ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06232369Updated Feb 6, 2024

Threat Reversal Abnormality in Patients With Anxiety Disorders

An interventional study of Active repetitive deep transcranial magnetic stimulation (dTMS) and Sham repetitive deep transcranial magnetic stimulation (dTMS) in Anxiety Disorder and Anxiety State, sponsored by Shenzhen Kangning Hospital. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-02-06.

Sponsored by Shenzhen Kangning Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Sep 2025, 1 year 2 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
190
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to explore the flexibility of threat control and underlying neural mechanism based on the threat reversal paradigm (a highly validated new paradigm where threat learning and inhibition are required) in patients with anxiety disorders (mainly generalized anxiety disorder). The hypotheses are:

  1. Threat reversal abilities are hypothesized to be impaired in patients with anxiety disorders compared to healthy normal subjects, which are assumed to be associated with anxiety symptoms.
  2. The neural mechanism underlying threat reversal abnormalities in patients with anxiety disorders is hypothesized to involve the prefrontal cortex, amygdala, and hippocampus.
  3. The repetitive stimulation to the core brain regions of threat reversal is assumed to improve threat reversal abilities and anxiety symptoms of patients.
Read the detailed description

In this study, there are three sub-trials in combination with skin conductance response (SCR), functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and non-invasive neuromodulation techniques to uncover the abnormal threat reversal in anxiety disorder at behavioral and neural levels.

Participants in the first trial will learn the threat of emotional faces based on the Pavlovian conditioned fear learning paradigm; their neural activities in the hypothesized brain regions will be obtained via brain imaging equipment. The researchers will compare the differences among three groups (one patient group, two healthy control groups with different anxiety level) on performance in the threat reversal task, and their neural activities and brain functional connectivity characteristics, in order to reveal the potential behavioral threat reversal abnormalities and core associated brain regions underlying threat reversal.

Participants in the second trial will be given the same learning paradigm and brain imaging equipment as in the first, but with repetitive stimulation intervention on the core brain regions determined in study 1. Using a double-blind randomized controlled experiment, the participants will be divided into three groups (active stimulation + patient, sham stimulation + patient, and sham stimulation + healthy control). The researchers will compare the behavioral differences in the threat reversal task after active and sham stimulation.

Participants in the third trial will be given the same study design and intervention as the second trial, but for eight weeks. Finally, the researchers will retest and compare the improvement in threat reversal abilities and anxiety symptoms to see the long-term clinical effects of the intervention.

02

Conditions studied

  • Anxiety Disorder
  • Anxiety State

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Threat Reversal
  • Emotion Flexibility
03

In context

Anxiety Disorders

7,201 studies on the registry are indexed under Anxiety Disorders; 1,682 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 190 is above the median of 80 across 6,057 interventional studies indexed under Anxiety Disorders.

Browse Anxiety Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

Shenzhen Kangning Hospital is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Clinical diagnosis of anxiety disorders (by psychiatrists using the structured clinical interview for (SCID) with reference to the diagnostic criteria for GAD according to the ICD-10)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria for patient participants:

  1. A history of serious cardiovascular, cerebrovascular diseases, stroke, or other neurological disorders, a history of gastrointestinal diseases.
  2. Severe hearing or vision impairments.
  3. Metallic implants in the body, such as non-removable dentures, stents, metal plates, joint metal replacements, etc.
  4. Claustrophobia.
  5. Acute or chronic diseases or infections.
  6. Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  7. Smoking or drinking alcohol within 24 hours before the experiment.
  8. Previous participation in similar experiments conducted by this institution.

Inclusion Criteria for healthy control participants:

  1. No physical diseases or mental disorders.
  2. No claustrophobia.
  3. No hereditary diseases.
  4. No medication history or smoking history.
  5. Females not pregnant and not in their menstrual period.
  6. Normal vision or corrected vision, no smoking, drinking alcohol, or taking medication within 24 hours prior to the experiment.
  7. No previous participation in similar experiments.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

DSM diagnostic criteria

The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
190 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Patient group + active stimulation intervention

    Patient participants with anxiety disorders in this arm will first accept active repetitive stimulation on core brain regions and then complete the threat reversal learning paradigm.

    Device: Active repetitive deep transcranial magnetic stimulation (dTMS)

  • Sham comparator
    Patient group + sham stimulation intervention

    Patient participants with anxiety disorders in this arm will first accept sham repetitive stimulation on core brain regions and then complete the threat reversal learning paradigm.

    Device: Sham repetitive deep transcranial magnetic stimulation (dTMS)

  • Sham comparator
    Healthy control group + sham stimulation intervention

    Healthy participants in this arm will first accept sham repetitive stimulation on core brain regions and then complete the threat reversal learning paradigm.

    Device: Sham repetitive deep transcranial magnetic stimulation (dTMS)

Interventions

  • DeviceActive repetitive deep transcranial magnetic stimulation (dTMS)

    Before the intervention, the brain structure of each participant will be captured using an MRI scanner, and individualized spatial coordinates of the hypothesized target will be determined based on these 3D structural images. Then the resting motor threshold will be tested using the method of thumb twitching observation. The intervention will employ the H7 coil that is accurately delivered to the intended target by an optic navigation and a deep pulse protocol at 90% of the tested threshold for 15-minute stimulation duration.

  • DeviceSham repetitive deep transcranial magnetic stimulation (dTMS)

    Before the intervention, the brain structure of each participant will be captured using an MRI scanner, and individualized spatial coordinates of the hypothesized target will be determined based on these 3D structural images. Then the resting motor threshold will be tested using the method of thumb twitching observation. The intervention will employ the H7 coil that is placed on the scalp to mimic the sensation and sounds of the actual treatment but without letting the magnetic field reach the brain tissue for 15-minute duration.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Changes in participants' skin conductance response (SCR)

    The level of SCR will be assessed for each experiment trial as the base-to-peak amplitude difference in skin conductance of the largest deflection (in micro-siemens; pS) in the 0.5-4.5-slatency window after stimulus onset.

    Time frame: Baseline; every week (assessed weekly up to 8 weeks from the date of last intervention session)

  2. Changes in the prefrontal cortex measured with fMRI

    Changes in the difference in blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) signals in the prefrontal cortex before and after the intervention.

    Time frame: Baseline; once per week (assessed weekly up to 8 weeks from the date of last intervention session)

  3. Changes in the amygdala measured with fMRI

    Changes in the difference in blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) signals in the amygdala before and after the intervention.

    Time frame: Baseline; once per week (assessed weekly up to 8 weeks from the date of last intervention session)

  4. Changes in the hippocampus measured with fMRI

    Changes in the difference in blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) signals in the hippocampus before and after the intervention.

    Time frame: Baseline; once per week (assessed weekly up to 8 weeks from the date of last intervention session)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Changes in the State-Trait Anxiety Scale (STAI)

    The STAI assesses the current state of anxiety and relatively stable aspects of anxiety proneness, each subscale consisting of 20 items. Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert scale, ranging from "Not at all" to "Very much". Higher summed scores in subscales indicate greater state anxiety and trait anxiety.

    Time frame: Baseline; once per week (assessed weekly up to 8 weeks from the date of last intervention session); 3 months (assessed at the week after 3 months from the last intervention session)

  2. Changes in the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale-12 (IUS-12)

    The IUS measures individuals' emotional, cognitive, and behavioral responses or tolerance to uncertain situations, consisting 12 items. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from "Not at all characteristic of me" to "Entirely characteristic of me". Higher summed total scores suggest a higher level of intolerance of uncertainty.

    Time frame: Baseline; once per week (assessed weekly up to 8 weeks from the date of last intervention session); 3 months (assessed at the week after 3 months from the last intervention session)

  3. Changes in the Anxiety Sensitivity Index (ASI)

    The ASI measures the extent to which individuals are sensitive to their own anxiety symptoms, consisting 12 items. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from "Not at all characteristic of me" to "Entirely characteristic of me". Higher summed total scores indicate greater anxiety sensitivity.

    Time frame: Baseline; once per week (assessed weekly up to 8 weeks from the date of last intervention session); 3 months (assessed at the week after 3 months from the last intervention session)

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — We will share our data on the Open Science Framework after data collection

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan

Time frame: The information will be shared after the related paper is published and will be available for at least one year.

Access criteria: The information will be shared on the Open Science Framework for the public.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 6, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06232369
Lead sponsor
Shenzhen Kangning Hospital
Collaborators
The National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC)
Responsible party
Jingchu Hu (Associate Research Fellow, Shenzhen Kangning Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 30, 2024
Start date
Mar 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Sep 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 6, 2024

Study contacts

Jingchu Hu, Dr.
Contact
hujingchu@gmail.com
(+86)15603072635
Jingchu Hu, Dr.
principal investigator · Shenzhen Kangning Hospital

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Feb 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion