ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06371352Updated Oct 15, 2024

Effect of Intermittent and Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation on Sleep, Daytime Sleepiness, and Fatigue in Depression

An interventional study of iTBS and cTBS in Unipolar Depression and Bipolar Disorder, sponsored by Jakub Antczak. Recruiting at 1 site in Poland. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-10-15.

Sponsored by Jakub Antczak · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started May 2024; still recruiting 2 years 5 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
90
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Intermittent and continuous theta-burst stimulation (iTBS and cTBS respectively) are the newer modalities of transcranial magnetic stimulation with documented efficacy in treatment of depressed mood but with conflicting results regarding their efficacy in treatment of other symptoms of depression such as insomnia, daytime sleepiness and fatigue. This study will investigate the efficacy of iTBS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and cTBS over the right DLPFC, compared to sham stimulation, in treatment of insomnia, daytime sleepiness and fatigue in depression.

Read the detailed description

Intermittent and continuous theta-burst stimulation (iTBS and cTBS respectively) are the newer modalities of conventional repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) with documented noninferiority in improving mood in depressive disorders. The effect of both modalities on other significant depression symptoms has not been studied. In this feasibility study investigators aim primarily to assess the safety and therapeutic potential of iTBS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (lDLPFC) and cTBS over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (rDLPFC) on sleep quality, sleep propensity, fatigue, and daytime sleepiness in patients with major and bipolar depression.

02

Conditions studied

  • Unipolar Depression
  • Bipolar Disorder

Keywords

  • Unipolar Depression
  • Bipolar Disorder
  • theta burst stimulation
  • sleep
  • sleepiness
  • fatigue
  • transcranial magnetic stimulation
03

In context

Depressive Disorder

855 studies on the registry are indexed under Depressive Disorder; 159 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 90 is close to the median of 88 across 689 interventional studies indexed under Depressive Disorder.

Browse Depressive Disorder studies →

Lead sponsor

Jakub Antczak is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • severe or moderate depressive episode (according to international classification of diseases (ICD)-10) without psychotic symptoms at the time of inclusion
  • Diagnosis of major depression (F33.1 or F33.2) or bipolar disorder (F31.3 or F31.4).
  • The score of the Athens Insomnia Scale five or more
  • Unchanged antidepressive pharmacotherapy at least one month prior to inclusion

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • to transcranial magnetic stimulation, including ferromagnetic elements in head, pregnancy and epilepsy
  • Psychotic symptoms at the time of inclusion
  • Suicidal ideations and/or attempts within three months prior to inclusion
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
90 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    iTBS over the left DLPFC

    Active iTBS with intensity of 120% of the resting motor threshold recorded from the right first dorsal interosseus will be administered over the left DLPFC. Therapy will include 90 sessions (three sessions in each of 20 consecutive working days - four weeks in total). In every session 900 magnetic pulses will be elicited.

    Device: iTBS

  • Experimental
    cTBS over the right DLPFC

    Active cTBS with intensity of 120% of the resting motor threshold recorded from the left first dorsal interosseus will be administered over the right DLPFC. Therapy will include 90 sessions (three sessions in each of 20 consecutive working days - four weeks in total). In every session 1200 magnetic pulses will be elicited.

    Device: cTBS

  • Sham comparator
    Sham stimulation

    Active iTBS or cTBS will be administered over the left or right DLPFC respectively with sham coil. Therapy will include 90 sessions (three sessions in each of 20 consecutive working days - four weeks in total). In every session 900 or 1200 magnetic pulses will be elicited.

    Device: Sham

Interventions

  • DeviceiTBS

    Active iTBS over the left DLPFC to induce the long term potentiation of stimulated area.

  • DevicecTBS

    Active cTBS over the right DLPFC to induce the long term potentiation of stimulated area.

  • DeviceSham

    Sham iTBS or cTBS over the left or right DLPFC respectively for placebo.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Beck Depression Inventory 2

    Inventory consisting of 21 items measuring cognitive, affective, somatic, and vegetative symptoms of depression. Each item is scored from 0 to 3, with a higher score denoting more severe depression. Items are related to the criteria from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV. The minimum value of the total score is 0 and the maximum is 63 with higher scores meaning worse outcome. Change from the baseline to the measurement done after finishing intervention, to the measurement done two weeks after finishing intervention to the measurement done four weeks after finishing intervention.

    Time frame: Before intervention - four weeks after finishing intervention.

  2. Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index

    Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index is a questionnaire to identify sleep disturbances. It consists of a combination of Likert-type and open-ended questions, which are later converted to scaled scores. Scores for each question range from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating greater sleep disturbances. The minimum value of the total score is 0 and the maximum is 21 with higher scores meaning worse outcome. Change from the baseline to the measurement done after finishing intervention, to the measurement done two weeks after finishing intervention to the measurement done four weeks after finishing intervention.

    Time frame: Before intervention - four weeks after finishing intervention.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale

    An 18-item scale assessing negative symptoms, such as emotional withdrawal (e.g. withdrawal from relations), motor slowness and blunted affect. Each item is rated from 1 to 7 with 7-point Likert scaling, where 7 means the most severe disturbance. The minimum value of the total score is 18 and the maximum is 126 with higher scores meaning worse outcome. Change from the baseline to the measurement done after finishing intervention, to the measurement done two weeks after finishing intervention to the measurement done four weeks after finishing intervention.

    Time frame: Before intervention - four weeks after finishing intervention.

  2. Epworth Sleepiness Scale

    An eight-item scale. Each item refers to a situation such as driving a car or sitting quietly. The subject is asked to assess the chance of dosing in each situation, ranging from 0 (no chance) to 3 (dosing very likely). The minimum value of the total score is 0 and the maximum is 24 with higher scores meaning worse outcome. Change from the baseline to the measurement done after finishing intervention, to the measurement done two weeks after finishing intervention to the measurement done four weeks after finishing intervention.

    Time frame: Before intervention - four weeks after finishing intervention.

  3. Fatigue Assessment Scale

    A 10-item scale to assess the severity of fatigue. Each item is an expression describing the fatigue, such as: "I am bored by fatigue" or "Mentally I feel exhausted". Each item is answered using a Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (never) to 5 (always). The minimum value of the total score is 10 and the maximum is 50 with higher scores meaning worse outcome. Change from the baseline to the measurement done after finishing intervention, to the measurement done two weeks after finishing intervention to the measurement done four weeks after finishing intervention.

    Time frame: Before intervention - four weeks after finishing intervention.

  4. Quality of Life in Depression Scale

    A 34-item, self-reported scale to assess the impact of depression on the quality of life. The scale is scored binomially with higher scores indicating a lower quality of life. The minimum value of the total score is 0 and the maximum is 34 with higher scores meaning worse outcome. Change from the baseline to the measurement done after finishing intervention, to the measurement done two weeks after finishing intervention to the measurement done four weeks after finishing intervention.

    Time frame: Before intervention - four weeks after finishing intervention.

  5. Sleep propensity non-rapid eye movement 1 sleep stage

    A 23-channel electroencephalography (EEG), 2-channel electrooculogram (EOG) and a chin electromyogram (EMG) recorded through 45 minutes in lying position with eyes closed. The recordings will then be divided into 30 second epochs. Each epoch will be assigned to particular sleep stage or wake, according to standards of sleep staging issued by the American Academy of Sleep Medicine \[Silber et al. 2007\]. The difference in the latency of non-rapid eye movement 1 sleep stage (the time from light off to the first epoch of the non-rapid eye movement 1 sleep stage) before and after intervention will be assessed.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  6. Sleep propensity non-rapid eye movement 2 sleep stage

    A 23-channel electroencephalography (EEG), 2-channel electrooculogram (EOG) and a chin electromyogram (EMG) recorded through 45 minutes in lying position with eyes closed. The recordings will then be divided into 30 second epochs. Each epoch will be assigned to particular sleep stage or wake, according to standards of sleep staging issued by the American Academy of Sleep Medicine \[Silber et al. 2007\]. The difference in the latency of non-rapid eye movement 2 sleep stage (the time from light off to the first epoch of the non-rapid eye movement 2 sleep stage) before and after intervention will be assessed.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Silber MH, Ancoli-Israel S, Bonnet MH, Chokroverty S, Grigg-Damberger MM, Hirshkowitz M, Kapen S, Keenan SA, Kryger MH, Penzel T, Pressman MR, Iber C. The visual scoring of sleep in adults. J Clin Sleep Med. 2007 Mar 15;3(2):121-31. Erratum In: J Clin Sleep Med. 2007 Aug 15;3(5):table of contents. PubMed 17557422 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — EEG, EOG, EMG recordings, scans of scales, inventories and questionnaires will be available upon request sent per e-mail to: bstefanowski@ipin.edu.pl

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan

Time frame: December 2026 - December 2030

Access criteria: For researchers in medical sciences and medical professional upon justification of their request.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 15, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06371352
Lead sponsor
Jakub Antczak
Collaborators
Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology, Warsaw
Responsible party
Jakub Antczak (Clinical Professor, Jagiellonian University) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Apr 17, 2024
Start date
May 15, 2024
Primary completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Completion
May 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 15, 2024

Study contacts

Bogdan Stefanowski, MD
Contact
bstefanowski@ipin.edu.pl
+48 22 45 82 532
Jakub Antczak, MD
Contact
jakub.antczak@uj.edu.pl
+48 12 400 25 50
Bogdan Stefanowski, MD
principal investigator · Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion