ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT06225388Updated Aug 15, 2024

Effect of Wearing a Compression Sock During Running on Muscle Soreness in Distance Runners.

An interventional study of Compression socks and Placebo socks in Muscle Soreness, Perceived Recovery and Perceived Exertion, sponsored by Centro Universitário Augusto Motta. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-08-15.

Sponsored by Centro Universitário Augusto Motta · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jul 2025, 1 year 4 months ago, but the record still lists the study as enrolling by invitation.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
44
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 50 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Running is the most popular physical activity worldwide. Although running provides many health benefits, it is often associated with injuries and symptoms such as delayed onset muscle soreness. There is still a paucity of interventions that can effectively minimise these symptoms in distance runners.

Read the detailed description

Our primary aim is to explore the effect of compression socks during running on delayed onset muscle soreness after running. Our secondary aims are to explore the effects of compression socks during running on perceived recovery, perceived exertion, affective response, and heart rate after running. This is a randomised, double-blind, sham-controlled crossover trial. Forty-four participants will be recruited via social media, running clubs and the running coaches' network of the research team. Participants will be randomised to complete a running protocol under two conditions (compression socks or sham socks). After that, there will be a wash-out period of 7 to 10 days, and participants will repeat the running protocol under the other conditions. Primary outcome: lower limb muscle soreness will be collected, using a 0-100 numerical pain scale, immediately, 24 hours and 48 hours after the running protocol, with 24 hours post-protocol being the primary timepoint. Secondary outcomes: perceived recovery will be collected, using a 0-10 scale immediately, 24 hours and 48 hours after the running protocol. Perceived exertion, affective response, and heart rate will be registered only immediately after the protocol. Between-group differences will be explored using linear mixed models.

02

Conditions studied

  • Muscle Soreness
  • Perceived Recovery
  • Perceived Exertion
  • Affective Response
  • Heart Rate

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • runner
  • garments
  • pain
  • stocking
  • knee
  • sports
03

In context

Myalgia

256 studies on the registry are indexed under Myalgia; 46 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 44 is close to the median of 44 across 216 interventional studies indexed under Myalgia.

Browse Myalgia studies →

Lead sponsor

Centro Universitário Augusto Motta is the lead sponsor of 39 studies on the registry; 14 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Run consistently in the last six months (at least three times a week and at least 10 kilometres per week);
  • Runners who did not run further than 42 kilometres in the last month.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy;
  • Any lower limbs fracture in the last 12 months;
  • History of lower limb arthroplasty or osteotomy, previous venous thrombosis, kidney disease;
  • Any running-related injury in the last six months. A running-related injury will be considered the presence of lower limb pain that caused restriction, stoppage of running (distance, speed, duration, or training) for at least seven days or three consecutive scheduled training sessions or the need for a health professional treatment
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
44 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Compression socks

    For the intervention, compression socks will be used, composed of 81% polyamide, 15% elastane and 4% polypropylene (Kendall sports, Kendall, São Paulo, Brazil). The sock offers compression of 20 to 30 mmHg in a decreasing manner with greater pressure at the ankle and less pressure at the knee joint line. Based on the manufacturer's guidelines, the sock size will be determined by measuring the calf and ankle circumference.

    Other: Compression socks

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo socks

    The placebo sock will be represented by a commercial sock composed of 70% polyamide, 24% cotton and 5% elastodiene without the purpose of providing compression.

    Other: Placebo socks

Interventions

  • OtherCompression socks

    A pair of socks corresponding to the intervention allocated will be given to the participant, by an investigator who will not participate in the evaluation, in a dark plastic bag to avoid any visual influence. We will adopt strategies to prevent information about the socks from influencing the participants' behaviour: (1) the compression and placebo socks will have the same colour, any visual detail and branding will be covered. Words or logos from the compression sock will be covered, so participants are unable to differentiate them. (2) After performing the running protocol, participants will remove their socks and return them to the investigator.

  • OtherPlacebo socks

    The compression and placebo socks will have the same colour, any visual detail and branding will be covered. Words or logos from the compression sock will be covered, so participants are unable to differentiate them. (2) After performing the running protocol, participants will remove their socks and return them to the investigator.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Lower limb muscle soreness.

    A visual analogue scale (VAS) will be used to measure the intensity of muscle soreness. This scale ranges from 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst possible pain).

    Time frame: 24 hours post-intervention.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Lower limb muscle soreness.

    A visual analogue scale (VAS) will be used to measure the intensity of muscle soreness. This scale ranges from 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst possible pain).

    Time frame: 5 minutes post-intervention, and 48 hours post-intervention.

  2. Perceived recovery.

    The Perceived Recovery Status Scales will assess participants' perceived recovery. This scale ranges from 0 (very poorly recovered / extremely tired) to 10 (very well recovered / highly energetic). Values from 0 to 2 indicate "expect declined performance", values from 4 to 6 indicate "expect similar performance", and values from 8 to 10 represent "expect improved performance". Values 3 and 7 are considered transitional conditions. The value 3 means that it is not clear that the participants will be able to maintain their performance, and the value 7 means the participants are not fully recovered

    Time frame: 5 minutes post-intervention, 24 hours, and 48 hours post-intervention.

  3. Perceived exertion

    The Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion (Borg RPE 6-20) will be used assess how hard and strenuous the running protocol was. This scale ranges from 6 (no exertion at all) to 20 (maximal exertion).

    Time frame: 5 minutes post-intervention.

  4. Affective response

    The Feeling Scale is a bipolar scale that measures the affective response (pleasure/displeasure) related to exercise. This scale ranges from + 5 (very good) to - 5 (very bad). Zero is considered neutral; positive values represent pleasure, and negative values represent displeasure.

    Time frame: 5 minutes post-intervention.

  5. Heart rate

    The average heart rate in beats per minute will be monitored through a smartwatch.

    Time frame: Through the intervention, an average of 30 minutes.

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The author will share the study's statistical analysis plan.

Supporting information: Statistical analysis plan

Access criteria: The statistical analysis plan will be available upon request.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jan 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jul 2025, 17 months after the start.

Of 101 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Myalgia, half reached primary completion within 8 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 3 and three quarters within 16. This study's planned 17 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 111 studies reached it within 8 months; a quarter within 3 and three quarters within 16.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 2, 2024
First posted
Jan 25, 2024
StartActual
Jan 20, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Jul 1, 2025
CompletionEst.
Jul 30, 2025
Last update
Aug 15, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 15, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06225388
Lead sponsor
Centro Universitário Augusto Motta
Responsible party
Gustavo Telles (Principal Investigator, Centro Universitário Augusto Motta) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 25, 2024
Start date
Jan 20, 2024
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 30, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 15, 2024

Study contacts

Leandro AC Nogueira, PhD
study chair · Centro Universitário Augusto Motta

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion