CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07547566Updated Apr 23, 2026

Recovery After Fatigue in Young Athletes: Comparison Between TECAR Therapy and Cycle Ergometer"

An interventional study of Tecar therapy (capacitive mode) and Active recovery using cycle ergometer in Muscle Fatigue and Healthy Adult, sponsored by Maimónides Biomedical Research Institute of Córdoba. Recruiting at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-23.

Sponsored by Maimónides Biomedical Research Institute of Córdoba · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
48
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two recovery methods after fatigue in young athletes. It aims to find out if tecar therapy (TECAR) or cycle ergometer exercise can improve recovery after intense physical activity and help athletes return to their normal performance more quickly.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does TECAR or cycle ergometer improve physical performance after fatigue?

Do these methods reduce muscle pain and soreness after fatigue?

Researchers will compare TECAR with active recovery using a cycle ergometer to see which method is more effective.

Participants will:

Perform a series of jumps to induce fatigue

Be randomly assigned to one of the recovery methods

Complete physical tests before and after fatigue

Undergo simple measurements of muscle condition and pain

Report their level of effort and muscle soreness

Read the detailed description

This study is a randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of two recovery strategies following exercise-induced fatigue in young athletes: tecar therapy (TECAR) and active recovery (usual care) using a cycle ergometer.

Exercise-induced fatigue can reduce physical performance and increase muscle soreness, which may negatively affect athletic performance and increase injury risk. This study aims to compare the effects of two commonly used recovery strategies on physical performance, muscle mechanical properties, and perceived recovery.

Participants will be physically active young athletes over 18 years of age, familiar with plyometric or jump-based activities. They will be recruited through convenience sampling. Individuals with recent musculoskeletal injuries or those who have performed intense physical exercise within 24 hours prior to testing will be excluded.

All procedures will be conducted in a controlled environment by trained personnel following a standardized protocol. After providing informed consent, participants will undergo baseline assessments, including physical performance tests, measurements of muscle mechanical properties, and subjective perception of effort and muscle soreness.

A standardized warm-up will be performed prior to testing, consisting of low-intensity aerobic activity for approximately five minutes, aiming to reach a moderate level of perceived exertion.

Participants will then complete a fatigue protocol consisting of repeated drop jumps from a fixed height of approximately 0.6 meters. The protocol will be organized into multiple sets with controlled rest intervals between repetitions and sets in order to induce acute neuromuscular fatigue in a standardized manner.

Immediately after the fatigue protocol, the same assessments will be repeated to evaluate the acute effects of fatigue.

Participants will then be randomly assigned to one of the two recovery interventions:

TECAR: application of capacitive and resistive electric transfer using radiofrequency energy for 20 minutes

Active recovery (usual care): continuous cycling on a cycle ergometer at low-to-moderate intensity for 20 minutes, reflecting standard recovery practices commonly used in athletic settings

Following the assigned recovery intervention, all assessments will be repeated to evaluate recovery effects.

In addition, subjective measures of muscle soreness and perceived effort will be collected at 12 and 24 hours after the intervention to assess short-term recovery.

Outcome measures will include objective indicators of physical performance and muscle mechanical properties, assessed using a handheld myotonometer, as well as pressure pain threshold (a measure of sensitivity to pressure), and subjective measures related to perceived effort and muscle soreness.

Statistical analysis will include descriptive statistics and inferential analysis to compare differences between groups and over time. A two-way analysis of variance (group × time) will be used to evaluate the effects of the recovery intervention and measurement time points, including potential interaction effects. Statistical significance will be set at p \< 0.05.

This study aims to provide evidence on the comparative effectiveness of TECAR and active recovery strategies, contributing to the optimization of recovery protocols in athletic populations.

02

Conditions studied

  • Muscle Fatigue
  • Healthy Adult

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Muscle Strength
  • Muscle Fatigue
  • Athletes
  • Recovery of Function
  • Countermovement jump
  • Pressure pain threshold
  • Muscle soreness
  • Muscle mechanical properties
  • Diathermy
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 18 years or older
  • Engaging in regular physical activity
  • Experience with sports involving jumping or plyometric exercises

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Performed intense physical exercise within 24 hours before the study
  • Planned to perform intense physical exercise within 24 hours after the study
  • Presence of muscle soreness at the beginning of the study
  • Musculoskeletal injury in the previous 6 months
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
48 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    TECAR

    Participants assigned to this group will receive tecar therapy (TECAR) for 20 minutes. TECAR will be applied using the capacitive mode only, combining manual mobile application and fixed automatic application. The intervention will be applied after a standardized fatigue protocol consisting of repeated drop jumps, which is identical for all participants.

    Device: Tecar therapy (capacitive mode)

  • Active comparator
    Active recovery (usual care)

    Participants assigned to this group will perform active recovery (usual care) consisting of continuous cycling on a cycle ergometer for 20 minutes at low intensity, not exceeding 2-3 on a 0-10 rating of perceived exertion scale. The intervention will be applied after a standardized fatigue protocol consisting of repeated drop jumps, which is identical for all participants. This intervention reflects standard recovery practices commonly used in athletic settings.

    Behavioral: Active recovery using cycle ergometer

Interventions

  • DeviceTecar therapy (capacitive mode)

    TECAR is applied using capacitive radiofrequency energy for 20 minutes following a standardized fatigue protocol. The intervention is delivered using capacitive mode only, combining manual mobile application and fixed automatic application over the quadriceps region to promote recovery after exercise-induced fatigue.

    Also known as: Capacitive and resistive electric transfer therapy. Radiofrequency therapy

  • BehavioralActive recovery using cycle ergometer

    Active recovery consists of continuous cycling on a cycle ergometer for 20 minutes at low intensity, not exceeding 2-3 on a 0-10 rating of perceived exertion scale. This intervention is performed after a standardized fatigue protocol and reflects common recovery practices in athletic settings.

    Also known as: Low-intensity cycling exercise

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Countermovement jump height

    Vertical jump performance will be assessed using a countermovement jump test. Jump height will be measured using a validated mobile application after three attempts, and the mean value will be recorded.

    Time frame: Baseline (after warm-up), immediately after fatigue protocol, and immediately after intervention (20 minutes).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Muscle mechanical properties

    Muscle mechanical properties will be assessed using a handheld myotonometer. Parameters will include muscle tone and stiffness measured at standardized anatomical locations of the rectus femoris, vastus lateralis, medial gastrocnemius, and lateral gastrocnemius.

    Time frame: Baseline (after warm-up), immediately after fatigue protocol, and immediately after intervention (20 minutes).

  2. Pressure pain threshold

    Pressure pain threshold will be assessed using a handheld algometer. Measurements will be performed at standardized anatomical locations of the rectus femoris, vastus lateralis, and medial gastrocnemius, and the mean of repeated measurements will be recorded.

    Time frame: Baseline (after warm-up), immediately after fatigue protocol, and immediately after intervention (20 minutes).

  3. Rating of perceived exertion

    Perceived exertion will be assessed using a 0-10 rating scale, where higher values indicate greater perceived effort.

    Time frame: Baseline (after warm-up), immediately after fatigue protocol, immediately after intervention (20 minutes), 12 hours, and 24 hours.

  4. Delayed-onset muscle soreness.

    Delayed-onset muscle soreness (DOMS) will be assessed using a 0-10 numeric rating scale, where 0 indicates no muscle soreness and 10 indicates the worst possible muscle soreness.

    Time frame: Baseline (after warm-up), 12 hours, and 24 hours.

06

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Physiobalance
    Córdoba, Córdoba 14011, Spain
    • Sandra Alcaraz Clariana, PhD PT · Contact · m72alcls@uco.es · +34625434043
    • Lourdes García Luque, PhD PT · Contact · z12galul@uco.es · +34627366324
    • Sandra Alcaraz Clariana, PhD PT · Principal investigator
    • Lourdes García Luque, PhD PT · Sub investigator
    Recruiting
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Lettner J, Graventein L, Hakam HT, Ramadanov N, Becker R, Prill R. Assessment of Muscle Stiffness Using the MyotonPro: Effects of Fatigue on Vastus Lateralis and Medialis Muscles. J Pers Med. 2024 Mar 12;14(3):301. doi: 10.3390/jpm14030301. PubMed 38541043 ↗
  • Nakamura M, Sato S, Kiyono R, Yahata K, Yoshida R, Kasahara K, Konrad A. The Effect of Capacitive and Resistive Electric Transfer Intervention on Delayed-Onset Muscle Soreness Induced by Eccentric Exercise. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 8;19(9):5723. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095723. PubMed 35565117 ↗
  • Dupuy O, Douzi W, Theurot D, Bosquet L, Dugue B. An Evidence-Based Approach for Choosing Post-exercise Recovery Techniques to Reduce Markers of Muscle Damage, Soreness, Fatigue, and Inflammation: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis. Front Physiol. 2018 Apr 26;9:403. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00403. eCollection 2018. PubMed 29755363 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07547566
Lead sponsor
Maimónides Biomedical Research Institute of Córdoba
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 23, 2026
Start date
Apr 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Aug 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 23, 2026

Study contacts

Sandra Alcaraz Clariana, PhD PT
Contact
m72alcls@uco.es
+34625434043
Lourdes García Luque, PhD PT
Contact
z12galul@uco.es
+34627366324
Sandra Alcaraz Clariana, PhD PT
principal investigator · Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba (IMIBIC). Department of Nursing, Pharmacology and Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine and Nursing, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain;

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion