ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06329661Updated Aug 19, 2026Results posted

A Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Corneal Endothelial Health of DED Subjects Treated With Cyclosporine

A Phase 4 interventional study of Cyclosporine ophthalmic solution, 0.1% and Saline solution, 0.6% in Dry Eye Disease and Endothelial Cell, sponsored by Novaliq GmbH. Completed at 6 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-19.

Sponsored by Novaliq GmbH · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
204
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 45 studies testing cyclosporine in Dry Eye Syndromes — 5 open to participants now, 5 under way, none of them phase 3. Cyclosporine · Dry Eye Syndromes.

Enrollment
4th of 41
204 · median 51
Started
2024
with 1 other
Phase 4
23 of 45
3 open now
Registered
36th of 45
by date
Lead sponsor
2 of 45
Novaliq GmbH

Among the 45 studies testing cyclosporine in Dry Eye Syndromes, this one is the 4th largest by enrollment of the 41 interventional ones, is one of 2 that started in 2024, is one of 23 in phase 4, and was the 36th registered.

By phase

45 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.

Phase 4this study23 · 3 open
No phase8 · 2 open
Phase 37 · 0 open
Phase 24 · 0 open
Phase 13 · 0 open

By the year they started

First in 1997; this study’s year is marked. 2 started in 2024.

Size and results

Median enrollment 51 across the 41 interventional studies. Of the 35 that completed or were terminated, 11 (31%) have results posted.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVWith an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 45 studies testing cyclosporine in Dry Eye Syndromes, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The objective of this trial is to evaluate the effect of cyclosporine ophthalmic solution, 0.1% on corneal endothelial cell health in comparison to a hypotonic saline solution in subjects with Dry Eye Disease (DED)

Read the detailed description

The effect of cyclosporine ophthalmic solution, 0.1% on corneal endothelial cell density (cells/mm²) will be evaluated in comparison to a hypotonic saline solution in subjects with DED after 12 months of treatment.

03

Conditions studied

  • Dry Eye Disease
  • Endothelial Cell

Browse trials for

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Be at least 18 years of age;
  • Provide written ;
  • Have a subject reported history of dry eye disease (DED) in both eyes
  • Be able and willing to follow instructions, including participation in all trial assessments and visits.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Be a woman who is pregnant, nursing, or planning a pregnancy;
  • Unwillingness to to use acceptable means of
  • slit-lamp findings or abnormal lid anatomy at screening
  • Ongoing ocular or systemic infection at screening or baseline
  • Presence of uncontrolled systemic diseases
  • Presence of known allergy and/or sensitivity to the study drug or its components
  • Intraocular surgery or ocular laser surgery or significant trauma within 365 days before Visit 1, or have any planned ocular surgeries during the trial period
  • Have a condition or be in a situation which the Investigator feels may put the subject at significant risk, may confound the trial results, or may interfere with the subject's participation in the trial significantly.
  • Randomized in a previous CyclASol trial
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
204 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Cyclosporine ophthalmic solution, 0.1% (VEVYE)

    Cyclosporine ophthalmic solution, 0.1%; 12 months

    Drug: Cyclosporine ophthalmic solution, 0.1%

  • Placebo comparator
    Saline solution, 0.6%

    Saline solution, 0.6%; 12 months

    Drug: Saline solution, 0.6%

Interventions

  • Colorless and clear opthalmic solution containing 0.1% Cyclosporine

    Also known as: VEVYE

  • DrugSaline solution, 0.6%

    Colorless and clear sodium chloride solution (0.6%)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Corneal Endothelial Cell Density (ECD)

    Change from baseline at 12 months in ECD measured as count/mm2 using specular microscopy in the study eye

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Results

Posted Aug 19, 2026

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneCyclosporine Ophthalmic Solution, 0.1% (VEVYE)Saline Solution, 0.6%
Started13569
Completed12261
Not completed138

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline in Corneal Endothelial Cell Density (ECD)

Change from baseline at 12 months in ECD measured as count/mm2 using specular microscopy in the study eye

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Mean · cells/mm²
Change From Baseline in Corneal Endothelial Cell Density (ECD)
cells/mm²Cyclosporine Ophthalmic Solution, 0.1% (VEVYE)Saline Solution, 0.6%
Change From Baseline in Corneal Endothelial Cell Density (ECD)6.4 ± 90.47-1.0 ± 81.43

Adverse events

Collected over 52 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Cyclosporine Ophthalmic Solution, 0.1% (VEVYE)0/135 (0%)5/135 (3.7%)27/135 (20%)
Saline Solution, 0.6%0/69 (0%)2/69 (2.9%)13/69 (18.8%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventCyclosporine Ophthalmic Solution, 0.1% (VEVYE)Saline Solution, 0.6%
Worsening of coronary artery diseaseCardiac disorders0/1351/69
Subdural haematomaInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/1351/69
Mild Acute PancreatitisGastrointestinal disorders1/1350/69
AnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/1350/69
LymphadenitisBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/1350/69
Pain secondary to posterolateral lumbar fusion surgeryMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/1350/69
Worsening OsteoarthritisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/1350/69
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventCyclosporine Ophthalmic Solution, 0.1% (VEVYE)Saline Solution, 0.6%
Application site irritationGeneral disorders20/1357/69
HypertensionVascular disorders7/1356/69

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Cyclosporine Ophthalmic Solution, 0.1% (VEVYE)Saline Solution, 0.6%Total
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years7443117
>=65 years612687
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Cyclosporine Ophthalmic Solution, 0.1% (VEVYE)Saline Solution, 0.6%Total
Female10550155
Male301949
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Cyclosporine Ophthalmic Solution, 0.1% (VEVYE)Saline Solution, 0.6%Total
Hispanic or Latino71017
Not Hispanic or Latino12859187
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Cyclosporine Ophthalmic Solution, 0.1% (VEVYE)Saline Solution, 0.6%Total
United States13569204
Corneal Endothelial Cell Density
Corneal Endothelial Cell Density(cell/mm²)Cyclosporine Ophthalmic Solution, 0.1% (VEVYE)Saline Solution, 0.6%Total
Mean2488.6 ± 283.322507.7 ± 250.232495.0 ± 272.11
08

Study locations

6 sites
  • CYS-007 Investigational Site
    Newport Beach, California 92663, United States
  • CYS-007 Investigational Site
    Torrance, California 90505, United States
  • CYS-007 Investigational Site
    Garner, North Carolina 27529, United States
  • CYS-007 Investigational Site
    Shelby, North Carolina 28150, United States
  • CYS-007 Investigational Site
    Cranberry Township, Pennsylvania 16066, United States
  • CYS-007 Investigational Site
    Memphis, Tennessee 38120, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Apr 2024 to primary completion in Jul 2025, 15 months.

Results were first posted in Aug 2026, 1 year after primary completion.

Of 28 industry-sponsored phase 4 interventional studies under Dry Eye Syndromes, half reached primary completion within 8 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 4 and three quarters within 15. This study's 15 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 112 studies reached it within 12 months; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 23.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 19, 2024
First posted
Mar 26, 2024
StartActual
Apr 22, 2024
Primary completionActual
Jul 30, 2025
CompletionActual
Jul 30, 2025
Results first posted
Aug 19, 2026
Last update
Aug 19, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 19, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06329661
Lead sponsor
Novaliq GmbH
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 26, 2024
Start date
Apr 22, 2024
Primary completion
Jul 30, 2025
Completion
Jul 30, 2025
Results posted
Aug 19, 2026
Last update
Aug 19, 2026

Study contacts

Sonja Krösser, PhD
study director · Novaliq GmbH

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Cyclosporine

Start the discussion