ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06285435Updated Feb 29, 2024

Coagulation Activation in Patients With Pemphigus

An observational study in Pemphigus, sponsored by Assiut University. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-02-29.

Sponsored by Assiut University · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Oct 2025, 1 year 1 month ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
54
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Aim of work:

  1. To evaluate the plasma markers of coagulation activation: prothrombin F1+2 and d-dimer levels in pemphigus patients with active disease and compare them with age and sex-matched controls.
  2. To evaluate the correlation of these markers with disease severity score by using Pemphigus Disease Area Index (PDAI) and with disease activity by measurement of anti-desmoglein 1 and 3 antibody titers.
Read the detailed description

Pemphigus encompasses a group of autoimmune bullous diseases characterized clinically by the presence of flaccid blisters and erosions of the mucous membranes and/or skin. It is characterized by autoantibodies directed against the desmosomal desmogleins; Desmoglein 1 (Dsg1) and Desmoglein 3 (Dsg3) on keratinocyte cell surfaces resulting in acantholysis, which is the mechanism underlying pemphigus.

Pemphigus diseases can be classified into 4 main forms based on clinical and immunopathological features: pemphigus vulgaris, in about 70-80% of patients; pemphigus foliaceus, in about 20%; paraneoplastic pemphigus, in about 5%; and IgA pemphigus, in 1-3%.

The global incidence of PV ranges from 0.7 to 5 cases per million per year. PV predominantly affects adults in the 4th-6th decade of life. PV often begins with painful, non-healing erosions in oral mucosa, and develops into blisters in the skin.

The diagnosis of pemphigus is based on triad of history taking, clinical examination and immunologic investigations. ELISA using recombinant Dsgs enables detection of circulating autoantibodies in pemphigus. The sensitivity and specificity of anti-Dsg ELISA are 96% to 100% .The autoantibody titers often fluctuate in parallel with disease activity and decline with clinical improvement; therefore, these titers are useful not only for diagnosis but also for monitoring of disease activity and a decrease in the ELISA index value can be a useful guide for steroid tapering in the lesion-free phase.

Growing evidence has suggested that several autoimmune disorders are significantly associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, the primary contribution of pemphigus to VTE development is unclear.

A retrospective cohort study demonstrated a 5% venous thromboembolism rate in patients with pemphigus within the first year after diagnosis.

A large-scale population-based longitudinal cohort study concluded that pemphigus is associated with an increased risk of pulmonary embolism (PE), particularly during the 1st year of the disease.

The mechanism underlying the increased VTE risk in pemphigus had not been clearly defined. However, there is evidence that systemic inflammation, which exists in pemphigus as well as in other autoimmune diseases, may promote thrombosis through upregulation of pro-coagulation systems, anticoagulant suppression, and antifibrinolytic effects. Elevated levels of tumor necrosis alpha (TNF-α) and interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6 and IL-8 released into systemic circulation have been found to promote coagulation.

Additional possible risk factors for VTE development in patients with pemphigus are hospitalization, immobility and high prevalence of infections. Corticosteroid therapy, the mainstay of pemphigus treatment, increases the risk of VTE by increasing the levels of fibrinogen and clotting factors.

D-Dimer is a biomarker of fibrin formation and degradation. So far, the guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of PE have clearly stated that only D-dimer tests are used in laboratory tests for diagnosis to date.

Although D-dimer is considered a sensitive biomarker for thromboembolic events, it does not show as much specificity. Other conditions can also raise D-dimer level, such as pregnancy, renal failure and sepsis. An elevated D-dimer value is not sufficient to establish the diagnosis of pulmonary thromboembolism.

The most important marker of coagulation activation is the prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 (F1 + 2), which is a small peptide released when prothrombin is converted to thrombin by the prothrombinase complex on negatively charged phospholipids expressed on membranes of activated platelets. Consequently, an increased rate of conversion of prothrombin to thrombin, as it may occur in prothrombotic states, should result in an increase of F1 + 2 concentration in plasma. Owing to its relatively short half-life (approximately 90 minutes), the plasma levels of F1 + 2 are considered as reliable estimates of thrombin formation in vivo at the time of blood sampling.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pemphigus

Browse trials for

03

In context

Pemphigus

76 studies on the registry are indexed under Pemphigus; 18 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 54 is close to the median of 60 across 21 observational studies indexed under Pemphigus.

Browse Pemphigus studies →

Lead sponsor

Assiut University is the lead sponsor of 5,078 studies on the registry; 2,178 are open to participants now.

Of its 14 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients with active pemphigus who are either in a relapse for less than a week or are newly diagnosed cases will be included. The active stage of PV is defined as the de novo development of blisters on a healthy (unaffected or healed) site of either the skin or the mucous membrane.

Clinical assessment, histopathological analysis (acantholysis and intraepidermal splitting) will be used to confirm the diagnosis of each patient.

Control group: Healthy age and sex-matched subjects, who are free of chronic systemic diseases or dermatological conditions, will be enrolled as control.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • pemphigus vulgaris patients at active stage of the disease.
  • patients between the ages of 18 and 60.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with other bullous diseases.
  • Patients with other skin diseases.
  • Patients with chronic liver, renal or haematological diseases.
  • Patients with malignant tumors.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
54 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • pemphigus vulgaris patients

    Diagnostic Test: prothrombin fragment 1+2

  • control group

    Diagnostic Test: prothrombin fragment 1+2

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testprothrombin fragment 1+2

    Blood sample

    Also known as: D-dimer

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Comparison of coagulation activation markers in pemphigus patients with controls

    Evaluate the plasma markers of coagulation activation: prothrombin F1+2 and d-dimer levels in pemphigus patients with active disease and compare them with age and sex-matched controls.

    Time frame: Baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. Correlation of markers with disease severity

    Evaluate correlation of these markers with disease severity score by using Pemphigus Disease Area Index (PDAI) and with disease activity by measurement of anti-desmoglein 1 and 3 antibody titers.

    Time frame: Baseline

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Gregoriou S, Efthymiou O, Stefanaki C, Rigopoulos D. Management of pemphigus vulgaris: challenges and solutions. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2015 Oct 21;8:521-7. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S75908. eCollection 2015. PubMed 26543381 ↗
  • Jiang C, Adjei S, Santiago S, Lu J, Duran M, Tyring S. Novel use of dupilumab in pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus. JAAD Case Rep. 2023 Sep 30;42:12-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jdcr.2023.09.018. eCollection 2023 Dec. No abstract available. PubMed 37965194 ↗
  • Beek NV, Zillikens D, Schmidt E. Bullous Autoimmune Dermatoses-Clinical Features, Diagnostic Evaluation, and Treatment Options. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2021 Jun 18;118(24):413-420. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2021.0136. PubMed 34369370 ↗
  • Yuan Q, Yang W, Zhang X. Immune cells in pemphigus vulgaris and bullous Pemphigoid: From pathogenic roles to targeting therapies. Int Immunopharmacol. 2023 Oct;123:110694. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2023.110694. Epub 2023 Jul 29. PubMed 37523970 ↗
  • Kridin K, Kridin M, Amber KT, Shalom G, Comaneshter D, Batat E, Cohen AD. The Risk of Pulmonary Embolism in Patients With Pemphigus: A Population-Based Large-Scale Longitudinal Study. Front Immunol. 2019 Jul 24;10:1559. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01559. eCollection 2019. PubMed 31396203 ↗
  • Shaheen MS, Silverberg JI. Association of inflammatory skin diseases with venous thromboembolism in US adults. Arch Dermatol Res. 2021 May;313(4):281-289. doi: 10.1007/s00403-020-02099-6. Epub 2020 Jul 8. PubMed 32642810 ↗
  • Yang P, Li H, Zhang J, Xu X. Research progress on biomarkers of pulmonary embolism. Clin Respir J. 2021 Oct;15(10):1046-1055. doi: 10.1111/crj.13414. Epub 2021 Aug 3. PubMed 34214256 ↗
  • Marin M, Orso D, Federici N, Vetrugno L, Bove T. D-dimer specificity and clinical context: an old unlearned story. Crit Care. 2021 Mar 10;25(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03532-6. No abstract available. PubMed 33691711 ↗
  • Capecchi M, Scalambrino E, Griffini S, Grovetti E, Clerici M, Merati G, Chantarangkul V, Cugno M, Peyvandi F, Tripodi A. Relationship between thrombin generation parameters and prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 plasma levels. Int J Lab Hematol. 2021 Oct;43(5):e248-e251. doi: 10.1111/ijlh.13462. Epub 2021 Jan 12. No abstract available. PubMed 33433957 ↗
  • Lee SH, Hong WJ, Kim SC. Analysis of Serum Cytokine Profile in Pemphigus. Ann Dermatol. 2017 Aug;29(4):438-445. doi: 10.5021/ad.2017.29.4.438. Epub 2017 Jun 21. PubMed 28761292 ↗
  • Rosenbach M, Murrell DF, Bystryn JC, Dulay S, Dick S, Fakharzadeh S, Hall R, Korman NJ, Lin J, Okawa J, Pandya AG, Payne AS, Rose M, Rubenstein D, Woodley D, Vittorio C, Werth BB, Williams EA, Taylor L, Troxel AB, Werth VP. Reliability and convergent validity of two outcome instruments for pemphigus. J Invest Dermatol. 2009 Oct;129(10):2404-10. doi: 10.1038/jid.2009.72. Epub 2009 Apr 9. PubMed 19357707 ↗
  • Leshem YA, Atzmony L, Dudkiewicz I, Hodak E, Mimouni D. Venous thromboembolism in patients with pemphigus: A cohort study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017 Aug;77(2):256-260. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.01.059. Epub 2017 May 9. PubMed 28495498 ↗
  • Egami S, Yamagami J, Amagai M. Autoimmune bullous skin diseases, pemphigus and pemphigoid. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020 Apr;145(4):1031-1047. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.02.013. PubMed 32272980 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 29, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06285435
Lead sponsor
Assiut University
Responsible party
Youstina Zaghloul (Master degree student, Assiut University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 29, 2024
Start date
Mar 1, 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 29, 2024

Study contacts

Youstina Zaghloul
Contact
yostina.zaghloul@gmail.com
01002142707

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Feb 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion