leave.

    Time frame: Through alignment, an average of 6 months

  6. Treatment Efficiency Index

    The treatment efficiency index calculated by measuring the average Little's irregularity index before treatment and dividing it by the average treatment time in months/ days for alignment of the mandibular incisors.

    Time frame: Through alignment, an average of 6 months

  7. BANA (Microbial-enzymatic N-benzoyl-DL-arginine-2-napthylamide) Score

    Microbiological index for the subgingival plaque

    Time frame: Baseline, after 3 months, and after 6 months

  8. Immunological Assay using ELISA

    Immunological assay cytokine IL-1Beta in the gingival crevicular fluid

    Time frame: Baseline, after 3 months, and after 6 months

  9. Patient's occlusal comfort level

    Patient's occlusal comfort level assessed by means of a Visual Analog Scale with a score from 0 - 10, 0 being least comfortable and 10 being most comfortable

    Time frame: Baseline, and after an average of 6 months, and after treatment an average of 1 year

  10. Changes in mandibular incisor inclination

    Changes in mandibular incisor inclination as measured on the lateral cephalogram

    Time frame: Baseline, and after an average of 6 months

  11. Changes in the mandibular arch form

    Changes in the mandibular arch form as measured on the study model

    Time frame: Baseline, and after an average of 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University Dental Hospital Sharjah (UDHS_
    Sharjah city, Emirate of Sharjah 27272, United Arab Emirates
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Buschang PH, Shaw SG, Ross M, Crosby D, Campbell PM. Comparative time efficiency of aligner therapy and conventional edgewise braces. Angle Orthod. 2014 May;84(3):391-6. doi: 10.2319/062113-466. Epub 2013 Nov 18. PubMed 24749702 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — All IPD collected throughout the trial

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report

Time frame: IPD will be available once the trial is finalized up to 3 years post recruitment

Access criteria: Principle investigator and researchers will have access to all IPD collected throughout the trial once it has been depersonalized.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Oct 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2028, 62 months after the start.

Of 50 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Crowding, half reached primary completion within 17 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 28. This study's planned 62 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 52 studies reached it within 17 months; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 28.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 31, 2024
First posted
Dec 12, 2024
StartActual
Oct 16, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2028
CompletionEst.
Dec 2028
Last update
Aug 11, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 11, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06731465
Lead sponsor
University of Sharjah
Responsible party
Mais Medhat Sadek AbdelAzim (Assistant Professor, University of Sharjah) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 12, 2024
Start date
Oct 16, 2023
Primary completion
Dec 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 11, 2026

Study contacts

Mais Medhat Sadek, BDS, MSc, PHD, Morth(RCSEd)
principal investigator · University of Sharjah

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion