ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06189781Updated Jun 11, 2024

Pain Injection Versus Epidural Anesthesia for Hip Surgery in Pediatric Patients With Cerebral Palsy

A Phase 4 interventional study of Ropivacaine injection and Bupivacaine, lidocaine, ropivacaine in Cerebral Palsy, Hip Dysplasia and Pain, Postoperative, sponsored by University of California, Los Angeles. Recruiting at 4 sites in United States. Open to participants aged Up to 18 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-06-11.

Sponsored by University of California, Los Angeles · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Dec 2023; still recruiting 2 years 11 months later.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
90
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
Up to 18 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Pain management in pediatric patients presents a difficult challenge. Unlike adults, pediatric patients often cannot communicate their pain management needs clearly. This is especially true in patients with cerebral palsy (CP), who often have concomitant developmental delay, intellectual disability and verbal limitations. Current literature indicates pain as a common experience for children with CP but has been understudied in this population. Moreover, inadequate post-operative pain control can result in negative physiologic and psychological complications and lead to poor surgical outcomes. Currently, perioperative pain management following orthopaedic procedures in pediatric patients follows traditional protocols that rely on the administration of opioid medications despite their known adverse side effects including nausea, vomiting, itching, constipation, urinary retention, confusion, and respiratory depression.

Epidural anesthesia is a key modality in traditional pain management for pediatric patients with CP given its proven efficacy in decreasing pain and managing spasticity. Yet, administering epidural anesthesia in this patient population poses several risks including damage to preexisting intrathecal baclofen pumps, iatrogenic infection, and technically demanding insertion given high rates of concomitant neuromuscular scoliosis. Alternatively, multimodal analgesic injections theoretically offer an efficacious adjunct to traditional pain management protocols with a lower risk profile. Preliminary data from our study group's pilot randomized control trial comparing the safety and efficacy of a multimodal surgical site injection to placebo showed decreased pain scores and narcotic consumption postoperatively in this patient population. Based on these promising results, the objective of this randomized control trial is to evaluate the efficacy of a multimodal surgical site injection compared to epidural anesthesia for postoperative pain control following operative management of hip dysplasia in pediatric patients with CP.

Read the detailed description

Over the past decade, there has been an ongoing shift away from the use of opioids in the postoperative setting due to both their negative side effects and their high potential for dependence and abuse. Various new techniques for multimodal pain management are increasingly being utilized in adult orthopaedics, including injection of local anesthetics and analgesic agents. These techniques aim to block pain directly at the site of injection in order to reduce postoperative pain while minimizing systemic effects and preserving motor function, allowing for early mobilization. Numerous randomized controlled trials in both the arthroplasty and adult trauma populations have demonstrated reduced pain and narcotic consumption with local analgesia injection, but there is scant evidence on the efficacy of similar injections in pediatric surgical patients. While robust evidence demonstrating both safety and efficacy of these injections has led to routine use in the adult orthopaedic population, use in pediatric patients still remains limited, likely due to a lack of level I therapeutic evidence.

Local anesthetic injections offer several theoretical advantages over current pain management modalities. When compared with other methods of anesthesia, including epidural anesthesia or some peripheral nerve blocks, local anesthetic injections preserve motor function, allowing for early mobilization and rehabilitation. Additionally, they do not require specialized equipment or anesthesia personnel and can be administered in the operating room without significantly affecting the duration of the procedure. While a mainstay in traditional pain management protocols, epidural anesthesia in the pediatric CP population poses specific risks including damage to preexisting intrathecal baclofen pumps and iatrogenic infection. Moreover, epidural insertion can be a technically demanding procedure in these patients given high rates of concomitant neuromuscular scoliosis. Prior retrospective studies comparing peripheral nerve and lumbar plexus blocks compared to epidural anesthesia have shown mixed results in decreasing pain scores and opioid use in this patient population. As described in Preliminary Data section below, the investigators' pilot randomized control trial demonstrated significantly decreased pain scores and narcotic use postoperatively in pediatric patients with CP who received multimodal analgesia injection compared to placebo while undergoing hip surgery. The present study aims to substantively contribute to current literature by providing level I evidence comparing the safety and efficacy of surgical site injections with epidural anesthesia in a patient population for whom pain management remains challenging.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cerebral Palsy
  • Hip Dysplasia
  • Pain, Postoperative
03

In context

Cerebral Palsy

1,936 studies on the registry are indexed under Cerebral Palsy; 458 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 90 is above the median of 34 across 1,431 interventional studies indexed under Cerebral Palsy.

Browse Cerebral Palsy studies →

Lead sponsor

University of California, Los Angeles is the lead sponsor of 1,170 studies on the registry; 195 are open to participants now.

Of its 95 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 70 (74%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • under 18 years old
  • diagnosis of cerebral palsy or similar neuromuscular disease
  • undergoing uni- or bilateral proximal femoral osteotomy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ongoing preoperative opioid use
  • history of allergic reaction to any component of the pain injection
  • history of adverse reaction to epidural anesthesia
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
90 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Pain Injection

    The local anesthetic group will be injected with a combination of ropivacaine, epinephrine, and ketorolac.

    Drug: Ropivacaine injection

  • Active comparator
    Epidural

    The control group will receive epidural anesthesia. Lumbar epidural anesthesia will be started intra-operatively.

    Drug: Bupivacaine, lidocaine, ropivacaine

Interventions

  • The local anesthetic group will be injected with ropivacaine 2mg/mL (3mg/kg), epinephrine 1mg/mL (0.5mg), and ketorolac 30mg/mL (0.5mg/kg). The maximum dose of ropivacaine regardless of patient weight will be 200mg. This is based on recommended maximum dose protocols from our anesthesia colleagues. If bilateral hips are involved, the total amount will be split evenly between the two sides.

  • DrugBupivacaine, lidocaine, ropivacaine

    Drug pages: Bupivacaine · Lidocaine · Ropivacaine

    The lumbar epidural group will receive a combination of either/or bupivacaine, lidocaine, and ropivacaine, which will be monitored by the anesthesia team.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Average postoperative narcotic consumption measured in morphine equivalents per kilograms of patient body weight

    This describes one outcome measure where the amount of opiates consumed will be expressed in morphine equivalents divided by the body weight of patients measured in kilograms.

    Time frame: First 48 hours after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Postoperative pain scores measured by Visual Analogue Scale/Faces Pain Scale/Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability Scale

    Pain score assessments will be completed in the post-anesthesia care unit, and every 4 hours following the surgical procedure. Scores will be collected by nursing staff on the inpatient ward and recorded in the electronic medical record. The type of pain score collection will vary based on patient age and level of intellectual disability. In verbal children, either the Visual Analogue Scale or Faces Pain Scale will be employed. In non-verbal children, the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability Scale will be employed. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity. Both scales are from 0 (minimum) -10 (maximum), where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicate maximal pain.

    Time frame: 2-4 days

  2. Hospital length of stay measured in days

    Postoperative hospital length of stay

    Time frame: 2-4 days

  3. Parent satisfaction measured on a scale of 1-5

    Parent satisfaction will be based on a standardized, validated questionnaire taken by parents in person at the first post-operative clinic visit aimed to assess their satisfaction with their child's pain management peri-operatively. Each question is answered with a score of either 1-5, with 1 being the best outcome and 5 being the worst outcome. The score for each question will be summed together to come up with a total score. A higher total score indicates a worse level of satisfaction with perioperative pain management.

    Time frame: 2-3 weeks postoperatively

07

Study locations

3 of 4 sites recruiting
  • Orthopaedic Institute for Children
    Los Angeles, California 90007, United States
    Recruiting
    • Nicole J Hung, MD · Contact310-592-5180
    • Rachel M Thompson, MD · Principal investigator
  • Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center
    Los Angeles, California 90095, United States
    Recruiting
    • Nicole J Hung, MD · Contactnhung@mednet.ucla.edu · 310-592-5180
    • Rachel M Thompson, MD · Principal investigator
  • UCLA Medical Center, Santa Monica
    Santa Monica, California 90404, United States
    Recruiting
    • Nicole J Hung, MD · Contact310-592-5180
    • Rachel M Thompson, MD · Principal investigator
  • Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
    Chicago, Illinois 60611, United States
    Not yet recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Nelson KB, Emery ES 3rd. Birth asphyxia and the neonatal brain: what do we know and when do we know it? Clin Perinatol. 1993 Jun;20(2):327-44. PubMed 8358954 ↗
  • Nolan J, Chalkiadis GA, Low J, Olesch CA, Brown TC. Anaesthesia and pain management in cerebral palsy. Anaesthesia. 2000 Jan;55(1):32-41. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2000.01065.x. PubMed 10594431 ↗
  • Tabaie S, Shah A, Tarawneh O, Blaylock G, Sheppard E, Cho K. Use of Epidural Analgesia in Children With Neuromuscular Conditions Following Hip Reconstruction. Cureus. 2022 Oct 20;14(10):e30522. doi: 10.7759/cureus.30522. eCollection 2022 Oct. PubMed 36285108 ↗
  • Hauer J, Houtrow AJ; SECTION ON HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, COUNCIL ON CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES. Pain Assessment and Treatment in Children With Significant Impairment of the Central Nervous System. Pediatrics. 2017 Jun;139(6):e20171002. doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-1002. PubMed 28562301 ↗
  • McKearnan KA, Kieckhefer GM, Engel JM, Jensen MP, Labyak S. Pain in children with cerebral palsy: a review. J Neurosci Nurs. 2004 Oct;36(5):252-9. doi: 10.1097/01376517-200410000-00004. PubMed 15524243 ↗
  • Ciccozzi A, Pizzi B, Vittori A, Piroli A, Marrocco G, Della Vecchia F, Cascella M, Petrucci E, Marinangeli F. The Perioperative Anesthetic Management of the Pediatric Patient with Special Needs: An Overview of Literature. Children (Basel). 2022 Sep 21;9(10):1438. doi: 10.3390/children9101438. PubMed 36291372 ↗
  • Wheeler M, Oderda GM, Ashburn MA, Lipman AG. Adverse events associated with postoperative opioid analgesia: a systematic review. J Pain. 2002 Jun;3(3):159-80. doi: 10.1054/jpai.2002.123652. No abstract available. PubMed 14622770 ↗
  • Piper NA, Flack SH, Loeser JD, Lynn AM. Epidural analgesia in a patient with an intrathecal catheter and subcutaneous pump to deliver baclofen. Paediatr Anaesth. 2006 Sep;16(9):989-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2006.01908.x. PubMed 16918665 ↗
  • Fiore JF Jr, Olleik G, El-Kefraoui C, Verdolin B, Kouyoumdjian A, Alldrit A, Figueiredo AG, Valanci S, Marquez-GdeV JA, Schulz M, Moldoveanu D, Nguyen-Powanda P, Best G, Banks A, Landry T, Pecorelli N, Baldini G, Feldman LS. Preventing opioid prescription after major surgery: a scoping review of opioid-free analgesia. Br J Anaesth. 2019 Nov;123(5):627-636. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.08.014. Epub 2019 Sep 25. PubMed 31563269 ↗
  • Vendittoli PA, Makinen P, Drolet P, Lavigne M, Fallaha M, Guertin MC, Varin F. A multimodal analgesia protocol for total knee arthroplasty. A randomized, controlled study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Feb;88(2):282-9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00173. PubMed 16452738 ↗
  • Peters CL, Shirley B, Erickson J. The effect of a new multimodal perioperative anesthetic regimen on postoperative pain, side effects, rehabilitation, and length of hospital stay after total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006 Sep;21(6 Suppl 2):132-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.04.017. PubMed 16950075 ↗
  • Andersen KV, Pfeiffer-Jensen M, Haraldsted V, Soballe K. Reduced hospital stay and narcotic consumption, and improved mobilization with local and intraarticular infiltration after hip arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial of an intraarticular technique versus epidural infusion in 80 patients. Acta Orthop. 2007 Apr;78(2):180-6. doi: 10.1080/17453670710013654. PubMed 17464604 ↗
  • Koehler D, Marsh JL, Karam M, Fruehling C, Willey M. Efficacy of Surgical-Site, Multimodal Drug Injection Following Operative Management of Femoral Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Mar 15;99(6):512-519. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00733. PubMed 28291185 ↗
  • Busch CA, Shore BJ, Bhandari R, Ganapathy S, MacDonald SJ, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, McCalden RW. Efficacy of periarticular multimodal drug injection in total knee arthroplasty. A randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 May;88(5):959-63. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00344. PubMed 16651569 ↗
  • Uesugi K, Kitano N, Kikuchi T, Sekiguchi M, Konno S. Comparison of peripheral nerve block with periarticular injection analgesia after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, controlled study. Knee. 2014 Aug;21(4):848-52. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2014.04.008. Epub 2014 Apr 18. PubMed 24827696 ↗
  • Laron D, Kelley J, Chidambaran V, McCarthy J. Fascia Iliaca Pain Block Results in Lower Overall Opioid Usage and Shorter Hospital Stays than Epidural Anesthesia After Hip Reconstruction in Children With Cerebral Palsy. J Pediatr Orthop. 2022 Feb 1;42(2):96-99. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000002028. PubMed 34882587 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Dec 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2026, 36 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 13, 2023
First posted
Jan 5, 2024
StartActual
Dec 1, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Dec 30, 2026
CompletionEst.
Jun 30, 2027
Last update
Jun 11, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 11, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06189781
Responsible party
Rachel Thompson, MD (Director, Center for Cerebral Palsy, University of California, Los Angeles) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 5, 2024
Start date
Dec 1, 2023
Primary completion
Dec 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 11, 2024

Study contacts

Rachel M Thompson, MD
Contact
rathompson@mednet.ucla.edu
213-742-1369
Nicole J Hung, MD
Contact
nhung@mednet.ucla.edu
310-592-5180
Rachel M Thompson, MD
principal investigator · University of California, Los Angeles

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Ropivacaine

Start the discussion