ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07584473Updated May 13, 2026

NCWS or IBS/FD in Relatives of CD Patients

An interventional study of Wheat-Free Diet in Non Celiac Wheat Sensitivity, IBS (Irritable Bowel Syndrome) and Functional Dyspepsia, sponsored by University of Palermo. Recruiting at 2 sites in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-13.

Sponsored by University of Palermo · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Apr 2026; still recruiting 7 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
600
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Over 50% of non-celiac wheat sensitivity (NCWS) patients are HLA DQ2/DQ8 positive and often have a Celiac Disease (CD) family history. Studies have identified a subgroup of NCWS patients whose clinical and immunological features are closer to CD than to irritable bowel syndrome/functional dyspepsia (IBS/FD) ('inflammatory subgroup'). The investigators hypothesized that among CD patient's relatives, there might be a high number of NCWS subjects, who hypothetically belong to the 'inflammatory subgroup'. Therefore, the aim of this multi-step project is to identify the prevalence of both self-reported NCWS and IBS/FD not related to wheat ingestion among CD patient's relatives (parents, grandparents, siblings and sons).

Read the detailed description

Hypothesis, Rationale and Aims Over 50% of non-celiac wheat sensitivity (NCWS) patients are HLA DQ2/DQ8 positive and often have a Celiac Disease (CD) family history. Studies have identified a subgroup of NCWS patients whose clinical and immunological features are closer to CD than to irritable bowel syndrome/functional dyspepsia (IBS/FD) ('inflammatory subgroup'). The investigators hypothesized that among CD patient's relatives, there might be a high number of NCWS subjects, who hypothetically belong to the 'inflammatory subgroup'.

To the best of investigators' knowledge, very few studies have tried to identify NCWS, or even IBS/FD not related to wheat ingestion prevalence among CD patient's relatives, nor have studied their clinical, immunological, intestinal permeability (IP) and gut microbiota (GM) features, or the changes induced by a wheat-free diet (WFD). More specifically, in 1996, Troncone et al. showed high lymphocyte counts (i.e. total intraepithelial lymphocyte number and/or numbers of lamina propria and intraepithelial CD3+ and γδ+ cells) after rectal gluten instillation in siblings of CD children, revealing a gluten sensitization not restricted to HLA. Esteve M et al. analyzed the duodenal histological pattern and clinical features of 110 HLA-DQ2 positive CD patient's first-degree relatives, proving that 22.2% of them had some evidence of 'gluten-sensitive enteropathy'; subjects with Marsh I and Marsh II-III lesions were significantly more often symptomatic (56.3% and 53.8%, respectively) than patients with normal mucosa (Marsh 0 21.1%, p=0.002). Another Spanish study group analyzed the prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms and the influence of gluten intake in 139 CD patient's first-degree relatives, finding that 57.6% had gastrointestinal symptoms [bloating (16.5%), constipation (15.1%), diarrhea (14.4%), and abdominal pain (5.8%)] and 32.7% (n. 37/113) had a Marsh I degree at duodenal histology examination. At baseline, 45.7% of the participants reported symptoms (evaluated with CD-specific symptom index), which reduced to 24.5% (i.e. reduction ≥20%) during a 4-week gluten-free diet, going-back to 38.1% during a gluten-overload diet (i.e. 15g of gluten supplement to their normal diet containing gluten). Moreover, Araya M et al. reported that among 166 CD patient's first-degree relatives, the most spontaneously declared being asymptomatic, but detailed questioning revealed that 60.7% experienced symptoms, which had not been investigated.

Therefore, the aim of this multi-step project is to identify the prevalence of both self-reported NCWS and IBS/FD not related to wheat ingestion among CD patient's relatives (parents, grandparents, siblings and sons).

Inclusion criteria

  • CD patient's relatives
  • >18 years old
  • reporting IBS/FD-like and extraintestinal (EI) symptoms

Exclusion criteria

  • self-exclusion of wheat from the diet and refuse to reintroduce it for diagnostic purposes;
  • drug and/or alcohol (>30 g/day for men and >20 g/day for women) abuse;
  • treatment with steroids and/or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the 2 weeks before duodenal biopsy;
  • pregnancy or breastfeeding;
  • Helicobacter pylori and other bacterial and/or parasitic infections;
  • diagnosis of chronic inflammatory bowel disease or other organic pathologies affecting the digestive system [e.g., IgE-mediated Wheat Allergy (WA), microscopic colitis, diverticulitis, segmental colitis associated with diverticulosis, etc.], neurological diseases, major psychiatric disorders, infectious diseases, immunological deficiencies, and impairments limiting physical activity;
  • patients undergoing radiotherapy and chemotherapy.

Diagnostic criteria of NCWS and IBS/FD not related to wheat ingestion

  1. NCWS

    • subjects with wheat-dependent symptoms, both gastrointestinal and extraintestinal;
    • negativity of anti-deamidated gliadin peptide (DGP) immunoglobulin (Ig)A and IgG antibodies, anti-tissue transglutaminase (tTG) IgA and IgG antibodies, and anti-endomysial antibodies (EMA);
    • absence of duodenal villous atrophy in all patients carrying the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) DQ2 and/or DQ8 haplotypes (therefore regardless of the negativity of CD-specific serum antibodies), evaluated when the patients had consumed a minimum of 100g of pasta and/or bread a day, for at least 45 days;
    • absence of WA: negative skin prick test and/or specific serum immunoglobulin E (IgE) assay for wheat, gluten and gliadin;
    • resolution of symptoms on a strict WFD.
  2. IBS/FD not related to wheat intake - subjects diagnosed with IBS/FD, according to the Rome IV classification, who did not specifically report gastrointestinal or EI symptoms/signs following ingestion of wheat and who did not respond to a WFD.

Research plan, Experimental design and Methodologies The study consists of 2 work packages (WP) that will be carried out in collaboration between the partners and according to a prospective study design.

WP1: Identification of CD patient's first-degree relatives with IBS/FD-like and extraintestinal (EI) symptoms

CD patient's relatives (>18 years old, non-pregnant, non-breastfeeding) will fill out the following online questionnaires (T0):

  • Demographic/anthropometric features [Sex, Age, Ethnicity, Height, Weight, Body Mass Index (BMI)]
  • Self-perceived food intolerance (including NCWS)
  • Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS)
  • Bristol Stool Scale
  • IBS-Symptom Severity Scale (IBS-SSS)
  • Extraintestinal Symptom Rating Scale (ESRS)
  • IBS-Quality of Life (IBS-QoL). All patients complaining of IBS/FD-like and EI symptoms will undergo HLA DQ2/DQ8 and CD serological screening (DGP IgA and IgG antibodies, tTG class IgA and IgG antibodies, EMA). Symptomatic patients with CD suspicion (HLA DQ2/DQ8 positivity, regardless of serology results) will undergo duodenal biopsy (examined according to Marsh-Oberhuber classification). Other organic diseases will be excluded according to the clinician's choice, according to the National Health Systems (NHS) screening programs for symptomatic CD relatives. At the end of all required examinations, we will identify a subgroup of patients suffering from IBS/FD-like and EI symptoms not related to other organic diseases (T1).

WP2: Identification of CD patient's relatives with potential NCWS vs IBS/FD not related to wheat intake with 6-week long strict WFD Patients, identified at T1, will undergo a 6-week long strict WFD (preliminary dietician consul will be granted to all subjects), at the end of which (T2) they will fill-out an online form including a WFD adherence questionnaire (i.e. modified 'Biagi' score) and the questionnaires reported in WP1 (except the self-perceived food intolerance one). Patients reporting a reduction ≥30% in at least one questionnaire after WFD will be identified as self-reported NCWS, all the others will be identified as IBS/FD not related to wheat intake.

Power Calculation The sample size is difficult to determine as very low data are known about NCWS/IBS/FD prevalence among CD patient's relatives. According to previous studies, up to 50-60% CD patient's relatives complain symptoms. In addition, some studies, assessing NCWS immunological pattern, obtained statistical significance with almost 35 patients.

According to the multicenter design of this study, the investigators planned to screen CD patient relatives as much as possible (at least 600 subjects), with esteemed identification of 200-300 subjects with IBS/FD-like and/or EI symptoms (WP1). It is not possible to establish a priori how many patients will be identified as affected by self-reported NCWS and, therefore, it is not possible to indicate how many will access the subsequent phases of the study (WP2).

Potential pitfalls and caveats, and alternative approaches WP1, which consists of a simple screening survey and subsequent clinical assessment of CD patients' relatives, should be carried out without pitfalls, mostly following the NHS recommendations for CD early screening.

Usually, patients who self-report NCWS easily agree to start a period of WFD. A 6-week long WFD challenge represents a sufficient period to evaluate the evolution of symptoms in these patients, without risking determining nutritional deficiencies that could alter the patient's state of health.

Expected results, and Impact This multicenter study will define exactly, for the first time, the prevalence of self-reported NCWS and IBS/FD not related to wheat intake among CD patient's relatives. In addition, a screening carried out on these subjects will allow both to early identify subjects with CD, and to direct subjects affected by NCWS or IBS/FD not related to wheat intake towards a more rapid diagnosis, consequently reducing direct and indirect costs for NHS, and an adequate therapeutic approach, consistently improving their QoL.

  • Clinical benefits: thanks to this project, which starts with a general screening of CD patient's first-degree relatives, physicians will both early diagnose new CD patients and identify and treat those subjects who, although not celiac, suffer from NCWS or IBS/FD not related to wheat intake. Moreover, the early identification of new CD subjects will be useful to prevent possible long-term consequences, such as malnutrition, osteoporosis, and neoplastic diseases development.
  • Research benefits: this study will add a piece to the knowledge about CD, NCWS, and IBS/FD not related to wheat ingestion, and defining, for the first time, the prevalence of the last 2 conditions in CD patient's familiar.
  • Social benefits: the early diagnosis of CD, NCWS and IBS/FD not related to wheat intake will improve health status (considering physical, psychological and social issues) of recruited subjects.
  • Economic benefits: the early diagnosis of CD, NCWS and IBS/FD not related to wheat intake would determine a reduction in the number of medical visits and examinations, as well as of lost workdays, with substantial economic savings for the NHS and improvement of patient's QoL. In addition, in new CD subjects, the early diagnosis will also reduce the costs related to the development of CD long-term complications.
02

Conditions studied

  • Non Celiac Wheat Sensitivity
  • IBS (Irritable Bowel Syndrome)
  • Functional Dyspepsia
  • Celiac Disease

Keywords

  • non celiac wheat sensitivity
  • irritable bowel syndrome
  • functional dyspepsia
  • celiac disease
  • Relatives
03

In context

Irritable Bowel Syndrome

1,116 studies on the registry are indexed under Irritable Bowel Syndrome; 208 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 600 is above the median of 70 across 896 interventional studies indexed under Irritable Bowel Syndrome.

Browse Irritable Bowel Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Palermo is the lead sponsor of 145 studies on the registry; 28 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • CD patient's relatives
  • >18 years old
  • reporting IBS/FD-like and extraintestinal (EI) symptoms

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria

  • self-exclusion of wheat from the diet and refuse to reintroduce it for diagnostic purposes;
  • drug and/or alcohol (>30 g/day for men and >20 g/day for women) abuse;
  • treatment with and/or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the 2 weeks before duodenal ;
  • pregnancy or breastfeeding;
  • diagnosis of chronic inflammatory bowel disease or other organic pathologies affecting the digestive system [e.g., IgE-mediated Wheat Allergy (WA), microscopic colitis, diverticulitis, segmental colitis associated with diverticulosis, etc.], neurological diseases, major psychiatric disorders, infectious diseases, immunological deficiencies, and impairments limiting physical activity.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
600 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Six-week long strict Wheat-Free Diet

    CD patient's first-degree relatives with IBS/FD-like and extraintestinal (EI) symptoms

    Other: Wheat-Free Diet

Interventions

  • OtherWheat-Free Diet

    Patients, identified at T1, will undergo a 6-week long strict WFD (preliminary dietician consul will be granted to all subjects), at the end of which (T2) they will fill-out an online form including a WFD adherence questionnaire (i.e. modified 'Biagi' score) and the questionnaires reported in WP1. Patients reporting a reduction ≥30% in at least one questionnaire after WFD will be identified as self-reported NCWS, all the others will be identified as IBS/FD not related to wheat intake.

    Also known as: WFD

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Identification of patients with self-reported NCWS or IBS/FD not related to wheat intake among relatives of CD patients: Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS)

    CD patient's relatives included in the study will refill out the following online questionnaire at the end of the 6-week long strict WFD (T2): - Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) (range from 15 to 105) Patients reporting a reduction ≥30% in the questionnaire after WFD will be identified as patients with self-reported NCWS. Patients not reporting a reduction ≥30% in at least one questionnaire after WFD will be identified as patients with IBS/FD not related to wheat intake.

    Time frame: From baseline to 6-week

Other outcomes

  1. Identification of patients with self-reported NCWS or IBS/FD not related to wheat intake among relatives of CD patients: Bristol Stool Scale

    CD patient's relatives included in the study will refill out the following online questionnaire at the end of the 6-week long strict WFD (T2): \- Bristol Stool Scale (from type 1, separate hard lumps, like nuts, to type 7, watery, no solid pieces, entirely liquid) Patients reporting a reduction ≥30% in the questionnaire after WFD will be identified as patients with self-reported NCWS. Patients not reporting a reduction ≥30% in at least one questionnaire after WFD will be identified as patients with IBS/FD not related to wheat intake.

    Time frame: From baseline to 6-week

  2. Identification of patients with self-reported NCWS or IBS/FD not related to wheat intake among relatives of CD patients: IBS-Symptom Severity Scale (IBS-SSS)

    CD patient's relatives included in the study will refill out the following online questionnaire at the end of the 6-week long strict WFD (T2): \- IBS-Symptom Severity Scale (IBS-SSS) (range from less than 75 to 300 or greater) Patients reporting a reduction ≥30% in the questionnaire after WFD will be identified as patients with self-reported NCWS. Patients not reporting a reduction ≥30% in at least one questionnaire after WFD will be identified as patients with IBS/FD not related to wheat intake.

    Time frame: From baseline to 6-week

  3. Identification of patients with self-reported NCWS or IBS/FD not related to wheat intake among relatives of CD patients: Extraintestinal Symptom Rating Scale (ESRS)

    CD patient's relatives included in the study will refill out the following online questionnaire at the end of the 6-week long strict WFD (T2): \- Extraintestinal Symptom Rating Scale (ESRS) (range 0 to 24 for women, and 0 to 22 for men) Patients reporting a reduction ≥30% in the questionnaire after WFD will be identified as patients with self-reported NCWS. Patients not reporting a reduction ≥30% in at least one questionnaire after WFD will be identified as patients with IBS/FD not related to wheat intake.

    Time frame: From baseline to 6-week

  4. Identification of patients with self-reported NCWS or IBS/FD not related to wheat intake among relatives of CD patients: IBS-Quality of Life (IBS-QoL)

    CD patient's relatives included in the study will refill out the following online questionnaire at the end of the 6-week long strict WFD (T2): \- IBS-Quality of Life (IBS-QoL) (range from 0 to 100). Patients reporting a reduction ≥30% in the questionnaire after WFD will be identified as patients with self-reported NCWS. Patients not reporting a reduction ≥30% in at least one questionnaire after WFD will be identified as patients with IBS/FD not related to wheat intake.

    Time frame: From baseline to 6-week

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
  • Celiac Disease and Food Intolerance Clinic, Geriatrics Unit, "P. Giaccone" University Hospital, Palermo
    Palermo, PA 90127, Italy
    Recruiting
  • Internal Medicine Unit, P.O. "V. Cervello," Ospedali Riuniti "Villa Sofia-Cervello," Palermo
    Palermo, PA 90146, Italy
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Biagi F, Bianchi PI, Marchese A, Trotta L, Vattiato C, Balduzzi D, Brusco G, Andrealli A, Cisaro F, Astegiano M, Pellegrino S, Magazzu G, Klersy C, Corazza GR. A score that verifies adherence to a gluten-free diet: a cross-sectional, multicentre validation in real clinical life. Br J Nutr. 2012 Nov 28;108(10):1884-8. doi: 10.1017/S0007114511007367. Epub 2012 Feb 10. PubMed 22321199 ↗
  • Drossman DA, Hasler WL. Rome IV-Functional GI Disorders: Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction. Gastroenterology. 2016 May;150(6):1257-61. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.03.035. No abstract available. PubMed 27147121 ↗
  • Vaquero L, Rodriguez-Martin L, Alvarez-Cuenllas B, Hernando M, Iglesias-Blazquez C, Menendez-Arias C, Vivas S. Coeliac disease and gastrointestinal symptom screening in adult first-degree relatives. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Dec;32(12):1931-1937. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13801. PubMed 28387454 ↗
  • Troncone R, Greco L, Mayer M, Mazzarella G, Maiuri L, Congia M, Frau F, De Virgiliis S, Auricchio S. In siblings of celiac children, rectal gluten challenge reveals gluten sensitization not restricted to celiac HLA. Gastroenterology. 1996 Aug;111(2):318-24. doi: 10.1053/gast.1996.v111.pm8690196. PubMed 8690196 ↗
  • Seidita A, Giuliano A, Soresi M, Chiavetta M, Nardi E, Mogavero G, Giannone G, Carroccio A, Mansueto P. Fecal calprotectin levels in patients with non-celiac wheat sensitivity: a proof of concept. Intern Emerg Med. 2024 Aug;19(5):1255-1266. doi: 10.1007/s11739-024-03595-7. Epub 2024 Apr 12. PubMed 38609737 ↗
  • Sapone A, Lammers KM, Casolaro V, Cammarota M, Giuliano MT, De Rosa M, Stefanile R, Mazzarella G, Tolone C, Russo MI, Esposito P, Ferraraccio F, Carteni M, Riegler G, de Magistris L, Fasano A. Divergence of gut permeability and mucosal immune gene expression in two gluten-associated conditions: celiac disease and gluten sensitivity. BMC Med. 2011 Mar 9;9:23. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-9-23. PubMed 21392369 ↗
  • Mansueto P, Di Liberto D, Fayer F, Soresi M, Geraci G, Giannone AG, Seidita A, D'Alcamo A, La Blasca F, Lo Pizzo M, Florena AM, Dieli F, Carroccio A. TNF-alpha, IL-17, and IL-22 production in the rectal mucosa of nonceliac wheat sensitivity patients: role of adaptive immunity. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2020 Sep 1;319(3):G281-G288. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00104.2020. Epub 2020 Jul 13. PubMed 32658621 ↗
  • Esteve M, Rosinach M, Fernandez-Banares F, Farre C, Salas A, Alsina M, Vilar P, Abad-Lacruz A, Forne M, Marine M, Santaolalla R, Espinos JC, Viver JM. Spectrum of gluten-sensitive enteropathy in first-degree relatives of patients with coeliac disease: clinical relevance of lymphocytic enteritis. Gut. 2006 Dec;55(12):1739-45. doi: 10.1136/gut.2006.095299. Epub 2006 May 18. PubMed 16709658 ↗
  • Di Liberto D, Mansueto P, D'Alcamo A, Lo Pizzo M, Lo Presti E, Geraci G, Fayer F, Guggino G, Iacono G, Dieli F, Carroccio A. Predominance of Type 1 Innate Lymphoid Cells in the Rectal Mucosa of Patients With Non-Celiac Wheat Sensitivity: Reversal After a Wheat-Free Diet. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2016 Jul 7;7(7):e178. doi: 10.1038/ctg.2016.35. PubMed 27388423 ↗
  • Carroccio A, Rini G, Mansueto P. Non-celiac wheat sensitivity is a more appropriate label than non-celiac gluten sensitivity. Gastroenterology. 2014 Jan;146(1):320-1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.08.061. Epub 2013 Nov 22. No abstract available. PubMed 24275240 ↗
  • Carroccio A, Mansueto P, Iacono G, Soresi M, D'Alcamo A, Cavataio F, Brusca I, Florena AM, Ambrosiano G, Seidita A, Pirrone G, Rini GB. Non-celiac wheat sensitivity diagnosed by double-blind placebo-controlled challenge: exploring a new clinical entity. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Dec;107(12):1898-906; quiz 1907. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.236. Epub 2012 Jul 24. PubMed 22825366 ↗
  • Brottveit M, Beitnes AC, Tollefsen S, Bratlie JE, Jahnsen FL, Johansen FE, Sollid LM, Lundin KE. Mucosal cytokine response after short-term gluten challenge in celiac disease and non-celiac gluten sensitivity. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 May;108(5):842-50. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.91. Epub 2013 Apr 16. PubMed 23588237 ↗
  • Araya M, Oyarzun A, Lucero Y, Espinosa N, Perez-Bravo F. DQ2, DQ7 and DQ8 Distribution and Clinical Manifestations in Celiac Cases and Their First-Degree Relatives. Nutrients. 2015 Jun 18;7(6):4955-65. doi: 10.3390/nu7064955. PubMed 26096569 ↗

Related links

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Apr 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Apr 2027, 12 months after the start.

Of 305 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Irritable Bowel Syndrome, half reached primary completion within 21 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 40. This study's planned 12 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 357 studies reached it within 19 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 38.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 25, 2026
First posted
May 13, 2026
StartActual
Apr 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Apr 30, 2027
CompletionEst.
Apr 30, 2028
Last update
May 13, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 13, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07584473
Responsible party
Pasquale Mansueto (Principal Investigator, University of Palermo) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 13, 2026
Start date
Apr 1, 2026
Primary completion
Apr 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 30, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
May 13, 2026

Study contacts

Pasquale Mansueto, MD
Contact
pasquale.mansueto@unipa.it
+393477279879
Aurelio Seidita, MD
Contact
aurelio.seidita@unipa.it
Antonio Carroccio, MD
study director · University of Palermo

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion