ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07821567Updated Sep 16, 2026

Understanding Dance for Falls Prevention

An observational study in Older Adults (65 Years and Older), Geriatric and Rehabilitation, sponsored by Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-16.

Sponsored by Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
23
Ages
65 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Falls are common among older adults, and can lead to both physical and emotional problems. The new World Falls Guidelines suggest that falls prevention programmes should take into account a person's individual priorities and beliefs.

At the Older Persons Assessment Unit (OPAU), physiotherapy focuses on helping patients improve their abilities to do everyday tasks and enhancing their quality of life. Personalised treatment is offered to make sure it's as effective and long-lasting as possible.

One of the main programmes run in the department is a class designed to improve strength and balance, but even people who complete these classes often struggle to stick to exercise when the classes end.

Dance classes are a fun, creative, and social way to exercise, and OPAU has worked with Breathe Arts Health Research to explore dance as a treatment for older adults at risk of falls. So far, the results show that people who chose dance for strength and balance saw the same physical benefits as those who did the more traditional strength and balance exercises, but this evidence on its own isn't enough to widely recommend dance as a way to lower falls risk.

To build stronger evidence for dance as a safe and effective activity for reducing fall risks, this project will explore how participants and dance instructors feel about the programme. It will also look at the different exercises in the dance sessions to understand what works best to help improve strength and balance and reduce the risk of falling.

Read the detailed description

Background to the Project:

Every year in the United Kingdom (UK), falls among older people cost the National Health Service (NHS) over £2.3 billion. When including costs of other services such as social care needed due to hip fractures from falls, the total yearly cost in the UK increases to £4.4 billion. These figures show just how expensive falls can be for healthcare systems.

However, the problem is not just about the money. Falls have a huge impact on older people's lives, often related to fear of falling, and can lead to problems such as reduced independence in everyday activities, lower quality of life, and social isolation. As the number of older adults increases, these issues are expected to get worse.

This means there is a need for proactive measures to prevent falls. This is important to help older people live better lives, as well as to make best use of healthcare resources. One of the most effective ways to reduce falls is exercise, especially exercises that improve balance and muscle strength. The main thing that makes exercise programmes successful is whether or not people can stick to the exercise programme once started.

Scientific Rationale:

All the causes of falls in older people are not fully understood because they can be triggered by many different factors. There are also many different programmes and strategies for preventing falls, and these can include things like exercise, medication review, and balance training. Some programmes use a combination of these methods.

Exercise focussing on strength and balance in particular has been shown to reduce fall rates by almost one-third. The Otago and Falls Management Exercise (FaME) programmes are two examples of exercise regimes that have been proven to be effective.

Even though the advice to be physically active exists, not everyone participates in exercises that challenges their balance. Research in Australia showed that older people were not likely to take part in exercises that help improve balance and strength, even though these exercises could reduce their risk of falls.

One type of exercise that's gaining attention is Tai Chi, a form of exercise that helps with balance and strength. It has been shown to reduce fall rates by up to 37%. Tai Chi involves structured movements that are controlled and flowing, and work in all directions, making it great for improving movement control and balance.

Dance is another form of exercise that challenges balance. Like Tai Chi, it involves continuous, controlled movement, but it also includes elements of social interaction and cognitive (thinking) challenges, which could help reduce fall risk in different ways. Some studies have shown that dance can improve physical strength and function, but more research is needed to determine how effective it is specifically for preventing falls.

While there's some uncertainty about how best to use dance for fall prevention, experts agree that dance is worth investigating further. One challenge is that dance programmes can vary a lot, in a way that Tai Chi does not, making it harder to draw conclusions about dance being able to reduce falls. New research frameworks, like the Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System (RTSS), can help researchers to describe exactly how dance interventions are thought to work and what they aim to improve.

In addition to studying the effectiveness of dance programmes, it's important to consider how dance instructors lead these sessions and how older people feel about participating. Understanding the motivations of older adults who choose dance to reduce fall risk will give us better insight into how to improve these programmes.

Dance for Strength and Balance Programme:

In the Older Person's Assessment Unit, we've been running a dance programme called Dance for Strength and Balance (DSAB) for older adults at risk of falling. This programme was jointly created with the Breathe Arts Health Research charity and funded by Guy's \& St. Thomas' Charity, offering an alternative to traditional strength and balance exercises.

Physiotherapists compared this dance programme with a traditional strength and balance group, and found no significant difference in four measures of physical ability and falls risk, although the traditional group did show more improvement in one test. Despite this, people who participated in the dance programme reported positive experiences.

However, there is still some hesitation in the healthcare community about using dance for fall prevention since more research is needed to prove its effectiveness. This is where this project comes in, aiming to continue testing and refining the programme to make it better and easier to understand.

The investigators are in a unique position because we have hands-on experience in designing, running, and evaluating a dance programme for older people at risk of falling. What's still missing from the research is more detailed feedback from the participants and dance instructors. There is a need to understand why older people choose dance, what benefits they feel they're getting, and how instructors adapt the programme for their needs. Also, as dance might not be an exercise type that everybody wants to do, the investigators also want to hear from those that choose not to take part in the dance classes about why they made their choice.

Aim of the Study The goal is to explore the effectiveness of dance programmes for fall prevention and to understand the experiences and perceptions of older adults who participate in them.

02

Conditions studied

  • Older Adults (65 Years and Older)
  • Geriatric
  • Rehabilitation

Keywords

  • Dance
  • Rehabilitation Treatment specification System
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust is the lead sponsor of 295 studies on the registry; 80 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patient participants will be recruited from patients referred to the outpatient physiotherapy service at the Older Persons Assessment Unit (OPAU) at Guy's \& St Thomas' NHS Trust (GSTT).

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Consecutive patients referred to the SABG following initial assessment by a physiotherapist
  • And are found to have a strength and/or balance impairment
  • And are deemed appropriate for group exercise intervention
  • And are able and willing to be interviewed and recorded, with or without a family member or carer to support with language or cognition limitations
  • Patients ≥ 65 years of age

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

    • Patients (or proxy carer) that do not provide written consent to be interviewed and recorded for the purposes of the study

      • Or who are unable to follow a supervised exercise programme or take part in a group exercise class (defined by the need for hands on assistance, this will be determined at the initial physical assessment by the physiotherapist)
      • Or who are unable to follow instructions and taken part in conversational English to a sufficient level to be able to participate in a group exercise class (either independently or with a carer)
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
23 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • older adults

    Other: Dance · Other: Resistance exercise

Interventions

  • OtherDance

    Supervised dance targeting strength and balance improvements

  • OtherResistance exercise

    Supervised resistance exercise targeting strength and balance improvements in older adults

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Semi-structured survey responses

    Custom questionnaire comprising 12 textual short answer questions, 2 dichotomous response questions and 3 multi-category response questions. These questionnaires are to explore participant perceptions around dance and traditional strength and balance exercise classes.

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Textual data from focus group

    Transcribed focus group session with dance class participants to explore the perceptions of mechanism of action, barriers and facilitators of dance as a falls risk reduction method.

    Time frame: To study completion, average 9 months

  3. Textual data from semi-structured interview

    Transcribed semi-structured interview with dance instructor to explore the perceptions of mechanism of action, barriers and facilitators of dance as a falls risk reduction method, and adaptations for this specific population.

    Time frame: To study completion, an average of 9 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Segmentation of class video recording into pertinent exercise events

    Video footage from 3 classes (one at the beginning, one in the middle and one at the end). The sessions will be broken down into treatment events, anchored to treatment ingredients and provided a timestamp within NVivo Software. Treatment events will be further split into 90 second segments (epochs). Dependent upon duration of treatment event, 2-3 epochs will be picked across the beginning, middle and end of the epoch. 1 participant will be randomly allocated to each epoch prior to analysis.

    Time frame: To study completion, average 9 months

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Sheppard A, Broughton MC. Promoting wellbeing and health through active participation in music and dance: a systematic review. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2020 Dec;15(1):1732526. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2020.1732526. PubMed 32267216 ↗
  • Sherrington C, Fairhall NJ, Wallbank GK, Tiedemann A, Michaleff ZA, Howard K, Clemson L, Hopewell S, Lamb SE. Exercise for preventing falls in older people living in the community. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 31;1(1):CD012424. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012424.pub2. PubMed 30703272 ↗
  • Hart T, Dijkers MP, Whyte J, Turkstra LS, Zanca JM, Packel A, Van Stan JH, Ferraro M, Chen C. A Theory-Driven System for the Specification of Rehabilitation Treatments. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Jan;100(1):172-180. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.09.109. Epub 2018 Sep 27. PubMed 30267669 ↗
  • Lazo Green K, Yang Y, Abaraogu U, Eastaugh CH, Beyer FR, Norman G, Todd C. Effectiveness of dance interventions for falls prevention in older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis. Age Ageing. 2024 May 1;53(5):afae104. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afae104. PubMed 38776214 ↗
  • Merom D, Pye V, Macniven R, van der Ploeg H, Milat A, Sherrington C, Lord S, Bauman A. Prevalence and correlates of participation in fall prevention exercise/physical activity by older adults. Prev Med. 2012 Dec;55(6):613-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.10.001. Epub 2012 Oct 10. PubMed 23064022 ↗
  • Gillespie LD, Robertson MC, Gillespie WJ, Sherrington C, Gates S, Clemson LM, Lamb SE. Interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12;2012(9):CD007146. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007146.pub3. PubMed 22972103 ↗
  • Skelton D, Dinan S, Campbell M, Rutherford O. Tailored group exercise (Falls Management Exercise -- FaME) reduces falls in community-dwelling older frequent fallers (an RCT). Age Ageing. 2005 Nov;34(6):636-9. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afi174. No abstract available. PubMed 16267192 ↗
  • Robertson MC, Campbell AJ, Gardner MM, Devlin N. Preventing injuries in older people by preventing falls: a meta-analysis of individual-level data. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002 May;50(5):905-11. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50218.x. PubMed 12028179 ↗
  • Lamb SE, Becker C, Gillespie LD, Smith JL, Finnegan S, Potter R, Pfeiffer K; Taxonomy Investigators. Reporting of complex interventions in clinical trials: development of a taxonomy to classify and describe fall-prevention interventions. Trials. 2011 May 17;12:125. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-125. PubMed 21586143 ↗
  • Montero-Odasso M, van der Velde N, Martin FC, Petrovic M, Tan MP, Ryg J, Aguilar-Navarro S, Alexander NB, Becker C, Blain H, Bourke R, Cameron ID, Camicioli R, Clemson L, Close J, Delbaere K, Duan L, Duque G, Dyer SM, Freiberger E, Ganz DA, Gomez F, Hausdorff JM, Hogan DB, Hunter SMW, Jauregui JR, Kamkar N, Kenny RA, Lamb SE, Latham NK, Lipsitz LA, Liu-Ambrose T, Logan P, Lord SR, Mallet L, Marsh D, Milisen K, Moctezuma-Gallegos R, Morris ME, Nieuwboer A, Perracini MR, Pieruccini-Faria F, Pighills A, Said C, Sejdic E, Sherrington C, Skelton DA, Dsouza S, Speechley M, Stark S, Todd C, Troen BR, van der Cammen T, Verghese J, Vlaeyen E, Watt JA, Masud T; Task Force on Global Guidelines for Falls in Older Adults. World guidelines for falls prevention and management for older adults: a global initiative. Age Ageing. 2022 Sep 2;51(9):afac205. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afac205. PubMed 36178003 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — We will not be sharing IDP as all data will be anonymised or pseudonymised for this work

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Sep 2026; primary completion for Nov 2026, 2 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 15, 2026
First posted
Sep 16, 2026
StartEst.
Sep 2026
Primary completionEst.
Nov 2026
CompletionEst.
Jan 2027
Last update
Sep 16, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 16, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07821567
Collaborators
King's College London, Breathe Arts Health Research
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 16, 2026
Start date
Sep 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Nov 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 16, 2026

Study contacts

Carrie-Ann Wood, BSc(hons) Physiotherapy
Contact
carrie-ann.wood@nhs.net
+442071882091
Katie Noone, BSc Physiotherapy
Contact
katie.noone@nhs.net
+442071882091
Jeremy Corcoran, PhD
study director · Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion