CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06276816Updated Feb 26, 2024

Cardiac Denervation Ablation Strategy for Severe Sinus Bradycardia

An observational study in Sinus Bradycardia, sponsored by China National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-02-26.

Sponsored by China National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Sep 2024, 2 years ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Sep 2023; still recruiting 3 years later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
88
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a prospective clinical observation and registration study. The investigator aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cardiac denervation ablation as a treatment strategy for severe sinus bradycardia.

Read the detailed description

Severe sinus bradycardia (SSB) is a common clinical condition that can lead to symptoms such as dizziness, fainting, and even cardiac arrest, posing a serious threat to patients' health and life. The causes of SSB vary: in elderly patients, SSB is often caused by ischemia and degenerative changes in the sinoatrial node, while in younger patients, it is often due to abnormal elevation of vagal nerve tone resulting in slowed heart rate and weakened myocardial contractility. Although implanting a pacemaker can effectively alleviate SSB bradycardia, the incidence of pacemaker electrode-related complications (such as electrode displacement, insulation layer rupture, lead infection, and fracture) is not low. Moreover, the impact of pacemaker implantation on patients' quality of life and the economic burden of regular pacemaker battery replacement impose significant psychological and financial burdens on patients, especially young patients. Clearly, for young SSB patients, if the abnormally elevated vagal nerve tone can be continuously reduced, it would be more effective in treating bradycardia and avoiding pacemaker implantation, which has significant social and economic value.

The investigators has pioneered the technique of cardiac denervation ablation, which can modulate the autonomic nervous tone of the heart and is used to treat autonomic nervous system-related diseases. In a preliminary exploratory study involving 6 SSB patients, investigators found that cardiac denervation ablation for SSB can reduce vagal nerve tone, increase sinus heart rate, and effectively alleviate bradycardia symptoms, thus avoiding the need for pacemaker implantation.

Therefore, based on the preliminary work, this project aims to conduct a prospective observational study and establish a registry. SSB patients who meet the indications for pacemaker implantation will be selected to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cardiac denervation ablation for SSB, its impact on quality of life, and the effectiveness of avoiding pacemaker implantation. The project will establish standardized surgical strategies and protocols for cardiac denervation ablation for SSB, summarize experiences, and lay the foundation for the clinical promotion and guideline revision of catheter ablation for SSB.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sinus Bradycardia

Keywords

  • Sinus Bradycardia
  • Cardioneuroablation
  • Sinus Node Dysfunction
  • Autonomic Nervous System
03

In context

Bradycardia

306 studies on the registry are indexed under Bradycardia; 69 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 88 is below the median of 257 across 129 observational studies indexed under Bradycardia.

Browse Bradycardia studies →

Lead sponsor

China National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases is the lead sponsor of 256 studies on the registry; 134 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

SSB patients undergoing cardiac denervation ablation

Inclusion criteria

  1. Sinus bradycardia and pacemaker implantation indication: long interval with mean heart rate \<45 bpm or 3s recorded within 6 months before inclusion;
  2. Negative atropine test: sinus heart rate> 90bpm after atropine injection
  3. SSB related symptoms: dizziness, palpitations, fatigue, amaurosis, syncope, etc.
  4. Age ≥18 and \<60 years old;
  5. The patient has agreed to participate in this trial and has signed the informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Previous history of atrial arrhythmia ablation or surgical procedure;
  2. Structural heart disease, chronic liver and kidney dysfunction, diabetes mellitus, neurological diseases.;
  3. Drug-related SSB;
  4. presence of left atrial thrombus;
  5. Pregnant women.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
88 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of patients with postoperative recurrence of bradycardia symptoms

    Symptoms such as chest tightness, suffocation, amaurosis, syncope with cardiac arrest with mean heart rate \<45bpm or ≥3s on 12-lead ECG or Holter

    Time frame: 12 months after ablation procedure

Secondary outcomes

  1. The result of the atropine test

    A negative response was defined as a 25% increase in sinus heart rate or an increase in sinus rhythm to 90 bpm after atropine injection.

    Time frame: 12 months after ablation procedure

  2. Changes in quality of life measured by Medical Outcomes Study 36- Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)

    Patients' quality of life was assessed by Medical Outcomes Study 36- Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). The scale contains 36 items in 9 categories of physical functioning, role-physica, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, mental health and reported health transition. Subjects' scores ranged from 0 to 900, with higher scores representing better quality of life.

    Time frame: 3, 6, 12 months after ablation procedure

  3. Changes in quality of life measured by EuroQol Five Dimensions Questionnaire Visual Analogue Scale (EQ VAS)

    Patients' quality of life was assessed by EuroQol Five Dimensions Questionnaire Visual Analogue Scale (EQ VAS). Subjects' scores ranged from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing better quality of life.

    Time frame: 3, 6, 12 months after ablation procedure

  4. Changes in minmum heart rate

    Comparison of postoperative versus baseline minimum heart rate using a 24-hour holter. The device provided to patients prior to discharge or at outpatient visits will be used for this assessment.

    Time frame: 3, 6, 12 months after ablation procedure

  5. Changes in mean heart rate

    Comparison of postoperative versus baseline mean heart rate using a 24-hour holter. The device provided to patients prior to discharge or at outpatient visits will be used for this assessment.

    Time frame: 3, 6, 12 months after ablation procedure

  6. Changes in deceleration capacity

    Comparison of postoperative versus baseline deceleration capacity (DC) using a 24-hour holter. Higher DC suggest higher vagal activity. The device provided to patients prior to discharge or at outpatient visits will be used for this assessment.

    Time frame: 3, 6, 12 months after ablation procedure

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • 1Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College
    Beijing, China
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Shen WK, Sheldon RS, Benditt DG, Cohen MI, Forman DE, Goldberger ZD, Grubb BP, Hamdan MH, Krahn AD, Link MS, Olshansky B, Raj SR, Sandhu RK, Sorajja D, Sun BC, Yancy CW. 2017 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Syncope: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation. 2017 Aug 1;136(5):e60-e122. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000499. Epub 2017 Mar 9. No abstract available. Erratum In: Circulation. 2017 Oct 17;136(16):e271-e272. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000537. PubMed 28280231 ↗
  • Brignole M, Moya A, de Lange FJ, Deharo JC, Elliott PM, Fanciulli A, Fedorowski A, Furlan R, Kenny RA, Martin A, Probst V, Reed MJ, Rice CP, Sutton R, Ungar A, van Dijk JG; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2018 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope. Eur Heart J. 2018 Jun 1;39(21):1883-1948. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy037. No abstract available. PubMed 29562304 ↗
  • Sun W, Zheng L, Qiao Y, Shi R, Hou B, Wu L, Guo J, Zhang S, Yao Y. Catheter Ablation as a Treatment for Vasovagal Syncope: Long-Term Outcome of Endocardial Autonomic Modification of the Left Atrium. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Jul 8;5(7):e003471. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003471. PubMed 27402231 ↗
  • Hu F, Zheng L, Liang E, Ding L, Wu L, Chen G, Fan X, Yao Y. Right anterior ganglionated plexus: The primary target of cardioneuroablation? Heart Rhythm. 2019 Oct;16(10):1545-1551. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.07.018. Epub 2019 Jul 19. PubMed 31330187 ↗
  • Hu F, Zheng L, Liu S, Shen L, Liang E, Liu L, Wu L, Ding L, Yao Y. The impacts of the ganglionated plexus ablation sequence on the vagal response, heart rate, and blood pressure during cardioneuroablation. Auton Neurosci. 2021 Jul;233:102812. doi: 10.1016/j.autneu.2021.102812. Epub 2021 Apr 20. PubMed 33940549 ↗
  • Hu F, Zheng L, Liu S, Shen L, Liang E, Ding L, Wu L, Chen G, Fan X, Yao Y. Avoidance of Vagal Response During Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Isolation: Effect of Initiating Isolation From Right Anterior Ganglionated Plexi. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2019 Dec;12(12):e007811. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.119.007811. Epub 2019 Nov 25. PubMed 31760820 ↗
  • Tu B, Wu L, Hu F, Fan S, Liu S, Liu L, Ding L, Zheng L, Yao Y. Cardiac deceleration capacity as an indicator for cardioneuroablation in patients with refractory vasovagal syncope. Heart Rhythm. 2022 Apr;19(4):562-569. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.12.007. Epub 2021 Dec 9. PubMed 34896621 ↗
  • Zheng L, Sun W, Qiao Y, Hou B, Guo J, Killu A, Yao Y. Symptomatic Premature Ventricular Contractions in Vasovagal Syncope Patients: Autonomic Modulation and Catheter Ablation. Front Physiol. 2021 May 3;12:653225. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.653225. eCollection 2021. PubMed 34012407 ↗
  • Stavrakis S, Scherlag BJ, Po SS. Autonomic modulation: an emerging paradigm for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012 Apr;5(2):247-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.112.972307. No abstract available. PubMed 22511657 ↗
  • Zhao L, Jiang W, Zhou L, Wang Y, Zhang X, Wu S, Xu K, Liu X. Atrial autonomic denervation for the treatment of long-standing symptomatic sinus bradycardia in non-elderly patients. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2015 Aug;43(2):151-9. doi: 10.1007/s10840-015-9981-8. Epub 2015 Feb 19. PubMed 25693516 ↗
  • Qin M, Zhang Y, Liu X, Jiang WF, Wu SH, Po S. Atrial Ganglionated Plexus Modification: A Novel Approach to Treat Symptomatic Sinus Bradycardia. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017 Sep;3(9):950-959. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.01.022. Epub 2017 Apr 26. PubMed 29759719 ↗
  • Debruyne P, Rossenbacker T, Collienne C, Roosen J, Ector B, Janssens L, Charlier F, Vankelecom B, Dewilde W, Wijns W. Unifocal Right-Sided Ablation Treatment for Neurally Mediated Syncope and Functional Sinus Node Dysfunction Under Computed Tomographic Guidance. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2018 Sep;11(9):e006604. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.118.006604. PubMed 30354289 ↗
  • Debruyne P, Rossenbacker T, Janssens L, Collienne C, Ector J, Haemers P, le Polain de Waroux JB, Bazelmans C, Boussy T, Wijns W. Durable Physiological Changes and Decreased Syncope Burden 12 Months After Unifocal Right-Sided Ablation Under Computed Tomographic Guidance in Patients With Neurally Mediated Syncope or Functional Sinus Node Dysfunction. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2021 Jun;14(6):e009747. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.120.009747. Epub 2021 May 17. PubMed 33999698 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 26, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06276816
Lead sponsor
China National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 26, 2024
Start date
Sep 13, 2023
Primary completion
Sep 30, 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 30, 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 26, 2024

Study contacts

yan Yao, PhD
Contact
ianyao@263.net.cn
13901121319
lihui Zheng, PhD
Contact
zhenglihui@263.net
13910617612
yan Yao, PhD
study chair · Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion