An observational study in Inflammatory and Non-inflammatory Bone and Joint Diseases, sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris. Recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-24.
Sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris · Observational
Early diagnosis is a key factor in the prevention and management of rheumatic diseases. Rheumatic diseases are classically diagnosed based on criteria combining clinical, biological and radiological features. However, in up to 20% of the cases, diagnoses remain unstated and underlying rheumatic diseases unclassified, which might lead to delayed specific treatment and unfavourable clinical outcomes. In addition, conventional methods could lack sensitivity and specificity for early diagnosis. Biological samples are attractive targets for the early detection of articular damage because they allow for collection of multiple levels of information from the clinic and the laboratory]. Biological samples most frequently collected from patients with rheumatic diseases are synovial fluid by joint aspiration, blood by venous puncture and tissue specimen by surgery. The investigators hypothesize that in challenging situations, novel biomarkers detected from synovial fluid or articular tissues using both conventional (e.g. histology, immunodetection, PCR) and innovative (e.g. Raman spectroscopy, nanospectroscopy) laboratory tests may help refining diagnosis and better classifying patients with rheumatic diseases.
Early diagnosis is a key factor in the prevention and management of rheumatic diseases. Rheumatic diseases are classically diagnosed based on criteria combining clinical, biological and radiological features. However, in up to 20% of the cases, diagnoses remain unstated and underlying rheumatic diseases unclassified, which might lead to delayed specific treatment and unfavourable clinical outcomes. In addition, conventional methods could lack sensitivity and specificity for early diagnosis. Biological samples are attractive targets for the early detection of articular damage because they allow for collection of multiple levels of information from the clinic and the laboratory. Biological samples most frequently collected from patients with rheumatic diseases are synovial fluid by joint aspiration, blood by venous puncture and tissue specimen by surgery. The investigators hypothesize that in challenging situations, novel biomarkers detected from synovial fluid, blood or articular tissues using both conventional (e.g. histology, immunodetection, PCR) and innovative (e.g. Raman spectroscopy, nanospectroscopy) laboratory tests may help refining diagnosis and better classifying patients with rheumatic diseases.
Synovial fluid is primarily composed of water, proteins, proteoglycans, glycosaminoglycans, lipids, small inorganic salts, and metabolites such as amino acids or sugars. Individual synovial fluid components may often perform multiple functions. For example, hyaluronic acid maintains the complex viscoelastic properties of synovial fluids and regulates the biological activity of advanced glycation end-products, cytokines, and enzymes associated with osteoarthritis. Normal joint function is dependent on the status of synovial fluid composition, especially considering the large interaction between the individual components. Although conventional laboratory tests have been used by rheumatologists for the past 50 years, they provide limited quantitative data and cannot specifically describe the biochemical and chemical changes, such as alterations in protein composition and proteomic profile undergone by synovial fluids in arthritic joints. Measurements that reflect the entire synovial fluid chemical, biological or viscoelastic profile could be interesting additional tools. An example of innovative measurement technique is Raman spectroscopy that can be used to detect changes in synovial fluid from patients with rheumatic diseases. Raman band intensity ratios vary significantly in spectra collected from synovial fluid in patients with radiological evidence of osteoarthritis damage. Changes to the protein secondary structure could be used as general marker of chemical changes in synovial fluid and that these changes can be associated with radiographic scoring of knee damage. Other publications focused on the Raman analysis of crystals extracted from synovial fluids. Our group developped Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy (SERS) using nanoparticles that might be more sensitive than conventional Raman spectroscopy in characterizing biofluids especially the entire synovial fluid and deciphering specific rheumatic disease spectral signatures.
Blood biomarkers have long been used for the diagnosis and follow-up of rheumatic diseases. They are mainly markers of auto-immunity, inflammation, cartilage degradation or bone remodelling.
Articular tissues include articular cartilage, bone, meniscus, synovial membrane, fat, tendons, ligaments, muscles. They are obtained during surgery. Their analysis is precious to characterize auto-immunity, inflammation, cartilage degradation or bone remodelling local status and to study local activation of cellular and molecular pathways of interest using conventional techniques of cellular and molecular biology.
386 studies on the registry are indexed under Joint Diseases; 64 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 86 across 116 observational studies indexed under Joint Diseases.
Browse Joint Diseases studies →Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris is the lead sponsor of 3,592 studies on the registry; 1,033 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
¨Patients with various bone and joint diseases
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Neoadjuvant treatment is given before the main treatment (usually surgery), often to shrink a tumour. Adjuvant treatment is given after it, to lower the chance of the cancer coming back.
Adjuvant and neoadjuvant
Neoadjuvant treatment is given before the main treatment (usually surgery), often to shrink a tumour. Adjuvant treatment is given after it, to lower the chance of the cancer coming back.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Patients with various bone and joint diseases
Other: Collection of joint fluid or tissue sample
During a puncture or joint surgery planned as part of the routine care of the patient, a part of the joint fluid or tissue sample will be collected in order to carry out the analyzes planned for the research.
Tissues and biofluid spectra using surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy
Molecular signature of articular samples
Time frame: Inclusion
Protein expression using immunodetection techniques and RNA expression using PCR
Cellular signature of articular samples
Time frame: Inclusion
Tissues and biofluid spectra using surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy
Time frame: Inclusion
Protein expression using immunodetection techniques and RNA expression using PCR
Time frame: Inclusion
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Started Jun 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2029, 36 months after the start.
Of 58 observational studies under Joint Diseases, half reached primary completion within 62 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 28 and three quarters within 153. This study's planned 36 months is below that.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris →