ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07641725Updated Jun 11, 2026

Comparison of the Efficacy of Clobetasol Propionate 0.05% Mouthwash, Photobiomodulation, and Their Combination in Managing of Oral Lesions in Patient With Pemphigus Vulgaris.

An interventional study of Clobetasol propionate 0.05% Mouthwash and diode laser for photobiomodulation in Oral Lesions in Patients With Pemphigus Vulgaris, sponsored by Damascus University. Recruiting at 1 site in Syria. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-11.

Sponsored by Damascus University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 7 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Nov 2025, registered Jun 2026).
  • Started Nov 2025; still recruiting 1 year later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Pemphigus vulgaris (PV) is a chronic, potentially life-threatening autoimmune mucocutaneous disorder that significantly impairs patients' quality of life. While systemic corticosteroids and immunosuppressants remain the standard of care, many patients suffer from persistent, painful oral lesions that exhibit delayed healing or poor response to conventional systemic protocols. This clinical trial investigates the efficacy and safety of supportive topical interventions: clobetasol propionate 0.05% mouthwash and photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT)-a non-invasive approach designed to accelerate tissue repair, and their combination. The primary objective is to identify effective adjunctive topical therapies that can facilitate the healing of oral erosions, mitigate pain, and potentially allow for a reduction in systemic medication dosages, thereby minimizing long-term treatment-related complications and improving overall patient outcomes.

Read the detailed description

Patients with pemphigus vulgaris often experience debilitating oral pain, which severely restricts their ability to maintain adequate nutrition and hydration. Furthermore, the presence of extensive oral ulcers and erosions poses a significant risk for secondary bacterial or fungal infections. These challenges underscore the clinical necessity for effective topical adjunctive treatments to complement systemic therapy. By enhancing local lesion management, these topical modalities aim to accelerate clinical.

02

Conditions studied

  • Oral Lesions in Patients With Pemphigus Vulgaris

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Pemphigus vulgaris - Photobiomodulation - Clobetasol propionate - Autoimmune Blistering Diseases.
03

In context

Pemphigus

76 studies on the registry are indexed under Pemphigus; 18 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 30 is close to the median of 30 across 53 interventional studies indexed under Pemphigus.

Browse Pemphigus studies →

Lead sponsor

Damascus University is the lead sponsor of 212 studies on the registry; 11 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Confirmed diagnosis of Pemphigus Vulgaris based on clinical presentation, histopathology, and immunopathological findings (positive direct and indirect immunofluorescence), according to World Health Organization (WHO) standards.
  2. Presence of active erosive or ulcerative oral lesions with a maximum diameter exceeding 1 cm.
  3. Patients currently maintained on a stable systemic regimen not exceeding 1 mg/kg/day.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Co-existing chronic systemic conditions, including significant gastrointestinal disorders or uncontrolled diabetes mellitus.
  2. History or current evidence of .
  3. Concurrent use of systemic antibiotics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), or hormonal therapies that may interfere with the study outcomes.
  4. Pregnancy or active lactation. Note: These criteria are strictly enforced to ensure that the study population remains homogeneous regarding the systemic treatment protocol.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Arm 1: Clobetasol propionate 0.05% Mouthwash

    Drug: Clobetasol propionate 0.05% mouthwash * Use 3 times daily. * Rinse and hold in the mouth for 3 minutes per application. * Do not swallow. * Duration: 4 weeks. Follow-up instructions: After 4 weeks of therapy, if the patient achieves complete clinical remission, taper the frequency gradually until discontinuation, similar to the tapering of systemic steroids (e.g., reduce from three times daily → twice daily → once daily → every other day → stop).

    Drug: Clobetasol propionate 0.05% Mouthwash

  • Experimental
    Arm 2: Photobiomodulation Therapy

    Patients in the laser group received photobiomodulation therapy using a 650 nm diode laser (continuous wave mode). The laser parameters were as follows: * Wavelength: 650 nm * Output power: 100 mW * Mode: Continuous wave * Radiant exposure (energy density): 4 J/cm² per session * Exposure duration: 20 seconds per session (adjusted according to the spot size/area of the lesion to achieve the target fluence of 4 J/cm²) Treatment was applied without contact by maintaining a distance of 1 mm from the lesion and making continuous circular movements from the periphery toward the center of the lesions. Sessions were performed twice a week for a total duration of 30 days (approximately 8-9 sessions, depending on the exact scheduling).

    Device: diode laser for photobiomodulation

  • Experimental
    Arm 3: Combination Therapy

    All patients in the intervention arm received combined treatment consisting of: Clobetasol propionate 0.05% mouthwash, rinsed three times daily for 3 minutes each time, for 30 days, in addition to photobiomodulation therapy using a 650 nm diode laser (continuous mode, 100 mW, 4 J/cm², 20 seconds per session). The laser therapy was administered twice weekly for 30 days. Treatments were performed by a trained clinician according to standardized protocol.

    Drug: Clobetasol propionate 0.05% Mouthwash · Drug: clobetasol propionate 0.05% mouthwash + photobiomodulation

Interventions

  • Participants will receive topical clobetasol propionate 0.05% mouthwash

  • Devicediode laser for photobiomodulation

    Participants will receive photobiomodulation therapy (low-level laser therapy) by diode laser.

  • Drugclobetasol propionate 0.05% mouthwash + photobiomodulation

    Drug page: Clobetasol

    Participants will receive combined treatment with topical clobetasol propionate 0.05% mouthwash and photobiomodulation therapy (low-level laser therapy) by diode laser.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pemphigus Disease Area Index (PDAI)

    The PDAI is a validated clinical scoring system used to assess disease activity in pemphigus vulgaris. It evaluates the extent and severity of skin and mucosal lesions, including lesion number and size. Higher scores indicate more severe disease activity. These scores are categorized as follows: 250 points associated with disease activity, distributed as follows: * 120 points for the skin * 120 points for the mucous membranes * 10 points for the scalp. 30 points for tissue damage Disease activity, as well as the number and size of lesions in each specific region, are considered crucial factors within this scoring system. In the context of this research, only the component assessing oral mucosal involvement will be utilized.

    Time frame: Patients will be followed up on Days 7, 14, 21, 28, 42, 60, and 90

  2. Oral Disease Severity Score (ODSS)

    The ODSS is a site-specific scoring system designed to assess the severity of oral mucosal involvement in pemphigus vulgaris. It quantifies the number, size, and distribution of oral lesions, as well as their functional impact on pain and eating ability. The total score is 106 points, calculated by summing the region score, the disease activity score, and the pain score.

    Time frame: Patients will be followed up on Days 7, 14, 21, 28, 42, 60, and 90

  3. Autoimmune Bullous Skin Disorder Intensity Score (ABSIS)

    The ABSIS is a composite score used to assess disease severity in autoimmune blistering disorders. It includes evaluation of the extent of skin and mucosal involvement and incorporates patient-reported symptoms such as pain and difficulty in eating. It provides both objective and subjective measures of disease severity. The overall assessment consists of a total score of 208 points (100 points for skin lesions, 100 points for oral lesions, and 8 points for self-reported discomfort during eating). In this study, only the oral mucosal component of the score will be used. This component evaluates 20 distinct anatomical sites in the oral cavity. A score of 0 (absence of any lesion) or 1 (presence of a lesion) is assigned to each site, resulting in a maximum score of 20 points for the extent of oral lesions. The second part of the score is dedicated to symptom severity. It details the degree of discomfort experienced while eating and drinking, with a maximum score of 10 points

    Time frame: Patients will be followed up on Days 7, 14, 21, 28, 42, 60, and 90

  4. physician Global Assessment (PGA)

    The PGA is a clinician-reported global measure of overall disease severity and activity. It is based on the physician's overall clinical judgment, integrating physical examination findings and disease extent into a single numerical score. It consists of a 10-point visual analogue scale (VAS) that ranges from 0 (representing ideal health or complete clearance) to 10 (representing the worst possible disease state). Physicians rate the patient according to their global clinical impression of the disease severity.

    Time frame: Patients will be followed up on Days 7, 14, 21, 28, 42, 60, and 90

Secondary outcomes

  1. Systemic Corticosteroid Dosage During Treatment of Oral Lesions

    One of the inclusion criteria requires that the patient is on a systemic corticosteroid dose that does not exceed 1 mg/kg/day. During the study, the systemic corticosteroid dose will be assessed whenever the dermatologist decides to reduce it in response to improvement of the oral lesions' symptoms.

    Time frame: in day 30,60,90

  2. Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14)

    The Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14) is a widely used, short-form questionnaire designed to measure the impact of oral health problems on an individual's oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL).

    Time frame: Patients will be followed up before the treatment and on Days 30,60,90

  3. Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A)

    The HAM-A is a 14-item clinician-rated scale that assesses the severity of anxiety symptoms over the past week. It covers both psychic anxiety (mental agitation, psychological distress, fears, and mood) and somatic anxiety (physical manifestations such as cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, and muscular symptoms). Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 (not present) to 4 (severe/incapacitating). The total score ranges from 0 to 56

    Time frame: before the treatment and after in days 30,60,90

  4. Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D)

    The HAM-D (most commonly the 17-item version) is one of the most established clinician-administered scales for assessing the severity of depressive symptoms over the past week. It evaluates core domains including depressed mood, feelings of guilt, suicidal ideation, insomnia, psychomotor agitation or retardation, anxiety, somatic symptoms, and loss of interest or energy. Items are scored on either a 3-point (0-2) or 5-point (0-4) scale, depending on the item, with a total score range of 0 to 52 (for the 17-item version).

    Time frame: before the treatment and after in days 30,60,90

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Department of Oral Medicine, Faculty of Dental medicine
    Damascus, Syria
    Recruiting
    • Abeer Aljoujou, PhD in oral medicine · Contactabeerjoujou@gmail.com · 00963944703131
    • Alaa Alhomsi, Phd student in oral medicine · Sub investigator
    • Abeer Aljoujou, PhD In Oral medicine · Principal investigator
    • Nemat Alsaghir, Phd in Dermatology · Principal investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Chen G, Yang B, Zhang Z, Yang Q, Yan X, Murrell DF, Zhang F. Chinese version of the treatment of autoimmune bullous disease quality of life questionnaire: Reliability and validity. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2018 Jul-Aug;84(4):431-436. doi: 10.4103/ijdvl.IJDVL_538_16. PubMed 28485307 ↗
  • Noce CW, Gomes A, Shcaira V, Correa ME, Moreira MC, Silva Junior A, Goncalves LS, Garnica M, Maiolino A, Torres SR. Randomized double-blind clinical trial comparing clobetasol and dexamethasone for the topical treatment of symptomatic oral chronic graft-versus-host disease. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2014 Aug;20(8):1163-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2014.04.009. Epub 2014 Apr 13. PubMed 24727333 ↗
  • Murrell DF, Caux F, Prost-Squarcioni C. Is the Oral Disease Severity Score going to be useful for dermatologists when assessing pemphigus? Br J Dermatol. 2018 Oct;179(4):816-817. doi: 10.1111/bjd.16911. No abstract available. PubMed 30318808 ↗
  • Lara RN, da Guerra EN, de Melo NS. Macroscopic and microscopic effects of GaAIAs diode laser and dexamethasone therapies on oral mucositis induced by fluorouracil in rats. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2007;5(1):63-71. PubMed 17366763 ↗
  • Jindal A, Rao C, Pai SB, Rao R. Utility of oral mucosa as a substrate for the serodiagnosis of pemphigus: A descriptive analysis. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2022 Mar-Apr;88(2):156-161. doi: 10.25259/IJDVL_469_20. PubMed 34491669 ↗
  • Harman KE, Brown D, Exton LS, Groves RW, Hampton PJ, Mohd Mustapa MF, Setterfield JF, Yesudian PD. British Association of Dermatologists' guidelines for the management of pemphigus vulgaris 2017. Br J Dermatol. 2017 Nov;177(5):1170-1201. doi: 10.1111/bjd.15930. No abstract available. PubMed 29192996 ↗
  • Gonzalez-Moles MA, Morales P, Rodriguez-Archilla A, Isabel IR, Gonzalez-Moles S. Treatment of severe chronic oral erosive lesions with clobetasol propionate in aqueous solution. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2002 Mar;93(3):264-70. doi: 10.1067/moe.2002.120522. PubMed 11925534 ↗
  • de Macedo AG, Bertges ER, Bertges LC, Mendes RA, Bertges TABS, Bertges KR, Aarestrup FM. Pemphigus Vulgaris in the Mouth and Esophageal Mucosa. Case Rep Gastroenterol. 2018 Jun 15;12(2):260-265. doi: 10.1159/000489299. eCollection 2018 May-Aug. PubMed 30022914 ↗
  • Dal Pra KJ, de Assis Tristao SDSS, Franco JB, Matias DT, Carrillo CM, de Melo Peres MPS, Ribas PF. Oral management of pemphigus vulgaris in the intensive care unit. Spec Care Dentist. 2020 May;40(3):280-284. doi: 10.1111/scd.12454. Epub 2020 Mar 12. PubMed 32162360 ↗
  • Amadori F, Bardellini E, Veneri F, Majorana A. Photobiomodulation laser therapy in pemphigus vulgaris oral lesions: A randomized, double-blind, controlled study. Stomatologija. 2022;24(3):80-84. PubMed 37140257 ↗
  • ALhomsi A, Aljoujou AA, Mashlah A, Al Ahdab S, Al Jabban H. Combined treatment of dexamethasone mouthwash and low-level laser therapy in the management of aphthous-like ulcers caused by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: A case report. Clin Case Rep. 2024 Mar 27;12(4):e8723. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.8723. eCollection 2024 Apr. PubMed 38550731 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Nov 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Sep 2026, 10 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 8, 2026
First posted
Jun 11, 2026
StartActual
Nov 1, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Sep 1, 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 1, 2026
Last update
Jun 11, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 11, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07641725
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 11, 2026
Start date
Nov 1, 2025
Primary completion
Sep 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 11, 2026

Study contacts

Alaa Alhomsi, DDS,MSc,PhD Student
Contact
allaalhomsi1@gmail.com
00963993837778
Abeer Aljoujou, PhD In Oral medicine
principal investigator · Associate Professor, Department of Oral Medicine, Faculty of Dental medicine, Damascus University, Damascus, Syria.
Nemat Alsaghir, PhD in dermatology
principal investigator · Lecturer, Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, Damascus University, Damascus, Syria.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Clobetasol

Start the discussion