An interventional study of Fractioned Pain Science Education (FPSE) and Full Dosage Mode Pain Science Education (FDPSE) in Temporomandibular Joint Disorders, sponsored by Universidade Federal de Sao Carlos. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-06-11.
Sponsored by Universidade Federal de Sao Carlos · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Temporomandibular Disorders (TMD) are a collection of musculoskeletal disorders which affect the masticatory structures and have a multifactorial etiology. A biopsychosocial approach is recommended for the management of these disorders including different interventions like exercise, manual therapy and pain education. The aim of this study is to compare the effect of a full dosage mode pain science education program (2 initial sessions of 45 minutes) versus a fractioned dosage format (6 sessions of 15 minutes) combined with manual therapy and orofacial exercises on primary outcomes - pain intensity and disability - and secondary outcomes - mandibular range of motion, pain-related self-efficacy, kinesiophobia, global perception of improvement, empathy, knowledge about pain neuroscience, beliefs about pain, exercise adherence, and catastrophizing - in patients with chronic painful TMD. This study will be a randomized controlled trial with a sample of 148 participants. Individuals will undergo a screening process to identify those with TMD diagnosis according to the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD), aged 20 to 60 years, of both genders, and then the volunteers will be randomized into two groups (G1: Full dosage mode pain science education program + Manual therapy/orofacial and neck motor exercises vs. G2: Fractioned dosage mode pain science education program + Manual therapy/orofacial and neck motor exercises). These volunteers will be recruited in the city of São Carlos, SP. The intervention will take place twice a week for 8 weeks, administered by a single therapist, each session lasting 1 hour. The primary outcomes will be pain intensity and disability, assessed using the numerical pain rating scale and the Craniofacial Pain and Disability Inventory (CFP-DI), respectively, and the secondary outcomes will be mandibular range of motion, pain-related self-efficacy, kinesiophobia, global perception of improvement, empathy, knowledge about pain neuroscience, beliefs about pain, exercise adherence, and catastrophizing, assessed using the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia for Temporomandibular Disorders (TSK-TMD), Global Perceived Effect of Improvement scale, Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ), CARE Empathy Scale, and Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). For statistical analysis, a Generalized Estimated Equations considering time and groups as factors will be used. A significance level of p\<0.05 will be considered.
609 studies on the registry are indexed under Temporomandibular Joint Disorders; 160 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 148 is above the median of 46 across 434 interventional studies indexed under Temporomandibular Joint Disorders.
Browse Temporomandibular Joint Disorders studies →Universidade Federal de Sao Carlos is the lead sponsor of 85 studies on the registry; 8 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
All participants in this arm will initially receive six sessions in which a workshop on PSE will be administered and discussed. A power-point presentation with metaphors and animated videos will be employed. The PSE program will be held in 6 sessions of 15 minutes each. Two protocols of Orofacial Exercises and Manual Therapy and of Neck Motor Control will be adopted in the present study. The exercises will be administered during six weeks, twice a week. One session will run in the outpatient clinic and the other will be home based. Half of the sessions will consist of orofacial therapy and exercises and the other half neck motor control exercises. Each exercise and technique will be administered 10 times for 10 seconds.
Behavioral: Fractioned Pain Science Education (FPSE) · Other: Manual Therapy · Other: Orofacial and Neck Exercises (ONE)
All participants in this arm will initially receive two sessions in which a workshop on PSE will be administered and discussed. A power-point presentation with metaphors and animated videos will be employed. The PSE program will be held in 2 sessions of 45 minutes each one. Two protocols of Orofacial Exercises and Manual Therapy and of Neck Motor Control will be adopted in the present study. The exercises will be administered during six weeks, twice a week. One session will run in the outpatient clinic and the other will be home based. Half of the sessions will consist of orofacial therapy and exercises and the other half neck motor control exercises. Each exercise and technique will be administered 10 times for 10 seconds.
Behavioral: Full Dosage Mode Pain Science Education (FDPSE) · Other: Manual Therapy · Other: Orofacial and Neck Exercises (ONE)
Pain Science Education (PSE) will be administered in workshop sessions with interactive presentations, using different resources as metaphors and videos. It will be held in 2 sessions of 45 minutes each, covering 6 topics of Explain Pain and Explain Pain Supercharged books.
Pain Science Education (PSE) will be administered in workshop sessions with interactive presentations, using different resources as metaphors and videos. It will be held in 6 sessions of 15 minutes each, covering 6 topics of Explain Pain and Explain Pain Supercharged books.
Intraoral temporalis release, Intraoral medial and lateral pterygoid (origin) technique and Intraoral sphenopalatine ganglion technique.
Orofacial Exercises: Mandibular body-condylar cross-pressure chewing technique; Post-isometric relaxation stretches-laterotrusion and opening (10 times/session; 10 seconds). Neck Motor Control Exercises: Bracing exercises (6 hierarchical levels - HL). Extreme range of motion exercises (stable spine). Cervical isometric exercises (5 HL) directly forward, obliquely, toward right and left, and directly backward (stable spine - elastic resistive bands). Functional training with elastic resistance and exercise balls on unstable surfaces (8 HJ). The progress in each exercise domain will happen when sustaining the contraction for 10 seconds, 10 times.
Change in Pain intensity
The Numerical Pain Rating Scale will be used to assess pain intensity in this trial. It consists of a sequence of numbers from 0 to 10, in which 0 represents "no pain" and 10 represents "worst pain imaginable".
Time frame: Immediately after treatment, three-, six- and twelve- month follow-up
Change in Orofacial Pain related Disability
The Craniofacial Pain and Disability Inventory (CF-PDI) is a self-administered questionnaire that measures the outcomes of pain and disability related to craniofacial pain. It demonstrated a good structure, internal consistency, reproducibility, and construct validity. Also, the Brazilian Portuguese version showed acceptable psychometric measurements. It consists of 21 items, with a score ranging from 0 to 63 points. Each question is scored on a 4-point ordinal scale, ranging from 0 to 3. A higher score reflects higher disability levels.
Time frame: Immediately after treatment, three-, six- and twelve- month follow-up
Change in Pain-Related Self-efficacy
The Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) will be used to measure pain self-efficacy beliefs (ability to function despite pain). Each item is rated by selecting a number on a 7-point scale, where 0 equals ''not at all confident'' and 6 equals ''completely confident''. A total score is calculated by summing the scores for each of the 10 items, resulting in a maximum possible score of 60. Higher scores reflect stronger self-efficacy beliefs. In the study analyzing the measurement properties of the Brazilian Portuguese version, the reliability of the PSEQ was considered adequate (the correlation divided in half was 0.76 and the internal consistency was 0.90).
Time frame: Immediately after treatment, three-, six- and twelve- month follow-up
Change in Kinesiophobia
The kinesiophobia outcome will be measured using the Tampa Scale For Kinesiophobia for Temporomandibular Disorders (TSK/TMD-Br). This is an 18-item self-report instrument that assesses fear of movement. The version translated into Brazilian Portuguese, TSK/TMD-Br, has 12 items. Each item is scored on a 4-point Likert scale, ranging from "strongly disagree" (score = 1) to "strongly agree" (score = 4). Responses are summed to produce a total score in which higher values reflect greater fear of movement (12-48 points) The TSK/TMD has good reliability (CCI = 0.66-0.83) and acceptable validity values (VISSCHER et al., 2010). Internal consistency analysis demonstrated adequate Cronbach's α values (\>0.70) for all domains and reliability demonstrated excellent ICC values for all domains (ICC\>0.75).
Time frame: Immediately after treatment, three-, six- and twelve- month follow-up
Change in Global Perceived Effect of Improvement
The Global Perceived of Effect of improvement has 11 points and ranges from -5 ("much worse") to 0 ("no change") to +5 ("completely recovered"). A higher score indicates greater recovery from the condition.
Time frame: Immediately after treatment, three-, six- and twelve- month follow-up
Status of Empathy with the care provider
The CARE Empathy Scale measures the degree of perception of empathy on the part of the patient, which can influence the effectiveness of the intervention. The instrument consists of 10 items, with additional explanations of colloquial language, aiming to facilitate understanding of the questions. The answers range from 1 "poor" to 5 "excellent". All item values are then added together, providing a final score between 10 and 50. The version translated into Brazilian Portuguese has a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.867.
Time frame: Immediately after treatment
Previous and acquired knowledge about pain neuroscience
The Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire (NPQ) will be used to verify learning related to the pain neuroscience education program. The 19 items have the following response options: true, false, undecided. Each correct question receives a score of 1. Incorrect answers and/or answers marked as undecided are not scored. The NPQ is scored out of 19 with 1 point awarded for each correct response. A score of 0 is attributed to incorrect responses and those marked as undecided. The internal consistency analysis revealed a reliability value of alpha = 0.63.
Time frame: Immediately after treatment, three-, six- and twelve- month follow-up
Beliefs about pain
The Concept Of Pain Inventory for Adults (COPI-ADULT) will be administered to assess participants' beliefs about pain. This instrument consists of 13 items. The items are presented on a 5-point Likert scale: 0 strongly disagree; 1 disagree; 2 I'm not sure; 3 agree and 4 strongly agree. Higher COPI-Adult scores reflect greater alignment with contemporary pain science (total scores can range from 0 to 52). It presents acceptable internal consistency (α=0.78) and good test-retest reliability at 1 week (intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.84 (95% confidence interval: 0.71-0.91).
Time frame: Immediately after treatment, three-, six- and twelve- month follow-up
Previous and current exercise adherence behaviour
The Exercise Adherence Assessment Scale (EARS-Br) is made up of six items that assess the exercise behavior adherence and has 5 possible answer options (0 = completely agree to 4 = completely disagree), the total score ranges from 0 to 24 points, the higher the score, the greater the adherence. The structure of the single-factor EARS-Br instrument with 6 items showed acceptable fit indices (comparative fit index and goodness-of-fit index \> 0.90 and root mean square error of approximation \< 0.08). The EARS-Br scale showed acceptable internal consistency (α = 0.88) and excellent reliability (ICC = 0.91). A Minimally Important Change (MIC) of 5.5 in the EARS-Br total score was considered a significant change in adherence behavior (AUC = 0.82). Moderate accuracy (AUC = 0.89) was obtained for a total EARS cutoff score of 17/24 after home exercise prescription. Sensitivity and specificity are also acceptable (greater than 80%).
Time frame: Immediately after treatment, three-, six- and twelve- month follow-up
Plan to share: No
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jun 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders→
Universidade Federal de Sao Carlos