ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06358339Updated Apr 24, 2026

TEEM-GIFTS: A Gamified mHealth to Reduce Post-Discharge Suicide Risk

An interventional study of TEEM in Suicide, sponsored by Shenzhen Kangning Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-24.

Sponsored by Shenzhen Kangning Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Started May 2025; still recruiting 1 year 6 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
640
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Patients with mental disorders are at significantly higher risk of suicide after discharge compared to the general population and patients with other diseases. Currently, there is a lack of post-discharge community suicide risk management services in China. The research team's preliminary research suggests that mHealth interventions are well-accepted and feasible for reducing the suicide risk in patients with mental disorders. Furthermore, the inclusion of gamification elements can enhance treatment adherence and user engagement. However, determining the appropriate combination of gamification elements and evaluating the implementation effectiveness of gamified mHealth interventions for suicide risk are challenges in transforming these into regular community mental health services. This study will leverage gamification theory and community-based participatory research to design a gamified mHealth intervention model aimed at reducing suicide risk among discharged patients with mental disorders, and to develop a corresponding management strategy. Using the multi-phase optimization strategy (MOST), the study will identify the optimal combination of gamification elements to reduce suicide risk and increase the outpatient follow-up rate. Through an implementation science framework, the investigators will evaluate the process, outcomes, cost, and feasibility of this management strategy with the goal of reducing suicide risk among these patients. The findings from this study will provide a scientific basis for innovative suicide risk management models for discharged patients with mental disorders in China, thereby paving the way for the application of implementation science in mental health.

Read the detailed description

The Tailored Evidence-based Enhancements in Mental health (TEEM) projects, adhering to implementation science principles, encompass various studies aimed at improving mental health care in China. Among these is the Gamified and Individualized Follow-Up Treatment for Suicide (GIFTS) study. Based on the multi-phase optimization strategy (MOST), this is a mixed-methods study with three phases. The selection phase involves forming the gamified mHealth suicide risk management strategy and system through community participatory research. The optimization phase involves testing and adjusting the intervention elements for the gamified mHealth strategy through a factorial design randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the effectiveness of different combinations of intervention elements in reducing suicide risk. The confirmation phase will assess the optimized strategy based on the Implementation Outcomes Framework (IOF), focusing primarily on patient outcomes obtained through a standard RCT.

  1. Selection phase Based on literature review, the research team has identified several gamification elements, including avatar, points, badges, missions, level \& leaderboards, team mates \& team missions, venting space, mood sharing, achievement and titles, and rewards, etc. During developing the gamification mHealth app (TEEM), the investigators categorize the elements into four types of intervention elements as Routine Tracker, Mind Care, Social Connectivity, and Achievement \& Rewards; meanwhile, under the community-based participatory research (CBPR) framework, the investigators aim to explore the appropriate content of gamification mHealth interventions, the acceptance and feasibility of such interventions among discharged psychiatric patients, as well as structural and perceptual barriers during implementation.

    In specific, the research team will recruit discharged patients with mental disorders and their lay health care supporters (LHSs) who are usually their family members, psychiatrists and nurses, psycho-crisis intervention team members, community mental health workers and mental health social workers as the community team, and will categorize the community team into three sub-groups, the patients-LHSs group, the clinic mental health service provider group (psychiatrists and nurses, and psycho-crisis intervention team members), and the community mental health service provider group (community mental health workers and mental health social workers). The investigators will conduct three focus group interviews in each sub-group and ten to fifteen cases of individual in-depth interview with the community to avoid bias in focus groups and to protect privacy related to personal experience in suicide and suicide intervention. There will be scheduled meetings with the community to discuss and revise the intervention strategy before implementation. Purposive sampling will be applied to recruit participants for the community team. For each type of sub-group, there will be five to eight members

  2. Optimization phase The research team will conduct a a factorial design randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the effectiveness of different combinations of intervention elements in reducing suicide risk. There are four intervention elements as mentioned, thus there will be 16 groups in the factorial design RCT. The research team will recruit discharged patients with mental disorders from Shenzhen Mental Health Center/Shenzhen Kangning Hospital (SKH).

    The research team sets the standard for optimizing interven elements as follows: The experimental group implementing the intervention element and the experimental group not implementing the intervention element should have an effect difference in reducing the suicide risk by 35%, which will be used as the basis for calculating the sample size of this study. This study aims to detect a 35% difference (δ) in the implementation of the intervention elements with a test level of α=0.05 and a test power (1-β) of 80%. A total of 260 patients need to be recruited for this study. Assuming a loss to follow-up rate of 20% and considering the number of experimental groups, the final sample size is 320 patients.

    In accordance with the factorial design, the optimization phase will consist of 16 groups, and this is due to the four types of intervention elements and their 16 possible intervention conditions. Thus, after recruitment and the baseline survey, participants will be assigned into Group 1 to Group 16 by simple randomization in R program, with 20 participants in each group. Further, participants in each group will only have access to a single intervention condition of elements assigned to their group. Noted, the intervention app TEEM will be developed during the selection phase, and there will be an Android/iOS version of TEEM and a mini-program in the WeChat platform. Participants, LHSs, nurses who perform recruitment and baseline survey, and investigators who perform follow-ups will be blinded to the assignment.

    To evaluate post-discharge suicide risk more cautiously and to provide crisis intervention in time, face-to-face interview will be conducted to collect information. Trained nurses in SKH will recruit participants and perform baseline survey. The research assistants will contact participants, schedule visits to SKH out-patient clinics , and complete follow-up questionnaires after out-patient visits at one week, one month, and three months after discharge. If participants refused subsequent visits, the investigators would schedule home visits to complete the survey by research assistants and community mental health workers. The condition that resulted in the greatest decrease in participants' suicide risk three months after discharge is the optimized intervention condition.

  3. Confirmation phase This phase will assess the optimized intervention, focusing primarily on patient outcomes obtained through a standard RCT, in which intervention group (Group 17) will receive the optimized intervention condition and the control group (Group 18) will receive care as usual. Similar to the optimization phase, the research team will recruit discharged patients with mental disorders from SKH. The sample size (n=320) and randomization process will be consistent with optimization phase. Data collection, baseline survey and follow-up schedule are similar to the optimization phase. The primary outcomes are suicide risk and the rate of re-visits to outpatient clinic at three months after discharge. Secondary outcomes will be illustrated later in the Outcome measures section.
  4. Study outcomes and measurements The implementation outcomes of the overall project are based on the Implementation Outcomes Framework, in which detailed primary and secondary outcomes of the study will be collected at 3 months after discharge.
02

Conditions studied

  • Suicide

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Psychiatric patients
  • Post-discharge suicide
  • Gamification
  • Multiphase optimization strategy
  • Implementation science
03

In context

Suicide

607 studies on the registry are indexed under Suicide; 162 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 640 is above the median of 104 across 490 interventional studies indexed under Suicide.

Browse Suicide studies →

Lead sponsor

Shenzhen Kangning Hospital is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

For patients

  • Being 18 years and above;
  • Being diagnosed with mental disorders;
  • Having received inpatient care for three days or more;
  • Living in Shenzhen and having no plan to leave Shenzhen in the following 12 months after discharge;
  • Being able to use apps or WeChat (WeChat mini program) on smart phones.

For lay health care supporters (LHSs)

  • Being 18 years and above;
  • Being without any diagnosis of mental disorder;
  • Being the lay health care supporter in the family;
  • Living in Shenzhen and having no plan to leave Shenzhen in the following 12 months after discharge;
  • Being able to use apps or WeChat (WeChat mini program) on smart phones.

For the clinic and community mental health service providers

  • Being 18 years and above;
  • Having practiced in mental health service at least for 12 months.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria For patients

  • Refusing to provide written consent or be unable to provide written consent due to any cognitive problems.
  • Being discharged by the patient's or LHSs' demand against medical advice.
  • With no ID, no stable residence nor any source of income.

For For lay health care supporters (LHSs)

  • Refusing to provide written consent.

For the clinic and community mental health service providers

  • Refusing to provide written consent.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
640 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Routine Tracker, Mind Care, Social Connectivity, and Achievement & Rewards

    At the optimization phrase, participants will be assigned into Group 1 to Group 16 randomly, with 20 participants in each group. The TEEM app with the intervention condition of Routine Tracker, Mind Care, Social Connectivity, and Achievement \& Rewards.

    Other: TEEM

  • Experimental
    Routine Tracker, Mind Care and Social Connectivity

    At the optimization phrase, participants will be assigned into Group 1 to Group 16 randomly, with 20 participants in each group. The TEEM app with the intervention condition of Routine Tracker, Mind Care and Social Connectivity.

    Other: TEEM

  • Experimental
    Routine Tracker, Social Connectivity, and Achievement & Rewards

    At the optimization phrase, participants will be assigned into Group 1 to Group 16 randomly, with 20 participants in each group. The TEEM app with the intervention condition of Routine Tracker, Social Connectivity, and Achievement \& Rewards.

    Other: TEEM

  • Experimental
    Routine Tracker and Achievement & Rewards

    At the optimization phrase, participants will be assigned into Group 1 to Group 16 randomly, with 20 participants in each group. The TEEM app with the intervention condition of Routine Tracker and Achievement \& Rewards.

    Other: TEEM

  • Experimental
    Routine Tracker and Social Connectivity

    At the optimization phrase, participants will be assigned into Group 1 to Group 16 randomly, with 20 participants in each group. The TEEM app with the intervention condition of Routine Tracker and Social Connectivity.

    Other: TEEM

  • Experimental
    Routine Tracker and Mind Care

    At the optimization phrase, participants will be assigned into Group 1 to Group 16 randomly, with 20 participants in each group. The TEEM app with the intervention condition of Routine Tracker and Mind Care.

    Other: TEEM

  • Experimental
    Routine Tracker and Achievement & Reward

    At the optimization phrase, participants will be assigned into Group 1 to Group 16 randomly, with 20 participants in each group. The TEEM app with the intervention condition of Routine Tracker and Achievement \& Reward.

    Other: TEEM

  • Experimental
    Routine Tracker

    At the optimization phrase, participants will be assigned into Group 1 to Group 16 randomly, with 20 participants in each group. The TEEM app with the intervention condition of Routine Tracker only.

    Other: TEEM

  • Experimental
    Mind Care, Social Connectivity, and Achievement & Rewards

    At the optimization phrase, participants will be assigned into Group 1 to Group 16 randomly, with 20 participants in each group. The TEEM app with the intervention condition of Mind Care, Social Connectivity, and Achievement \& Rewards.

    Other: TEEM

  • Experimental
    Mind Care and Social Connectivity

    At the optimization phrase, participants will be assigned into Group 1 to Group 16 randomly, with 20 participants in each group The TEEM app with the intervention condition of Mind Care and Social Connectivity.

    Other: TEEM

  • Experimental
    Mind Care and Achievement & Rewards

    At the optimization phrase, participants will be assigned into Group 1 to Group 16 randomly, with 20 participants in each group. The TEEM app with the intervention condition of Mind Care and Achievement \& Rewards.

    Other: TEEM

  • Experimental
    Mind Care

    At the optimization phrase, participants will be assigned into Group 1 to Group 16 randomly, with 20 participants in each group. The TEEM app with the intervention condition of Mind Care only.

    Other: TEEM

  • Experimental
    Social Connectivity and Achievement & Rewards

    At the optimization phrase, participants will be assigned into Group 1 to Group 16 randomly, with 20 participants in each group. The TEEM app with the intervention condition of Social Connectivity and Achievement \& Rewards.

    Other: TEEM

  • Experimental
    Social Connectivity

    At the optimization phrase, participants will be assigned into Group 1 to Group 16 randomly, with 20 participants in each group. The TEEM app with the intervention condition of Social Connectivity only.

    Other: TEEM

  • Experimental
    Achievement & Rewards

    At the optimization phrase, participants will be assigned into Group 1 to Group 16 randomly, with 20 participants in each group. The TEEM app with the intervention condition of Achievement \& Rewards only.

    Other: TEEM

  • Experimental
    Brief contact intervention

    At the optimization phrase, participants will be assigned into Group 1 to Group 16 randomly, with 20 participants in each group. Participants will receive care as usual (receiving brief contact intervention which mention in the study NCT04907669)

    Other: TEEM

  • Experimental
    Optimized TEEM

    At the confirmation phase, participants will be assigned into Group 17 to Group 18 randomly, with 160 participants in each group. The TEEM app with the optimized intervention condition from the optimization phase.

    Other: TEEM

  • Experimental
    Care as usual

    At the confirmation phase, participants will be assigned into Group 17 to Group 18 randomly, with 160 participants in each group. Participants will receive care as usual (receiving brief contact intervention which mention in the study NCT04907669)

    Other: TEEM

Interventions

  • OtherTEEM

    The TEEM app will provide four types of gamified intervention elements as Routine Tracker, Mind Care, Social Connectivity, and Achievement \& Rewards which providing services including brief contact intervention, mCBT, health education, venting space, mood sharing, etc. Only enrolled participants have access to log in and use the app.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Suicide ideation at three months after discharge

    This study will use the Beck Suicide Ideation Scale-Chinese Version (BSI-CV) to assess participants' suicide ideation. The BSI-CV includes 19 items, and each item scores from 0 to 2 with a total score ranging from 0 to 38, and a higher score indicates a higher level of suicide ideation. The total score and its trajectory from baseline to three months after discharge will be recorded and compared.

    Time frame: It will be evaluated at one week, one months and three months after discharge.

  2. The rate of re-visits to outpatient clinic at three months after discharge

    Responses to the question "How many times have you re-visited the outpatient clinic at SKH in the past three months? " will be recorded and compared. In clinic, patients must visit the outpatient clinic one week post-discharge to refill their medication, which can only be prescribed for a maximum of 30 days, resulting in at least four subsequent visits to the clinic. Thus, we define the rate of outpatient clinic revisits as the number of participants who complete all revisits divided by the total number of participants.

    Time frame: It will be evaluated at one week, one months and three months after discharge.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Self-determination at at three months after discharge

    This study will use the Self-Determination Scale-Chinese Version (SDS) to assess participants' the level of self-determination. The SDS includes 10 items, and each item includes two statements, with scoring options ranging from 'agree only with statement A' to 'agree only with statement B' on a scale of 1-9 with a total score ranging from 10 to 90, and a higher score indicates a higher level of self-determination. The total score and its trajectory from baseline to three months after discharge will be recorded and compared.

    Time frame: It will be evaluated at one week, one months and three months after discharge.

  2. Social connectedness at three month after discharge

    Social connectedness will be measured by the Social Connectedness Scale (SCS) to evaluate participants' social connected ness after discharge. The SCS is a 20-item scale, and each item is on a 6-Likert continuum (from "Strongly disagree" to "Strongly agree") scoring from 1 to 6. A higher total score indicates a higher level of social connectedness. The total score and its trajectory from baseline to three months after discharge will be recorded and compared.

    Time frame: It will be evaluated at one week, one months and three months after discharge.

  3. Social support at three months after discharge

    Social support will be measured by the 23-item Duke Social Support Index (DSSI) to evaluate participants' social support after discharge. The DSSI investigates social support by social interaction, perceived social support and instrumental social support. Every answer has been assigned a score, and the total reflects the sum of the items ranging from 11 to 45. A higher total score indicates a higher level of social support. The total score and its trajectory from baseline to three months after discharge will be recorded and compared.

    Time frame: It will be evaluated at one week, one months and three months after discharge.

Other outcomes

  1. Times of re-hospitalization for mental disorders

    Responses to the question "How many times have you been hospitalized for mental disorders" will be recorded and compared.

    Time frame: It will be evaluated at one week, one months and three months after discharge.

  2. Attitudes towards the acceptability of the intervention

    This is a mixed methods study, and the investigators will conduct community-based participatory research (CBPR) to evaluate the implementation of the intervention. After the confirmation phase, focus group interviews will be conducted with the CBPR team understand the community's attitudes towards the acceptability of the intervention. Of note, participants (the patients, LHSs, clinical and community mental health providers) are recruited for the qualitative interviews only, who are different from the MOST phases.

    Time frame: It will be evaluated by three focus group interviews immediately after the confirmation phase, and each interview will be about 60 to 120 minutes.

  3. Attitudes towards the adoption of the intervention

    This is a mixed methods study, and the investigators will conduct community-based participatory research (CBPR) to evaluate the implementation of the intervention. After the confirmation phase, focus group interviews will be conducted with the CBPR team understand the community's attitudes towards the adoption of the intervention. Of note, participants (the patients, LHSs, clinical and community mental health providers) are recruited for the qualitative interviews only, who are different from the MOST phases.

    Time frame: It will be evaluated by three focus group interviews immediately after the confirmation phase, and each interview will be about 60 to 120 minutes.

  4. The adoption rate of the intervention in patients

    The rate will be measured by the number of participants who use the TEEM app divided by the number of participants at the end of the study. Of note, this outcome evaluates the implementation process of the intervention.

    Time frame: It will be evaluated at three months after discharge.

  5. Attitudes towards the equity of the intervention

    This is a mixed methods study, and the investigators will conduct community-based participatory research (CBPR) to evaluate the implementation of the intervention. After the confirmation phase, focus group interviews will be conducted with the CBPR team understand the community's attitudes towards the equity of the intervention. Of note, participants (the patients, LHSs, clinical and community mental health providers) are recruited for the qualitative interviews only, who are different from the MOST phases.

    Time frame: It will be evaluated by three focus group interviews immediately after the confirmation phase, and each interview will be about 60 to 120 minutes.

  6. Attitudes towards the feasibility of the intervention

    This is a mixed methods study, and the investigators will conduct community-based participatory research (CBPR) to evaluate the implementation of the intervention. After the confirmation phase, focus group interviews will be conducted with the CBPR team understand the community's attitudes towards the feasibility of the intervention. Of note, participants (the patients, LHSs, clinical and community mental health providers) are recruited for the qualitative interviews only, who are different from the MOST phases.

    Time frame: It will be evaluated by three focus group interviews immediately after the confirmation phase, and each interview will be about 60 to 120 minutes.

  7. Attitudes towards the patient-centeredness of the intervention

    This is a mixed methods study, and the investigators will conduct community-based participatory research (CBPR) to evaluate the implementation of the intervention. After the confirmation phase, focus group interviews will be conducted with the CBPR team understand the community's attitudes towards the patient-centeredness of the intervention. Of note, participants (the patients, LHSs, clinical and community mental health providers) are recruited for the qualitative interviews only, who are different from the MOST phases.

    Time frame: It will be evaluated by three focus group interviews immediately after the confirmation phase, and each interview will be about 60 to 120 minutes.

  8. Cost for implementing the TEEM-GIFTS

    It will be measured by the overall cost on developing and implementing the TEEM during the study. Of note, this outcome evaluates the implementation process of the intervention.

    Time frame: It will be evaluated immediately after the confirmation phase.

  9. Fidelity of the study

    The investigators will develop a checklist to evaluate the fidelity of the overall study. Of note, this outcome evaluates the implementation process of the intervention.

    Time frame: It will be evaluated immediately after the confirmation phase.

  10. Efficiency of the intervention

    During the confirmation phase, the investigators will record the response speed of the app as experienced by users of TEEM. This term refers to how quickly an application reacts to user inputs or requests. It's a critical aspect of user experience, encompassing everything from tapping a button, swiping through content, to executing a command. Of note, this outcome evaluates the implementation process of the intervention.

    Time frame: It will be evaluated immediately after the confirmation phase.

  11. Attitudes towards the safety of the intervention

    This is a mixed methods study, and the investigators will conduct community-based participatory research (CBPR) to evaluate the implementation of the intervention. After the confirmation phase, focus group interviews will be conducted with the CBPR team understand the community's attitudes towards the safety of the intervention. Of note, participants (the patients, LHSs, clinical and community mental health providers) are recruited for the qualitative interviews only, who are different from the MOST phases.

    Time frame: It will be evaluated by three focus group interviews immediately after the confirmation phase, and each interview will be about 60 to 120 minutes.

  12. The timeliness of the intervention

    The investigators will record the time for the research team cost to response to participants' requests for crisis intervention and feedbacks.

    Time frame: It will be evaluated immediately after the confirmation phase.

  13. Patients' perceived stigma from baseline to three months after discharge

    Perceived stigma will be evaluated the Chinese version of Link Perceived Devaluation-Discrimination Scale. The scale contains 12 items assessing the extent to which a person believes that other people will devalue or discriminate against someone with a mental illness. Each item is on a 4-Likert continuum (from "Strongly disagree" to "Strongly agree") scoring from 1 to 4. A higher total score indicates a higher level of perceived stigma. The total score and its trajectory from baseline to three months after discharge will be recorded and compared.

    Time frame: It will be evaluated at one week, one months and three months after discharge.

  14. Patients' self-efficacy from baseline to three months after discharge

    Self-efficacy will be evaluated by the Chinese version of the General Self-Efficacy Scale. The scale contains 10 items, and each item is on a 4-Likert continuum (from "Not at all true" to "Exactly true") scoring from 1 to 4. A higher total score indicates a higher level of self-efficacy. The total score and its trajectory from baseline to three months after discharge will be recorded and compared.

    Time frame: It will be evaluated at one week, one months and three months after discharge.

  15. Patients' compliance to treatment from baseline to three months after discharge

    Compliance to treatment will be evaluated by a 4-item self-administered questionnaire. The questionnaire inquires whether the patients take medications under the instruction on prescriptions (frequency, dosage, time, and selfdiscontinued medication). Each item is on a 4-Likert continuum (from "Not following the instruction" to "Exactly following the instruction") scoring from 1 to 4. A higher total score indicates a higher level of compliance to treatment. The total score and its trajectory from baseline to three months after discharge will be recorded and compared.

    Time frame: It will be evaluated at one week, one months and three months after discharge.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Sebastian Deterding, Dan Dixon, Rilla Khaled, and Lennart Nacke. 2011. From game design elements to gamefulness: defining
  • Deci EL, Ryan RM, Handbook of self-determination research[M/OL]. Rochester, NY: University Rochester Press, 2002. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2002-01702-000.
  • Hopia H, Raitio K. Gamification in Healthcare: Perspectives of Mental Health Service Users and Health Professionals. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2016 Dec;37(12):894-902. doi: 10.1080/01612840.2016.1233595. Epub 2016 Dec 1. PubMed 27905826 ↗
  • Christensen H, Farrer L, Batterham PJ, Mackinnon A, Griffiths KM, Donker T. The effect of a web-based depression intervention on suicide ideation: secondary outcome from a randomised controlled trial in a helpline. BMJ Open. 2013 Jun 28;3(6):e002886. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002886. PubMed 23811172 ↗
  • Morris ZS, Wooding S, Grant J. The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research. J R Soc Med. 2011 Dec;104(12):510-20. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2011.110180. PubMed 22179294 ↗
  • Collins LM, Murphy SA, Nair VN, Strecher VJ. A strategy for optimizing and evaluating behavioral interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2005 Aug;30(1):65-73. doi: 10.1207/s15324796abm3001_8. PubMed 16097907 ↗
  • Collins LM, Baker TB, Mermelstein RJ, Piper ME, Jorenby DE, Smith SS, Christiansen BA, Schlam TR, Cook JW, Fiore MC. The multiphase optimization strategy for engineering effective tobacco use interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2011 Apr;41(2):208-26. doi: 10.1007/s12160-010-9253-x. PubMed 21132416 ↗
  • Hou F, Liu H, Bai Y, Peng B, Chen G, Zhang Y, Wu D, Fu T, Hu L, Li J. Protocol of the Tailored Evidence-based Enhancements in Mental Health-Gamified and Individualized Follow-Up Treatment for Suicide (TEEM-GIFTS): a Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST) study implementing a gamified mHealth intervention to reduce postdischarge suicide risk in patients with mental disorders in Shenzhen. BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 15;15(4):e092339. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092339. PubMed 40233959 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Quantitative data will be publicly available through FigShare 12 months after the main studies are published in peer-reviewed journals. The data will contain deidentified demographic information, primary and secondary outcomes, and other covariate outcomes.

Supporting information: Study protocol

Time frame: Twelve months after the main studies are published in peer-reviewed journals. The study protocol will be shared once published in peer-reviewed journal.

Access criteria: Please contact the PI Fengsu Hou to request for the use of the data, and the requests should include detail contact information of applicants, the purpose of study, and the analysis plan.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 24, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06358339
Lead sponsor
Shenzhen Kangning Hospital
Responsible party
Fengsu Hou (Research Associate Professor, Shenzhen Kangning Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 10, 2024
Start date
May 1, 2025
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 24, 2026

Study contacts

Fengsu Hou, Ph.D.
Contact
houfengsu@gmail.com
+86-18502864780
Huiming Liu, Ph.D.
Contact
huimingcsu@163.com
+86-13902448300
Fengsu Hou, Ph.D.
principal investigator · Shenzhen Kangning Hospital

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion