ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06143800Updated Nov 22, 2023

Reconsolidation-Based Intervention for Traumatic Memories

An interventional study of reactivation and cognitive reappraisal intervention in Depression, sponsored by Shenzhen Kangning Hospital. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 25 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-11-22.

Sponsored by Shenzhen Kangning Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Sep 2025, 1 year 2 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
390
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 25 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to test the effect and underlying mechanism of reconsolidation-based cognitive reappraisal for traumatic memories in patients with major depression disorder. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Is cognitive reappraisal based on memory reconsolidation effective for laboratory-created traumatic memories? Which of the two classical cognitive reassessment schemes is more effective?
  • What is the neural mechanism by which the novel cognitive reappraisal based on memory reconsolidation alters traumatic memories?
  • Can repeated use of the novel cognitive reappraisal based on memory reconsolidation alter the actual childhood traumatic memories of patients with major depression disorder? Can it reduce depressive symptoms? Are the effects long-lasting? Participants will be grouped to receive the intervention (retrieval + cognitive reappraisal, non-retrieval + cognitive reappraisal). The researchers will compare the differences in long-term memory tests and the improvement in depressive symptoms between the two groups to see the effects of the memory-based reconsolidation intervention.
Read the detailed description

There are three sub-trials in this study. Participants in the first trial will learn the fear of emotional faces based on the Pavlovian conditioned fear learning paradigm. Using an inter-subject experimental design, the intervention will be divided into four groups (retrieval /non-retrieval, self-concerned cognitive reappraisal/context-concerned cognitive reappraisal). The researchers will compare the differences between the four groups on long-term memory tests to see if the cognitive reappraisal based on memory reconsolidation has effect on traumatic memory in the laboratory of depressed patients.

Participants in the second trial are given the same treatment as in the first, but with brain imaging equipment to gain brain imaging data. The researchers will compare the brain functional characteristics of the four groups in the long-term memory test, in order to explore the neural mechanism of the effect of cognitive reappraisal on traumatic memory intervention based on memory reconsolidation mechanism.

Participants in the third trial are divided into two groups (retrieval + cognitive reappraisal, and non-retrieval + cognitive reappraisal) for an eight-week intervention. Finally, the researchers will compare the improvement in depressive symptoms between the two groups and retest physiological arousal and subjective assessments of traumatic memories one year later to see the long-term effects of the memory-based reconsolidation intervention.

02

Conditions studied

  • Depression

Keywords

  • Psychological Trauma; Memory
03

In context

Depression

8,577 studies on the registry are indexed under Depression; 1,720 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 390 is above the median of 81 across 7,063 interventional studies indexed under Depression.

Browse Depression studies →

Lead sponsor

Shenzhen Kangning Hospital is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 25 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Clinical diagnosis of major depression disorder
  • Must have normal vision or corrected vision

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have physical diseases or other mental disorders
  • Be pregnant, breastfeeding or do not have menstruation
  • Drink alcohol or smoke within 24 hours before the experiment
  • Participated in similar experiments before.
  • History of severe cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, stroke and other neurological diseases, and history of digestive system diseases.
  • Severe hearing and vision impairment.
  • Have metal implants in the body, such as non-removable dentures, scaffolds, steel plates, joint metal replacements, etc.
  • Have Claustrophobia
  • Have acute or chronic disease or infection
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Factorial assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
390 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    retrieval + self-focused cognitive reappraisal

    Participants in this arm will first accept a memory reactivation to open the reconsolidation window, then accept the self-focused cognitive reappraisal intervention.

    Behavioral: reactivation · Behavioral: cognitive reappraisal intervention

  • Experimental
    retrieval + context-focused cognitive reappraisal

    Participants in this arm will first accept a memory reactivation to open the reconsolidation window, then accept the context-focused cognitive reappraisal.

    Behavioral: reactivation · Behavioral: cognitive reappraisal intervention

  • Active comparator
    non-retrieval + self-focused cognitive reappraisal

    Participants in this arm will directly accept the self-focused cognitive reappraisal intervention without memory reactivation.

    Behavioral: cognitive reappraisal intervention

  • Active comparator
    non-retrieval + context-focused cognitive reappraisal

    Participants in this arm will directly accept the context-focused cognitive reappraisal intervention without memory reactivation.

    Behavioral: cognitive reappraisal intervention

Interventions

  • Behavioralreactivation

    During the retrieval phase, cues are presented to participants to reactivate their memories; participants in the non-retrieval group go directly to cognitive reappraisal phase.

    Also known as: memory retrieval

  • Behavioralcognitive reappraisal intervention

    Subsequently, in the self-focused cognitive reappraisal group, participants will be instructed to use "disengagement" reappraisal to separate themselves from the picture situation and draw a subjective distance so as not to strongly feel the negative emotions brought by the picture. In the context-focused reappraisal group, participants will focus on the picture situation, reappraise the meaning of the picture situation, and assign positive meanings to it.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Participants' Skin Conductance Response (SCR)

    The level of SCR was assessed for each trial as the base-to-peak amplitudedifference in skin conductance of the largest deflection (in microsiemens; pS) in the 0.5-4.5-slatency window after stimulus onset.

    Time frame: baseline, 8 weeks, and one year after treatment

  2. Change in the amygdala measured with fMRI

    Changes in the difference in BOLD (Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent) signal in the amygdala between treated cue and untreated cue measured with fMRI.

    Time frame: baseline, 8 weeks, and one year after treatment

  3. Change in the hippocampus measured with fMRI

    Changes in the difference in BOLD (Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent) signal in the hippocampus between treated cue and untreated cue measured with fMRI.

    Time frame: baseline, 8 weeks, and one year after treatment

  4. Change in the prefrontal cortex measured with fMRI

    Changes in the difference in BOLD (Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent) signal in the prefrontal cortex between treated cue and untreated cue measured with fMRI

    Time frame: baseline, 8 weeks, and one year after treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. The changes in the Baker Depression Scale (BDI).

    To assess depressive symptom changes after the treatment using the Baker Depression Scale (BDI). The BDI consists of 21 items coded on a 4-point scale (0-3). The total scores ranged from 0 to 63. The higher the total scores, the higher the depressive symptom severity.

    Time frame: baseline, 8 weeks, and one year after treatment

  2. The changes in the State-Trait Anxiety Scale (STAI)

    To assess anxious symptom changes after the treatment using the State-Trait Anxiety Scale (STAI). The STAI consists of 40 items. All items are rated on a 4-point scale (e.g., from "Almost Never" to "Almost Always"). Higher scores indicate greater anxiety.

    Time frame: baseline, 8 weeks, and one year after treatment

  3. The changes in the GROSS Self-Rating Emotional Regulation Style Questionnaire

    To assess emotional regulation style changes after the treatment using the GROSS Self-Rating Emotional Regulation Style Questionnaire. It is a 10-item scale designed to measure respondents' tendency to regulate their emotions in two ways: (1) Cognitive Reappraisal and (2) Expressive Suppression. Respondents answer each item on a 7-point Likert-type scale (1 to 7). Items 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 10 make up the Cognitive Reappraisal facet. Items 2, 4, 6, 9 make up the Expressive Suppression facet. Scoring is kept continuous. Each facet's scoring is kept separate.

    Time frame: baseline, 8 weeks, and one year after treatment

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — We wiil share our data on the Open Science Framework after data collection

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan

Time frame: These information will be shared after the related paper is published and will be available for at least one year

Access criteria: The information will be shared on the Open Science Framework for the public

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Dec 2023; primary completion for Sep 2025, 21 months later.

Of 3,468 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Depression, half reached primary completion within 21 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 41. This study's planned 21 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 3,566 studies reached it within 21 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 41.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 31, 2023
First posted
Nov 22, 2023
StartEst.
Dec 2023
Primary completionEst.
Sep 2025
CompletionEst.
Sep 2025
Last update
Nov 22, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 22, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06143800
Lead sponsor
Shenzhen Kangning Hospital
Collaborators
Science and Technology Innovation Commission of Shenzhen Municipality
Responsible party
Jingchu Hu (Principal Investigator, Shenzhen Kangning Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 22, 2023
Start date
Dec 2023 (estimated)
Primary completion
Sep 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 22, 2023

Study contacts

Jingchu Hu, Dr.
Contact
hujingchu@gmail.com
(+86)15603072635
Jingchu Hu, Dr.
principal investigator · Shenzhen Kangning Hospital

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Nov 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion