ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06224751CVTVUpdated Mar 18, 2024

Developing Better Computerised Vision Tests (CVTV)

An observational study in Visual Impairment, Amblyopia and Macular Degeneration, sponsored by Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust. Recruiting at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 3 Years to 99 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-03-18.

Primary conditionAmblyopiaRegistry: Vision DisordersReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Vision Disorders — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Amblyopia
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Amblyopia, a narrower term within Vision Disorders.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jan 2025, 1 year 10 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
550
Ages
3 Years to 99 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Clinical vision measurements usually involve printed charts with an eye care professional interpreting patient responses to generate a score. Those scores determine the need for or outcome of treatment. Detecting change can be improved with strict procedures/scoring, lending itself to computerisation. This in turn allows integration with electronic medical records. Many eye tests could be computerised in this way. At Guys and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, the investigators have developed and validated a computerised test of distance visual acuity, called COMPlog which is now in widespread use. The investigators now want to increase the range of tests available.

There is also a need to longitudinally monitor for adverse change. Such monitoring must be developed to keep false positive and false negative change detection to a minimum.

The aims of this two year linked program are to:

Part A) validate an extended range of computerised vision measurement tests against their gold standard hard copy printed equivalents. Some of these tests are designed for use in children and all are meant to quantify both normal and impaired vision. Patients of all ages and visual function will therefore be recruited from St Thomas' Hospital. The specific tests we aim to validate are logMAR Letter Near Acuity, Word Near Acuity, Letter Contrast Sensitivity, Auckland Optotypes Picture Acuity, Low Contrast Letter Acuity, Stereoacuity and Vanishing Optotypes. Patients will undergo test-retest measurements with up to two of these.

Part B) Iteratively develop an application for use in home monitoring of subjects at risk of treatable vision loss due to age related macular degeneration.

All computerised tests in parts A and B will be performed on prototype software. Eye patients will be recruited as subjects. Patients recruited to part A will undergo tests on one day for up to an hour, subjects in part B will participate for between 1 hour and two months.

02

Conditions studied

  • Visual Impairment
  • Amblyopia
  • Macular Degeneration
  • Ophthalmic Disease

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Visual acuity
  • Visual function
  • Ocular disease
03

In context

Amblyopia Reclassified

189 studies on the registry are indexed under Amblyopia; 41 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 550 is above the median of 156 across 39 observational studies indexed under Amblyopia.

Browse Amblyopia studies →

Lead sponsor

Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust is the lead sponsor of 295 studies on the registry; 80 are open to participants now.

Compared within Amblyopia, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Vision Disorders. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
3 Years to 99 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients attending the outpatient eye clinics at St Thomas' Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male and female patients attending hospital eye clinics, aged 3 - 99, inclusive.
  • Patients able to understand the information sheet, and willing and able to give to participate.
  • Patients with visual function ranging from normal to severely impaired.
  • Willing and able to comply with the visual function testing protocol.
  • Some validation studies require recruitment of disease specific groups (such as children with amblyopia or adults with age related macular degeneration).

For Part B of the project which aims to develop and pilot a home monitoring application, only adult (18-99 years) subjects complying with the above who also own a suitable browser device will be recruited.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unwilling or unable to comply with the visual function testing protocol.
  • Unwilling or unable to give .
  • Unwilling to participate.
  • In other research trials.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
550 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Near logMAR letter acuity

    Comparison of measurements made with the trial computerised test to the trial gold standard printed test

    Diagnostic Test: Near logMAR letter acuity

  • Near logMAR word acuity

    Comparison of measurements made with the trial computerised test to the trial gold standard printed test

    Diagnostic Test: Near LogMAR word acuity

  • Letter Contrast Sensitivity

    Comparison of measurements made with the trial computerised test to the trial gold standard printed test

    Diagnostic Test: Letter Contrast Sensitivity

  • Vanishing Optotype Sloan letters

    Comparison of measurements made with the trial computerised test to the trial gold standard printed test

    Diagnostic Test: Vanishing Optotype Sloan Letters

  • Auckland Optotypes/Auckland Vanishing Optotypes

    Comparison of measurements made with the trial computerised test to the trial gold standard printed test

    Diagnostic Test: Auckland Optotype/Auckland Vanishing Optotypes

  • Low contrast letter acuity

    Comparison of measurements made with the trial computerised test to the trial gold standard printed test

    Diagnostic Test: Low Contrast Letter Acuity

  • Red Green Stereoacuity

    Comparison of measurements made with the trial computerised test to the trial gold standard printed test

    Diagnostic Test: Red Green Stereoacuity

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testNear logMAR letter acuity

    Comparison of gold standard printed tests and computerised versions

  • Diagnostic testNear LogMAR word acuity

    Comparison of gold standard printed tests and computerised versions

  • Diagnostic testRed Green Stereoacuity

    Comparison of gold standard printed tests and computerised versions

  • Diagnostic testAuckland Optotype/Auckland Vanishing Optotypes

    Comparison of gold standard printed tests and computerised versions

  • Diagnostic testVanishing Optotype Sloan Letters

    Comparison of gold standard printed tests and computerised versions

  • Diagnostic testLetter Contrast Sensitivity

    Comparison of gold standard printed tests and computerised versions

  • Diagnostic testLow Contrast Letter Acuity

    Comparison of gold standard printed tests and computerised versions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Test agreement between the computerised vision measurement test and the gold standard hard copy test.

    The test agreement is quantified in terms of the mean difference and 95% confidence interval of the mean in log units.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  2. Test-retest variability for the computerised vision measurement test and the gold standard hard copy test.

    Measurement variability (difference in two measures captured using the same vision test on the same day) will be quantified in log units for each vision test used in this study.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • St Thomas' Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
    London, United Kingdom
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 18, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06224751
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 25, 2024
Start date
Apr 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jan 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 18, 2024

Study contacts

Abigail Orr, BSc
Contact
eyeresearch@gstt.nhs.uk
020 7188 4885
Alistair Laidlaw, MD FRCOphth
principal investigator · St Thomas' Hospital, London

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion