ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07660523Updated Sep 15, 2026

Focused Shockwave Therapy for Neck and Shoulder Myofascial Pain

An interventional study of Second-Generation Focused Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy and Home-Based Neck Exercise Program in Myofascial Pain Syndrome, sponsored by Cishan Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare. Recruiting at 1 site in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 20 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-15.

Sponsored by Cishan Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2026; still recruiting 3 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Myofascial pain syndrome of the neck and shoulder is a common condition characterized by persistent muscle pain, tenderness, stiffness, and limitations in daily activities. Focused extracorporeal shockwave therapy is a noninvasive treatment that may reduce pain and improve muscle function. However, additional clinical evidence is needed regarding the effectiveness of second-generation focused shockwave therapy and whether ultrasound imaging can objectively detect changes in muscle function after treatment.

This pilot randomized controlled trial will enroll 60 adults with chronic neck and shoulder myofascial pain syndrome. Participants will be randomly assigned to either a focused shockwave therapy group or a home-based neck exercise group.

Participants in the focused shockwave therapy group will receive one treatment session per week for three consecutive weeks. Participants in the control group will perform a standardized home exercise program designed to improve neck mobility and reduce muscle tightness.

Assessments will be performed before the intervention, after the intervention, and at follow-up. Study outcomes will include pain intensity measured using the Visual Analogue Scale, neck-related disability measured using the Neck Disability Index, pressure pain threshold measured using an algometer, and upper trapezius muscle thickness and contraction-related changes measured using ultrasound imaging.

The primary objective is to determine whether focused shockwave therapy is more effective than a home-based neck exercise program in reducing pain and improving neck function. The study will also evaluate whether ultrasound-derived muscle measurements are associated with changes in pain, pressure sensitivity, and functional disability.

Read the detailed description

Myofascial pain syndrome of the neck and shoulder is a common musculoskeletal pain condition characterized by painful and sensitive areas within tight bands of muscle, commonly referred to as myofascial trigger points. These trigger points frequently occur in the upper trapezius and levator scapulae muscles and may cause localized pain, referred pain, muscle stiffness, reduced neck movement, sleep disturbance, and limitations in work and daily activities. Persistent symptoms may also contribute to altered posture, reduced muscle performance, and decreased quality of life.

Focused extracorporeal shockwave therapy is a noninvasive treatment that delivers acoustic energy to painful soft tissues. Proposed effects include improved local circulation, modulation of pain-related nerve signaling, reduction of abnormal muscle tension, and stimulation of tissue repair. Second-generation focused shockwave systems use piezoelectric technology to provide a stable and precisely focused energy field. This technology may be particularly suitable for treating relatively superficial muscles, such as the upper trapezius.

Ultrasound imaging provides a noninvasive method for evaluating muscle structure and function. In addition to measuring resting muscle thickness, ultrasound can be used to assess changes in muscle thickness during different levels of contraction. These measurements may provide objective information regarding muscle function that cannot be obtained from pain questionnaires alone. In this study, ultrasound imaging will be used only as an outcome assessment tool and will not be used to guide the location of shockwave treatment.

This study is a pilot randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate the effectiveness of second-generation focused extracorporeal shockwave therapy in adults with chronic neck and shoulder myofascial pain syndrome. Approximately 60 participants will be enrolled and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either a focused shockwave therapy group or a home-based neck exercise group.

Eligible participants will be adults older than 20 years who have had nonspecific neck and shoulder pain for at least 3 months. The pain must primarily arise from muscles and soft tissues in the upper trapezius or levator scapulae region, as determined by a physical medicine and rehabilitation physician. Participants must also have a Neck Disability Index score greater than 5 and must not have recently received pain medication, muscle relaxants, injections, physical therapy, or other related treatment.

Individuals will be excluded if their neck or shoulder pain is primarily caused by a neurologic disorder, cervical radiculopathy, clinically significant cervical degenerative joint disease, rheumatic disease, previous head or neck trauma, cervical spine surgery, or whiplash injury. Individuals with contraindications to shockwave therapy will also be excluded. These contraindications include pregnancy, malignancy, bleeding disorders, use of anticoagulant medication, acute infection or inflammation at the treatment site, an implanted cardiac pacemaker or defibrillator, or another condition considered unsuitable for shockwave therapy by the study physician.

Participants assigned to the focused shockwave therapy group will receive treatment to clinically identified tight and painful regions of the upper trapezius and levator scapulae muscles. Treatment will be administered once weekly for 3 consecutive weeks using a second-generation Richard Wolf PiezoWave focused shockwave system. Each session will include approximately 3,000 shockwave pulses. The treatment depth will generally be set between 20 and 25 mm, the treatment frequency will be approximately 2 to 4 Hz, and the energy level will begin at a lower setting and may be gradually increased according to the participant's clinical response and tolerance. Treatment will be performed by a qualified member of the rehabilitation team in a designated treatment area.

Participants assigned to the control group will receive instruction in a standardized home-based neck exercise program for 3 weeks. The program is intended to improve neck mobility, reduce muscle tightness, and maintain flexibility of the neck and shoulder muscles. It will include movements in cervical flexion, extension, right and left rotation, right and left lateral flexion, and upper cervical rotation performed with the neck in a flexed position. Participants will receive initial instruction and correction from a qualified physical therapist, together with written educational materials. Adherence and difficulties with the exercises may be monitored through telephone or in-person follow-up.

Clinical assessments will be performed before the intervention, after completion of the intervention period, and at the scheduled follow-up visit. The assessments will include both patient-reported and objective measures.

Pain intensity will be measured using the Visual Analogue Scale. Participants will indicate the intensity of their neck and shoulder pain on a 100-mm line ranging from no pain to the worst imaginable pain.

Neck-related functional limitation will be evaluated using the Neck Disability Index. This questionnaire evaluates the effect of neck pain on areas such as personal care, lifting, reading, concentration, work, driving, sleep, and recreation. Higher scores indicate greater disability.

Pressure pain threshold will be measured using an electronic pressure algometer. Pressure will be applied gradually to the identified painful area until the participant first reports discomfort or pain. The measurement will be repeated, and the average value will be used for analysis. A lower pressure pain threshold indicates greater local pressure sensitivity.

Ultrasound imaging will be used to assess the upper trapezius muscle. Measurements will be obtained with the participant seated in a standardized position. Muscle thickness will be measured at the midpoint between the seventh cervical vertebra and the acromion. Ultrasound measurements will be obtained under three conditions: complete rest, an anti-gravity shoulder contraction, and maximal voluntary contraction.

The ultrasound outcomes will include resting muscle thickness and contraction-related changes in muscle thickness. The percentage change from rest to anti-gravity contraction will be used to reflect muscle activation during a low-level functional contraction. The additional percentage increase from anti-gravity contraction to maximal voluntary contraction will be used to reflect the muscle's capacity to generate a stronger contraction.

The primary objective of this study is to determine whether focused shockwave therapy provides greater improvement in pain than a home-based neck exercise program. Additional objectives are to compare changes in neck disability, pressure pain threshold, resting upper trapezius thickness, and ultrasound-derived muscle contraction measures between the two groups. The study will also explore whether changes in ultrasound measurements are associated with changes in pain intensity, pressure sensitivity, and neck-related disability.

Participant characteristics and study outcomes will be summarized using appropriate descriptive statistics. Changes over time within each group and differences between groups will be examined using statistical methods appropriate for repeated measurements. Group-by-time interactions will be evaluated to determine whether the pattern of improvement differs between the focused shockwave therapy and exercise groups. If the data do not meet the assumptions required for conventional parametric analyses, nonparametric methods or linear mixed models may be used. Correlation analyses will be performed to evaluate relationships between clinical outcomes and ultrasound measurements. Statistical significance will be assessed using a two-sided significance level of 0.05.

Adverse events and participant tolerance will be monitored throughout the intervention and follow-up periods. Participants may withdraw from the study at any time without affecting their usual medical care. All study data will be coded and stored securely to protect participant confidentiality.

02

Conditions studied

  • Myofascial Pain Syndrome

Keywords

  • Myofascial Pain Syndrome
  • Focused Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy
  • Neck and Shoulder Pain
  • Upper Trapezius Muscle
  • Pressure Pain Threshold
  • Ultrasound Imaging
  • Muscle Thickness
  • Neck Disability
03

In context

Myofascial Pain Syndromes

339 studies on the registry are indexed under Myofascial Pain Syndromes; 66 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is above the median of 50 across 307 interventional studies indexed under Myofascial Pain Syndromes.

Browse Myofascial Pain Syndromes studies →

Lead sponsor

Cishan Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare is the lead sponsor of 6 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults older than 20 years.
  • Clinical diagnosis of nonspecific neck and shoulder pain primarily arising from muscles and soft tissues in the upper trapezius or levator scapulae region, as determined by a physical medicine and rehabilitation physician.
  • Neck and shoulder pain lasting for at least 3 months.
  • Neck Disability Index score greater than 5.
  • No use of analgesic medication or muscle relaxants within the previous month.
  • No injection therapy, physical therapy, or other treatment for neck and shoulder pain within the previous month.
  • Ability to understand the study procedures and provide written .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Neck or shoulder pain caused by a neurologic disorder, including cervical radiculopathy.
  • Clinical or imaging diagnosis of cervical degenerative joint disease.
  • History of a rheumatic disease, including rheumatoid arthritis or systemic lupus erythematosus.
  • History of head or neck trauma.
  • History of cervical spine surgery.
  • History of whiplash injury.
  • Pregnancy.
  • Current or previous considered to shockwave therapy.
  • Bleeding disorder.
  • Current use of anticoagulant medication, including warfarin.
  • Acute inflammation or infection at the treatment site.
  • Implanted cardiac pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.
  • Any other condition judged by the study physician to make participation or focused shockwave therapy inappropriate or unsafe.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Focused Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy

    Participants assigned to this arm will receive second-generation focused extracorporeal shockwave therapy applied to clinically identified tight and painful regions of the upper trapezius and levator scapulae muscles. Treatment will be administered once weekly for 3 consecutive weeks using the Richard Wolf PiezoWave system. Each treatment session will include approximately 3,000 shockwave pulses at a treatment depth of 20 to 25 mm and a frequency of 2 to 4 Hz. The energy level will begin at level 4 and may be gradually increased to a maximum of level 15 according to the participant's clinical response and tolerance.

    Device: Second-Generation Focused Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy

  • Active comparator
    Home-Based Neck Exercise Program

    Participants assigned to this arm will receive instruction in a standardized home-based neck exercise program for 3 weeks. The program includes cervical flexion, extension, right and left rotation, right and left lateral flexion, and right and left upper cervical rotation performed with the neck in a flexed position. Participants will receive initial instruction and movement correction from a qualified physical therapist, together with written educational materials. Adherence and exercise-related difficulties will be monitored during the study.

    Behavioral: Home-Based Neck Exercise Program

Interventions

  • DeviceSecond-Generation Focused Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy

    Second-generation focused extracorporeal shockwave therapy will be applied to clinically identified tight and painful regions of the upper trapezius and levator scapulae muscles. Treatment will be administered using the Richard Wolf PiezoWave system once weekly for 3 consecutive weeks. Each session will include approximately 3,000 shockwave pulses at a treatment depth of 20 to 25 mm and a frequency of 2 to 4 Hz. The treatment energy level will begin at level 4 and may be gradually increased to a maximum of level 15 according to the participant's clinical response and tolerance.

  • BehavioralHome-Based Neck Exercise Program

    Participants will perform a standardized home-based neck exercise program for 3 weeks. The program includes cervical flexion, extension, right and left rotation, right and left lateral flexion, and right and left upper cervical rotation performed with the neck in a flexed position. Each exercise will be performed for 20 repetitions per set, for 3 sets, 5 times per day. Participants will receive initial instruction and movement correction from a qualified physical therapist, together with written educational materials. Adherence and exercise-related difficulties will be monitored during the study.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Neck and Shoulder Pain Intensity

    Pain intensity will be assessed using a 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale. Participants will mark their current neck and shoulder pain on a horizontal line ranging from 0 mm, representing no pain, to 100 mm, representing the worst imaginable pain. Higher scores indicate greater pain intensity. Changes from baseline will be compared between the focused extracorporeal shockwave therapy group and the home-based neck exercise group.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after completion of the 3-week intervention, and Week 8 after enrollment

  2. Change in Pressure Pain Threshold

    Pressure pain threshold will be measured using an electronic pressure algometer at the clinically identified painful region of the upper trapezius and levator scapulae muscles. Pressure will be gradually increased at approximately 5 newtons per second until the participant first reports discomfort or pain. Two measurements will be obtained and averaged. Higher values indicate lower pressure sensitivity and greater tolerance to mechanical pressure. Unit of Measure: N/cm²

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after completion of the 3-week intervention, and Week 8 after enrollment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Neck-Related Disability

    Neck-related disability will be assessed using the Neck Disability Index. The questionnaire contains 10 items evaluating pain intensity, personal care, lifting, reading, headaches, concentration, work, driving, sleeping, and recreation. Each item is scored from 0 to 5, producing a total score ranging from 0 to 50. Higher scores indicate greater neck-related disability.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after completion of the 3-week intervention, and Week 8 after enrollment

  2. Change in Resting Upper Trapezius Muscle Thickness

    Resting upper trapezius muscle thickness will be measured using ultrasound imaging with the participant seated and the neck maintained in a neutral position. The measurement site will be the midpoint of the line between the seventh cervical vertebra and the acromion. Muscle thickness will be defined as the shortest perpendicular distance between the superficial and deep muscle fascia. Higher values indicate greater measured muscle thickness. Unit of Measure: Centimeters

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after completion of the 3-week intervention, and Week 8 after enrollment

  3. Change in Upper Trapezius Thickness During Anti-Gravity Contraction

    The percentage change in upper trapezius muscle thickness from rest to anti-gravity contraction will be calculated using ultrasound measurements. Anti-gravity contraction will be performed with the shoulder abducted to 90 degrees without additional external resistance. The outcome will be calculated as: \[(anti-gravity contraction thickness minus resting thickness) divided by resting thickness\] multiplied by 100. Higher positive values indicate a greater increase in muscle thickness during anti-gravity contraction. Unit of Measure: Percent (%)

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after completion of the 3-week intervention, and Week 8 after enrollment

  4. Change in Upper Trapezius Thickness During Maximal Voluntary Contraction

    The additional percentage increase in upper trapezius muscle thickness from anti-gravity contraction to maximal voluntary contraction will be calculated using ultrasound measurements. The outcome will be calculated as: \[(maximal voluntary contraction thickness minus anti-gravity contraction thickness) divided by anti-gravity contraction thickness\] multiplied by 100. Higher positive values indicate a greater increase in muscle thickness during maximal voluntary contraction. Unit of Measure: Percent (%)

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after completion of the 3-week intervention, and Week 8 after enrollment

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • CiShan hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare
    Kaohsiung City, 80230, Taiwan
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Lam C, Francio VT, Gustafson K, Carroll M, York A, Chadwick AL. Myofascial pain - A major player in musculoskeletal pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2024 Mar;38(1):101944. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2024.101944. Epub 2024 Apr 21. PubMed 38644073 ↗
  • Chesterton LS, Sim J, Wright CC, Foster NE. Interrater reliability of algometry in measuring pressure pain thresholds in healthy humans, using multiple raters. Clin J Pain. 2007 Nov-Dec;23(9):760-6. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e318154b6ae. PubMed 18075402 ↗
  • Young IA PT, DSc, Dunning J PT, DPT, Butts R PT, PhD, Mourad F PT, DPT, Cleland JA PT, PhD. Reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness of the neck disability index and numeric pain rating scale in patients with mechanical neck pain without upper extremity symptoms. Physiother Theory Pract. 2019 Dec;35(12):1328-1335. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2018.1471763. Epub 2018 Jun 1. PubMed 29856244 ↗
  • Hawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, French M. Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Nov;63 Suppl 11:S240-52. doi: 10.1002/acr.20543. No abstract available. PubMed 22588748 ↗
  • Schmitz C, Csaszar NB, Milz S, Schieker M, Maffulli N, Rompe JD, Furia JP. Efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for orthopedic conditions: a systematic review on studies listed in the PEDro database. Br Med Bull. 2015;116(1):115-38. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldv047. Epub 2015 Nov 18. PubMed 26585999 ↗
  • Ezzati K, Khani S, Moladoust H, Takamjani IE, Nasiri E, Ettehad H. Comparing muscle thickness and function in healthy people and subjects with upper trapezius myofascial pain syndrome using ultrasonography. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2021 Apr;26:253-256. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2020.12.016. Epub 2020 Dec 15. PubMed 33992254 ↗
  • Salavati M, Akhbari B, Ebrahimi Takamjani I, Ezzati K, Haghighatkhah H. Reliability of the Upper Trapezius Muscle and Fascia Thickness and Strain Ratio Measures by Ultrasonography and Sonoelastography in Participants With Myofascial Pain Syndrome. J Chiropr Med. 2017 Dec;16(4):316-323. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2017.06.003. Epub 2017 Oct 11. PubMed 29276464 ↗
  • Fiani B, Davati C, Griepp DW, Lee J, Pennington E, Moawad CM. Enhanced Spinal Therapy: Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for the Spine. Cureus. 2020 Oct 27;12(10):e11200. doi: 10.7759/cureus.11200. PubMed 33269131 ↗
  • Zhang Q, Fu C, Huang L, Xiong F, Peng L, Liang Z, Chen L, He C, Wei Q. Efficacy of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy on Pain and Function in Myofascial Pain Syndrome of the Trapezius: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Aug;101(8):1437-1446. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.02.013. Epub 2020 Mar 28. PubMed 32234411 ↗
  • Ismail Hassan M, Shafiek Mustafa Saleh M, Hesham Sallam M, Hesham Elkhodary H, Mohamed Sayed M, Samy H, Hesham Mohamed A, Said Ashour A, Mohamed Mosaid E, Hassan Zaghloul M, Ramadan Elbathesh E, Vaish H, Mohammed Abdullah A A, Ibrahim Abdelhamed A. Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy versus laser therapy in treating musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lasers Med Sci. 2025 Apr 15;40(1):194. doi: 10.1007/s10103-025-04392-0. PubMed 40232318 ↗
  • Yoo JI, Oh MK, Chun SW, Lee SU, Lee CH. The effect of focused extracorporeal shock wave therapy on myofascial pain syndrome of trapezius: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Feb;99(7):e19085. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019085. PubMed 32049811 ↗
  • Muller-Ehrenberg H, Giordani F, Muller-Ehrenberg A, Stange R. The Use and Benefits of Focused Shockwaves for the Diagnosis of Myofascial Pain Syndrome by Examining Myofascial Trigger Points in Low Back Pain. Biomedicines. 2024 Dec 20;12(12):2909. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12122909. PubMed 39767813 ↗
  • Jun JH, Park GY, Chae CS, Suh DC. The Effect of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy on Pain Intensity and Neck Disability for Patients With Myofascial Pain Syndrome in the Neck and Shoulder: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Feb 1;100(2):120-129. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001493. PubMed 32520797 ↗
  • Ughreja RA, Venkatesan P, Balebail Gopalakrishna D, Singh YP. Effectiveness of myofascial release on pain, sleep, and quality of life in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome: A systematic review. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2021 Nov;45:101477. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2021.101477. Epub 2021 Aug 27. PubMed 34507243 ↗
  • Badil Guloglu S, Tunc S. The assessment of affective temperament and life quality in myofascial pain syndrome patients. Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2022 Mar;26(1):79-84. doi: 10.1080/13651501.2020.1833039. Epub 2020 Oct 21. PubMed 33084454 ↗
  • Lee CH, Lee SU. Usefulness of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy on Myofascial Pain Syndrome. Ann Rehabil Med. 2021 Aug;45(4):261-263. doi: 10.5535/arm.21128. Epub 2021 Aug 30. No abstract available. PubMed 34496468 ↗
  • Sciotti VM, Mittak VL, DiMarco L, Ford LM, Plezbert J, Santipadri E, Wigglesworth J, Ball K. Clinical precision of myofascial trigger point location in the trapezius muscle. Pain. 2001 Sep;93(3):259-266. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00325-6. PubMed 11514085 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared because the current study protocol and informed consent do not include a predefined plan for sharing participant-level data with external researchers. The data may contain sensitive clinical information, and access is restricted to authorized members of the research team. Aggregate and de-identified study results may be reported in scientific publications and conference presentations.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jul 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Apr 2027, 9 months after the start.

Of 202 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Myofascial Pain Syndromes, half reached primary completion within 5 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 2 and three quarters within 12. This study's planned 9 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 204 studies reached it within 5 months; a quarter within 2 and three quarters within 13.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 16, 2026
First posted
Jun 22, 2026
StartActual
Jul 13, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Apr 30, 2027
CompletionEst.
May 30, 2027
Last update
Sep 15, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 15, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07660523
Lead sponsor
Cishan Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare
Responsible party
Sheng-Hui Tuan (Attending Physician and Principal Investigator, Cishan Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 22, 2026
Start date
Jul 13, 2026
Primary completion
Apr 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
May 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 15, 2026

Study contacts

Chia-Yu Wei, M.S.
Contact
ivywei@chis.mohw.gov.tw
+886-7-6613811 ext. 5529

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion