CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06246591Updated Feb 7, 2024

Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy vs Mesotherapy in the Treatment of Myofascial Pain Syndrome: a Case-control Study

An interventional study of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy (Group A) and Mesotherapy (Group B) in Myofascial Pain Syndrome and Trigger Point Pain, Myofascial, sponsored by University of Palermo. Completed at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 35 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-02-07.

Sponsored by University of Palermo · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 11 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Feb 2022, registered Jan 2024).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
54
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
35 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Myofascial Pain Syndrome (MPS) is a disorder of the musculoskeletal system manifested by referred pain associated with functional limitation, muscle contractures, and possible neuralgic manifestations; this condition is characterized by the presence of "trigger points". The goal of this case-control study was to compare the effects and benefits of treatment with ESWT vs Mesotherapy in myofascial pain syndrome. The main question it aims to answer is: what is the best rehabilitation project-program between ESWT and mesotherapy for patients with myofascial syndrome? A case-control study was conducted at the U.O.C. of "Recovery and Functional Rehabilitation" A.O.U.P. "P. Giaccone" of Palermo from February 2022 to Dicember2023. Patients were randomized into 2 groups: in group "A", No. 5 sessions of focal ESWT were given weekly; in group "B", No. 5 sessions of Mesotherapy with administration of Thiocolchicoside fl 4mg/2ml and Mepivacaine fl 10mg/1ml were given weekly. Patients in group "A" and group "B" were evaluated at baseline (T0), after 5 sessions (T1) and one month after the end of treatment (T2). Researchers will compare patients treated with ESWT and patients performing mesotherapy to see if there are real differences in terms of pain reduction and improved quality of life.

02

Conditions studied

  • Myofascial Pain Syndrome
  • Trigger Point Pain, Myofascial

Keywords

  • Muscle contracture
  • ESWT
  • Mesotherapy
  • Myofascial syndrome
  • Trigger point
03

In context

Myofascial Pain Syndromes

1,136 studies on the registry are indexed under Myofascial Pain Syndromes; 137 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 54 is close to the median of 60 across 931 interventional studies indexed under Myofascial Pain Syndromes.

Browse Myofascial Pain Syndromes studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Palermo is the lead sponsor of 142 studies on the registry; 28 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
35 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 35-65 years
  • Diagnosis of myofascial syndrome
  • NRS at T0 ≥ 4
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant patients
  • Patients with malignancies already diagnosed or in the process of diagnostic definition
  • Coagulation disorders and/or therapy with anticoagulants
  • Skin lesions and/or local infections
  • Contraindications and/or allergies to the active ingredients of Mesotherapy.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
54 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy (Group A)

    Patients of this group were invited to our department's outpatient clinics on a weekly basis, for a total of five sessions (5 weeks), lasting approximately 20 minutes each. Treatment energy and frequency were established following the recommendations and guidelines of the International Society for Medical Shockwave Treatment (ISMST).

    Other: Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy (Group A)

  • Active comparator
    Mesotherapy (Group B)

    Patients in this group underwent mesotherapy treatment at our outpatient clinics with Thiocolchicoside fl 4mg/2ml and Mepivacaine fl 10mg/1ml, once a week, for a total of five sessions (5 weeks), lasting about 15 minutes each.

    Other: Mesotherapy (Group B)

Interventions

  • OtherExtracorporeal Shockwave Therapy (Group A)

    Each patient was evaluated before treatment for trigger points; patients underwent focal ESWT (PulseWave 2 - Mectronic Medicale s.r.l.) with a specific program for muscle contractures and myofascial pain (80-100 mJ with 2250 pulses of 5-10 Hz).

  • OtherMesotherapy (Group B)

    Each patient was evaluated before treatment for trigger points; after disinfection with Chlorhexidine 2% and sterile gauze, Thiocolchicoside fl 4mg/2ml, and a local anesthetic, Mepivacaine fl 10mg/1ml, diluted in 0.9% NaCl saline, for a final volume of 10 ml, were inoculated mesodermally; 6 to 12 microinjections with needle 26G 0.40x4mm, were performed.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Extent of pain: Numeric Rating Scale (NRS 0-10)

    The NRS is a subjective scale that rates the extent of pain with a score between 0 and 10; a score of 10 corresponds to maximum pain.

    Time frame: At the time of recruitment (T0). After 5 weeks from the start of treatment (T1). After 30 days from the end of treatment (T2).

  2. Intensity o f pain: Pressure pain threshold (PPT 1-4)

    PPT is defined as the minimum force applied to induce pain in the patient with myofascial pain syndrome. It has a score between 0 and 4; a score of 4 indicates maximum pain.

    Time frame: At the time of recruitment (T0). After 5 weeks from the start of treatment (T1). After 30 days from the end of treatment (T2).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Autonomy in activities of daily living: Barthel Index (BI 0-100)

    BI is a scale that assesses the patient's autonomy in ADL. A score of 100 corresponds to a normal value.

    Time frame: At the time of recruitment (T0). After 5 weeks from the start of treatment (T1). After 30 days from the end of treatment (T2).

  2. Quality of life: Short Form Health Survey 36 (0-100)

    SF-36 is a scale that assesses the quality of life in relation to the disease from which patients suffer. A score of 100 corresponds to an optimal value.

    Time frame: At the time of recruitment (T0). After 5 weeks from the start of treatment (T1). After 30 days from the end of treatment (T2).

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Functional Recovery and Rehabilitation Unit of the A.O.U.P. Paolo Giaccone
    Palermo, 90127, Italy
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Paoletta M, Moretti A, Liguori S, Toro G, Gimigliano F, Iolascon G. Efficacy and Effectiveness of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy in Patients with Myofascial Pain or Fibromyalgia: A Scoping Review. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Jul 28;58(8):1014. doi: 10.3390/medicina58081014. PubMed 36013480 ↗
  • Jun JH, Park GY, Chae CS, Suh DC. The Effect of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy on Pain Intensity and Neck Disability for Patients With Myofascial Pain Syndrome in the Neck and Shoulder: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Feb 1;100(2):120-129. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001493. PubMed 32520797 ↗
  • Nahomi Kuroda M, Thomaz de Aquino Nava G, Baldini Prudencio C, Affonso Paulo D, Peixouto I, Yoshi Moroshima M, de Almeida Lourenco M, Nogueira da Silva C, Mercia Pascon Barbosa A, Rodrigues Pedroni C. Effect of ischemic compressions versus extracorporeal shockwave therapy on myofascial trigger points: A protocol of a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2023 Mar 30;18(3):e0283337. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283337. eCollection 2023. PubMed 36996078 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf, Csr, Analytic code

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 7, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06246591
Lead sponsor
University of Palermo
Responsible party
Prof.ssa Giulia Letizia Mauro (Professor, University of Palermo) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 7, 2024
Start date
Feb 1, 2022
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2023
Completion
Dec 31, 2023
Last update
Feb 7, 2024

Study contacts

Giulia Letizia Mauro
principal investigator · Functional Recovery and Rehabilitation Unit of the A.O.U.P. Paolo Giaccone

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion