ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07772609STRONG-HIPUpdated Aug 19, 2026

Sequential Treatment With Romosozumab Followed by Denosumab vs. Zoledronic Acid for Gains in HIP BMD

A Phase 4 interventional study of Romosozumab and Zoledronic Acid 5 MG in 5 ML Injection in Osteoporosis in Post-menopausal Women, sponsored by Sahlgrenska University Hospital. Not yet recruiting at 9 sites in Sweden. Open to female participants aged 60 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-19.

Sponsored by Sahlgrenska University Hospital · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
216
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
60 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Osteoporosis is associated with a high risk of fractures, disability, loss of independence, and excess mortality. Zoledronic acid is an established first-line treatment in Sweden, but many patients at high fracture risk remain at substantial residual fracture risk. Short-course treatment with romosozumab followed by denosumab produces large increases in bone mineral density, but has not been directly compared with zoledronic acid.

STRONG-HIP is a multicentre, randomized, active-controlled phase 4 trial in 216 postmenopausal women aged 60 years or older with osteoporosis and high fracture risk. Participants are randomized 1:1 to receive romosozumab 210 mg monthly for 3 months followed by denosumab 60 mg every 6 months, or zoledronic acid 5 mg intravenously at baseline and Month 12.

The primary objective is to determine whether the romosozumab-denosumab sequence produces a greater percentage increase in total hip bone mineral density from baseline to Month 24 than zoledronic acid. Secondary outcomes include total hip and lumbar spine BMD at earlier time points, vertebral and clinical fractures, bone turnover markers, safety, health-related quality of life, and health-economic outcomes. A mechanistic substudy will assess bone microarchitecture and estimated strength using HR-pQCT.

Participants are followed for 24 months in the main study and may enter an optional extension with follow-up to Month 48 to assess the durability of treatment effects.

02

Conditions studied

  • Osteoporosis in Post-menopausal Women

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Randomized controlled trial
  • Romosozumab
  • Denosumab
  • High resolution peripheral computed tomography
  • Bone mineral density
  • Zoledronic acid
  • Postmenopausal
  • Osteoporosis
  • Fracture risk
03

In context

Osteoporosis

1,601 studies on the registry are indexed under Osteoporosis; 209 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 216 is above the median of 88 across 1,084 interventional studies indexed under Osteoporosis.

Browse Osteoporosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Sahlgrenska University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 263 studies on the registry; 68 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
60 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. The subject is a woman aged 60 years or older at screening.
  2. The subject has provided written before any trial-specific procedure is performed.
  3. The subject has osteoporosis at screening defined as a T-score of -2.5 or lower at the total hip or lumbar spine (L1-L4) on central reader confirmed bone densitometry by DXA.
  4. The subject is at high fracture risk, defined by at least one of the following: a previous low-trauma fracture after age 50 years (excluding skull, face, fingers and toes); FRAX probability at or above the age-specific Swedish intervention threshold (using Nordic and Nordic borne calculations, as appropriate) in use at screening.
  5. Corrected plasma calcium or ionized calcium is within the local reference range before randomization.
  6. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration ≥50 nmol/L before randomization.
  7. Adequate renal function for zoledronic acid treatment, defined as ≥35 mL/min calculated using the clinical trial center specified calculation procedure (e.g. the Cockcroft-Gault equation) before randomization.
  8. The subject is able and willing, in the investigator's judgment, to comply with the trial procedures and attend scheduled visits.
  9. For participants entering the extension, separate written extension consent is obtained before any extension-specific procedure is performed.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Severe osteoporosis, defined as total hip or lumbar spine T-score \< -3.5 and/or prevalent grade 2 or grade 3 vertebral fracture.
  2. Previous myocardial infarction or stroke at any time before screening.
  3. , unstable angina, coronary or major peripheral revascularization within 12 months before screening, decompensated heart failure, uncontrolled arrhythmia, or any cardiovascular condition that in the investigator's judgment confers unacceptably high risk of a major adverse cardiovascular event during study participation.
  4. Use of intravenous bisphosphonate therapy or teriparatide within 3 years before randomization.
  5. Use of oral bisphosphonate or denosumab within 12 months before randomization.
  6. Any previous use of romosozumab.
  7. Use of systemic estrogen, selective estrogen receptor modulator within 3 months.
  8. Use of oral for more than 14 consecutive days during the 6 months before screening.
  9. Known metabolic bone disease other than osteoporosis, including but not limited to Pagets disease, osteomalacia, untreated hyperparathyroidism, osteogenesis imperfecta, or active renal osteodystrophy.
  10. below 35 mL/min, rapidly deteriorating renal function, or another renal condition that makes zoledronic acid unsafe.
  11. Hypocalcaemia (ionized calcium \<1.15 mmol/l or total albumin corrected calcium of \<2.15 mmol/l) or vitamin D 25-OH-vit-D \<50nmol/l, not corrected before randomization.
  12. Unexplained serum alkaline phosphatase >2 times the local .
  13. within the last 5 years, except adequately treated basal-cell carcinoma of the skin, squamous-cell carcinoma in situ of the skin, or cervical carcinoma in situ.
  14. Current osteonecrosis of the jaw, unhealed oral or jaw lesions, active dental or jaw infection, or planned invasive dental extraction/implant procedure that has not been completed and healed before randomization, if considered by the investigator to represent a or unacceptable risk for treatment with romosozumab, denosumab or zoledronic acid.
  15. Known or contraindication to romosozumab, denosumab, zoledronic acid, calcium supplementation, or vitamin D supplementation that cannot be safely managed under the protocol.
  16. Inability to undergo protocol DXA/VFA reliably, for example because of body habitus exceeding scanner limits, inability to position safely, or interfering hardware or artefacts that prevent valid endpoint assessment.
  17. Current participation, or recent participation within 30 days or five half-lives (whichever is longer), in another interventional clinical trial that could affect safety or data interpretation.
  18. Any other medical, psychiatric, social or logistical condition that, in the investigators opinion, makes participation unsafe or would compromise protocol adherence or data reliability.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(10)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Postmenopausal

Periods have stopped for good: usually no period for 12 months in a row without another medical reason, sometimes confirmed by a blood test (FSH).

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Creatinine clearance (CrCl)

How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.

TIA (transient ischaemic attack)

A “mini-stroke”: temporary stroke-like symptoms caused by reduced blood flow to part of the brain, spinal cord or eye, without signs of a new stroke on a scan.

Stroke symptoms need emergency care at once, even if they go away.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
216 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Short-course Romosozumab Followed by Denosumab

    Participants will receive romosozumab 210 mg by subcutaneous injection at Baseline and Months 1 and 2, followed by denosumab 60 mg by subcutaneous injection at Months 3, 9, 15, and 21. Participants entering the optional extension will continue denosumab at Months 27, 33, 39, and 45, unless contraindicated or clinically inappropriate. All participants will receive daily calcium and vitamin D supplementation throughout the study.

    Drug: Romosozumab · Dietary Supplement: Calcium 500 mg and Vitamin D3 800 IU · Drug: Denosumab

  • Active comparator
    Zoledronic Acid

    Participants will receive zoledronic acid 5 mg by intravenous infusion at Baseline and Month 12. Participants entering the optional extension will receive additional infusions at Months 24 and 36, unless contraindicated or clinically inappropriate. All participants will receive daily calcium and vitamin D supplementation throughout the study.

    Drug: Zoledronic Acid 5 MG in 5 ML Injection · Dietary Supplement: Calcium 500 mg and Vitamin D3 800 IU

Interventions

  • Romosozumab 210 mg will be administered by subcutaneous injection once monthly for 3 consecutive months. Each monthly dose consists of two consecutive 105 mg injections.

    Also known as: Evenity

  • Zoledronic acid 5 mg intravenously at Baseline and Month 12, with additional doses at Months 24 and 36 in the extension unless contraindicated or clinically inappropriate.

  • Dietary supplementCalcium 500 mg and Vitamin D3 800 IU

    Drug page: Calcium

    Calcium and vitamin D supplementation, using 500 mg elemental calcium plus 20 micrograms cholecalciferol daily for 24 months. Participants entering the optional extension will receive daily calcium and vitamin D supplementation throughout the study.

  • Denosumab 60 mg by subcutaneous injection at Months 3, 9, 15, and 21. Participants entering the optional extension will continue denosumab at Months 27, 33, 39, and 45 unless contraindicated or clinically inappropriate.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percent change in total hip bone mineral density

    Percentage change from baseline to month 24 in total hip bone mineral density, measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

    Time frame: 24 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percent change in lumbar spine bone mineral density at Months 6, 12 and 24.

    Percentage change from baseline to months 6, 12 and 24 in lumbar spine bone mineral density, measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6, 12 and 24 months.

  2. Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hip BMD at Months 6 and 12

    Percentage change from baseline to month 6 and 12 total hip mineral density, measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 and 12 months.

  3. Incident vertebral fracture

    Incident morphometric vertebral fracture by Genant grading on centrally read vertebral fracture assessment (VFA)

    Time frame: From baseline to months 12, 24 in the main study. For those entering the extension study, from baseline to months 36 and 48.

  4. First clinical fragility fracture

    Time to first clinical fragility fracture

    Time frame: Baseline to month 24, and for those entering the extension study, to months 36 and 48.

  5. Occurrence of any fracture during follow-up.

    Occurrence of any new morphometric vertebral fracture or clinical fragility fracture during follow-up.

    Time frame: Baseline to Month 24, and for those entering the extension study, to Months 36 and 48.

  6. Percent Change From Baseline in plasma C-Terminal Telopeptide of Type I Collagen

    Percent change from baseline in plasma C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX), a marker of bone resorption. Samples will be collected before study-drug administration at treatment visits and analysed centrally. Treatment-group differences over time will be assessed using a longitudinal repeated-measures model.

    Time frame: Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24

  7. Percent Change From Baseline in Plasma Procollagen Type I N-Terminal Propeptide

    Percent change from baseline in Plasma Procollagen Type I N-Terminal Propeptide, a marker of bone formation. Samples will be collected before study-drug administration at treatment visits and analysed centrally. Treatment-group differences over time will be assessed using a longitudinal repeated-measures model.

    Time frame: Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24

  8. EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) Health-State Utility Index

    The EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire will be converted to a health-state utility index using the prespecified Swedish value set. Index values range from -0.31 to 1.00, where 1.00 represents full health and higher values indicate better health-related quality of life. Between-group changes from baseline will be evaluated at Months 12 and 24.

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 12, and Month 24

  9. Model-Estimated Lifetime Number of Fractures

    Expected lifetime numbers of hip, vertebral, and other osteoporotic fractures will be estimated for each treatment strategy using a lifetime decision-analytic osteoporosis model informed by the randomized Month-24 total hip BMD treatment difference and Swedish epidemiological data.

    Time frame: Month 24

  10. Budget Impact of the Sequential Treatment Strategy

    Estimated net financial impact over a prespecified 5-year implementation horizon of introducing the sequential treatment strategy in Swedish clinical practice, based on the eligible population, expected uptake, treatment costs, and projected fracture-related cost offsets.

    Time frame: Month 24

Other outcomes

  1. Model-Predicted Fracture Risk Reduction Based on Total Hip BMD

    Fracture-specific relative and absolute risk reductions will be estimated from the adjusted randomized between-group difference in percent change from baseline in total hip BMD at Month 24. The treatment difference will be translated into expected fracture-risk reductions using prespecified validated meta-regression models underpinning the FDA-qualified total hip BMD surrogate endpoint. Estimates may include hip, vertebral, nonvertebral, and all clinical fractures, according to the available validated models.

    Time frame: Month 24

  2. Incremental Cost per Quality-Adjusted Life-Year (QALY) Gained

    Incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained for the sequential treatment strategy compared with zoledronic acid, estimated from a Swedish healthcare perspective using a lifetime health-economic model. The model will use treatment effects derived from the randomized Month-24 total hip BMD difference together with Swedish epidemiological, cost, mortality, and utility inputs.

    Time frame: Month 24

  3. Model-Estimated Lifetime Healthcare Costs

    Discounted lifetime healthcare costs per participant, including treatment, administration, monitoring, adverse-event management, and fracture-related healthcare costs, estimated from a Swedish healthcare perspective using a lifetime health-economic model based on treatment effects and other study data available at Month 24.

    Time frame: Month 24

  4. Model-Estimated Quality-Adjusted Life-Years

    Discounted lifetime quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) per participant estimated using EQ-5D-5L and prespecified fracture-state utility inputs in a lifetime health-economic model based on treatment effects and other study data available at Month 24.

    Time frame: Month 24

07

Study locations

9 sites
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual participant data underlying the published results may be made available to qualified researchers upon reasonable request. Supporting documents may include the study protocol, statistical analysis plan, and a redacted clinical study report.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report, Analytic code

Time frame: Beginning after publication of the primary study results and available for a period determined by applicable institutional and data-retention policies.

Access criteria: De-identified individual participant data and supporting study documents may be made available to qualified researchers upon reasonable request after publication of the primary results, subject to scientific review, applicable ethical and data-protection requirements, and a data-use agreement.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Jan 2027; primary completion for Dec 2029, 35 months later.

Of 55 non-industry phase 4 interventional studies under Osteoporosis, half reached primary completion within 46 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 31 and three quarters within 71. This study's planned 35 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 65 studies reached it within 46 months; a quarter within 29 and three quarters within 71.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 13, 2026
First posted
Aug 19, 2026
StartEst.
Jan 11, 2027
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2029
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2031
Last update
Aug 19, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 19, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07772609
Collaborators
Uppsala University Hospital, Karolinska University Hospital, Norrlands University Hospital, Sundsvall Hospital, Skane University Hospital, Region Stockholm, Skaraborg Hospital, University Hospital, Linkoeping, Göteborg University
Responsible party
Mattias Lorentzon (Senior Consultant in Geriatric Medicine and Professor of Geriatric Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 19, 2026
Start date
Jan 11, 2027 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2031 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 19, 2026

Study contacts

Mattias Lorentzon, MD, PhD
Contact
mattias.lorentzon@medic.gu.se
+46313431979
Lena Silberberg, BSc
Contact
lena.silberberg@vgregion.se
+46313421000
Mattias Lorentzon, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Sahlgrenska University Hospital Mölndal, Västra Götalandsregionen and University of Gothenburg

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Romosozumab · Denosumab

Start the discussion