CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT06239142Updated Feb 2, 2024

Understanding Mental Fatigue After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

An observational study in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, Aneurysmal and Mental Fatigue, sponsored by Sahlgrenska University Hospital. Active, not recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-02-02.

Sponsored by Sahlgrenska University Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
64
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Fatigue is among the most frequently reported sequelae in stroke survivors. For a specific stroke diagnosis, aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH), fatigue, in general, is reported to be present in 30 to 90% of the patients. It is the mental fatigue component that significantly contributes to difficulties that patients with aSAH face when returning to normal life. However, there is substantial variation in the reported incidence of mental fatigue (25%-60%), which may be attributed to several methodological factors, such as differences in the follow-up periods and instruments used. Consequently, a complete understanding of how mental fatigue influences long-term recovery remains elusive. This research project will contribute to new and important knowledge in long-term effects after SAH when it comes to mental fatigue.

In this study patients surviving an SAH will be assessed for mental fatigue at 5 years after the insult. The patients have previously been assessed at 1 and 3 years. All patients have been treated at Sahlgrenska University Hospital during the acute phase after SAH. Follow-up is performed after 5 years after aSAH through a structured telephone interview, where patients are scored using the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE) Additionally, the patients receive a self-assessment questionnaire, the Mental Fatigue Scale, Patients are reminded to return the questionnaires at three times.

This study aims to determine the long-term prevalence, severity, and dynamics of mental fatigue at 1, 3, and 5 years after an aSAH. The study also aims to identify whether demographic characteristics and secondary complications or diagnoses after aSAH can be associated with an increased risk of developing mental fatigue or unfavourable outcome.

Read the detailed description

In this study patients surviving an SAH will be assessed for mental fatigue at 5 years after the insult. The patients have previously been assessed at 1 and 3 years. All patients have been treated at Sahlgrenska University Hospital during the acute phase after SAH. Follow-up is performed after 5 years after aSAH through a structured telephone interview, where patients are scored using the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE) Additionally, the patients receive a self-assessment questionnaire, the Mental Fatigue Scale, Patients are reminded to return the questionnaires at three times.

Primary outcome measure:

The Mental Fatigue Scale (MFS)score

The MFS is a multidimensional self-reporting questionnaire developed for assessing different aspects of mental fatigue in patients with brain injuries. It comprises 15 items regarding fatigue, including lack of initiative; mental recovery; concentration difficulties; memory problems; slowness of thinking; sensitivity to stress; increased mental fatigue, increased tendency to become emotional; irritability; sensitivity to light and noise; and decreased or increased sleep duration. Each item has four response options ranging from 0 (normal function) to 3 (maximal problems); further, one can select response points in between (i.e., 0,5, 1,5, and 2,5), which yields a total of seven options. Items 1-14 are used to calculate the total score, with a maximum score of 42. We did not include item 15, which assesses 24-h variations, in the total score, but it can be used in clinical practice. An MFS score ≥ 10.5 indicates mental fatigue. A higher MFS score indicates more severe problems.

This study explores the presence, severity and dynamics of mental fatigue.

The Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE)

The GOSE evaluates the patient's functional outcome and level of independence in eight different domains of daily living, including physical, cognitive, emotional, and social functioning. It was developed to classify patients after a traumatic or nontraumatic brain injury, allowing for comparisons of outcomes between patients. The scale ranges from death (1 point) to good recovery (8 points), with higher scores indicating better outcomes and higher levels of independence. A GOSE score of 8 indicates full recovery with only minor symptoms that do not affect activities of daily living (ADL). A GOSE score of ≥ 5 indicates that patients can independently manage their ADL and is used in studies to describe a favorable outcome 5,28.

Secondary Outcome Measures are the association between mental fatigue and GOSE, demographics, complications during the acute phase and loss of conscious at ictus.

02

Conditions studied

  • Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, Aneurysmal
  • Mental Fatigue
03

In context

Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

509 studies on the registry are indexed under Subarachnoid Hemorrhage; 124 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 64 is below the median of 117 across 226 observational studies indexed under Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.

Browse Subarachnoid Hemorrhage studies →

Lead sponsor

Sahlgrenska University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 259 studies on the registry; 68 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

64 patients where included in a primary study of the acute phase after subarachnoid hemorrhage. This study population consists of patients surviving up to 5 years after the SAB and eligible to assess for the presence of mental fatigue.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients having had a aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • age\<18 years, patients having pacemaker
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
64 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mental fatigue

    Mental fatigue scale score. The instrument consists of 15 questions addressing different problems within the fatigue area and problems can be graded by the patient in 7 steps according to severity. Maximum score is 30 and a value above 10.5 indicates the presence of mental fatigue.

    Time frame: 5 years

  2. GOSE

    extended Glascow outcome scale. Describing functional outcome according to an 8-grdaed scale where 1 corresponds to dead and 8 to fully recovered.

    Time frame: 5 years

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual patient data will not be shared

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 2, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06239142
Lead sponsor
Sahlgrenska University Hospital
Responsible party
Helena Odenstedt Hergès (Associate professor, Sahlgrenska University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 2, 2024
Start date
May 2015
Primary completion
Oct 2021
Completion
Jun 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 2, 2024

Study contacts

Helena Odenstedt Herges, PhD
principal investigator · Sahlgrenska Academy Gothenburg University Inst of Clinical sciences

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Jan 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion